Contents lists available atScienceDirect
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / a p c a t b
Photo-induced reactions in the CO 2 -methane system on titanate nanotubes modified with Au and Rh nanoparticles
Balázs László
a, Kornélia Baán
a, Erika Varga
a, Albert Oszkó
a, András Erd ˝ohelyi
a, Zoltán Kónya
b,c,∗, János Kiss
a,c,∗aDepartmentofPhysicalChemistryandMaterialsScience,UniversityofSzeged,Aradivértanúktere1.,SzegedH-6720,Hungary
bDepartmentofAppliedandEnvironmentalChemistry,UniversityofSzeged,RerrichBélatér1.,SzegedH-6720,Hungary
cMTA-SZTEReactionKineticsandSurfaceChemistryResearchGroup,RerrichBélatér1.,SzegedH-6720,Hungary
a r t i c l e i n f o
Articlehistory:
Received25March2016
Receivedinrevisedform20June2016 Accepted23June2016
Availableonline24June2016
Keywords:
Carbondioxidephotocatalysis Methanephotocatalysis Titanatenanotubes Rhodiumnanoparticles Goldnanoclusters
a b s t r a c t
Thephotocatalytictransformationofthemethane-carbondioxidesystemwasinvestigatedbyin-situ methodsinthepresentstudy.Titanatenanotube(TNT)supportedgoldandrhodiumcatalystswereused inthecatalytictests.Ourmaingoalwastheanalysisoftheroleofthecatalystsinthedifferentpartsofthe reactionmechanism.ThecatalystswerecharacterizedbyX-rayphotoelectronspectroscopy(XPS),high resolutiontransmissionelectronmicroscopy(HRTEM)anddiffusereflectanceUV–visspectroscopy(DR- UV–vis).Photocatalytictestswereperformedinacontinuousflowquartzreactorequippedwithmass spectrometerdetectorandmercury-arcUVsource.Diffusereflectanceinfraredspectroscopy(DRIFTS) wasusedtoanalyzethesurfaceofthecatalystduringphotoreaction.Post-catalytictestswerealsocarried outonthecatalystsincludingXPS,temperatureprogrammedreduction(TPR)andRamanspectroscopy methodsinordertofollowthechangesofthematerials.Titanatenanotubecanstabilizeeventhesmallest, molecular-likeAuclusterswhichshowedthehighestactivityinthereactions.Approximately3%methane conversionwasreachedinthebestcaseswhilethecarbondioxideconversionwasnottraceable.Itwas revealedthatwaterhasaveryimportantroleintheoxidationreaction.Themaindiscoveredreaction routesaremethanedehydrogenationandoxidation,themethylcouplingandtheformingofstructured carbondepositsonthecatalystsurface.ThesourceofthesurplusCOcanbemostlythereductionof carbondioxide.DuringthereductionprocessphotoelectronsandhydrogenionsbringsabouttheCO2
reductionviaCO2•−radicalanion.
©2016ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Inthepastyearsgreateffortsweremadeinthedryreforming ofmethanewithcarbondioxidetosyngas.Greenhousegases,pri- marilycarbondioxideandmethane,emittedbyhumanactivities contributetotheglobalwarming[1].Fromenvironmentalpoint ofview,themainadvantageofthisprocessistheutilizationand conversionofthetwomostdangerousgreenhousegases,CH4and CO2,intomorevaluablecompounds[2–9].BothCO2andCH4are stablemolecules,whicharenoteasytotransformintootherchem- icalsundermildreactionconditions.Theuseofphototechnology wouldbreakthethermodynamicbarrierofendothermicreactions buttheassistanceofsomeheatcanbestillnecessarytoworkout
∗ Correspondingauthorsat:MTA-SZTEReactionKineticsandSurfaceChemistry ResearchGroup,RerrichBélatér1.,SzegedH-6720,Hungary.
E-mailaddress:jkiss@chem.u-szeged.hu(J.Kiss).
thephotoreductionofCO2[10].Generally,themainproductsofthe CO2+CH4reactionareCOandH2[10]buttheformationofacetone wasalsoreported[11].Recently,modifiedTiO2 nanocomposites wereusedinphotocatalyticCO2reductionbyCH4[12–14].
Amongvarious semiconductors,titaniumdioxide(TiO2)asa photocatalysthasbeenresearchedexcessivelydue toitsadvan- tagessuchasrelativecheapness,availabilityinexcess,chemically andbiologicallystablecharacterandpossessionofhigheroxida- tivepotentials. UV-irradiationis abletogenerate electronsand holesinTiO2,whicharegoodreductantsandpowerfuloxidants for redoxreactions[15–21].Duetoitsfavorable electronicand optoelectronicproperties,ithasbeenwidelyappliedtosolarcells andphoto-catalysts.However,improvedpropertiesarenecessary tomeet highdemandandcomplex requirements. Theprosper- ousdevelopmentoftitaniumdioxidenanomaterialshasthrived theinvestigationofaclassofTiO2-basednanostructures;layered titanatematerials[22–24].Layeredtitanatematerialshaveattrac-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.057 0926-3373/©2016ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
tivefeaturesoftheirown,includingextremelylargeion-exchange capacity,fastiondiffusionandintercalation.
OnthebasisofthepioneeringworkofKasugaetal.[25]research effortsontitanateswereatfirstconcentratedonthehydrothermal synthesisandstructure elucidationoftitanatenanotubes(TNT).
Titanatenanotubesareopen-endedhollowtubularobjectsmea- suring7–10nminouterdiameterand50–170nminlength.They featureacharacteristicspiralcrosssectioncomposedof4–6wall layers.Thetypicaldiameteroftheirinnerchannelis5nm[25–27].
