• Nem Talált Eredményt

JJ II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "JJ II"

Copied!
17
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

volume 3, issue 4, article 65, 2002.

Received 8 April, 2001;

accepted 15 June, 2002.

Communicated by:D. Bainov

Abstract Contents

JJ II

J I

Home Page Go Back

Close Quit

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

ON CERTAIN NEW INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS

S.S. DRAGOMIR AND YOUNG-HO KIM

School of Communications and Informatics Victoria University of Technology

PO Box 14428, Melbourne City MC 8001 Victoria, AUSTRALIA.

EMail:sever.dragomir@vu.edu.au

URL:http://rgmia.vu.edu.au/SSDragomirWeb.html Department of Applied Mathematics

Changwon National University Changwon 641-773, Korea.

EMail:yhkim@sarim.changwon.ac.kr

c

2000School of Communications and Informatics,Victoria University of Technology ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756

034-02

(2)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page2of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to establish some variants integral inequalities in two independent variables. These integral inequalities given here can be applied as tools in the boundedness and uniquness of certain partial differential equations.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:26D10, 26D15.

Key words: Integral inequality, Two independent variables, Partial differential equa- tions, Nondecreasing, Nonincreasing.

Contents

1 Introduction. . . 3 2 Main Results . . . 4 3 Some Applications . . . 14

References

(3)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page3of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

1. Introduction

The integral inequalities involving functions of one and more than one inde- pendent variables which provide explicit bounds on unknown functions play a fundamental role in the development of the theory of differential equations (see [1]–[11]). In recent year, Pachpatte [11] discovered some new integral inequal- ities involving functions of two independent variables. These inequalities are applied to study the boundedness and uniqueness of the solutions of following terminal value problem for the hyperbolic partial differential equation (1.1) with the condition (1.2).

uxy(x, y) =h(x, y, u(x, y)) +r(x, y), (1.1)

u(x,∞) =σ(x), u(∞, y) = τ(y), u(∞,∞) =d.

(1.2)

Our main objective here, motivated by Pachpatte’s inequalities [11], is to establish additional new integral inequalities involving functions of two inde- pendent variables which can be used in the analysis of certain classes of partial differential equations.

(4)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page4of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

2. Main Results

Throughout the paper, all the functions which appear in the inequalities are assumed to be real-valued and all the integrals are involved in existence on the domains of their definitions. We shall introduce some notation, Rdenotes the set of real numbers and R+ = [0,∞) is the given subset ofR.The first order partial derivatives of a functionsz(x, y)defined forx, y ∈ Rwith respect tox andyare denoted byzx(x, y)andzy(x, y)respectively.

We need the inequalities in the following Lemma2.1and Lemma2.2, which are given in the book [1].

Lemma 2.1. Letgbe a monotone continuous function in an intervalI,contain- ing a pointu0,which vanishes in I.Letuandk be continuous functions in an intervalJ = [α, β]such thatu(J)⊂I,and suppose thatkis of fixed sign inJ.

Leta∈I.

(i) Assume thatg is nondecreasing andkis nonnegative. If u(t)≤a+

Z t

α

k(s)g(u(s))ds, t∈J, then

u(t)≤G−1

G(a) + Z t

α

k(s)ds

, α≤t ≤β1, whereG(u) = Ru

u0dx/g(x), u∈I,andβ1 = min(v1, v2),with v1 = sup

v ∈J :a+ Z t

α

k(s)g(u(s))ds∈I, α≤t ≤v

,

(5)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page5of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

v2 = sup

v ∈J :G(a) + Z t

α

k(s)ds∈G(I), α≤t≤v

. (ii) Assume thatJ = (α, β].If

u(t)≤a+ Z β

t

k(s)g(u(s))ds, t∈J, then

u(t)≤G−1

G(a) + Z β

t

k(s)ds

, α1 < t≤β, whereα1 = max(µ1, µ2),with

µ1 = sup

µ1 ∈J :a+ Z β

t

k(s)g(u(s))ds ∈I, µ≤t≤β

, µ2 = sup

µ∈J :G(a) + Z β

t

k(s)ds∈G(I), µ≤t ≤β

. The proofs of the inequalities in (i), (ii) can be completed as in [1, p. 40–42].

