• Nem Talált Eredményt

Kettős beáramlású kamrák

In document Radiológiai praktikum (Pldal 110-115)

Kettős beáramlású kamráról akkor beszélünk, ha mindkét atrioventricularis szájadék ugyanabban a kamrában van. Kettős beáramlású bal kamra gyak-rabban, mig a kettős beáramlású jobb kamra ritkáb-ban fordul elő. A billentyűvel nem rendelkező kamra gyakran hipopláziás.

A betegek műtétére Fontan procedurát alkal-mazzák (a szisztémás vért az artéria pulmonálissal összekötik – így praktikusan a kamrát kikerülik és a szív egyedüli kiáramlási pályája az aorta fele irá-nyul). Típusosan a Fontan-műtét előtt a véna cava superior vérét terelik a tüdő, a jobb oldali artéria pulmonális ág felé (Glenn-műtét).

A betegek MRI vizsgálata gyakran nehéz, mert gyakran más eltérések is társulnak, pl. truncus pul-monalis distorsio, kamrai dysfunkció, és atrioventri-cularis billentyű regurgitáció (különösen ha az komplett közös atrioventricularis csatorna van).

Emellett stenosisok alakulhatnak a sebészi áramlási útvonalon és anastomosisokon (136, 137).

A képalkotás protokollja ilyen betegeknél a követ-kezőkből kell hogy álljon:

 axiális T1 súlyozott felvételek

 négyüreg és rövid tengely cine T2 súlyozott fel-vételek

 MR angiográfia.

Vékony szeletes és ferde felvételek segítséget nyújthatnak a truncus pulmonális disztorziójának és az anasztomózisok vizualizálásában. általában fázis kontraszt vizsgálatot végzünk a sebészi anasztomó-zisok és a proximális pulmonális ágak esetén (135).

Fiziológiás kvantifikáció mérései. Regur-gitációs frakció és volumen. A congenitális anomáliák többsége esetén rendkívül fontos a az artéria

pul-A szív képalkotó diagnosztikája 215 214 A szív képalkotó diagnosztikája

MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17(10):1437–

1443.

38. Geleijnse ML, Fioretti PM, Roelandt JR. Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobuta-mine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30(3):595–606.

39. Bach DS, Muller DW, Gros BJ, Armstrong WF. False positive dobutamine stress echocardiograms: charac-terization of clinical, echocardiographic and angio-graphic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24(4):928–

933.

40. Hoffmann R, Lethen H, Marwick T, et al. Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpreta-tion of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27(2):330–336.

41. Pennell DJ, Underwood SR, Manzara CC, et al.

Magnetic resonance imaging during dobutamine stress in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1992;70(1):34–40.

42. Baer FM, Voth E, Theissen P, Schicha H, Sechtem U.

Gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging during incremental dobutamine infusion for the localization of coronary artery stenoses. Eur Heart J 1994;15(2):218–225.

43. van Rugge FP, van der Wall EE, de Roos A, Bruschke AV. Dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22(2):431–439.

44. Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnor-malities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocar-diography. Circulation 1999;99(6):763–770.

45. Hundley WG, Hamilton CA, Thomas MS, et al.

Utility of fast cine magnetic resonance imaging and display for the detection of myocardial ischemia in patients not well suited for second harmonic stress echocardiography. Circulation 1999;100(16):1697–

1702.

46. Pina IL, Balady GJ, Hanson P, Labovitz AJ, Madonna DW, Myers J. Guidelines for clinical exercise testing laboratories. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation, American Heart Association.

Circulation 1995;91(3):912–921.

47. Smith SC, Jr., Dove JT, Jacobs AK, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary

angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2001;103(24):3019–3041.

48. Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic tech-netium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32(1):57–62.

49. Machecourt J, Longere P, Fagret D, et al. Prognostic value of thallium-201 single-photon emission com-puted tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging according to extent of myocardial defect. Study in 1,926 patients with follow-up at 33 months. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23(5):1096–1106.

50. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Cullom SJ, et al. Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation 1999;99(21):2742–

2749.

51. Atalay MK, Reeder SB, Zerhouni EA, Forder JR.

Blood oxygenation dependence of T1 and T2 in the isolated, perfused rabbit heart at 4.7T. Magn Reson Med 1995;34(4):623–627.

52. Reeder SB, Atalay MK, McVeigh ER, Zerhouni EA, Forder JR. Quantitative cardiac perfusion: a noninva-sive spin-labeling method that exploits coronary ves-sel geometry. Radiology 1996;200(1):177–184.

