• Nem Talált Eredményt

JJ II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "JJ II"

Copied!
13
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

volume 5, issue 4, article 108, 2004.

Received 23 May, 2003;

accepted 09 October, 2004.

Communicated by:F. Qi

Abstract Contents

JJ II

J I

Home Page Go Back

Close Quit

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

A GENERALIZATION OF AN INEQUALITY INVOLVING THE GENERALIZED ELEMENTARY SYMMETRIC MEAN

ZHI-HUA ZHANG AND ZHEN-GANG XIAO

Zixing Educational Research Section Chenzhou, Hunan 423400, China.

EMail:zxzh1234@163.com

Hunan Institute of Science and Technology Yueyang, Hunan 414006, China.

EMail:xiaozg@163.com

c

2000Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 070-03

(2)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page2of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

Abstract

A generalization of an inequality involving the generalized elementary symmet- ric mean and its elementary proof are given.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:Primary 26D15 Key words: Generalized elementary symmetric mean, Inequality.

The authors would like to thank Professor Feng Qi and the anonymous referee for some valuable suggestions which have improved the final version of this paper.

Contents

1 Introduction. . . 3 2 Proof of Theorem 1.1 . . . 5

References

(3)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page3of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

1. Introduction

Leta = (a1, a2,· · · , an)andrbe a nonnegative integer, whereaifor1≤i≤n are nonnegative real numbers. Then

(1.1) En[r]=En[r](a) = X

i1+i2+···+in=r, i1,i2,···,in≥0are integers

n

Y

k=1

aikk

withEn[0] =En[0](a) = 1forn≥1andEn[r] = 0forr <0orn ≤0is called the rth generalized elementary symmetric function ofa.

Therth generalized elementary symmetric mean ofais defined by (1.2)

[r]

X

n

=

[r]

X

n

(a) = En[r](a)

n+r−1 r

.

In 1934, I. Schur [5, p. 182] obtained the following (1.3)

[r]

X

n

(a) = (n−1)!

Z

· · ·

Z n X

i=1

aixi

!r

dx1· · ·dxn−1,

wherexn = 1−(x1+x2 +· · ·+xn−1)and the integral is taken overxk ≥ 0 fork = 1,2, . . . , n−1. By using (1.3) and Cauchy integral inequality, he also proved that

(1.4)

[r−1]

X

n

(a)

[r+1]

X

n

(a)≥

[r]

X

n

(a)

2

.

(4)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page4of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

In 1968, K.V. Menon [2] proved that forn = 2 orn ≥ 3 andr = 1,2,3, inequality (1.4) is valid.

In [1], the generalized symmetric means of two variables was investigated.

In [3] and [4] a problem was posed: Does inequality (1.4) hold for arbitrary n, r ∈N?

In 1997, Zh.-H. Zhang generalized (1.3) in [7] and also proved (1.4) by a similar proof as in [5].

In [6], some inequalities of weighted symmetric mean were established.

In this paper, we shall obtain an identity relatingP[r]

n (a)toEn[r](a)and give an elementary proof of an inequality which generalizes (1.4). Our main result is as follows.

Theorem 1.1. Ifr, s∈Nandr > s, then

(1.5)

[s]

X

n

(a)

[r+1]

X

n

(a)≥

[r]

X

n

(a)

[s+1]

X

n

(a).

The equality in (1.5) holds if and only ifa1 =a2 =· · ·=an. Lettings=r−1in inequality (1.5) leads to inequality (1.4).

(5)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page5of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

2. Proof of Theorem 1.1

To prove inequality (1.5), the following properties forEn[r]are necessary.

Property 1. Ifn, r∈N, then

(2.1) En[r]=En−1[r] +anEn[r−1]

and

(2.2) En[r]=

r

X

j=0

ajnEn−1[r−j].

Proof. Ifn= 1orr = 0, (2.1) holds trivially.

Whenn >1andr≥1, we have (2.3)

i1+i2+···+in=r

X

i1,i2,···,in≥0 n

Y

k=1

aikk =

i1+i2+···+in=r

X

i1,i2,···,in−1≥0 in=0

n

Y

k=1

aikk +an

i1+i2+···+in=r−1

X

i1,i2,···,in≥0 n

Y

k=1

aikk.

Combining the definition ofEn[r]and (2.3), identity (2.1) follows.

Identity (2.2) can be deduced from the recurrence of (2.1).

Property 2. Ifris an integer, then

(2.4) (r+ 1)En[r+1]=

r

X

k=0 n

X

i=1

ak+1i

!

En[r−k].

(6)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page6of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

Proof. It will be verified by induction. It is clear that identity (2.4) holds triv- ially forn = 1. Suppose identity (2.4) is true forn−1and nonnegative integers r.

By (2.2), for0≤k≤r, we have En[r−k]=

r−k

X

j=0

ajnEn−1[r−k−j],

and

r

X

j=0

(j + 1)aj+1n En−1[r−j] =anEn−1[r] +a2nEn−1[r−1]+· · ·+arnEn−1[1] +ar+1n En−1[0]

+ a2nEn−1[r−1]+· · ·+arnEn−1[1] +ar+1n En−1[0]

· · · ·

+ arnEn−1[1] +ar+1n En−1[0]

+ ar+1n En−1[0]

=

r

X

k=0 r−k

X

j=0

aj+k+1n En−1[r−k−j].