Here we omit the details.

Letu(x, y), a(x, y), b(x, y)be nonnegative continuous functions defined for x, y ∈R+.

Lemma 2.2. (i) Assume thata(x, y)is nondecreasing inxand nonincreasing inyforx, y ∈R+.If

u(x, y)≤a(x, y) + Z x

0

Z

y

b(s, t)u(s, t)dtds

(6)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page6of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

for allx, y ∈R+,then

u(x, y)≤a(x, y) exp Z x

0

Z

y

b(s, t)dtds

.

(ii) Assume that a(x, y)is nonincreasing in each of the variablesx, y ∈ R+. If

u(x, y)≤a(x, y) + Z

x

Z

y

b(s, t)u(s, t)dtds for allx, y ∈R+,then

u(x, y)≤a(x, y) exp Z

x

Z

y

b(s, t)dtds

.

The proofs of the inequalities in (i), (ii) can be completed as in [1, p. 109- 110]. Here we omit the details.

To establish our results, we require the class of functionsSas defined in [2].

A functiong : [0,∞)→[0,∞)is said to belong to the classSif (i) g(u)is positive, nondecreasing and continuous foru≥0, (ii) (1/v)g(u)≤g(u/v), u >0, v ≥1.

Theorem 2.3. Let u(x, y), a(x, y), b(x, y), c(x, y), d(x, y)be nonnegative con- tinuous functions defined for x, y ∈ R+, let g ∈ S.Define a function z(x, y) by

z(x, y) = a(x, y) +c(x, y) Z x

0

Z

y

d(s, t)u(s, t)dtds

(7)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page7of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

withz(x, y)is nondecreasing inxandz(x, y)≥1forx, y ∈R+.If (2.1) u(x, y)≤z(x, y) +

Z x

α

b(s, y)g u(s, y) ds, forα, x, y∈R+andα ≤x,then

(2.2) u(x, y)≤p(x, y)

a(x, y) +c(x, y)e(x, y)

× exp Z x

0

Z

y

d(s, t)p(s, t)c(s, t)dtds

, forx, y ∈R+,where

p(x, y) = G−1

G(1) + Z x

α

b(s, y)ds

, (2.3)

e(x, y) = Z x

0

Z

y

d(s, t)p(s, t)a(s, t)dtds, (2.4)

G(u) = Z u

u0

ds

g(s), u≥u0 >0, (2.5)

G−1 is the inverse function ofG,and G(1) +

Z x

α

b(s, y)ds ∈Dom(G−1).

Proof. Let z(x, y) is a nonnegative, continuous, nondecreasing and letg ∈ S.

Then (2.1) can be restated as

(2.6) u(x, y)

z(x, y) ≤1 + Z x

α

b(s, y) 1

z(x, y)g(u(s, y)) ds.

(8)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page8of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Define a function w(x, y) by the right side of (2.6), then [u(x, y)/z(x, y)] ≤ w(x, y)and

(2.7) w(x, y)≤1 +

Z x

α

b(s, y)g(w(s, y))ds.

Treatingy, y∈R+fixed in (2.7) and using (i) of Lemma2.1to (2.7), we get

(2.8) w(x, y)≤G−1

G(1) + Z x

α

b(s, y)ds

. Using (2.8) in[u(x, y)/z(x, y)]≤w(x, y),we obtain

u(x, y)≤z(x, y)p(x, y),

wherep(x, y)is defined by (2.3). From the definition ofz(x, y)we have (2.9) u(x, y)≤p(x, y) (a(x, y) +c(x, y)v(x, y)),

wherev(x, y)is defined by v(x, y) =

Z x

0

Z

y

d(s, t)u(s, t)dtds.