53. Poncelet BP, Koelling TM, Schmidt CJ, et al.

Measurement of human myocardial perfusion by double-gated flow alternating inversion recovery EPI. Magn Reson Med 1999;41(3):510–519.

54. Panting JR, Taylor AM, Gatehouse PD, et al. First-pass myocardial perfusion imaging and equilibrium signal changes using the intravascular contrast agent NC100150 injection. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10(3):404–410.

55. Wilke N, Simm C, Zhang J, et al. Contrast-enhanced first pass myocardial perfusion imaging: correlation between myocardial blood flow in dogs at rest and during hyperemia. Magn Reson Med 1993;29(4):485–

56. Keijer JT, van Rossum AC, van Eenige MJ, et al. 497.

Semiquantitation of regional myocardial blood flow in normal human subjects by first-pass magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 1995;130(4):893–

901.

57. Klocke FJ, Simonetti OP, Judd RM, et al. Limits of detection of regional differences in vasodilated flow in viable myocardium by first-pass magnetic reso-nance perfusion imaging. Circulation 2001;104(20):2412–2416.

58. Wilke N, Kroll K, Merkle H, et al. Regional myocar-dial blood volume and flow: first-pass MR imaging 15. Kraitchman DL, Chin BB, Heldman AW, Solaiyappan

M, Bluemke DA.: MRI detection of myocardial per-fusion defects due to coronary artery stenosis with MS-325. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15(2):149–158.

16. Edelman RR, Wallner B, Singer A, Atkinson DJ, Saini S.: Segmented turboFLASH: method for breath-hold MR imaging of the liver with flexible contrast.

Radiology 1990;177(2):515–521.

17. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al.: An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myo-cardial infarction. Radiology 2001;218(1):215–223.

18. Sondergaard L, Lindvig K, Hildebrandt P, et al.:

Quantification of aortic regurgitation by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Am Heart J 1993;125(4):1081–1090.

19. van der Geest RJ, Reiber JH.: Quantification in car-diac MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10(5):602–

20. Lorenz CH, Walker ES, Morgan VL, Klein SS, 608.

Graham TP, Jr.: Normal human right and left ven-tricular mass, systolic function, and gender differ-ences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 1999;1(1):7–21.

21. Marcus JT, DeWaal LK, Gotte MJ, van der Geest RJ, Heethaar RM, Van Rossum AC.: MRI-derived left ventricular function parameters and mass in healthy young adults: relation with gender and body size. Int J Card Imaging 1999;15(5):411–419.

22. Sandstede J, Lipke C, Beer M, et al.: Age- and gender-specific differences in left and right ventricular car-diac function and mass determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2000;10(3):438–442.

23. Plein S, Bloomer TN, Ridgway JP, Jones TR, Bainbridge GJ, Sivananthan MU.: Steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging of the heart:

comparison with segmented k-space gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14(3):230–236.

24. Moon JC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, Smith GC, Pennell DJ.: Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiology 2002;223(3):789–797.

25. Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, et al.: Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular mag-netic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiog-raphy in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 2002;90(1):29–34.

26. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al.:

Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomen-clature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a state-ment for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical

Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Circulation 2002;105(4):539–542.

27. Bogaert JG, Bosmans HT, Rademakers FE, et al.: Left ventricular quantification with breath-hold MR imaging: comparison with echocardiography.

MAGMA 1995;3(1):5–12.

28. Nagel E, Lorenz C, Baer F, et al.: Stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance: consensus panel report. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ; 2001;3(3):267–281.

29. Picano E, Mathias W, Jr., Pingitore A, Bigi R, Previtali M. Safety and tolerability of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: a prospective, multicentre study. Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative Study Group. Lancet 1994;344(8931):1190–1192.

30. Mertes H, Sawada SG, Ryan T, et al. Symptoms, adverse effects, and complications associated with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Experience in 1118 patients. Circulation 1993;88(1):15–19.

31. Wahl A, Paetsch I, Gollesch A, et al. Safety and feasi-bility of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress car-diovascular magnetic resonance for diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia: experience in 1000 consecu-tive cases. Eur Heart J 2004;25(14):1230–1236.

32. Heyndrickx GR, Baig H, Nellens P, Leusen I, Fishbein MC, Vatner SF. Depression of regional blood flow and wall thickening after brief coronary occlusions.

Am J Physiol 1978;234(6):H653–659.

