• Nem Talált Eredményt

JJ II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "JJ II"

Copied!
14
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

volume 7, issue 2, article 69, 2006.

Received 02 December, 2005;

accepted 11 January, 2006.

Communicated by:N.E. Cho

Abstract Contents

JJ II

J I

Home Page Go Back

Close Quit

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

ON ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS RELATED TO CERTAIN FAMILY OF INTEGRAL OPERATORS

KHALIDA INAYAT NOOR

Mathematics Department

COMSATS Institute of Information Techonolgy Islamabad, Pakistan

EMail:khalidanoor@hotmail.com

c

2000Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 354-05

(2)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page2of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Abstract LetAbe the class of functionsf(z) =z+P

n=2anzn. . . ,analytic in the open unit discE.A certain integral operator is used to define some subclasses ofA and their inclusion properties are studied.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:30C45, 30C50.

Key words: Convex and starlike functions of orderα,Quasi-convex functions, Inte- gral operator.

This research is supported by the Higher Education Commission, Pakistan, through grant No: 1-28/HEC/HRD/2005/90.

Contents

1 Introduction. . . 3 2 Main Results . . . 8

References

(3)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page3of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

1. Introduction

LetAdenote the class of functions

(1.1) f(z) = z+

X

n=2

anzn,

which are analytic in the open diskE = {z :|z| < 1}.Let the functions fi be defined fori= 1,2,by

(1.2) fi(z) =z+

X

n=2

an,izn.

The modified Hadamard product (convolution) off1andf2 is defined here by (f1? f2)(z) = z+

X

n=2

an,1an,2zn.

Let Pk(β)be the class of functionsh(z) analytic in the unit discE satisfying the propertiesh(0) = 1and

(1.3)

Z

0

Reh(z)−β 1−β

dθ ≤kπ,

where z = re, k ≥ 2and 0 ≤ β < 1,see [4]. For β = 0, we obtain the class Pk defined by Pinchuk [5]. The case k = 2, β = 0 gives us the class P of functions with positive real part, and k = 2, P2(β) = P(β) is the class of functions with positive real part greater thanβ.

(4)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page4of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Also we can write forh∈Pk(β)

(1.4) h(z) = 1

2 Z

0

1 + (1−2β)ze−it 1−ze−it dµ(t),

whereµ(t)is a function with bounded variation on[0,2π]such that (1.5)

Z

0

dµ(t) = 2 and

Z

0

|dµ(t)| ≤k.

From (1.4) and (1.5), we can write, forh∈Pk(β), (1.6) h(z) =

k 4 +1

2

h1(z)− k

4 − 1 2

h2(z), h1, h2 ∈P(β).

We have the following classes:

Rk(α) =

f :f ∈ A and zf0(z)

f(z) ∈Pk(α), z ∈E, 0≤α <1

. We note thatR2(α) =S?(α)is the class of starlike functions of orderα.

Vk(α) =

f :f ∈ A and (zf0(z))0

f0(z) ∈Pk(α), z ∈E, 0≤α <1

. Note thatV2(α) =C(α)is the class of convex functions of orderα.

Tk(β, α) =

f :f ∈ A, g ∈R2(α) and zf0(z)

g(z) ∈Pk(β), z ∈E, 0≤α, β <1

.

(5)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page5of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

We note thatT2(0,0)is the classK of close-to-convex univalent functions.

Tk?(β, α) =

f :f ∈ A, g ∈V2(α) and (zf0(z))0

g0(z) ∈Pk(β), z ∈E, 0≤α, β <1

. In particular, the classT2?(β, α) =C?(β, α)was considered by Noor [3] and for T2?(0,0) = C? is the class of quasi-convex univalent functions which was first introduced and studied in [2].

It can be easily seen from the above definitions that (1.7) f(z)∈Vk(α) ⇐⇒ zf0(z)∈Rk(α) and

(1.8) f(z)∈Tk?(β, α) ⇐⇒ zf0(z)∈Tk(β, α).

We consider the following integral operatorLµλ :A −→ A,forλ >−1;µ >0;

f ∈ A,

Lµλf(z) =Cλλ+µ µ zλ

Z z

0

tλ−1

1− t z

µ−1

f(t)dt

=z+ Γ(λ+µ+ 1) Γ(λ+ 1)

X

n=2

Γ(λ+n)

Γ(λ+µ+n)anzn, (1.9)

(6)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page6of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

where Γ denotes the Gamma function. From (1.9), we can obtain the well- known generalized Bernadi operator as follows:

Iµf(z) = µ+ 1 zµ

Z z

0

tµ−1f(t)dt

=z+

X

n=2

µ+ 1

µ+nanzn, µ >−1; f ∈ A.

We now define the following subclasses ofAby using the integral operator Lµλ.

Definition 1.1. Letf ∈ A.Thenf ∈Rk(λ, µ, α)if and only if Lµλf ∈Rk(α), forz ∈E.