From (2.9) we get v(x, y)≤

Z x

0

Z

y

d(s, t)p(s, t) (a(s, t) +c(s, t)v(s, t))dtds

=e(x, y) + Z x

0

Z

y

d(s, t)p(s, t)c(s, t)v(s, t)dtds,

(9)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page9of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

where e(x, y) is defined by (2.4). Clearly, e(x, y)is nonnegative, continuous, nondecreasing in x, x ∈ R+ and nonincreasing in y, y ∈ R+. Now, by (i) of Lemma2.2, we obtain

(2.10) v(x, y)≤e(x, y) exp Z x

0

Z

y

d(s, t)p(s, t)c(s, t)dtds

. Using (2.10) in (2.9) we get the required inequality in (2.2).

Theorem 2.4. Let u(x, y), a(x, y), b(x, y), c(x, y), d(x, y)be nonnegative con- tinuous functions defined forx, y ∈R+and letg ∈S.Define a functionz(x, y) by

z(x, y) =a(x, y) +c(x, y) Z

x

Z

y

d(s, t)u(s, t)dtds withz(x, y)is nonincreasing inxandz(x, y)≥1forx, y ∈R+.If

u(x, y)≤z(x, y) + Z β

x

b(s, y)g(u(s, y))ds forβ, x, y ∈R+andβ ≥x,then

u(x, y)≤p(x, y)

a(x, y) +c(x, y)e(x, y)

×exp Z

x

Z

y

d(s, t)p(s, t)c(s, t)dtds

(10)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page10of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

forx, y ∈R+,where

p(x, y) =G−1

G(1) + Z β

x

b(s, y)ds

, (2.11)

e(x, y) = Z

x

Z

y

d(s, t)p(s, t)a(s, t)dtds.

Gis defined in (2.5),G−1 is the inverse function ofG,and G(1) +

Z β

x

b(s, y)ds∈Dom(G−1).

The details of the proof of Theorem2.4 follows by an argument similar to that in the proofs of Theorem2.3with suitable changes. We omit the details.

Theorem 2.5. Let u(x, y), a(x, y), b(x, y), c(x, y) be nonnegative continuous functions defined for x, y ∈ R+ andF : R3+ → R+ be a continuous function which satisfies the condition

(2.12) 0≤F(x, y, u)−F(x, y, v)≤K(x, y, v)(u−v)

foru ≥ v ≥ 0,whereK(x, y, v)is a nonnegative continuous function defined forx, y, v ∈R+.And letg ∈S.Define a functionz(x, y)by

z(x, y) = a(x, y) +c(x, y) Z x

0

Z

y

F(s, t, u(s, t))dtds with nondecreasing inxandz(x, y)≥1forx, y ∈R+.If

(2.13) u(x, y)≤z(x, y) + Z x

α

b(s, y)g u(s, y) ds

(11)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page11of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

forα, x, y∈R+andα ≤x,then (2.14) u(x, y)≤p(x, y)

a(x, y) +c(x, y)A(x, y)

×exp Z x

0

Z

y

K(s, t, p(s, t)a(s, t))p(s, t)c(s, t)dtds

forx, y ∈R+,wherep(x, y)is defined by (2.3) and

(2.15) A(x, y) =

Z x

0

Z

y

F (s, t, p(s, t)a(s, t))dtds, G(u) = Ru

u0(ds/g(s)), u≥u0 >0, G−1 is the inverse function ofG,and G(1) +

Z x

α

b(s, y)ds ∈Dom(G−1).

Proof. The proof of this theorem follows by argument similar to that given in the proof of Theorem2.3. Letz(x, y)is a nonnegative, continuous, nondecreasing and letg ∈S,then, we observe that

u(x, y)≤z(x, y)p(x, y),

wherep(x, y)is defined by (2.3). From the definition ofz(x, y)we have (2.16) u(x, y)≤p(x, y) a(x, y) +c(x, y)w(x, y)

, wherew(x, y)is defined by

w(x, y) = Z x

0

Z

y

F(s, t, u(s, t))dtds.