33. Fischer SE, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH. Novel real-time R-wave detection algorithm based on the vec-torcardiogram for accurate gated magnetic reso-nance acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 1999;42(2):361–

34. Baer FM, Voth E, Schneider CA, Theissen P, Schicha 370.

H, Sechtem U. Comparison of low-dose dobutamine-gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging and posi-tron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxy-glucose in patients with chronic coronary artery dis-ease. A functional and morphological approach to the detection of residual myocardial viability.

Circulation 1995;91(4):1006–1015.

35. Baer FM, Voth E, LaRosee K, et al. Comparison of dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography and dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging for detec-tion of residual myocardial viability. Am J Cardiol 1996;78(4):415–419.

36. Baer FM, Theissen P, Schneider CA, et al. Dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging predicts contractile recovery of chronically dysfunctional myocardium after successful revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31(5):1040–1048.

37. Sandstede JJ, Bertsch G, Beer M, et al. Detection of myocardial viability by low-dose dobutamine Cine

A szív képalkotó diagnosztikája 217 216 A szív képalkotó diagnosztikája

83. Hundley WG, Li HF, Willard JE, et al. Magnetic reso-nance imaging assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation. Comparison with invasive techniques.

Circulation 1995;92(5):1151–1158.

84. Kilner PJ, Manzara CC, Mohiaddin RH, et al.

Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping in mitral and aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 1993;87(4):1239–

1248.

85. Heidenreich PA, Steffens J, Fujita N, et al. Evaluation of mitral stenosis with velocity-encoded cine-magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 1995;75(5):365–369.

86. Eichenberger AC, Jenni R, von Schulthess GK. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160(5):971–

87. Shellock FG. Prosthetic heart valves and annuloplas-977.

ty rings: assessment of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001;3(4):317–324.

88. Sechtem U, Tscholakoff D, Higgins CB. MRI of the normal pericardium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147(2):239–244.

89. Masui T, Finck S, Higgins CB. Constrictive pericardi-tis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1992;182(2):369–373.

90. Clifford CP, Davies GJ, Scott J, Shaunak S, Sarvill J, Schofield JB. Tuberculous pericarditis with rapid pro-gression to constriction. Prompt diagnosis and treat-ment are needed. BMJ 1993;307(6911):1052–1054.

91. Seelos KC, Caputo GR, Carrol CL, Hricak H, Higgins CB. Cine gradient refocused echo (GRE) imaging of intravascular masses: differentiation between tumor and nontumor thrombus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16(2):169–175.

92. Grebenc ML, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Green CE, Burke AP, Galvin JR. Cardiac myxoma: imaging features in 83 patients. Radiographics 2002;22(3):673–

689.

93. Meunier JP, Tatou E, Bernard A, Brenot R, David M.

Cardiac pheochromocytoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71(2):712–713.

94. Pickering TG, Isom OW, Bergman GW, Barbieri JM.

Pheochromocytoma of the heart. Am J Cardiol 2000;86(11):1288–1289, A1210.

95. Chiles C, Woodard PK, Gutierrez FR, Link KM.

Metastatic involvement of the heart and pericardium:

CT and MR imaging. Radiographics 2001;21(2):439–

449.

96. Schvartzman PR, White RD. Imaging of cardiac and paracardiac masses. J Thorac Imaging 2000;15(4):265–

273.

97. Buser PT, Auffermann W, Holt WW, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of global left ventricular function with use of cine nuclear magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13(6):1294–1300.

98. Pattynama PM, Lamb HJ, Van der Velde EA, Van der Geest RJ, Van der Wall EE, De Roos A. Reproducibility of MRI-derived measurements of right ventricular volumes and myocardial mass. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13(1):53–63.

99. Germain P, Roul G, Kastler B, Mossard JM, Bareiss P, Sacrez A. Inter-study variability in left ventricular mass measurement. Comparison between M-mode echography and MRI. Eur Heart J 1992;13(8):1011–

1019.

100. Bottini PB, Carr AA, Prisant LM, Flickinger FW, Allison JD, Gottdiener JS. Magnetic resonance imag-ing compared to echocardiography to assess left ventricular mass in the hypertensive patient. Am J Hypertens 1995;8(3):221–228.

101. Strohm O, Schulz-Menger J, Pilz B, Osterziel KJ, Dietz R, Friedrich MG. Measurement of left ventric-ular dimensions and function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13(3):367–371.

102. Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ven-triculography and cardiovascular magnetic reso-nance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J 2000;21(16):1387–1396.

103. Lawson MA, Blackwell GG, Davis ND, Roney M, Dell’Italia LJ, Pohost GM. Accuracy of biplane long-axis left ventricular volume determined by cine mag-netic resonance imaging in patients with regional and global dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 1996;77(12):1098–

1104.