Definition 1.2. Letf ∈ A.Thenf ∈Vk(λ, µ, α)if and only if Lµλf ∈Vk(α), forz ∈E.

Definition 1.3. Let f ∈ A. Then f ∈ Tk(λ, µ, β, α) if and only if Lµλf ∈ Tk(β, α),forz ∈E.

Definition 1.4. Let f ∈ A. Then f ∈ Tk?(λ, µ, β, α) if and only if Lµλf ∈ Tk?(β, α),forz ∈E.

We shall need the following result.

Lemma 1.1 ([1]). Letu=u1 +iu2andv =v1 +iv2 and letΦbe a complex- valued function satisfying the conditions:

(i) Φ(u, v)is continuous in a domainD⊂C2,

(7)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page7of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

(ii) (1,0)∈DandΦ(1,0)>0.

(iii) Re Φ(iu2, v1)≤0,whenever(iu2, v1)∈Dandv1 ≤ −12(1 +u22).

Ifh(z) = 1 +P

m=2cmzmis a function analytic inEsuch that(h(z), zh0(z))∈ DandRe Φ(h(z), zh0(z))>0forz ∈E,thenReh(z)>0inE.

(8)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page8of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

2. Main Results

Theorem 2.1. Letf ∈ A, λ > −1, µ > 0andλ+µ >0.ThenRk(λ, µ,0)⊂ Rk(λ, µ+ 1, α),where

(2.1) α= 2

(β+ 1) +p

β2+ 2β+ 9, with β = 2(λ+µ).

Proof. Letf ∈Rk(λ, µ,0)and let zLµ+1λ f(z)0

Lµ+1λ f(z) =p(z) = k

4 + 1 2

p1(z)− k

4 −1 2

p2(z),

wherep(0) = 1andp(z)is analytic inE.From (1.9), it can easily be seen that (2.2) z Lµ+1λ f(z)0

= (λ+µ+ 1)Lµλf(z)−(λ+µ)Lµ+1λ f(z).

Some computation and use of (2.2) yields z(Lµλf(z))0

Lµλf(z) =

p(z) + zp0(z) p(z) +λ+µ

∈Pk, z ∈E.

Let

Φλ,µ(z) =

X

j=1

(λ+µ) +j λ+µ+ 1 zj

=

λ+µ λ+µ+ 1

z 1−z +

1 λ+µ+ 1

z (1−z)2.

(9)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page9of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Then

p(z)?Φλ,µ(z)

=p(z) + zp0(z) p(z) +λ+µ

= k

4 +1 2

[p1(z)?Φλ,µ(z)]− k

4 − 1 2

[p2(z)?Φλ,µ(z)]

= k

4 +1

2 p1(z) + zp01(z) p1(z) +λ+µ

− k

4 − 1

2 p2(z) + zp02(z) p2(z) +λ+µ

, and this implies that

pi(z) + zp0i(z) pi(z) +λ+µ

∈P, z ∈E.

We want to show that pi(z) ∈ P(α), where α is given by (2.1) and this will show thatp∈Pk(α)forz ∈E.Let

pi(z) = (1−α)hi(z) +α, i= 1,2.

Then

(1−α)hi(z) +α+ (1−α)zh0i(z) (1−α)hi(z) +α+λ+µ

∈P.

We form the functionalΨ(u, v)by choosingu=hi(z), v =zh0i.Thus Ψ(u, v) = (1−α)u+α+ (1−α)v

(1−α)u+ (α+λ+µ).

(10)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page10of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

The first two conditions of Lemma1.1are clearly satisfied. We verify the con- dition (iii) as follows.

Re Ψ(iu2, v1) =α+ (1−α)(α+λ+µ)v1

(α+λ+µ)2+ (1−α)2u22. By puttingv1 ≤ −(1+u

2 2)

2 ,we obtain Re Ψ(iu2, v1)

≤α−1 2

(1−α)(α+λ+µ)(1 +u22) (α+λ+µ)2+ (1−α)2u22

= 2α(α+λ+µ)2+ 2α(1−α)2u22−(1−α)(α+λ+µ)−(1−α)(α+λ+µ)u22 2[(α+λ+µ)2+ (1−α)2u22]

= A+Bu22 2C , where

A= 2α(α+λ+µ)2−(1−α)(α+λ+µ), B = 2α(1−α)2−(1−α)(α+λ+µ), C= (α+λ+µ)2+ (1−α)2u22 >0.

We note thatRe Ψ(iu2, v1)≤ 0if and only if,A≤ 0andB ≤0.FromA ≤0, we obtainαas given by (2.1) andB ≤0gives us0≤α <1,and this completes the proof.

(11)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page11of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Theorem 2.2. Forλ >−1, µ >0and(λ+µ)>0, Vk(λ, µ,0)⊂Vk(λ, µ+ 1, α),whereαis given by (2.1).

Proof. Let f ∈ Vk(λ, µ,0). Then Lµλf ∈ Vk(0) = Vk and, by (1.7) z(Lµλ)0 ∈ Rk(0) = Rk.This implies

Lµλ(zf0)∈Rk =⇒ zf0 ∈Rk(λ, µ,0)⊂Rk(λ, µ+ 1, α).