TitanateshaveageneralformulaasHxNa2-xTi3O7·nH2Oandtheir sodiumcontentcanbeloweredbyacidtreatments.Currentlyour interestisinthesodium-freeH2Ti3O7·nH2OformofTNTs.Titanate nanostructuresareofgreatinterestforcatalyticapplications,since theirhighsurfaceareaandcationexchangecapacityprovidethe possibilityofachievingahighmetal(e.g.Co,Cu,Ni,AgandAu)dis- persion[28–32].Rhinsmallsizescanbealsostabilizedintitanate nanotubesand,similarlytoAu,initiatesthetransformationfrom tubestructuretoanatasephase[33,34].
Numerousthermal-andphoto-inducedcatalyticreactionswere discovered on titanate supported metal catalysts up to now [22–24].The location of metal ions onthe nanocrystal surface mayproveimportantinmediatingelectrontransferreactionsthat haverelevanceinphotocatalysisorpowerstorage.Gold-containing titanatenanotubeswerefoundtodisplayhigheractivitythanthe DegussaP-25catalystinthephoto-oxidationofacetaldehyde[35], inthephotocatalyticdegradationofformic acid[36].Moreover, titanate-relatednanofibersdecoratedeitherwithPtorPdnanopar- ticlesshowsignificantphotocatalytic behavioras demonstrated bythedecompositionoforganicdyesinwater,thedegradation of organic stains on the surface of flexible freestanding cellu- lose/catalystcompositefilmandthegenerationofhydrogenfrom ethanolusingbothsuspendedandimmobilizedcatalysts.Theper- formanceofthenanofiber-basedcatalystmaterialscompeteswith theirconventionalnanoparticle-basedcounterparts[37–39].
Inthepresentstudyweinvestigatethephotocatalyticconver- sionof CO2 andCH4 over Auand Rhdopedtitanatenanotubes.
Wepayattentiontothesurfacestructureandopticalproperties ofnanoparticlesonnanotubes.DuringUVirradiationtheproduct distributionisdeterminedbymassspectrometryandthesurface intermediatesformedinphoto-inducedreactionsaredetermined byDRIFTS. We trytofindcorrelationbetween thestructure of nanoparticlesandthephotocatalyticactivity.
2. Experimental
2.1. Synthesisofthecatalyst
Thetitanatenanotubesweresynthesizedbyanalkalihydrother- mal method described previously [24,34,39,40]. The specific surfaceareaoftitanatenanotubesisapproximately185m2g−1.
ForthesynthesisofgoldnanoparticledecoratedH2Ti3O7nano- tubes1goftheas-preparednanotubeswassuspendedin100ml distilled water by applyingultrasound irradiation for 1h. Then 5.2ml ofHAuCl4 solutionwithanappropriate concentrationto provide∼1wt%goldloadingwasaddedtothewellhomogenized nanotubesuspension.After10minofstirring50mgofNaBH4(sep- aratelydissolvedin5mlofdistilledwater)wasaddedrapidlyto achieve theinstantaneousformation of gold nanoparticles.The suspensionwaskeptstirredfor further20minthenwasrinsed withdistilledwaterthoroughly.Theas-purifiedsamplewasdried overnightin a temperatureprogrammedelectricovenat350K.
Usingthislow-temperatureAuloadingmethod,weescapedthe undesiredphasetransformationofnanotubestoanataseinitiated bygoldatelevatedtemperature(450–473K)[31].
Rh/TNT nanocomposite was produced by impregnating the titanatenanotubeswithRhCl3·3H2Osolutiontoyield1wt%metal content[32,33].Theimpregnatedpowderwasdriedinairat383K for3h.InordertogetmetallicRhthecatalystpassedoverfurther treatment(pre-treatment)justbeforethephotocatalyticmeasure- ments.Thepre-treatment consistedof 4sections: Annealingin oxygenflowfor1hat473K,flushingtheoxygenwithargonatthe sametemperature,reductioninhydrogenflowfor1hat523Kand finallyflushingthehydrogenwithargonfor1hat523K.
Au/TiO2wasproducedbyimpregnatingTiO2hombikatUV-100 (anatase phase) powderwith HAuCl4 solution.The preparation methodwasthesameasfortheRh/TNTcatalyst.Finally1wt%gold contentwasreached.Au/TNTandRh/TNTwith2.5%metalcontent werealsopreparedfortheUV–vismeasurementstoinvestigatethe concentrationdependenceofthebandgap.TheAu/TNTandRh/TNT notationsreferstothe1%metalcontentvariantshenceforward.
Itisimportanttoemphasize thatnocarboncontainingcom- poundwasusedatallduringthesynthesisofthecatalystsinorder toavoidanykindofincidentalcarboncontaminationinfiltratesinto thestructure.Thesekindsofcarboncontaminationscanresultsin surplusproductswhicharenotoriginatedfromthereactantshence resultsinmisleadingconversionsregardingtothecarbonbased reactants.
Thesurfaceareasofthecatalystsweremeasuredwitha‘BELCAT A’instrumentwithsinglepointBETmethod.Thesurfaceareasare 181,171,168and300m2/gforTNT,Rh/TNT,Au/TNTandAu/TiO2, respectively.
Thephotocatalyticactivityofboththecompositesandthepure supporthad beeninvestigatedunder exactlythesamereaction parameters.The pre-treatmentprocess wasuniformfor allcat- alystsinordertogetbettercomparability:Themethodusedat Rh/TNTwasappliedinallcases.
2.2. Materials
Thepurityofthegasesusedforpretreatmentandfortheprepa- ration of the reactant mixtures were 99.5%, 99.995%, 99.995%, 99.996%and 99.999%for O2,CH4, CO2,Ar and H2 respectively.
Inthecaseofargonfurtherpurificationwasappliedwithanin- lineadsorptiontrapcontainingsilicageland5Azeoliteinorderto removewaterandcarbon-dioxidecontamination.
