Ezt a kutatást az Európai Unió Horizont 2020 kutatási és innovációs programja finanszírozta, a 700180 számú Marie Skłodowska-Curie támogatási megállapodás keretében.
A tanulmány eredeti változata az Ars Vivendi Journal 11. számában jelent meg, 2019 márciusában.
Köszönjük a folyóiratnak a fordításhoz és másodközléshez való szíves hozzájárulását.
Hivatkozások
Abbott, D., Carpenter, J., Gibson, B. E., Hastie, J., Jepson, M. & Smith, B. (2019). Disabled men with muscu-lar dystrophy negotiate gender. Disability & Society, 34(5), 683-703.
Bacchi, C. & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural Policy Analysis. A Guide to Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bahner, J. (2012). Legal Rights or Simply Wishes? The Struggle for Sexual Recognition of People with Physi-cal Disabilities Using Personal Assistance in Sweden. Sexuality and Disability, 30(3), 337–356.
Bahner, J. (megjelenés alatt). Mapping the terrain of sexuality and disability: From policy to practice. Ars Vivendi Journal.
Berkel, R. (2013). From Dutch Disease to Dutch Fitness? Two Decades of Disability Crisis in the Nether-lands. In Lindsay, C. & Houston, D. (eds.) Disability Benefits, Welfare Reform and Employment Policy.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carey, G., Malbon, E., Olney, S. & Reeders, D. (2018). The personalisation agenda: the case of the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme. International Review of Sociology, 28(1), 20–34.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2017). Concluding observations on the initial report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/
treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CRPD/C/GBR/CO/1&Lang=En (Letöltés ideje: 2019.
09. 01.)
Commonwealth of Australia (2011). National Disability Strategy 2010–2020. https://www.dss.gov.au/our-res- ponsibilities/disability-and-carers/publications-articles/policy-research/national-disability-stra-tegy-2010-2020 (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.)
de Jong, P. R. (2012). Recent changes in Dutch disability policy. The Hague: University of Amsterdam & APE de Than, C. (2015). Sex, disability and human rights. Current legal and practical problems. In T. Owens (ed.). bv.
Supporting disabled people with their sexual lives: a clear guide for health and social care professionals.
London & Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Department of Health (2013). A Framework for Sexual Health Improvement in England. https://www.gov.
uk/government/publications/a-framework-for-sexual-health-improvement-in-england (Letöltés ide-je: 2019. 09. 01.)
Dowse, L., Frohmader, C. & Didi, A. (2016). Violence Against Disabled Women in the Global South: Wor-king Locally, Acting Globally. In Grech, S. & Soldatic, K. (eds.) Disability in the global South. The Critical Handbook. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Equality and Human Rights Commission (2017). Being disabled in Britain: A journey less equal.
https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/publication-download/being-disabled-britain-journey-less-equal (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.)
Family & Community Services (2016). Sexuality and Relationship Guidelines. https://www.facs.nsw.gov.au/
download?file=590660 (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.)
Gagnon, J. H. & Simon, W. (2005). Sexual Conduct: The Social Sources of Human Sexuality. New Yersey: Rut-gers.
Giami, A. (2015). Sexuality, health and human rights: The invention of sexual rights. Sexologies, 24(3), e45–
e53.
Graby, S. & Homayoun, R. (2019). The crisis of local authority funding and its implications for independent living for disabled people in the United Kingdom. Disability & Society, 34(2) 320-325.
Hand Angel (2018). Home. http://www.handangel.org/
Handisex (2018). Home. http://handisex.dk/?lang=en
Helmius, G. (2004). Sexualiteten som individuellt och socialt fenomen. In Barron, K. (ed.). Genus och funk-tionshinder. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun [The qualitative research interview].
Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Liddiard, K. (2017). The intimate lives of disabled people. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
Malmberg, D. (2012). “To be cocky is to challenge norms”. The impact of bodynormativity on bodily and sexual attraction in relation to being a cripple. Lambda Nordica, (1–2), 194–216.
Nakamura, K. (2014). Barrier-Free Brothels: Sex Volunteers, Prostitutes and People with Disabilities. In Kawano, S., Roberts, G. S. & Long, S. O. (eds). Capturing Contemporary Japan: Differentiation and Uncertainty (pp. 202–220). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
NDIA (2018a). IAC advice on reasonable and necessary support across the lifespan: An ordinary life for people with disability.
https://www.ndis.gov.au/about-us/governance/IAC/iac-reasonable-necessary-lifespan (Letöltés ideje: 2019.
09. 01.)
NDIA (2018b). NDIA response to recent media coverage. https://www.ndis.gov.au/news/media-response.
html (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.)
NDIA (2018c). Promoting independence for people with disability. https://www.ndis.gov.au/about-us/gover-nance/IAC/iac-advice-independence.html (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.)
NDIS Act (2013). https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016C00934
Netherlands Institute for Human Rights (2017). Rapportage VN-verdrag handicap in Nederland 2017 [Report on the UN Convention of Disability in the Netherlands 2017]. https://www.mensenrechten.nl/nl/pub-licatie/38166
New South Wales Government (2014). Disability Inclusion Act. https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/~/view/
act/2014/41/full
NPO Noir (2018). 性的支援について [About sexual support]. http://www.npo-noir.com/?page_id=2159 O’Toole, C. J. (2000). The View from Below: Developing a Knowledge Base about an Unknown Population.