104. Friedrich MG. Magnetic resonance imaging in car-diomyopathies. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000;

2(1):67-82.

105. Rogers WJ, Jr., Shapiro EP, Weiss JL, et al.

Quantification of and correction for left ventricular systolic long-axis shortening by magnetic resonance tissue tagging and slice isolation. Circulation 1991;84(2):721–731.

106. Friedrich MG, Strohm O, Schulz-Menger J, Marciniak H, Luft FC, Dietz R. Contrast media-enhanced mag-netic resonance imaging visualizes myocardial changes in the course of viral myocarditis. Circulation 1998;97(18):1802–1809.

107. Laissy JP, Messin B, Varenne O, et al. MRI of acute myocarditis: a comprehensive approach based on vari-ous imaging sequences. Chest 2002;122(5):1638–1648.

with polylysine-Gd-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5(2):227–237.

59. Kroll K, Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, et al. Modeling regional myocardial flows from residue functions of an intravascular indicator. Am J Physiol 1996;271(4 Pt 2):H1643–1655.

60. Wendland MF, Saeed M, Yu KK, et al. Inversion recovery EPI of bolus transit in rat myocardium using intravascular and extravascular gadolinium-based MR contrast media: dose effects on peak signal enhancement. Magn Reson Med 1994;32(3):319–329.

61. Judd RM, Atalay MK, Rottman GA, Zerhouni EA.

Effects of myocardial water exchange on T1 enhance-ment during bolus administration of MR contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 1995;33(2):215–223.

62. Weisskoff RM, Chesler D, Boxerman JL, Rosen BR.

Pitfalls in MR measurement of tissue blood flow with intravascular tracers: which mean transit time? Magn Reson Med 1993;29(4):553-558.

63. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

Circulation 1999;100(19):1992–2002.

64. Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lomasney JW, Klocke FJ, Judd RM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(6):1985–1991.

65. Hillenbrand HB, Kim RJ, Parker MA, Fieno DS, Judd RM. Early assessment of myocardial salvage by con-trast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Circulation 2000;102(14):1678–1683.

66. Van Rossum AC, Visser FC, Van Eenige MJ, et al.

Value of gadolinium-diethylene-triamine pentaacetic acid dynamics in magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial infarction with occluded and reper-fused coronary arteries after thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol 1990;65(13):845–851.

67. de Roos A, van Rossum AC, van der Wall E, et al.

Reperfused and nonreperfused myocardial infarc-tion: diagnostic potential of Gd-DTPA--enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1989;172(3):717–720.

68. de Roos A, van der Wall EE, Bruschke AV, van Voorthuisen AE. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of myocardial infarction.

Magn Reson Q 1991;7(3):191–207.

69. Dendale P, Franken PR, Block P, Pratikakis Y, De Roos A. Contrast enhanced and functional magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of viable myo-cardium after infarction. Am Heart J 1998;135(5 Pt 1):875–880.

70. Yokota C, Nonogi H, Miyazaki S, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in acute myo-cardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1995;75(8):577–581.

71. Wu E, Judd RM, Vargas JD, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Kim RJ. Visualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Lancet 2001;357(9249):21–28.

72. Richard V, Murry CE, Reimer KA. Healing of myo-cardial infarcts in dogs. Effects of late reperfusion.

Circulation 1995;92(7):1891–1901.

73. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343(20):1445–1453.

74. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB.

The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1.

Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977;56(5):786–794.

75. Ricciardi MJ, Wu E, Davidson CJ, et al. Visualization of discrete microinfarction after percutaneous coro-nary intervention associated with mild creatine kinase-MB elevation. Circulation 2001;103(23):2780–

2783.

76. Bello D, Shah DJ, Farah GM, et al. Gadolinium car-diovascular magnetic resonance predicts reversible myocardial dysfunction and remodeling in patients with heart failure undergoing beta-blocker therapy.

Circulation 2003;108(16):1945–1953. Epub 2003 Oct 1913.

77. Sondergaard L, Stahlberg F, Thomsen C. Magnetic resonance imaging of valvular heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10(5):627–638.

78. Arai AE, Epstein FH, Bove KE, Wolff SD. Visualization of aortic valve leaflets using black blood MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10(5):771–777.

79. Nayak KS, Pauly JM, Kerr AB, Hu BS, Nishimura DG. Real-time color flow MRI. Magn Reson Med 2000;43(2):251–258.

80. Pereles FS, Kapoor V, Carr JC, et al. Usefulness of seg-mented trueFISP cardiac pulse sequence in evaluation of congenital and acquired adult cardiac abnormali-ties. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177(5):1155–1160.