2.3. Characterizationofthecatalysts
XPspectraweretakenwithaSPECSinstrumentequippedwith aPHOIBOS150MCD9hemisphericalanalyzer.Theanalyzerwas operatedintheFATmodewith20eVpassenergy.TheAlK␣radi- ation(h=1486.6eV)ofadualanodeX-raygunwasusedasan excitationsource.Thegunwasoperatedatthepowerof210W (14kV,15mA).Typicallyfive scanswere summedtogeta sin- glehigh-resolutionspectrum. TheTi2p3/2 maximum(458.9eV) wasusedasbindingenergyreference.Self-supportingpelletswere usedinXPSmeasurements.Forspectrumacquisitionandevalu- ationbothmanufacturer’s(SpecsLab2)andcommercial(CasaXPS, Origin)softwarepackageswereused.
The morphology of metal-modified titanate nanotubes was characterizedbyhighresolutiontransmissionelectronmicroscopy (FEITecnaiG220X-Twin;200kVoperationvoltage,×180000mag- nification,125pm/pixelresolution).X-raydiffractometry(Rigaku MiniFlexII;CuK␣)andelectrondiffractionwereusedtodetermine thecrystallinityandthestructure.Themetalparticlesizedistri- butionwasdeterminedbyimageanalysisoftheHRTEMpictures usingthe‘ImageJ’software.Atleastfiverepresentativeimagesof equalmagnification,takenatdifferentspotsoftheTEMgridwere firstsubjectedtorollingballbackgroundsubtractionandcontrast enhancement,andthenthediameterofthemetalnanoparticlesin
theimagewasmanuallymeasuredagainstthecalibratedTEMscale bar.Thediameterdistributionhistogramwasconstructedfrom200 individualnanoparticlediametermeasurements.
DiffusereflectanceUV–vis spectroscopywasusedtoinvesti- gatethebandgapenergyofthecatalysts.Spectrawerecollected withahome-madefiberopticsystemconsistingofaMicropack HPX-2000lightsourceandanOceanOpticsUSB2000detector.The detectorhas2048pixelresolutioninthe200–1100nmwavelength range.Thefinalspectrumwasobtainedbyaveraging40scans.The spectrawereconvertedfromAbsorbance fA()typetoKubelka- Munk fKM(E)whereE=hinelectronvolts.Thenthespectrawere smoothedwiththeweightedmovingaveragemethod(51points, symmetric).Spectraldeconvolutionwasappliedinallcasesinorder togetclearpeakataround3.5eV.Simplexmethodwasusedtofit thespectrumwithgaussianfunctions.Themainrequirementfor thefittingwastogetatleast0.999forthevalueofR2whilekeepthe peaknumberaslowaspossible.Thebandgapwascalculatedfrom thegaussianpeakcenteredataround3.6eV.Thepeakwastrans- formedtoTauc-plotaccordingtothefollowingequation:Tauc-plot fT(E)=(fKM(E)*E)1/nwheren=2forsemiconductorswithallowed indirectbandgaplikeTiO2[41].Thenalinearfunctionwasfittedto theleftinflectionpointofthefT(E)curveanditsx-interceptyields theenergyoftheopticalbandgap(Eg).
2.4. In-situphotocatalyticmeasurements
The photocatalyticreactions wereperformed in a flow-type quartz reactor which consisted of cylindrical quartz and glass tubes.Animmersion-typemercury-arc lampplaced inthecen- terofthereactorwasusedforirradiation.Aheatabsorbingwater layerwasintroducedbetweenthefirstandsecondquartztubes tocutofftheinfraredradiationandtocooldownthemetalparts and thesealsofthereactor.Thefine catalystpowder wassus- pendedindeionizedwaterthenthemixturehadbeendriedonto theinnersurfaceofthethird(glass)tubeinsuchawaytocover approximately 430cm2 area. Typically 0.5g catalyst was used.
Thevolumeofthereactorwas476cm3.Thereactantgaseswith controlledflow rates had beenintroduced betweenthesecond and third tubes. In this arrangement the catalyst surface faced towardsthelight sourcecancontactwiththegasesduringthe irradiation.Argonwasusedascarriergas.Theoverallflowrate was30cm3/mininallcases.Thereactantmixtureswereprepared pendingflowbymassflowcontrollers:methanewith0.9cm3/min flowratewasintroducedinto29.1cm3/minargonstreamtoget methane-argonmixture.0.9cm3/min methaneand 0.9cm3/min carbondioxidewereintroducedinto28.2cm3/minargonstream togetCH4 CO2 ArmixturewithCH4:CO2=1:1molarratio.Inthe caseofblankexperiments29.1cm3/min argonbubbledthrough waterat25◦C toget0.9cm3/minpluswatervapor.Considering theoverall flowrateandthevolumeofthereactortheaverage retentiontimeofthegasmixturesisgenerally16min.Thetem- peraturecontrolofthecatalystwhichisnecessaryforthecorrect pre-treatmentisachievedwithanouterheaterbuiltfromaglass tube,someheaterwireandafeedbackthermocouple.Fig.1shows theschematicdrawingofthereactorandthesamplingsystem.
TheUVsourcewasan‘undopedTQ-718’highpressuremercury- arclamp(UV-ConsultingPeschl)operatedat500Wcontrolledby a‘P-EVG-10’ powersupply. Theirradiancereferstothecatalyst supportingsurfaceandwasmeasuredbya‘GentecUP19K-50L-H5- D0’powerdetectorwithaspectralrangeof0.19–20m.Asoda limeglasscutofffilterwasappliedtosplitthemeasurementrange.
Themeasuredirradianceswere0.143(±16%)and0.199(±6.5%) W/cm2inthe190–350and350–2000nmrange.Photonfluxwas calculatedforeachbandgapvalueinmolh−1cm−2.Thefirststepof thecalculationwasthenormalizationoftheemissionspectrumof thelampusingthemeasuredirradiancevalueofthe190–350nm
Fig.1. Theschematicofthephotoreactorwithsamplingpoints.
region.Afternormalizationthespectrumwasintegratedfromthe bandgapvalue(Eg)to6.2eV(200nm)togetthephotonflux.The photonfluxwastransformedfrommolh−1cm−2 tomolh−1g−1 usingthecatalystquantityandthesizeofthecoveredareawhich isslightlydifferentineachexperiment.Theoverallphotonconver- sionefficiency()wascalculatedbythedivisionoftheformation rateofthemainproductwiththerespectivephotonflux.