According to the inductive hypothesis, for nonnegative integersrand0≤ j ≤ r, we have

(2.5) (r−j+ 1)En−1[r+1−j] =

r−j

X

k=0 n−1

X

i=1

ak+1i

!

En−1[r−k−j].

(7)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page7of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

From Property1and the above formula, we have (r+ 1)En[r+1]

(2.6)

= (r+ 1)

r+1

X

j=0

ajnEn−1[r+1−j]

=

r

X

j=0

(r−j+ 1)ajnEn−1[r−j+1]+

r+1

X

j=1

jajnEn−1[r−j+1]

=

r

X

j=0

ajn

r−j

X

k=0 n−1

X

i=1

ak+1i

!

En−1[r−j−k]+

r

X

j=0

(j+ 1)aj+1n En−1[r−j]

=

r

X

k=0 r−k

X

j=0

ajn

n−1

X

i=1

ak+1i

!

En−1[r−j−k]+

r

X

k=0 r−k

X

j=0

aj+k+1n En−1[r−k−j]

=

r

X

k=0 n−1

X

i=1

ak+1i +ak+1n

! r−k X

j=0

ajnEn−1[r−k−j]

!

=

r

X

k=0 n

X

i=1

ak+1i

!

En[r−k].

This shows that (2.4) holds forn. The proof is complete.

Property 3. Ifr, s∈Nandr > s, then

(2.7) (r+ 1)(s+ 1)

n+r r+ 1

n+s s+ 1

[s]

X

n [r+1]

X

n

[r]

X

n [s+1]

X

n

(8)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page8of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

=

r

X

j=0 j

X

k=0

"

X

1≤v<u≤n

En[s−k]En[r−j]−En[s−j]En[r−k]

×

j−k−1

X

t=0

aj−1−tv ak+tu

!

(av−au)2

# .

Proof. Whenj > k, we have

n

X

i=1

aki

n

X

i=1

aj+1i

n

X

i=1

aji

n

X

i=1

ak+1i (2.8)

= 1 2

n

X

v=1 n

X

u=1

akvaj+1u +aj+1v aku−ajvak+1u −ak+1v aju

= 1 2

n

X

v=1 n

X

u=1

akvaku aj−k+1v +aj−k+1u −aj−kv au−avaj−ku

= 1 2

n

X

v=1 n

X

u=1

akvaku aj−kv −aj−ku

(av −au)

= X

1≤v<u≤n

akvaku aj−kv −aj−ku

(av−au)

and

(2.9) aj−kv −aj−ku

= (av−au)

j−k−1

X

t=0

aj−k−1−tv atu.

(9)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page9of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

Therefore (2.10)

n

X

i=1

aki

n

X

i=1

aj+1i

n

X

i=1

aji

n

X

i=1

ak+1i

= X

1≤v<u≤n

" k−j−1 X

t=0

aj−1−tv ak+tu

!

(av−au)2

# .

Whenk > j, we have (2.11)

n

X

i=1

aki

n

X

i=1

aj+1i

n

X

i=1

aji

n

X

i=1

ak+1i

=− X

1≤v<u≤n

" k−j−1 X

t=0

aj+tv ak−1−tu

!

(av−au)2

# .

From Property2, it is deduced that (2.12) (r+ 1)En[r+1] =

r

X

j=0 n

X

i=1

aj+1i

! En[r−j]

and

(2.13) (n+r)En[r]=nEn[r]+rEn[r]=

r

X

j=0 n

X

i=1

aji

!

En[r−j].

(10)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page10of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

Hence, using the above formulas and notingEn[r−k]= 0fork > ryields (r+ 1)(s+ 1)

n+r r+ 1

n+s s+ 1

[s]

X

n [r+1]

X

n

[r]

X

n [s+1]

X

n

 (2.14) 

= (n+s)(r+ 1)En[s]En[r+1]−(n+r)(s+ 1)En[r]En[s+1]

=

s

X

k=0 n

X

i=1

aki

! En[s−k]

r

X

j=0 n

X

i=1

aj+1i

! En[r−j]

r

X

j=0 n

X

i=1

aji

! En[r−j]

s

X

k=0 n

X

i=1

ak+1i

! En[s−k]

=

s

X

k=0 r

X

j=0 n

X

i=1

aki

n

X

i=1

aj+1i

n

X

i=1

aji

n

X

i=1

ak+1i

!

En[s−k]·En[r−j]

=

r

X

j=0 j

X

k=0

"

X

1≤v<u≤n

En[s−k]En[r−j]

j−k−1

X

t=0

aj−1−tv ak+tu

!

(av −au)2

#

s

X

k=0 k

X

j=0

"

X

1≤v<u≤n

En[s−k]En[r−j]

k−j−1

X

t=0

aj+tv ak−1−tu

!