(12)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page12of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

From (2.12) and (2.16) we get w(x, y)≤

Z x

0

Z

y

F (s, t, p(s, t) (a(s, t) +c(s, t)w(s, t))) +F (s, t, p(s, t)a(s, t))−F (s, t, p(s, t)a(s, t))

dtds

≤A(x, y) + Z x

0

Z

y

K((s, t, p(s, t)a(s, t))p(s, t)c(s, t)w(s, t)dtds, whereA(x, y)is defined by (2.15). Clearly,A(x, y)is nonnegative, continuous, nondecreasing in x, x ∈ R+ and nonincreasing in y, y ∈ R+. Now, by (i) of Lemma2.2, we obtain

(2.17) w(x, y)≤A(x, y)

×exp Z x

0

Z

y

K((s, t, p(s, t)a(s, t))p(s, t)c(s, t)dtds

. Using (2.16) in (2.17) we get the required inequality in (2.14).

Theorem 2.6. Let the assumptions of Theorem2.5be fulfilled. Define a function z(x, y)by

z(x, y) =a(x, y) +c(x, y) Z

x

Z

y

F(s, t, u(s, t))dtds, with nonincreasing inxandz(x, y)≥1forx, y ∈R+.If

u(x, y)≤z(x, y) + Z β

x

b(s, y)g(u(s, y))ds

(13)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page13of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

forβ, x, y ∈R+andβ ≥x,then u(x, y)≤p(x, y)

a(x, y) +c(x, y)A(x, y)

×exp Z

x

Z

y

K(s, t, p(s, t)a(s, t))p(s, t)c(s, t)dtds

forx, y ∈R+,wherep(x, y)is defined by (2.11) and A(x, y) =

Z

x

Z

y

F(s, t, p(s, t)a(s, t)) dtds.

Gis defined in (2.5),G−1 is the inverse function ofG,and G(1) +

Z β

x

b(s, y)ds∈Dom(G−1).

The details of the proof of Theorem2.6 follows by an argument similar to that in the proofs of Theorem2.5with suitable changes. We omit the details.

(14)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page14of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

3. Some Applications

In this section we present some immediate applications of Theorem2.3to study certain properties of solutions of the following terminal value problem for the hyperbolic partial differential equation

uxy(x, y) = h(x, y, u(x, y)) +r(x, y), (3.1)

u(x,∞) = σ(x), u(0, y) =τ(y), u(0,∞) =k, (3.2)

where h : R2+ ×R → R, r : R2+ → R, σ, τ(y) : R+ → R are continuous functions andkis a real constant.

The following example deals with the estimate on the solution of the partial differential equation (3.1) with the conditions (3.2).

Example 3.1. Letc(x, y)continuous, nonnegative, nondecreasing inxand non- increasing inyforx, y ∈R+,and let

(3.3) |h(x, y, u)| ≤c(x, y)d(x, y)|u|, (3.4)

σ(x) +τ(y)−k− Z x

0

Z

y

r(s, t)dtds

≤a(x, y) + Z x

α

b(s, y)g(|u|)ds, where a(x, y), b(x, y), d(x, y), g are as defined in Theorem2.3. If u(x, y) is a solution of (3.1) with the conditions (3.2), then it can be written as (see [1, p.

80])

(3.5) u(x, y) = σ(x) +τ(y)−k− Z x

0

Z

y

(h(s, t, u(s, t)) +r(s, t)) dtds

(15)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page15of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

forx, y ∈R.From (3.3), (3.4), (3.5) we get (3.6) |u(x, y)| ≤a(x, y) +

Z x

α

b(s, y)g(|u|)ds +c(x, y)

Z x

0

Z

y

d(s, t)|u|dtds.

Now, a suitable application of Theorem2.3to (3.6) yields the required estimate following

|u(x, y)| ≤p(x, y)

a(x, y) +c(x, y)e(x, y)

× exp Z x

0

Z

y

d(s, t)p(s, t)c(s, t)dtds

forx, y ∈R+,wheree(x, y), p(x, y)are define in Theorem2.3.