Theproductsformedduringthephotocatalyticreactionswere analyzedwitha‘HidenHPR-70’gasanalysissystem.Itisequipped withanautomaticallycontrolled8-waybatchinletsamplingsub- system and a ‘HAL3F-RC’ quadrupole mass spectrometer with standard electron ionizersource.Separation technique wasnot usedinordertoachievehighsensitivitywiththemassspectrom- eter.Theinstrument’sdetectionlimitis500ppbtohydrogenand 100ppbtomethane.Samplesweretakenfromthegasflowinturns priorandafterthephotoreactorduringthereaction.The‘Multi- pleIonDetection’(MID)modewasappliedwiththefollowingm/z valuesselected:2,15,16,18,26,27,28,29,30,31,43,44,45.Thedif- ferenceofthem/zsignalsoriginatesfromthetwosamplingpoints wasusedhenceforwardinthecalculationsinordertominimize thenoiselevel.Thefragmentationpatternsandtheconcentrations werepreviouslycalibratedtotheexpectedproducts.Asmallvac- uumchamberequippedwithacapacitivegaugeandaleakvalve wasusedtopreparethedesiredconcentrationofagasneedtobe calibrated.Finalpressurewassettoatmosphericwithargon.Sam- plesweretakenfromthisstaticvolumebyathirdbatchinletport attachedtothechamber.Calibrationwasmadeatthemagnitude oftheexpectedconcentrationsforH2,CH4,N2,O2,CO,CO2,C2H6 andmethanolseparately.One-pointcalibrationwasapplied.
Thephotocatalyticmeasurementsequenceconsistedofthefol- lowingsteps:pretreatmentofthecatalyst[Section2.2.],a6–9h baselinesection,3-hirradiation,3-hdarksection,thenrepeating theirradiationanddarksectionstwotimes.Theinsertionofthe darksectionswasnecessarytofollowtheadsorption-desorption processofthereactantsandtoeasethequalitativeanalysisofthe products.Thecoolantwaterlayerwasunabletoeliminatetheheat effectofthelampcompletelyatroomtemperature.Thetempera- tureofthecatalystwasapproximately403Kduringtheirradiation.
To minimize the temperature fluctuationbetween the UV and darksessionsthecatalystwaskeptat403Kinthedarksections too.Threetypesofreactionsweretestedphotocatalitically:The methanetransformation,theCH4+CO2reactionandablankexper- imentwithonlywaterpresentonargon.Theblankexperimentwas necessarytoverifythattheproductsdonotoriginatesfromsur- facecontaminations.Averageandmaximalformationrates(¯rand r)werecalculatedfromthemeasuredconcentrationsandknown parametersinmolh−1g−1unitsforthemainproductsandreac- tantsregardingto9hirradiation.Thesignoftheratesispositive fortheformingproductsandnegativeforthewaningreactants.
Infraredspectroscopymeasurementswerecarriedoutwithan
‘AgilentCary-670’FTIRspectrometerequippedwith‘HarrickPray- ingMantis’diffusereflectanceattachment.Thesampleholderhad twoBaF2windowsintheinfraredpathandaquartzwindowinthe UV-path.Afocusedmercuryshortarclamp(Osram,HBO100W/2) wasusedforUVirradiation.Thespectrometerwaspurgedwith drynitrogen.Typically16scanswererecordedataspectralresolu- tionof2cm−1.Thespectrumofthepretreatedcatalystwasusedas background.Thesameexperimentalconditionswereusedasinthe photocatalyticmeasurements.TheUVirradiationwasintermitted duringthespectrumrecording.Thereactantswereflushedoutfrom thediffusereflectancecellwithheliumafteronehourirradiation.
Spectrawerecollectedafter30minflushingtoo.
2.5. Analysisoftheusedcatalyst
Post-catalyticmeasurementswereperformedinordertoinves- tigatethechangesoccurredinthecatalystduringthereaction.The usedcatalystwasremovedfromthereactorthenitwasanalyzed withfourdifferentmethods:Thequantityofthesurfacecarbon wasdeterminedwithtemperatureprogrammedreduction(TPR).
Ramanspectroscopymeasurementswerecarriedoutinorderto investigatethestructureofsurfacedeposits.X-rayphotoelectron spectroscopy(XPS)wasusedtoinvestigatetheoxidationstateof rhodiumandcarbononthesurfaceoftheusedcatalyst.
TheTPRmeasurementswerecarriedoutinthefollowingman- ner:Theusedcatalystwasplacedintoa10centimeterlongquartz tubeand heated up fromroom temperatureto 1173Klinearly at15K/minratein40ml/minhydrogenflow.Theproductswere analyzed with an ‘Agilent 7890’ gas chromatograph equipped with‘HPCarbonplot’capillarycolumn.Thermalconductivityand methanizer-sensitizedflameionizationdetectorswereused.
TheRamanspectraofthesamplesweremeasuredat532nm laserexcitationwith5mWpowerusinga‘ThermoScientificDXR RamanMicroscope’. Typically10 scansweremadewith2cm−1 resolutionintherangeof100–1800cm−1.
3. ResultsandDiscussion
3.1. CharacterizationofAuandRhnanoparticlessupportedon titanatenanotubes
Protonatedtitanatenanotubesdecoratedwithgoldnanoparti- cleswerecharacterizedbyXPS.TheXP-spectrumtakeninthegold 4fbindingenergyrangeispresentedinFig.2.Thefigureaddition- allyshowsthespectrumofaclean goldfilm(thickness:50nm) preparedonaglassplateforcomparison.Symmetric4f5/2and4f7/2 emissionswereobservedat87.7and84.0eVinbothcaseswhich isgeneralformetallicgold.Furthermore,ahigherbindingenergy peakappearedonAu/TNTwithAu4f7/2at85.9eV.Itisimportantto mentionthatwhengoldwasdispersedonTiO2filmonlyone4f7/2 emissionappeared[42].
