• Nem Talált Eredményt

INTRODUCTION In [3], Liu proved the following theorem

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "INTRODUCTION In [3], Liu proved the following theorem"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

AN INEQUALITY ON TERNARY QUADRATIC FORMS IN TRIANGLES

NU-CHUN HU

DEPARTMENT OFMATHEMATICS

ZHEJIANGNORMALUNIVERSITY

JINHUA321004, ZHEJIANG

PEOPLESREPUBLIC OFCHINA. nuchun@zjnu.cn

Received 07 May, 2008; accepted 25 February, 2009 Communicated by S.S. Dragomir

ABSTRACT. In this short note, we give a proof of a conjecture about ternary quadratic forms involving two triangles and several interesting applications.

Key words and phrases: Positive semidefinite ternary quadratic form, arithmetic-mean geometric-mean inequality, Cauchy inequality, triangle.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 26D15.

1. INTRODUCTION

In [3], Liu proved the following theorem.

Theorem 1.1. For any4ABC and real numbersx, y, z, the following inequality holds.

(1.1) x2cos2 A

2 +y2cos2B

2 +z2cos2C

2 ≥yzsin2A+zxsin2B+xysin2C.

In [6], Tao proved the following theorem.

Theorem 1.2. For any4A1B1C1,4A2B2C2, the following inequality holds.

(1.2) cosA1

2 cosA2

2 + cosB1

2 cosB2

2 + cosC1

2 cosC2 2

≥sinA1sinA2+ sinB1sinB2+ sinC1sinC2. Then, in [4], Liu proposed the following conjecture.

Conjecture 1.3. For any4A1B1C1,4A2B2C2and real numbersx, y, z, the following inequal- ity holds.

(1.3) x2cosA1

2 cosA2

2 +y2cosB1

2 cosB2

2 +z2cosC1

2 cosC2 2

≥yzsinA1sinA2+zxsinB1sinB2+xysinC1sinC2. In this paper, we give a proof of this conjecture and some interesting applications.

133-08

(2)

2. PRELIMINARIES

For4ABC, let a, b, c denote the side-lengths, A, B, C the angles, s the semi-perimeter,S the area,R the circumradius and r the inradius, respectively. In addition we will customarily use the symbolsP

(cyclic sum) andQ

(cyclic product):

Xf(a) = f(a) +f(b) +f(c), Y

f(a) = f(a)f(b)f(c).

To prove the inequality (1.1), we need the following well-known proposition about positive semidefinite quadratic forms.

Proposition 2.1 (see [2]). Letpi, qi (i= 1,2,3)be real numbers such thatpi ≥0 (i= 1,2,3), 4p2p3 ≥q12,4p3p1 ≥q22,4p1p2 ≥q32and

(2.1) 4p1p2p3 ≥p1q21+p2q22+p3q23 +q1q2q3. Then the following inequality holds for any real numbersx, y, z,

(2.2) p1x2+p2y2+p3z2 ≥q1yz+q2zx+q3xy.

Lemma 2.2. For4ABC, the following inequalities hold.

2 cosB 2 cosC

2 ≥ 3√ 3

4 sin2A >sin2A, (2.3)

2 cosC 2 cosA

2 ≥ 3√ 3

4 sin2B >sin2B, (2.4)

2 cosA 2 cosB

2 ≥ 3√ 3

4 sin2C >sin2C.

(2.5)

Proof. We will only prove (2.3) because (2.4) and (2.5) can be done similarly. Since S= 1

2bcsinA=p

s(s−a)(s−b)(s−c)

and

cosB 2 =

rs(s−b)

ca , cosC 2 =

rs(s−c) ab ,

then it follows that 2 cosB

2 cosC

2 ≥ 3√ 3 4 sin2A

⇐⇒ 2

rs(s−b) ca

rs(s−c)

ab ≥ 3√ 3S2 b2c2

⇐⇒ 4s2(s−b)(s−c)

a2bc ≥ 27s2(s−a)2(s−b)2(s−c)2 b4c4

⇐⇒ 4

a2 ≥ 27(s−a)2(s−b)(s−c) b3c3

⇐⇒ 4b3c3 ≥27a2(s−a)2(s−b)(s−c).

(2.6)

(3)

On the other hand, by the arithmetic-mean geometric-mean inequality, we have the following inequality.

27a2(s−a)2(s−b)(s−c)

= 108· 1

2a(s−a)· 1

2a(s−a)·(s−b)(s−c)

≤108 1

2a(s−a) + 12a(s−a) + (s−b)(s−c) 3

3

= 4

bc− (b+c−a)2 4

3

<4b3c3.

Therefore the inequality (2.6) holds, and hence (2.3) holds.

Lemma 2.3. For4ABC, the following equality holds.

X sin4A

cos2 B2 cos2 C2 = (2R+ 5r)s4−2(R+r)(16R+ 5r)rs2+ (4R+r)3r2

2R3s2 .