Consequentlyf ∈Vk(λ, µ+ 1, α),whereαis given by (2.1).

Theorem 2.3. Letλ >−1, µ >0and(λ+µ)>0.Then Tk(λ, µ, β,0)⊂Tk(λ, µ+ 1, γ, α), whereαis given by (2.1) andγ ≤β is defined in the proof.

Proof. Letf ∈Tk(λ, µ,0).Then there existsg ∈R2(λ, µ,0)such that nz(Lµ

λf)0 Lµλg

o

∈Pk(β),forz ∈E, 0≤β <1.Let z(Lµ+1λ f(z))0

Lµ+1λ g(z) = (1−γ)p(z) +γ

= k

4 +1 2

{(1−γ)p1(z) +γ} − k

4 − 1 2

{(1−γ)p2(z) +γ}, wherep(0) = 1,andp(z)is analytic inE.

(12)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page12of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Making use of (2.2) and Theorem2.1withk= 2,we have (2.3)

z(Lµλf(z))0 Lµλg(z) −β

=

(1−γ)p(z) + (γ−β) + (1−γ)zp0(z) (1−α)q(z) +α+λ+µ

∈Pk, andq∈P,where

(1−α)q(z) +α= z Lµ+1λ g(z)0

Lµ+1λ g(z) , z ∈E.

Using (1.6), we form the functionalΦ(u, v)by takingu=u1+iu2 =pi(z), v = v1+iv2 =zp0iin (2.3) as

(2.4) Φ(u, v) = (1−γ)u+ (γ−β) + (1−γ)v

(1−α)q(z) +α+λ+µ. It can be easily seen that the functionΦ(u, v)defined by (2.4) satisfies the con- ditions (i) and (ii) of Lemma1.1. To verify the condition (iii), we proceed, with q(z) =q1+iq2,as follows:

Re [Φ(iu2, v1)]

= (γ−β) + Re

(1−γ)v1

(1−α)(q1+iq2) +α+λ+µ

= (γ−β) + (1−γ)(1−α)v1q1+ (1−γ)(α+λ+µ)v1 [(1−α)q1+α+λ+µ]2+ (1−α)2q22

(13)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page13of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

≤(γ−β)− 1 2

(1−γ)(1−α)(1 +u22)q1 + (1−γ)(α+λ+µ)(1 +u22) [(1−α)q1+α+λ+µ]2+ (1−α)2q22

≤0, for γ ≤β <1.

Therefore, applying Lemma1.1,pi ∈P, i = 1,2and consequentlyp∈Pk and thusf ∈Tk(λ, µ+ 1, γ, α).

Using the same technique and relation (1.8) with Theorem 2.3, we have the following.

Theorem 2.4. For λ > −1, µ > 0, λ+µ > 0, Tk?(λ, µ, β,0) ⊂ Tk?(λ, µ+ 1, γ, α), whereγandαare as given in Theorem2.3.

Remark 1. For different choices of k, λ and µ, we obtain several interesting special cases of the results proved in this paper.

(14)

On Analytic Functions Related to Certain Family of Integral

Operators Khalida Inayat Noor

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page14of14

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(2) Art. 69, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

References

[1] S.S. MILLER, Differential inequalities and Carathéordary functions, Bull.

Amer. Math. Soc., 81 (1975), 79–81.

[2] K. INAYAT NOOR, On close-to-convex and related functions, Ph.D Thesis, University of Wales, U.K., 1972.

[3] K. INAYAT NOOR, On quasi-convex functions and related topics, Int. J.

Math. Math. Sci., 10 (1987), 241–258.

[4] K.S. PADMANABHAN AND R. PARVATHAM, Properties of a class of functions with bounded boundary rotation, Ann. Polon. Math., 31 (1975), 311–323.

[5] B. PINCHUK, Functions with bounded boundary rotation, Israel J. Math., 10 (1971), 7–16.

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

SRIVASTAVA, Some generalized convolution proper- ties associated with certain subclasses of analytic functions, J.. Some Properties for an

INAYAT NOOR, On subordination for certain analytic func- tions associated with Noor integral operator, Appl. MOCANU

OWA, On sandwich theorems for some subclasses of analytic functions involving a linear operator, to appear in Integral Transforms and

OWA, On sandwich theorems for some subclasses of analytic functions involving a linear operator, to appear in Integral Transforms and

[3] make use of the Alexan- der integral transforms of certain analytic functions (which are starlike or convex of positive order) with a view to investigating the construction

[3] make use of the Alexander integral transforms of certain analytic functions (which are starlike or convex of positive order) with a view to investigating the construction

Key words: Partial sums, Meromorphic functions, Integral operators, Meromorphic starlike functions, Meromorphic convex functions, Meromorphic close to convex

A COEFFICIENT INEQUALITY FOR CERTAIN CLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS OF COMPLEX