Twodifferentexplanationscanbeofferedfortheappearanceof thisunusuallyhighbindingenergygoldstateaswediscussedprevi- ously[25].Corelevelshiftsduetoparticlesizemustbeconsidered firstintheinterpretationofthespectraofnanoparticles[43–46].
ThesecondpossibleexplanationisthatAumayhaveundergonean ionexchangeprocess.ThisisnotpossibleonTiO2becauseofthe lackofcationscompensatingtheframeworkcharge,however,itis quitelikelytohappenontitanateswhicharewell-knownfortheir ion-exchangeability[47].
TEMimageonFig.3/Ademonstratesthetubularmorphologyof theas-synthesizedtitanatenanotubeswithadiameterof∼7nm andlengthupto80nm.Theacidicwashingprocessresultedina milddestructionoftheinnerandouterwallsofthenanotubes.The
Fig.2. XP-spectrafromthegold4fregiontakenontitanatenanotubes(A)andona cleanAufilmpreparedonaglassplate(B).
sizeofAunanoparticleswasbetween2.0and8.0nmontheH-form titanate nanotubes (Fig. 3/B). The Au particle sizes was deter- minedbyXRD,too.Theaveragesizewas5.3nmcalculatedfrom theScherrerequation.TheTEMimageofRhdecoratednanotubes and nanowiresshowthepresence ofhomogeneously dispersed nanoparticlesonthesurfaceoftitanatenanostructures(Fig.3/C).
TheparticlesizedistributionofRhonTNTwascalculatedfromTEM andresultedin2.8nmasthemostabundantparticlediameter.As smallas1nmsizedmetalparticlesweredetectedtoointhissam- ple.Particleswithdiametersbiggerthan5nmwerenotobserved.
UnfortunatelywecouldnotobservepeaksforRhcrystalsintheXRD spectraprobablyduetolowconcentrationofparticles.Wemayalso assumethatcertainpartofRhunderwentionexchangeprocess [34].InourpreviousstudiesweobservedthatAuandalsoRhcatal- ysesthetransformationoftubestructuretonanoanataseabove 473Kand573K,respectively[32,34].Inpresentcasesthetemper- atureofpreparationandthephotocatalytictestexperimentsare muchlower.
TheRh3d5/2peakat309.3eVat1%Rhcontentandat308.3eVat 2%metalcontentclearlysuggesttheexistenceofanoxidationstate ormorphologythatisdifferentfromthebulkbecausethebind- ingenergyoftheRh3d5/2electronsisabout307.1eVformetallic Rh.Thehigherbindingenergystatesmaycorrespondtoverysmall clustersstabilizedin thestructure ofnanowiresandnanotubes.
ThestabilizationofRhclustersinsmallsizeandtheinfluenceof Rhnanoparticlesonthetransformationoftitanatestructurescan beexplainedalsobytheelectronicinteractionbetweenRh and titanate,whichwasobservedin severalcasesbetweenreduced titaniaandmetals,includingRh[48–51].
3.2. OpticalpropertiesofAuandRhdopedtitanatenanotubes Fig.4shows theabsorptionspectraofsix differentsamples, includingAuandRhloadedtitanatenanotubes.
Thepuretitanatenanotubeshowedstrongabsorptionat3.53eV (351nmwavelength)intheseexperiments.Thecalculatedbandgap energyfromtheTaucplotis3.07eV.Thisvaluewas3.03eVfor pureanatase[Fig.4].ThereductionofAuCl4withNaBH4yields1 or2.5wt%Auonthesurface.Thebandgapof1wt%Au/TNTslightly decreased(3.03eV). Nofurthersignificantchangewasobserved at2.5wt%Aucontent.Thischangewaslessthanin thecase of titanatenanowiressupportedAuproducedinasimilarway[32].
ThespectrumoftheAu/TNTshowsa strongabsorptionbandat 2.31eV(534nm).Thisisthecharacteristicabsorptionofthesur- faceplasmonofgoldnanoparticles(d>3nm)andarisesasaresult
Fig.3.TEMimagesofprotonatedTNT(A),Au/TNTpreparedbyNaBH4reduction(B)andRh/TNT(C),andtheparticlesizedistributionofRhonTNTcalculatedfromTEM imageanalysis(D).
ofthecollectivemodesofoscillationofthefreeconductionband electronsinducedbyaninteractingelectromagneticfield[52–54].
Interestingly,thespectrumshowssomeunresolvedpeaksathigher energies.Afterdeconvolutionwecanidentifythreeabsorptionsat 2.68,2.93,and3.19eV.Weshouldemphasizeforthesakeofidenti- ficationthatsmallgoldnanoparticles(d<3nm)losetheirbulk-like electronicproperties;forexample,theynolongershowtheplas- monexcitationcharacteristicsofrelativelylargegoldnanocrystals [53,54].It hasbeendemonstratedbyXPSand HRTEMmeasure- mentsthatourtitanatenanotubesamplescontaingoldinsmall sizes(d<3nm),too[Figs.2and3].Recentlyamultiplemolecular- liketransitionofathiol-protectedAu25clusterwasobserved.At leastthreewell-definedbandsat1.8,2.75,and3.1eVweredetected byUV–visspectroscopy[53].VeryrecentlyasimilarAu25cluster wasidentifiedonCeO2 rodcatalyst.ItwasconsideredthatCeO2
rodshavealargeamountofdefectsites[55–57]andifloadingof Au25(SR)18nanoclustersisverylow,onecanreasonablyexpectthat therodsupportmaybehelpfultoanchorthegoldnanoclusters [58].Asitwaspointedoutinpreviousworks[22,25,27,32,34,40]
thetitanatenanotubesalsocontainahugeamountofdefectsand thesmallclustersandparticlesofgoldcangrowontheoutershell andintheinsideofthetubes.Furthermore,theclustercoalescence couldbepreventedbecausethedefectsintitanatenanotubeswere foundhelpfulforstrongbondingwithmetalnanoparticles[32].For comparisonwepreparedAunanoparticlesonanataseTiO2(Hom- bikatUV-100).Inthiscasetheintensityofplasmoniccharacterwas lessandthemolecular-likefeaturewashardlyseenafterdeconvo-
lutingtheUV–visspectrum[Fig.4].Theratioofthepeakareasof molecular-likebandsandtheplasmonicbandis0.28inthecaseof anatasesupportandis0.36fornanotubesupport.Fromthiscom- parisonwemayconcludethattitanatenanotubeshavetheability tostabilizethesmallparticleseveninclustersizeformation,similar toCeO2rodcatalyst.
