DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
Sponsored by a Grant TÁMOP-4.1.2-08/2/A/KMR-2009-0041 Course Material Developed by Department of Economics,
Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University Budapest (ELTE) Department of Economics, Eötvös Loránd University Budapest
Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Balassi Kiadó, Budapest
2
Author: Katalin Szilágyi Supervised by Katalin Szilágyi
January 2011
Week 3
Endogenous growth theory Introduction
• Proximate causes of growth:
• Capital
• Labor (population)
• Technology
• Exogenous growth theory: mechanics of growth explained with proximate causes
• Cross-sectional and/or time-series differences in growth performance are assumed
• Sources of growth are unclear (exogenous)
• Some empirical difficulties with exogenous growth theory
• Lack of (unconditional) cross-country convergence (Barro)
• Lack of capital flows from rich to poor countries (Lucas)
3
Outline
• Human capital and endogenous growth
• Technology and growth
• Innovation and R&D
• Diffusion of technology
• Role of history: complementarities and development traps
1. Human capital and endogenous growth 1. Factors of production
• Fixed and flexible
• Flexible: can be accumulated (supply is endogenous)
• Fixed: cannot be deliberately accumulated (supply is exogenous)
• Solow: labor is fixed (exogenous), capital is flexible (endogenous)
Human capital and growth
• Heterogeneity in human capital
• Labor force = educated + uneducated
• Difference: level of human capital (productivity)
• Total labor force (population) is exogenous, but the structure is not
4
• Being educated (human capital formation) is a result of a deliberate decision (endogenous)
• Two flexible factors of production: physical and human capital
Model with human capital
• Two inputs: physical (k) and human capital (h)
• Cobb–Douglas technology:
y = kαh1- α
• Assumption: n = δ = 0
• Accumulation of physical capital:
kt+1 – kt = syt
• Accumulation of human capital:
ht+1 – ht = qyt
• Long run equilibrium:
h/k = q/s
• Ration of h to k depends on accumulation rates
• Growth:
• Long-run growth depends on:
• Saving rate
• Accumulation of human capital
capital physical
to capital human
of ratio run long the means where
) és (
) ( ) 1 , (
) (
) ( ) 1
(
1r
s r q t qr
h
t h t
sr h t
k
t k t
k
5
• Technology
• Initial differences in income persist!
• Long-run growth rates (↔ steady state levels) are the identical in countries with the same characteristics
• Decisions about factor accumulation (saving/education) have long-run consequences for growth
• Not just level shifts (Solow)
• Constant return to scale in the two flexible inputs
• With diminishing marginal products separately
• Marginal product of capital (Lucas paradox): not just the scarcity of physical capital
• MPK(k,h) depends on h as well!
• Cross-country convergence and divergence
• Conditional convergence after controlling for differences in human capital.
Ceteris paribus: poor countries grow faster.
• Conditional divergence after controlling for differences in initial income.
Ceteris paribus: countries with more human capital grow faster.
• Rich countries tend to have more human capital→ two effects cancel out, no visible convergence.
2. Technology and growth
6
Technology
• Solow: long-run growth only through improvement in technology
• Improvement in technology
• Deliberate and calculated: innovation
• Models of individual optimisation
• Not necessarily deliberate and calculated: diffusion
• Models of externalities
Model of innovation Innovation
• Decision: channeling human capital (H) directly into production (u) or to R&D (1-u)
• Dilemma: consumption now or later
• Production function:
Yt = EtγKtα(utH)1-α
• Accumulation of knowledge („know-how”):
(Et - Et-1) / Et = a(1 - ut)H
7
Model of innovation
• Long-run growth is due to (endogous) accumulation of knowledge
• Depends on the level of human capital and on ratio of labor employed in R&D
• Protection of intellectual property rights is key
• Temporary monopolies are efficient
• Models of innovation are not compatible with the idea of perfect competition (Romer, Grossman–Helpman)
Model of technology diffusion Diffusion of technology
• Individual decisions of human capital formation and innovation have external benefits (Romer)
• From an individual’s point of view: technology is given (exogenous) Yt = EtKtαHt1-α
• From the aggregate point of view: technology is endogenous Et = a(Kt*)β
8
Externalities
• Increasing returns in the aggregate of flexible inputs
• Still diminishing returns from the individual’s point of view
• Growth per capita is increasing
• Externality: PMB and SMB diverge
• PMB < SMB: disaggregated allocation is suboptimal
Complementarity
• Complementarity
• Action by one agent generates incentives for other agents
• Examples:
• If others go to college, I go as well.
• If everybody uses Microsoft, I will use it as well.
3. Complementarities and development traps
Complementarities and multiple equilibria
9
• Multiple equilibria: if agents’ behavior depend on their expectations about others
• S(S*)
• Multiple equilibria: low-level (”pessimistic”) and high-level (”optimistic”) (S = S1 and S = S2)
• Historical experience (lock-in)
Example: QWERTY
• QWERTY vs. DVORAK
• Cost of adopting a new technology depends on the number of people using it
• History matters (Intel vs. RISC, Microsoft vs. Apple)
• Complementarity → multiple equilibria
• History ”selects” from them
10
Problem of co-ordination
• Low-level equilibrium trap
• Rosenstein–Rodan (1943): co-ordinated development is the key to avoid
• Co-ordinated industry policies (big push)