(2.7)

Proof. By the familiar identity: a+b+c= 2s, ab+bc+ca = s2+ 4Rr +r2, abc = 4Rrs (see [5]) and the following identity

Xa5(b+c−a) =−(a+b+c)6+ 7(ab+bc+ca)(a+b+c)4

−13(a+b+c)2(ab+bc+ca)2−7abc(a+b+c)3

+ 4(ab+bc+ca)3+ 19abc(ab+bc+ca)(a+b+c)−6a2b2c2, it follows that

Xa5(b+c−a) = 4(2R+ 5r)rs4−8(R+r)(16R+ 5r)r2s2+ 4(4R+r)3r3, and hence

Xsin4A(1 + cosA) = X a 2R

4(b+c)2−a2 2bc

= (a+b+c)P

a5(b+c−a) 32R4abc

= (2R+ 5r)s4−2(R+r)(16R+ 5r)rs2+ (4R+r)3r2

16R5 .

Thus, together with the familiar identityQ

cosA2 = 4Rs , it follows that X sin4A

cos2B2 cos2 C2 =

Psin4Acos2 A2 Qcos2 A2

=

Psin4A(1 + cosA) 2Q

cos2 A2

= (2R+ 5r)s4−2(R+r)(16R+ 5r)rs2+ (4R+r)3r2

2R3s2 .

Therefore the equality (2.7) is proved.

Lemma 2.4. For4ABC, the following inequality holds.

(2.8) −(2R+ 5r)s4+ 2(2R+ 5r)(2R+r)(R+r)s2−(4R+r)3r2 ≥0.

(4)

Proof. First it is easy to verify that the inequality (2.8) is just the following inequality.

(2.9) (2R+ 5r)[−s4+ (4R2+ 20Rr−2r2)s2 −r(4R+r)3]

+ 2r(14R2+ 31Rr−10r2)(4R2+ 4Rr+ 3r2−s2)

+ 4(R−2r)(4R3+ 6R2r+ 3Rr2−8r3)≥0.

Thus, together with the fundamental inequality

−s4+ (4R2+ 20Rr−2r2)s2−r(4R+r)3 ≥0

(see [5, page 2]), Euler’s inequalityR ≥ 2r and Gerretsen’s inequalitys2 ≤4R2 + 4Rr+ 3r2 (see [1, page 45]), it follows that the inequality (2.9) holds, and hence (2.8) holds.

Lemma 2.5. For4ABC, the following inequality holds.

(2.10) X sin4A

cos2 B2 cos2 C2 + 64Y sin2 A

2 ≤4.

Proof. By Lemma 2.3 and the familiar identityQ

sinA2 = 4Rr , it follows that X sin4A

cos2 B2 cos2 C2 + 64Y sin2 A

2 ≤4

⇐⇒ (2R+ 5r)s4−2(R+r)(16R+ 5r)rs2+ (4R+r)3r2

2R3s2 +4r2

R2 ≤4

⇐⇒ −(2R+ 5r)s4+ 2(2R+ 5r)(2R+r)(R+r)s2−(4R+r)3r2

2R3s2 ≥0.

(2.11)

Thus, by Lemma 2.4, it follows that the inequality (2.11) holds, and hence (2.10) holds.

3. PROOF OF THE MAIN THEOREM

Now we give the proof of inequality (1.1).

Proof. First, it is easy to verify that

cosA1

2 cosA2

2 ≥0, (3.1)

cosB1

2 cosB2 2 ≥0, (3.2)

cosC1

2 cosC2 2 ≥0.

(3.3)

Next, by Lemma 2.2, we have the following inequalities:

4 cosB1

2 cosB2

2 ·cosC1

2 cosC2

2 ≥sin2A1sin2A2, (3.4)

4 cosC1

2 cosC2

2 ·cosA1

2 cosA2

2 ≥sin2B1sin2B2, (3.5)

4 cosA1

2 cosA2

2 ·cosB1

2 cosB2

2 ≥sin2C1sin2C2. (3.6)

(5)

Thus, in order that Proposition 2.1 is applicable, we have to show the following inequality.

(3.7) 4Y cosA1

2

YcosA2

2

≥cosA1

2 sin2A1cosA2

2 sin2A2+ cosB1

2 sin2B1cosB2

2 sin2B2 + cosC1

2 sin2C1cosC2

2 sin2C2+Y sinA1

YsinA2.

However, in order to prove the inequality (3.7), we only need the following inequality.

(3.8) sin2A1

cosB21 cosC21 · sin2A2

cosB22 cosC22 + sin2B1

cosC21 cosA21 · sin2B2 cosC22 cosA22 + sin2C1

cosA21 cosB21 · sin2C2

cosA22 cosB22 + 8Y sinA1

2 ·8Y sinA2

2 ≤4.