(av−au)2

#

=

r

X

j=0 j

X

k=0

"

X

1≤v<u≤n

En[s−k]En[r−j]

j−k−1

X

t=0

aj−1−tv ak+tu

!

(av −au)2

#

r

X

j=0 j

X

k=0

"

X

1≤v<u≤n

En[s−j]En[r−k]

j−k−1

X

t=0

aj−1−tv ak+tu

!

(av−au)2

#

(11)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page11of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

=

r

X

j=0 j

X

k=0

"

X

1≤v<u≤n

En[s−k]En[r−j]−En[s−j]En[r−k]

×

j−k−1

X

t=0

aj−1−tv ak+tu

!

(av−au)2

# ,

which implies the expression (2.7).

Property 4. Ifr, s∈Nandr > s, then

(2.15) En[r−1]En[s]≥En[r]En[s−1].

The equality in (2.15) holds if and only if at least n −1 numbers equal zero among{a1, a2, . . . , an}.

Proof. From Property1, we have En[r−1]En[s]−En[r]En[s−1]

(2.16)

=En[r−1]

En−1[s] +anEn[s−1]

En−1[r] +anEn[r−1]

En[s−1]

=En[r−1]En−1[s] −En−1[r] En[s−1]

=

r−1

X

j=0

ajnEn−1[r−1−j]

!

En−1[s] −En−1[r]

s−1

X

j=0

ajnEn−1[s−1−j]

!

(12)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page12of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

=

s−1

X

j=0

ajn

En−1[r−1−j]En−1[s] −En−1[r] En−1[s−1−j]

+En−1[s]

r−1

X

j=s

ajnEn−1[r−1−j]

! .

Since (2.15) holds forn= 1, it follows by induction that (2.15) holds forn.

Property 5. Ifr, s, j, k∈Nandr > s > j > k, then (2.17) En[s−k]En[r−j]≥En[s−j]En[r−k].

The equality in (2.17) is valid if and only if at leastn−1numbers equal zero among{a1, a2, . . . , an}

Proof. From Property4, ifr−(k+ 1)> s−(k+ 1), r−(k+ 2)> s−(k+ 2), . . . , r−j > s−j, then

(2.18)

j

Y

m=k+1

En[r−m]En[s−m+1]

j

Y

m=k+1

En[r−m+1]En[s−m]

. This implies (2.17).

It is easy to see that the equality in (2.17) is valid. The proof is completed.

Proof of Theorem1.1. Combination of Property 3 and Property 5 easily leads to Theorem1.1.

Remark 2.1. Finally, we pose an open problem: Give an explicit expression of En[r−1]En[s]−En[r]En[s−1] in terms ofa1, a2, . . . , an.

(13)

A Generalization of an Inequality Involving the Generalized Elementary

Symmetric Mean

Zhi-Hua Zhang and Zhen-Gang Xiao

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page13of13

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(4) Art. 108, 2004

References

[1] D.W. DETEMPLE AND J.M. ROBERTSON, On generalized symmetric means of two variables, Univ. Beograd. Publ. Elektrotehn. Fak. Ser. Mat.

Fiz., 634–672 (1979), 236–238

[2] K.V. MENON, Inequalities for symmetric functions, Duke Math. J., 35 (1968), 37–45.

[3] D.S. MITRINOVI ´C, Analytic Inequalities, Springer, 1970.

[4] J.-Ch. KUANG, Chángyòng Búdˇengshì (Applied Inequalities), 2nd Ed. Hu- nan Education Press, Changsha, China, 1993. (Chinese)

[5] G.H. HARDY, J.E. LITTLEWOOD ANDG. POLYA, Inequalities, 2nd Ed.

Cambridge Univ. Press, 1952.

[6] Zh.-G. XIAO, Zh.-H. ZHANG AND X.-N. LU, A class of inequalities for weighted symmetric mean, J. Hunan Educational Institute, 17(5) (1999), 130–134. (Chinese)

[7] Zh.-H. ZHANG, Three classes of new means in n+ 1 variables and their applications, J. Hunan Educational Institute, 15(5) (1997), 130–136. (Chi- nese)

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

A completely elementary proof of a known upper bound for the deviations from the mean value is given.. Related inequalities are

Key words and phrases: Hilbert’s inequality, Hölder’s inequality, Jensen’s inequality, Power mean inequality.. 2000 Mathematics

In this note we offer two short proofs of Young’s inequality and prove its reverse.. 2000 Mathematics Subject

Key words and phrases: Integral inequality, Cauchy mean value theorem, Mathematical induction.. 2000 Mathematics

The authors establish the Hardy integral inequality for commutators generated by Hardy operators and Lipschitz functions.. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:

Classical inequalities and convex functions are used to get cyclical inequalities involving the elements of a triangle.. 2000 Mathematics Subject

An inequality providing some bounds for the integral mean via Pompeiu’s mean value theorem and applications for quadrature rules and special means are given.. 2000 Mathematics

The authors would like to thank Professor Feng Qi and the anonymous referee for some valuable suggestions which have improved the final version of this