volume 7, issue 4, article 131, 2006.
Received 05 May, 2006;
accepted 04 August, 2006.
Communicated by:N.E. Cho
Abstract Contents
JJ II
J I
Home Page Go Back
Close Quit
Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics
Aq-ANALOGUE OF AN INEQUALITY DUE TO KONRAD KNOPP
JIN-LIN LIU
Department of Mathematics Yangzhou University Yangzhou 225002, Jiangsu People’s Republic of China EMail:jlliu@yzu.edu.cn
c
2000Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 132-06
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page2of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
Abstract
The main object of the present paper is to investigate several interesting prop- erties of a linear operatorHp,q,s(αi)associated with the generalized hypergeo- metric function.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:30C45, 26A33.
Key words: Analytic functions; The generalized hypergeometric function; Differential subordination; Univalent functions; Hadamard product (or convolution).
The present research is partly supported by Jiangsu Gaoxiao Natural Science Foun- dation (04KJB110154).
Contents
1 Introduction. . . 3 2 Main Results . . . 6
References
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page3of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
1. Introduction
LetA(p)denote the class of functions of the form (1.1) f(z) = zp+
∞
X
n=p+1
anzn, (p∈N ={1,2,3, . . .})
which are analytic in the open unit diskU ={z:z ∈C and|z|<1}.
Let f(z) and g(z) be analytic in U. Then we say that the function g(z) is subordinate to f(z)if there exists an analytic function w(z) inU such that
|w(z)| < 1 (forz ∈ U) and g(z) = f(w(z)). This relation is denotedg(z) ≺ f(z). In casef(z)is univalent inU we have that the subordinationg(z)≺f(z) is equivalent tog(0) =f(0)andg(U)⊂f(U).
For analytic functions f(z) =
∞
X
n=0
anzn and g(z) =
∞
X
n=0
bnzn,
byf∗gwe denote the Hadamard product or convolution off andg, defined by
(1.2) (f∗g)(z) =
∞
X
n=0
anbnzn= (g∗f)(z).
Next, for real parametersA andB such that−1 ≤ B < A ≤ 1, we define the function
(1.3) h(A, B;z) = 1 +Az
1 +Bz (z ∈U).
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page4of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
It is well known thath(A, B;z)for−1 ≤ B ≤ 1is the conformal map of the unit disk onto the disk symmetrical with respect to the real axis having the center (1−AB)/(1−B2)and the radius(A−B)/(1−B2)forB 6=∓1. The boundary circle cuts the real axis at the points(1−A)/(1−B)and(1 +A)/(1 +B).
For complex parametersα1, . . . , αqandβ1, . . . , βs(βj 6= 0,−1,−2, . . .;j = 1, . . . , s), we define the generalized hypergeometric function qFs(α1, . . . , αq; β1, . . . , βs;z)by
qFs(α1, . . . , αq;β1, . . . , βs;z) =
∞
X
n=0
(α1)n· · ·(αq)n (β1)n· · ·(βs)n · zn
n!
(q≤s+ 1;q, s∈N0 =N ∪ {0};z ∈U), (1.4)
where(x)n is the Pochhammer symbol, defined, in terms of the Gamma func- tionΓ, by
(x)n= Γ(x+n) Γ(x) =
1 (n = 0),
x(x+ 1)· · ·(x+n−1) (n ∈N).
Corresponding to a functionFp(α1, . . . , αq;β1, . . . , βs;z)defined by Fp(α1, . . . , αq;β1, . . . , βs;z) =zpqFs(α1, . . . , αq;β1, . . . , βs;z), we consider a linear operator
Hp(α1, . . . , αq;β1, . . . , βs) :A(p)→A(p), defined by the convolution
(1.5) Hp(α1, . . . , αq;β1, . . . , βs)f(z) = Fp(α1, . . . , αq;β1, . . . , βs;z)∗f(z).
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page5of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
For convenience, we write
(1.6) Hp,q,s(αi) = Hp(α1, . . . , αi, . . . , αq;β1, . . . , βs) (i= 1,2, . . . , q).
Thus, after some calculations, we have
z(Hp,q,s(αi)f(z))0 =αiHp,q,s(αi+ 1)f(z)−(αi−p)Hp,q,s(αi)f(z) (i= 1,2, . . . , q).
(1.7)
It should be remarked that the linear operator Hp,q,s(αi) (i = 1,2, . . . , q) is a generalization of many operators considered earlier. For q = 2 and s = 1 Carlson and Shaffer studied this operator under certain restrictions on the pa- rameters α1, α2 and β1 in [1]. A more general operator was studied by Pon- nusamy and Rønning [13]. Also, many interesting subclasses of analytic func- tions, associated with the operator Hp,q,s(αi) (i = 1,2, . . . , q) and its many special cases, were investigated recently by (for example) Dziok and Srivastava [2, 3, 4], Gangadharan et al. [5], Liu [7], Liu and Srivastava [8, 9] and others (see also [6,12,15,16,17]).