In fact, by the Cauchy inequality and Lemma 2.5, we have that

"

sin2A1

cosB21 cosC21 · sin2A2

cosB22 cosC22 + sin2B1

cosC21 cosA21 · sin2B2 cosC22 cosA22

+ sin2C1

cosA21 cosB21 · sin2C2

cosA22 cosB22 + 8Y sinA1

2 ·8Y sinA2

2

#2

"

X sin4A1

cos2 B21 cos2 C21 + 64Y

sin2A1 2

#

×

"

X sin4A2

cos2 B22 cos2 C22 + 64Y

sin2 A2 2

#

≤16

Therefore the inequality (3.8) holds, and hence (3.7) holds. Thus, together with inequality (3.4)–(3.7), Proposition 2.1 is applicable to complete the proof of (1.1).

4. APPLICATIONS

LetP be a point in the4ABC. Recall that A, B, C denote the angles,a, b, cthe lengths of sides, wa, wb, wc the lengths of interior angular bisectors, ma, mb, mc the lengths of medians, ha, hb, hc the lengths of altitudes, R1, R2, R3 the distances of P to vertices A, B, C, r1, r2, r3 the distances ofP to the sidelinesBC, CA, AB.

Corollary 4.1. For any4ABC,4A1B1C1,4A2B2C2, the following inequality holds.

a2cosA1

2 cosA2

2 +b2cosB1

2 cosB2

2 +c2cosC1

2 cosC2 2

≥bcsinA1sinA2+casinB1sinB2+absinC1sinC2. Corollary 4.2. For any4ABC,4A1B1C1,4A2B2C2, the following inequality holds.

wa2cosA1

2 cosA2

2 +w2bcosB1

2 cosB2

2 +w2ccosC1

2 cosC2 2

≥wbwcsinA1sinA2+wcwasinB1sinB2+wawbsinC1sinC2.

(6)

Corollary 4.3. For any4ABC,4A1B1C1,4A2B2C2, the following inequality holds.

m2acosA1

2 cosA2

2 +m2b cosB1

2 cosB2

2 +m2ccosC1

2 cosC2 2

≥mbmcsinA1sinA2+mcmasinB1sinB2+mambsinC1sinC2. Corollary 4.4. For any4ABC,4A1B1C1,4A2B2C2, the following inequality holds.

h2acosA1

2 cosA2

2 +h2bcosB1

2 cosB2

2 +h2ccosC1

2 cosC2 2

≥hbhcsinA1sinA2+hchasinB1sinB2 +hahbsinC1sinC2. Corollary 4.5. For any4ABC,4A1B1C1,4A2B2C2, the following inequality holds.

R21cosA1

2 cosA2

2 +R22cosB1

2 cosB2

2 +R32cosC1

2 cosC2 2

≥R2R3sinA1sinA2+R3R1sinB1sinB2 +R1R2sinC1sinC2. Corollary 4.6. For any4ABC,4A1B1C1,4A2B2C2, the following inequality holds.

r21cosA1

2 cosA2

2 +r22cosB1

2 cosB2

2 +r23cosC1

2 cosC2 2

≥r2r3sinA1sinA2+r3r1sinB1sinB2+r1r2sinC1sinC2. REFERENCES

[1] O. BOTTEMA, R.Ž. DJORDJEVI ´C, R.R. JANI ´C, D.S. MITRINOVI ´CANDP.M. VASI ´C, Geometric Inequalities, Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing, Groningen, 1969.

[2] S.J. LEON, Linear Algebra with Applications, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2005.

[3] J. LIU, Two results about ternary quadratic form and their applications, Middle-School Mathematics (in Chinese), 5 (1996), 16–19.

[4] J. LIU, Inequalities involving nine sine (in Chinese), preprint.

[5] D.S. MITRINOVI ´C, J.E. PE ˇCARI ´C AND V. VOLENEC, Recent Advances in Geometric Inequal- ities, Mathematics and its Applications (East European Series), 28. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1989.

[6] C.G. TAO, Proof of a conjecture relating two triangle, Middle-School Mathematics (in Chinese), 2 (2004), 43–43.

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

Key words: Inequality, Arithmetic mean, Geometric mean, Logarithmic mean, Iden- tric mean, n variables, Van der Monde determinant. The authors would like to thank Professor Feng Qi

Key words and phrases: Inequality, Arithmetic mean, Geometric mean, Logarithmic mean, Identric mean, n variables, Van der Monde determinant.. 2000 Mathematics

Thus, in a sense, the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, Hölder’s inequality, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, and Lyapunov’s inequality are all equivalent [1, p. In the fol-

Key words and phrases: Hilbert’s inequality, Hölder’s inequality, Jensen’s inequality, Power mean inequality.. 2000 Mathematics

Key words and phrases: Multiplicative integral inequalities, Weights, Carlson’s inequality.. 2000 Mathematics

Key words and phrases: Integral inequality, Cauchy mean value theorem, Mathematical induction.. 2000 Mathematics

Yang [4] considered an analogous form of inequality (1.1) and posed an inter- esting open problem as follows..

Key words and phrases: Integral expression, Inequality, Mathieu’s series, gamma function, Fourier transform inequality.. 2000 Mathematics