81. Pflugfelder PW, Sechtem UP, White RD, Cassidy MM, Schiller NB, Higgins CB. Noninvasive evalua-tion of mitral regurgitaevalua-tion by analysis of left atrial signal loss in cine magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 1989;117(5):1113–1119.

82. Wagner S, Auffermann W, Buser P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and estimation of the severity of valvular regurgitation from the signal void on cine magnetic resonance images. Am Heart J 1989;118(4):760–767.

A szív képalkotó diagnosztikája 219 218 A szív képalkotó diagnosztikája

128. Marcus FI, Fontaine GH, Guiraudon G, et al. Right ventricular dysplasia: a report of 24 adult cases.

Circulation 1982;65(2):384–398.

129. Thiene G, Nava A, Corrado D, Rossi L, Pennelli N.

Right ventricular cardiomyopathy and sudden death in young people. N Engl J Med 1988;318(3):129–133.

130. McKenna WJ, Thiene G, Nava A, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardio-myopathy. Task Force of the Working Group Myocardial and Pericardial Disease of the European Society of Cardiology and of the Scientific Council on Cardiomyopathies of the International Society and Federation of Cardiology. Br Heart J 1994;71(3):215–218.

131. Pennell D, Casolo G. Right ventricular arrhythmia:

emergence of magnetic resonance imaging as an investigative tool. Eur Heart J 1997;18(12):1843–1845.

132. Chung T. Assessment of cardiovascular anatomy in patients with congenital heart disease by magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Cardiol 2000;21(1):18–26.

133. Van Praagh R. Segmental Approach to Diagnosis. In:

Fyler DC ed Nadas’ Pediatric Cardiology 1992;Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus Inc.:27–36.

134. Powell AJ, Geva T. Blood flow measurement by mag-netic resonance imaging in congenital heart disease.

Pediatr Cardiol 2000;21(1):47–58.

135. Fratz S, Hess J, Schwaiger M, Martinoff S, Stern HC.

More accurate quantification of pulmonary blood flow by magnetic resonance imaging than by lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with fontan circu-lation. Circulation 2002;106(12):1510–1513.

136. Be’eri E, Maier SE, Landzberg MJ, Chung T, Geva T.

In vivo evaluation of Fontan pathway flow dynamics by multidimensional phase-velocity magnetic reso-nance imaging. Circulation 1998;98(25):2873–2882.

137. Fogel MA, Hubbard A, Weinberg PM. A simplified approach for assessment of intracardiac baffles and extracardiac conduits in congenital heart surgery with two- and three-dimensional magnetic reso-nance imaging. Am Heart J 2001;142(6):1028–1036.

138. Beerbaum P, Korperich H, Barth P, Esdorn H, Gieseke J, Meyer H. Noninvasive quantification of left-to-right shunt in pediatric patients: phase-con-trast cine magnetic resonance imaging compared with invasive oximetry. Circulation 2001;103(20):2476–2482.

139. Hundley WG, Li HF, Lange RA, et al. Assessment of left-to-right intracardiac shunting by velocity-encoded, phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison with oximetric and indica-tor dilution techniques. Circulation 1995;91(12):

2955–2960.

108. Aso H, Takeda K, Ito T, Shiraishi T, Matsumura K, Nakagawa T. Assessment of myocardial fibrosis in cardiomyopathic hamsters with gadolinium-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1998;33(1):22–32.

109. Choudhury L, Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, et al.

Myocardial scarring in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomy-opathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40(12):2156–2164.

110. Wagner A, Schulz-Menger J, Dietz R, Friedrich MG.

Long-term follow-up of patients paragraph sign with acute myocarditis by magnetic paragraph sign reso-nance imaging. MAGMA 2003;16(1):17–20.

111. Jarvinen V, Kupari M, Hekali P, Poutanen VP.

Assessment of left atrial volumes and phasic function using cine magnetic resonance imaging in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol 1994;73(15):1135–1138.

112. Jarvinen VM, Kupari MM, Poutanen VP, Hekali PE.

A simplified method for the determination of left atrial size and function using cine magnetic reso-nance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14(3):215–

113. Doherty NE, 3rd, Seelos KC, Suzuki J, et al. 226.

Application of cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging for sequential evaluation of response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol

Application of cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging for sequential evaluation of response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol

In document Radiológiai praktikum (Pldal 110-115)