In the present sequel to these earlier works, we shall use the method of differ- ential subordination to derive several interesting properties and characteristics of the operatorHp,q,s(αi) (i= 1,2, . . . , q).
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page6of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
2. Main Results
We begin by recalling each of the following lemmas which will be required in our present investigation.
Lemma 2.1 (see [10]). Leth(z)be analytic and convex univalent inU,h(0) = 1and letg(z) = 1 +b1z+b2z2+· · · be analytic inU. If
(2.1) g(z) +zg0(z)/c≺h(z) (z ∈U;c6= 0), then forRec≥0,
(2.2) g(z)≺ c
zc Z z
0
tc−1h(t)dt.
Lemma 2.2 (see [14]). The function(1−z)γ ≡ eγlog(1−z),γ 6= 0, is univalent inU if and only ifγis either in the closed disk|γ−1| ≤1or in the closed disk
|γ+ 1| ≤1.
Lemma 2.3 (see [11]). Letq(z)be univalent in U and let θ(w) and φ(w)be analytic in a domain Dcontainingq(U)with φ(w) 6= 0whenw ∈ q(U). Set Q(z) = zq0(z)φ(q(z)), h(z) = θ(q(z)) +Q(z)and suppose that
1. Q(z)is starlike (univalent) inU; 2. Rezh0(z)
Q(z)
= Reθ0(q(z))
φ(q(z)) +zQQ(z)0(z)
>0 (z∈U).
Ifp(z)is analytic inU, withp(0) =q(0), p(U)⊂D, and
θ(p(z)) +zp0(z)φ(p(z))≺θ(q(z)) +zq0(z)φ(q(z)) =h(z), thenp(z)≺q(z)andq(z)is the best dominant.
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page7of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
We now prove our first result given by Theorem2.4below.
Theorem 2.4. Let αi >0 (i = 1,2, . . . , q), λ > 0, and−1 ≤ B < A ≤ 1. If f(z)∈A(p)satisfies
(2.3) (1−λ)Hp,q,s(αi)f(z)
zp +λHp,q,s(αi+ 1)f(z)
zp ≺h(A, B;z), then
(2.4) Re
Hp,q,s(αi)f(z) zp
m1!
>
αi λ
Z 1
0
uαiλ−1
1−Au 1−Bu
du
m1
(m≥1).
The result is sharp.
Proof. Let
(2.5) g(z) = Hp,q,s(αi)f(z) zp
forf(z)∈ A(p). Then the functiong(z) = 1 +b1z +· · · is analytic in U. By making use of (1.7) and (2.5), we obtain
(2.6) Hp,q,s(αi+ 1)f(z)
zp =g(z) + zg0(z) αi .
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page8of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
From (2.3), (2.5) and (2.6) we get
(2.7) g(z) + λ
αizg0(z)≺h(A, B;z).
Now an application of Lemma2.1leads to
(2.8) g(z)≺ αi
λz−αiλ Z 1
0
tαiλ−1
1 +At 1 +Bt
dt
or
(2.9) Hp,q,s(αi)f(z)
zp = αi
λ Z 1
0
uαiλ−1
1 +Auw(z) 1 +Buw(z)
du, wherew(z)is analytic inU withw(0) = 0and|w(z)|<1(z ∈U).
In view of−1≤B < A≤1andαi >0, it follows from (2.9) that (2.10) Re
Hp,q,s(αi)f(z) zp
> αi λ
Z 1
0
uαiλ−1
1−Au 1−Bu
du (z ∈U).
Therefore, with the aid of the elementary inequalityRe(w1/m)≥(Rew)1/mfor Rew >0andm ≥1, the inequality (2.4) follows directly from (2.10).
To show the sharpness of (2.4), we takef(z)∈A(p)defined by Hp,q,s(αi)f(z)
zp = αi
λ Z 1
0
uαiλ−1
1 +Auz 1 +Buz
du.
For this function, we find that (1−λ)Hp,q,s(αi)f(z)
zp +λHp,q,s(αi+ 1)f(z)
zp = 1 +Az
1 +Bz
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page9of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
and
Hp,q,s(αi)f(z)
zp → αi
λ Z 1
0
uαiλ−1
1−Au 1−Bu
du asz → −1.
Hence the proof of the theorem is complete.
Next we prove our second theorem.
Theorem 2.5. Letαi >0 (i= 1,2, . . . , q), and0≤ρ <1. Letγ be a complex number withγ 6= 0and satisfy either|2γ(1−ρ)αi−1| ≤1or|2γ(1−ρ)αi+1| ≤ 1 (i= 1,2, . . . , q). Iff(z)∈A(p)satisfies the condition
(2.11) Re
Hp,q,s(αi+ 1)f(z) Hp,q,s(αi)f(z)
> ρ (z ∈U;i= 1,2, . . . , q),
then
(2.12)
Hp,q,s(αi)f(z) zp
γ
≺ 1
(1−z)2γ(1−ρ)αi =q(z) (z ∈U;i= 1,2, . . . , q),
whereq(z)is the best dominant.