Our next result deals with the uniqueness of the solution of the partial differ- ential equation (3.1) with the conditions (3.2).

Example 3.2. Suppose that the functionhin (3.1) satisfies the condition (3.7) |h(x, y, u)−h(x, y, v)| ≤c(x, y)d(x, y)|u−v|,

wherec(x, y), d(x, y)is as defined in Theorem2.3withc(x, y)is nonincreasing iny.Letu(x, y), v(x, y)be two solutions of equation (3.1) with the conditions (3.2). From (3.5), (3.7) we have

(3.8) |u(x, y)−v(x, y)| ≤c(x, y) Z x

0

Z

y

d(s, t)|u(s, t)−v(s, t)|dtds.

Now a suitable application of Theorem 2.3 yields u(x, y) = v(x, y), that is, there is at most one solution to the problem (3.1) with the conditions (3.2).

(16)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page16of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

References

[1] D. BAINOVAND P. SIMEONOV, Integral Inequalities and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1992.

[2] P.R. BEESACK, Gronwall inequalities, Carleton University Mathematical Lecture Notes, No. 11, 1987.

[3] S.S. DRAGOMIR AND N.M. IONESCU, On nonlinear integral inequal- ities in two independent variables, Studia Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai, Math., 34 (1989), 11–17.

[4] A. MATEANDP. NEVAL, Sublinear perturbations of the differential equa- tion y(n) = 0 and of the analogous difference equation, J. Differential Equations, 52 (1984), 234–257.

[5] D.S. MITRINOVI ´C, J.E. PE ˇCARI ´CANDA.M. FINK, Inequalities Involv- ing Functions and their Integrals and Derivatives, Kluwer Academic Pub- lishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1991.

[6] B.G. PACHPATTE, Inequalities for Differential and Integral Equations, Academic Press, New York, 1998.

[7] B.G. PACHPATTE, On some new discrete inequalities and their applica- tions, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., India, 46(A) (1976), 255–262.

[8] B.G. PACHPATTE, On certain new finite difference inequalities, Indian J.

Pure Appl. Math., 24 (1993), 373–384.

[9] B.G. PACHPATTE, Some new finite difference inequalities, Computer Math. Appl., 28 (1994), 227–241.

(17)

On Certain New Integral Inequalities and their

Applications

S.S. DragomirandYoung-Ho Kim

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page17of17

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 3(4) Art. 65, 2002

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

[10] B.G. PACHPATTE, On some new discrete inequalities useful in the the- ory of partial finite difference equations, Ann. Differential Equations, 12 (1996), 1–12.

[11] B.G. PACHPATTE, On some fundamental integral inequalities and their discrete analogues, J. Ineq. Pure Appl. Math., 2(2) (2001), Article 15.

[ONLINE:http://jipam.vu.edu.au/v2n2/046_00.html]

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

Key words and phrases: Multiplicative integral inequalities, Weights, Carlson’s inequality.. 2000 Mathematics

The authors establish the Hardy integral inequality for commutators generated by Hardy operators and Lipschitz functions.. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:

Classical inequalities and convex functions are used to get cyclical inequalities involving the elements of a triangle.. 2000 Mathematics Subject

Refinements and extensions are presented for some inequalities of Brenner and Alzer for certain polynomial–like functions.. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:

In the present paper, by introducing some parameters, new forms of Hardy- Hilbert’s inequalities are given.. 2000 Mathematics Subject

In this paper, using Grüss’ and Chebyshev’s inequalities we prove several in- equalities involving Taylor’s remainder.. 2000 Mathematics Subject

These are sharper than some known generalizations of the Hilbert integral inequality including a recent result of Yang.. 2000 Mathematics Subject

In this paper, some new inequalities similar to Hilbert-Pachpatte type inequali- ties are given.. 2000 Mathematics Subject