• Nem Talált Eredményt

Greenhouse gas emissions from biochar-amended soil

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "Greenhouse gas emissions from biochar-amended soil"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

Ref

Ref + N

Ref + N + PS

0.2%

BC + N 0.2%

BC + N + PS

2.0%

BC + N 2.0%

BC + N + PS Cumulative CH 4 emission (µg CH 4 g-1 dry wt soil)

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5

BCDK2

26

207

36

191 Ref

Ref + N

Ref + N + PS

0.2%

BC + N 0.2%

BC + N + PS

2.0%

BC + N 2.0%

BC + N + PS Cumulative CO 2 emission (mg CO 2 g-1 dry wt soil)

0 1 2 3 4

BCDK2

7

23

70

56 Ref

Ref + N

Ref + N + PS

0.2%

BC + N 0.2%

BC + N + PS

2.0%

BC + N 2.0%

BC + N + PS Cumulative N 2O emission (µg N 2O g-1 dry wt soil)

0 3 6 9 12 15

BCDK2

39

24

36

54

Greenhouse gas emissions from biochar-amended soil

Introduction

Empirical evidence suggests that biochar can have a conspicuous effect on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from soil. For example, an updated meta-analysis showed that biochar reduced nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions by 49% (grand mean) at an average application rate of 1.4% (Cayuela et al., 2015). The reductions were higher in controlled laboratory experiments than in field studies where numerous environmental factors may interact. Several hypotheses have been proposed (and tested), but so far, we lack a mechanistic understanding of the biochar effects on soil GHG emissions. In the present study, we addressed the short-term emissions of N2O, carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4) in relation to biochar amendment and interactions with inorganic and organic soil N sources represented by mineral fertilizer and pig slurry, respectively. Data presently shown are for straw biochar at rates of 0.2 and 2.0%.

Lars Elsgaard and Sandhya Karki,

Department of Agroecology, AU, Denmark

Biochar rates:

0.2% (3 t/ha) 2% (30 t/ha)

Treatments & protocol

-BC, biochar (0.2, 2.0%)

-PS, pig slurry (0, 20 Mg/ha) -N, NO3- (50 mg/kg)

-Ref, reference (soil) -3 replicates

-2 biochar types

-3 wk incubation, 20°C -14 measurement dates -N2O, CO2 and CH4 by GC

Biochar interaction with soil N cycling and emission of greenhouse gases

Effects of biochar application to soils on climate change mitigation perspectives were tested for N2O, CO2 and CH4 in controlled laboratory experiments with two types of biochar: BCDK2 (plant-based biochar from wheat straw) and ABCHU (animal bone-based biochar). To mimic field conditions repacked soil cores (4 cm high x 6 cm diameter) were used for incubation of treatments including different levels of pig slurry (corresponding to 0, 20 Mg/ha), nitrate (50 mg/kg), and biochar rates (0.2 and 2%, wt/wt). All treatments were made in triplicates and incubated during a 3-week period under dark conditions with controlled moisture. At 14 individual measurement days, soil cores were individually transferred to 1-L glass jars that was tightly closed. One hour after closing the jars, gas samples were withdrawn from the headspace and analysed for production of N2O, CO2 and CH4 by gas chromatography.

Nitrous oxide emissions were evident from the repacked soil cores, and the emissions were clearly stimulated by N availability both in inorganic and organic form (Fig. A). When biochar was added to the soil ecosystem, less N2O was emitted; for the wheat straw biochar (BCDK2) the reduction were in the range of 24-54%, with a grand mean of 39%. For the other biochar tested (ABCHU), reductions in N2O emissions were less certain (mean, 7%; data not shown).

Carbon dioxide emissions increased in soil with organic, but not with inorganic N (Fig. B).

When biochar was added, an increase in CO2 emission was seen, notably at 2.0% biochar. For BCDK2 the increase was in the range of 7-70%; for bone-based biochar the increase was at a lower range (mean, 16%; data not shown). Sources of CO2 could be from stimulated microbial turnover of native soil/slurry C, but also from minor fractions of readily available biochar C.

Methane emissions in reference soils showed a decrease in response to N amendment (Fig. C).

However, an interaction between N sources (notably pig slurry) and biochar resulted in drastic increases in the CH4 emissions; this was notably the case in soil systems with pig slurry as N source. Here increases ranging up to 207% for plant-based biochar (BCDK2) were observed, whereas increases up to 344% were observed for bone-bases biochar (data not shown).

The results align with the notion of conspicuous effects of biochar on GHG emissions from soil.

Further interpretation and mechanistic understanding of the interaction between GHG emissions, biochar types, and environmental factors is needed to provide robust predictions of biochar effects on GHG emissions on a wider field scale. Further work on this is in progress.

Figure captions A, B, C

GHG emission from repacked soil cores with or without straw biochar (BCDK2) in treatments with added nitrate and pig slurry. Ref, soil without biochar; N, NO3- added (50 mg/kg); PS, pig slurry added (20 Mg/ha). Data are mean ± standard error (n=3). Numbers above bars show percent difference between treatments with biochar and respective references without biochar. The panels show:

(A) N2O; (B) CO2; (C) CH4. GHG emission rates are shown as cumulative values (21 d) and highlight the relative differences between treatments.

GC

A

B

C

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme

for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 289785 Cited reference: Cayuela et al. (2015). Agric Ecosyst Environ 202, 135-138

Soil

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

Unfortunately, the international community is looking at the issue of sustainable development through a very narrow prism. Carbon/Greenhouse gas emissions constitute

By 2030, carbon dioxide emissions from passenger cars could increase by 1.5 million tonnes and from freight transport could decrease by 1 million tonnes, which would mean a

Final molasses from sugar beet and sugarcane is used mainly in livestock feed, yeast production, and to produce ethanol both for human consumption and for fuel.. Other

Therefore, the aims of the present study were to investigate (i) response of plant growth to biochar addition; temporal changes in (ii) soil nitrogen, phosphorous, and

Soil temperatures were monitored concurrently with the SWC measurements; however, their values showed very minimal changes between treatments due to the pot setups (unlike field

The most obvious solution for reducing carbon dioxide emissions is to increase the utilisation ratio of carbon-free energy sources used in power generation... of nuclear and

This study analysed the relationship between carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, agricultural labour productivity, agricultural land productivity and agricultural

However, in the short term after a soil disturbance caused by plowing, the differences between organic carbon content showed less of a role in CO 2 fluxes; the ma- jor cause of