Proof. Let
(2.13) p(z) =
Hp,q,s(αi)f(z) zp
γ
(z ∈U;i= 1,2, . . . , q).
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page10of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
Then, by making use of (1.7), (2.11) and (2.13), we have (2.14) 1 + zp0(z)
γαip(z) ≺ 1 + (1−2ρ)z
1−z (z ∈U).
If we take
q(z) = 1
(1−z)2γ(1−ρ)αi, θ(w) = 1 and φ(w) = 1 γαiw,
thenq(z)is univalent by the condition of the theorem and Lemma2.2. Further, it is easy to show thatq(z), θ(w)andφ(w)satisfy the conditions of Lemma2.3.
Since
Q(z) =zq0(z)φ(q(z)) = 2(1−ρ)z 1−z is univalent starlike inU and
h(z) =θ(q(z)) +Q(z) = 1 + (1−2ρ)z 1−z .
It may be readily checked that the conditions (1) and (2) of Lemma 2.3 are satisfied. Thus the result follows from (2.14) immediately. The proof is com- plete.
Corollary 2.6. Let αi > 0 (i = 1,2, . . . , q) and0 ≤ ρ < 1. Let γ be a real number andγ ≥1. Iff(z)∈A(p)satisfies the condition (2.11), then
Re
Hp,q,s(αi)f(z) zp
2γ(1−ρ)1
αi >2−1/γ (z ∈U;i= 1,2, . . . , q).
The bound2−1/γ is the best possible.
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page11of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
References
[1] B.C. CARLSON AND D.B. SHAFFER, Starlike and prestarlike hyperge- ometric functions, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 15 (1984), 737–745.
[2] J. DZIOKANDH.M. SRIVASTAVA, Classes of analytic functions associ- ated with the generalized hypergeometric function, Appl. Math. Comput., 103 (1999), 1–13.
[3] J. DZIOK AND H.M. SRIVASTAVA, Some subclasses of analytic func- tions with fixed argument of coefficients associated with the generalized hypergeometric function, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math., 5 (2002), 115–125.
[4] J. DZIOKAND H.M. SRIVASTAVA, Certain subclasses of analytic func- tions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function, Integral Transform. Spec. Funct., 14 (2003), 7–18.
[5] A. GANGADHARAN, T.N. SHANMUGAM AND H.M. SRIVASTAVA, Generalized hypergeometric functions associated withk-uniformly convex functions, Comput. Math. Appl., 44 (2002), 1515–1526.
[6] Y.C. KIM AND H.M. SRIVASTAVA, Fractional integral and other linear operators associated with the Gaussian hypergeometric function, Complex Variables Theory Appl., 34 (1997), 293–312.
[7] J.-L. LIU, Strongly starlike functions associated with the Dziok-Srivastava operator, Tamkang J. Math., 35 (2004), 37–42.
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page12of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
[8] J.-L. LIU ANDH.M.SRIVASTAVA, Classes of meromorphically multiva- lent functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function, Math. Comput. Modelling, 38 (2004), 21–34.
[9] J.-L. LIU AND H.M. SRIVASTAVA, Certain properties of the Dziok- Srivastava operator, Appl. Math. Comput., 159 (2004), 485–493.
[10] S.S. MILLER AND P.T. MOCANU, Differential subordinations and uni- valent functions, Michigan Math. J., 28 (1981), 157–171.
[11] S.S. MILLER ANDP.T. MOCANU, On some classes of first order differ- ential subordination, Michigan Math. J., 32 (1985), 185–195.
[12] S. OWA ANDH.M. SRIVASTAVA, Univalent and starlike generalized hy- pergeometric functions, Canad. J. Math., 39 (1987), 1057–1077.
[13] S. PONNUSAMY AND F. RØNNING, Duality for Hadamard products applied to certain integral transforms, Complex Variables: Theory Appl., 32 (1997), 263–287.
[14] M.S. ROBERTSON, Certain classes of starlike functions, Michigan Math.
J., 32 (1985), 135–140.
[15] H.M. SRIVASTAVA AND S. OWA, Some characterization and distortion theorems involving fractional calculus, generalized hypergeometric func- tions, Hadamard products, linear operators, and certain subclasses of ana- lytic functions, Nagoya Math. J., 106 (1987), 1–28.
[16] H.M. SRIVASTAVAANDS. OWA (Eds.), Univalent Functions, Fractional Calculus, and Their Applications, Halsted Press (Eills Horwood Limited,
On Subordinations for Certain Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with the Generalized
Hypergeometric Function Jin-Lin Liu
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page13of13
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 131, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
Chichester), John Wiley and Sons, New York,Chichester, Brisbane, and Toronto, (1989).
[17] H.M. SRIVASTAVA AND S. OWA (Eds.), Current Topics in Analytic Function Theory, World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, New Jersey, London and Hong Kong, (1992).