After impregnating the titanate nanotubes with rhodium- chloridesolutiontwonewveryweakbandsappearedat2.52and 3.07eV(492and404nm,respectively).TheRh(III)salthasaneffect ofslightlydecreasingthebandgappossiblyduetotheinfiltration ofrhodiumionsintothetitanatestructure.Thebandgapisslightly decreasedinthecaseof1%Rh/TNTto3.04eVcomparedtopure nanotube(3.07eV)butdoesnotchangedat2.5%rhodiumcontent (notshown).Astrongabsorptioninthevisibleregionemergeddue toreduction[Fig.4].Onthereducedsamplesthebandgapdoes notdecreasedatall(3.08eVfor1%Rhand3.16eVof2.5%Rh).The deconvolutionhasbiggeruncertaintyinthiscasecomparedtothe clean,protonatedtitanatenanotubesandtheRh(III)saltcontaining materialsduetothehighoverlapping,hencethebandgapenergy hasbiggererror,too.Thenewbroadbandhasamaximumat3.06eV (405nm)[Fig.4].
Of thenoble metals(Pt, Pd, Ru and Rh),a theoretical study foundthatonlyRhhasastrongUVplasmonicresponse[59],itwas supportedexperimentally,too[60].Consideringonlytherepresen- tativenanoparticlesizeandshapemodelwithrandomorientations, thetheoreticallypredictedpeakforthedipolarmodeinthetripod planenear3.3eV(375nm)isingoodagreementwiththeexper-
Fig.4.TheDR-UV–visspectrawiththecalculatedbandgapenergiesofsixdifferentsamples.Theoriginalspectraareshownbythethick,greycurves.Bandgapenergieswere calculatedfromfittedgaussfunctionswithTauc’smethodinallcases.
imentaldataobtainedonsiliconsubstrate[61].Weassumethat thelocalsurfaceplasmonresonance(LSPR)stronglydependson thenatureofsubstrateandtheresonantenergyincreasinglyred- shiftedwithincreasingsize.Theobservedbroadbandcenteredat 3.06eVcontainstheplasmoniccharacterofRhontitanatenano- tubes.
3.3. Photocatalytictests
Photocatalyticmeasurementsrevealedthatmethaneisactive towardsphoto-oxidationinallcasesevenifnootherreactantsare presentinthefeedmixture.Table1showstheaverageandmaximal formationratesoftheidentifiedproductsandthemethaneconver- sionvalues.Bothtitanatesupportedcatalystsexhibitedoneorder ofmagnitudehigheractivityinmethaneconversionthanpristine nanotubes.TheAu/TiO2showedsmalleractivityinmethanetrans- formationthanthenanotubesupportedvariant.
Generallythemethanetransformstohydrogen,ethane,andoxi- dizestocarbon dioxide,carbon monoxideandmethanol. Fig.5 showstheconversionofmethaneandtheformationofproducts asafunctionofirradiationtime.
Ascanbeseenthemolarfractionoftheproductsareincreasing whilethequantityofmethanedecreasesduringtheUV-activesec- tions.Decreasinginthemolarfractionswithtimecanbeobserved inthecaseofRh/TNT.ThisdropisrestrictedtotheUVactiveperi- odsandistheconsequenceofactivityloss.InthecaseofAu/TNTno activitylosswasobservedintheexperiment.Wecanstatethatthe supportedmetalcatalystsareextremelyactiveinhydrogengener- ation.Thecontributionofethanetothehydrogenratesissmallin thesecasessoourmainprocessshouldbesomekindofmethane decompositionwherethecarbonhighlyoxidizesoritremainson thesurface.Itisimportanttoemphasizethattheformationofwater wasnotdetected,ormoreprecisely,therateofwaterformationwas
Fig.5.Conversionofmethaneandformationofproductsasafunctionofirradiation timeonRh/TNTandAu/TNTcatalystsinthemethanetransformationreaction.
underthedetectionlimit.Thecarbonbalance(C)wascalculated fromtheaverageformationratesbyEq.(1).
C=
−rCH4−2rC2H6−rCO2−rCO−rCH3OH
∗9h (1)CispositiveandlargeinthecasesofTNTsupportedmetals whichmeansthatsomecarbonismissingfromtheproductstream.