Sexuality and Disability, 18(3), 207–224.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (Tredje uppl. ed.). London: Sage.
Pring, J. (2018, March 22, 2018). Scrapped! Ministers ‘secretly ditch government’s disability strategy’. Disabi-lity News Service. https://www.disabiDisabi-litynewsservice.com/scrapped-ministers-secretly-ditch-govern- https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/scrapped-ministers-secretly-ditch-govern-ments-disability-strategy/ (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.)
Reindl, M.-S. (2014). If Sex is Care: An exploration of the concept of normalization in the field of disability.
Amsterdam: Amsterdam University College.
Richardson, D. (2000). Constructing sexual citizenship: theorizing sexual rights. Critical Social Policy, 20(1), 105–135.
Rijksoverheid (2018). Betreft Voortgang moties VN-verdrag Handicap [Concerning progress on mo-tions on the CRPD]. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2016/12/20/ka-merbrief-over-de-voortgang-moties-vn-verdrag-handicap (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.)
Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Parker, R. & Agg-leton, P. (eds). Culture, Society and Sexuality: a reader (pp. 150-187). London: Routledge.
Rutgers (2018). Who we are, Organisation. https://www.rutgers.international/who-we-are/organisation
Seksualvejlederforeningen (2018). In English, Welcome to the Danish Association for Sexuality Advisors.
http://www.seksualvejlederforeningen.dk/in-english/
Shakespeare, T., Gillespie-Sells, K. & Davies, D. (1996). The Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires. Lon-don: Casell.
Shapiro, L. (2017). The disabled sexual surrogate. Reproductive Health Matters, 25(50), 134–137.
Shuttleworth, R. (2012). Bridging Theory and Experience. A Critical-Interpretive Ethnography of Sexuality and Disability. In McRuer, R. & Mollow, A. (eds.) Sex and Disability (pp. 54–68). Durham and Lon-don: Duke University Press.
Siebers, T. (2012). A Sexual Culture for Disabled People. In McRuer, R. & Mollow, A. (eds.) Sex and Disability (pp. 37–53). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Tilley, E., Walmsley, J., Earle, S. & Atkinson, D. (2012). ‘The silence is roaring’: sterilization, reproductive rights and women with intellectual disabilities. Disability & Society, 27(3), 413–426.
United Nations (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. https://www.un.org/develop-ment/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html#Fulltext (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.)
United Nations (2017). Sexual and reproductive health and rights of girls and young women with disabilities.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities. https://www.ohchr.org/
en/issues/disability/srdisabilities/pages/reports.aspx (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.)
United Nations Population Fund (2018). Young Persons with Disabilities: Global Study on Ending Gender-ba-sed Violence and Realizing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights. https://www.unfpa.org/sites/
default/files/pub-pdf/51936_-_UNFPA_Global_Study_on_Disability_-_web.pdf (Letöltés ideje:
2019. 09. 01.)
Vlaams, P. (2018). Conceptnota voor nieuwe regelgeving betreffende het faciliteren van de beleving van seksua-liteit en intimiteit op maat van personen met een zorgbehoefte [Concept note for new regulations con-cerning the facilitation of the perception of sexuality and intimacy tailored to persons with a care need].
https://www.vlaamsparlement.be/parlementaire-documenten/parlementaire-initiatieven/1208475 (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.)
White Hands (2018). Sexual rights for all. http://www.whitehands.jp/e.html
World Association for Sexual Health (WAS) (2014). Declaration of Sexual Rights. http://www.worldsexo-logy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/declaration_of_sexual_rights_sep03_2014.pdf
World Health Organization, & United Nations Population Fund (2009). Promoting sexual and reproductive health for persons with disabilities: WHO/UNFPA Guidance notes. https://www.unfpa.org/publica-tions/promoting-sexual-and-reproductive-health-persons-disabilities (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.) World Health Organization (2018). Defining sexual health. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/
sexual_health/sh_definitions/en/ (Letöltés ideje: 2019. 09. 01.)
Yerkes, M. & van der Veen, R. (2011). Crisis and Welfare State Change in the Netherlands. Social Policy &
Administration, 45(4), 430–444.
1. Bevezetés
Az intézetben lakó intellektuális és/vagy pszichoszociális fogyatékossággal élő nők szexualitása, anyasága a mai napig tabunak számít, az őket érő megannyi – testi, lelki, szellemi és szexuális – erő-szak elrejtve marad, még erő-szakmai körökben is. Diskurzust kezdeményezünk erről, emberi jogi és fogyatékosságtudományi oldalról körbejárva, egy olyan párbeszéd megindulását remélve, ami, ha kis lépésekben is, de változáshoz vezethet.
2. Önrendelkezés
Az önrendelkezés fogalma számos módon definiálható. Az önrendelkezés többek között szocio-kulturális konstruktum, jog és alapelv. E meghatározások segítségével közelebb kerülhetünk annak megválaszolásához, hogy mit is jelent az önrendelkezés gyakorlása az intézeti keretek között élő nők számára. Lehetséges-e egyáltalán önrendelkező életet élni ilyen körülmények között? És