Itsreasoncanbeanundetectedproductorsomekindofsurface deposit.Itisimportanttonotethatthenanosizedgoldcatalyst (Au/TNT)hashigheractivityinethanegenerationbecausetherates areincreasedbyoneorderofmagnitudecomparedtotheothercat- alysts.Theintroductionofcarbondioxideintothereactantstream didnot resultsignificanteffects ontherates.Theconversionof
Table1
Averageandmaximalformationratesoftheidentifiedproductsandthecalculatedmethaneconversionsinthedifferentexperimentsetups.Thecarbondeficitandtheoverall photoconversionefficiency()regardingtohydrogenformationarealsoshown.
reactants catalyst rateofformation(molh−1g−1) KCH4(%) carbondeficit(molg−1) H2
CH4 C2H6 H2 CO2 CO CH3OH
CH4 TNT −8.75 1.17 1.40,3.44 3.04a 0.23b 0.0837a 0.23 28b 1.4×10−6
Rh/TNT −49.6 1.95 115,235 11.2a 5.44a 0.138a 1.41 260b 1.2×10−4
Au/TNT −70.2 12.0 116,127 18.1a 11.3a 1.01a 1.64 140c 9.7×10−5
Au/TiO2 b.d.l. 1.50 48.0,57.3 9.28a 1.70a 0.108a b.d.l. b.d.l. 6.4×10−5
CH4+CO2 TNT −6.05 0.721 0.746a,1.61 b.d.l. 0.427a b.d.l. 0.16 37.6a 8.2×10−7
Rh/TNT −68.0 1.72 107,246 53.6 11.4a 0.142a 2.03 b.d.l. 1.2×10−4
Au/TNT −70.5 11.4 104,117 b.d.l. 11.9a 0.954a 1.66 310a 8.8×10−5
Au/TiO2 −21.8 1.86 50.7,63.2 b.d.l. 5.76a 0.144a 0.73 110b 6.2×10−5
H2O Rh/TNT b.d.l. b.d.l. b.d.l. 0.34a b.d.l. b.d.l. – – –
Italicnumbersmeansthemaximalformationrates.
b.d.l.:belowdetectionlimit.
aEstimateddeviationis>10%but≤25%.
bEstimateddeviationis>25%but≤50%.
c Estimateddeviationisbiggerthan50%.
CO2wasunderourdetectionlimitexceptonecasewhereCO2was formeddespiteitshighbasicconcentration.Wecoulddeducethat CO2isratherformsthandiminishesinthesecases.
Inthephoto-inducedCH4decompositionprocessCO2andCO (alsoC)appearedasproductssothereshouldbeanoxygensource inthesystem.Inthecaseoftitanatenanotubeswaterisaplausi- blereactionpartnerwhichservestheoxygenreactingwithmethyl radical.Itwasalreadyestablishedthattitanatenanotubescontain alargeamountofH2O[28,34,62].Wehaveidentifiedadsorbedand latticewaterinourXPS,DRIFTSandDTG-MSexperiments.TheOH andH2Ostretchingvibrationsbetween3000and3750cm−1could bedetectedupto673Kontitanatenanotubes.TheOHandH2O deformationsignalat1618–1648cm−1waspresentupto600–700 K.Interestingly,averyweekasymmetricinfraredsignalattributed toH2Oaround3730cm−1 wasdetectedevenat773Konnano- tubes.An“OH”likephotoemissionemergedat532.6–532.8eVin theO1sXPspectrum.Thispeakdisappearedat573Konnanowires whileonnanotubesthisemissiondiminishedonlyabove673K.In agreementwiththeIRandDTG-MSresultsthepeakcorresponding towaterdecreasedsharplybetween293and573K.Ourhypoth- esisthatwater actsasanoxygensourceformethaneoxidation gainedstrengthwhenweintroducedwaterinsteadofcarbondiox- ideintothereactantstream:Notonlythemethaneconsumption butalsotheformationratesofH2,CO2andCOandthequantityof themissingcarbonwereincreased.
Oneblankexperimentwasconductedinordertomakesurethat theproductsarenotoriginatesfromsurfacecontaminations.When onlywaterispresentonargon,nomethane,ethaneorhydrogen formationwereobserved.OnlytracesamountofCO2wasevolved.
Thismeansthattheproductsdetectedontheotherexperiments originatesfromthereactants.
3.4. In-situinfraredspectroscopymeasurements
Fig. 6 shows the infrared spectra registered after one hour irradiationinthemethaneconversionandCH4+CO2reactionsper- formedoverTNTandRh/TNTcatalysts.Peaksevolvedpartlydue totheadsorptionofreactantsorproductsandpartlyduetothe irradiationofthesample.Theadsorptionofwaterasreactantor contaminationresultsintheappearanceofapeakat1638cm−1 andabroadbandbetween2700and3700cm−1.Thecarbondiox- ideadsorptionresultedin strongpeaksat1558and 1375cm−1 whichcanbeattributedtobidentatecarbonateswhichbindtothe surfaceoftitanatenanotubes[63,64].Thecarbonatepeakshave higher intensitywhen CO2 is present in thefeed.The remain- ingsmall peaks arethe resultsof UVirradiation. Thebands at
2968and2885cm−1areattributedtothesymmetricandasym- metricstretchingvibrationsofmethylgroupsonRhsurface[65].
ThemethylgroupmaybondtothetitanateviaanO-bondform- ingmethoxybutthes(C O)vibrationmodewhichshouldappear ataround 1050cm−1 onmetal-oxides [64] wasnotdetectedin ourcase. The deformationmodeof methylvibration ataround 1350cm−1 ispossiblyhiddenbyoverlapping signalsinourcase [65].Physisorbedcarbondioxidecanbeidentifiedat2337cm−1. The Rh-bonded linear carbon-monoxide resulted in a peak at 2100cm−1onpartiallyoxidizedRh,whereasbridgedCOappeared at1924cm−1[66–68].Thepeakat2141cm−1representsthethe- oreticalvibrationenergyofgasphaseCOwhichisphysisorbedon thesurfacelikethecarbondioxideinourcase.Thephysisorption ofCOandCO2wasnotobservedpreviouslyonthefreshcatalysts sowecanassumethatsomechangesareoccurredonthesurface duringthephoto-inducedreaction.
Duringphotoilluminationashoulderappearedat1664cm−1 intheCH4 decompositionandintheCH4+CO2reactiononpris- tineTNT.Thisbandcanbeattributedtoadsorbedformyl group [69] which forms inthe reaction.Monodentateformate can be alsoidentifiedfromthebandsat1585and1384cm−1[66,70].The absorptionbandofformylismissingwhenmetalispresent.Very probablythisintermediateishighlyinstableandthemetalcataly- sesitsfurtherreactiontoformCO.Monodentateformateispresent inallcaseswhichmeanthatitsfurtherreactionisslow.
3.5. Ramanspectroscopyresults
WeperformedRamanspectroscopymeasurementsinorderto getinformation aboutthestructureofthesurface depositsdis- cussedintheprevioussection.TheRamanspectraareplottedin Fig.7.
Absorptionbandsappearedonlyinthe1800–100cm−1region.
Theabsorptionbandswerelocatedatthesamewavenumbersin bothcases.Onlytheareaofthebandsdiffers.Thebandsat1598 and1335cm−1correspondtotheGandDbandsofstructuredcar- bonlayerssuchasgraphene[71].TheDandDbandsataround 1620and1100cm−1werenotobserved.TheintensityoftheDband ishighrelativetotheGbandwhichmeanshighdefectdensityin thegrapheneplane.Thispeakratioiscommoninthecaseofmulti- walledcarbonnanotubes.Wecanconcludethatstructuredcarbon withhighdefectdensityformedonthesurfaceduringmethane conversion.TheremainingbandsintheRamanspectrabelongto thetitanatenanotube[34,72].
Fig.6.DRIFTspectraofthecatalystscollectedafter1hUVirradiationintwodifferentreactionsperformedontheTNTbasedcatalysts.Thegasphasereactantswereflushed outwithheliumbeforecollectingspectra.
Fig.7.RamanspectraoftheRh/TNTcatalystsusedintheCH4+H2Oandinthe CH4+CO2reactions.
3.6. XPSmeasurements
HighresolutionXPspectrawerecollectedinthebindingenergy rangeofcarbon1sandrhodium3dorbitalsinordertoinvestigate theoxidationstatesoftheseelements(Fig.8).TheRh3d5/2-3d3/2 doublethasashoulder athigherbindingenergies. The307.3eV peakfor3d5/2canbeidentifiedasRh0whereasthehighenergy shoulderat309.4eVischaracteristicforRh3+.Thisassignationis inaccordancewiththeinfraredspectroscopyresultsmentioned previouslybecausetheinfrared absorptionat2100cm−1 corre- spondsto carbon monoxide bonded to oxidized rhodium. The colourchangeofthecatalystfromdarkgreytobrownishgreywas experiencedunderirradiationwhichisthesignofre-oxidationtoo.
ThehigherbindingenergystateofRh3delectronsmaycorrespond tosmallerRh-clustersizesontheotherhandandisaconsequence ofthefinalstateeffectwhichismoredominantinthecaseofcat- alystswithlessthan2%metalcontent[28].
Fig.8. TheXPspectraoftheRh/TNTcatalystusedintheCH4decompositionreaction.
AdditionalC1sspectrum(lower)showsthecarbonregionbeforeuse,justafter reduction.
Additional C 1s spectrum (lower) shows the carbon region beforeuse,justafterreduction.
O1sat530.4eVrepresentsthelatticeoxygenofTNT.Thepho- toemissionpeakat532.7eVinvolvesCO,methoxyandcarbonate likespeciesformedduringphotoreaction.AdsorbedH2Oappears at534.9eV[34].
Wecouldidentify3peaksinthecarbon1sregionwhichcor- respondtodifferentoxidationstates:Thepeakat286.7eVisthe characteristicbindingenergyfortheC OandC Ocarbons.Itcan originatefromthecarbon-monoxidechemisorbedbyRhparticles whichisalready revealedbyinfraredspectroscopy.Thepeakat 284.4eVcorresponds to sp2 hybrid state carbon (C, CH and CH2)whichconfirmsthepresenceofstructuralcarbonconcluded fromRamanresults.Thepeakat282.2eVbelongstoreducedcar- bonwhichmeansmetal-carbonbonds.Itmeansthatthecarbon depositsaresittingonthesurfaceofRhparticles[73].Anadditional C1sspectrumisplottedinFig.8fromafreshlyreducedRh/TNTcat- alysthadnotbeenusedinphotocatalyticreactionyet.Itcanbeseen
Fig.9. Formationrateofmethaneduringthetemperatureprogrammedreduction experiments.
thatthecarboncontentismuchlowerinthiscasethanafterreac- tion.sp2 carbonat284.5eVandoxidizedcarbonoriginatesfrom carbonatesat289.7eVcanbeidentified.
3.7. Temperatureprogrammedreductionmeasurements
Temperatureprogrammedreductionexperimentswerecarried outtoinvestigatethequantityandthereactivityofthesurfacecar- bonassumedtobeformedduringthephotocatalyticreactions.Two experimentswerecarriedoutontheRh/TNTusedintheCH4+H2O andintheCH4+CO2reactions.Twoblankexperimentswerecar- riedoutadditionallytomakesurefromthesourceofthesurface carbon.
Nomethaneformationwasobservedatallinthefirstblank experimentwherefreshRh/TNTwasheatedupinhydrogenflow.
Onlytraceamountofcarbondioxidewasdetected.Thismeansthat thefreshlypretreatedsampleisfreeofreduciblesurfacecarbon.
Ontheotherhandsmallamountofmethaneformedinthesec- ondblankexperimentwherethecatalystwastreatedinmethane flowfor1hat403KbeforetheTPRexperiment.Theformationofa largeamountofmethanewasdetectedduringthemeasurements madeontheusedcatalysts.Casually,theformationofsomeethane andthedesorptionofcarbon-dioxidewasobservedinthesecases.
Theappearanceofmethaneandethaneistheresultofthein-situ reductionofcarboncontainingsurfacedepositsformedduringthe photocatalyticreactions. Thesourceofthecarbondioxideisthe surfacecarbonateorhydrogencarbonatespecieswhich decom- posewithoutreductionasthetemperaturerises.Theformation rateofmethanewascalculatedinallcasesandwasplottedagainst temperatureinFig.9.
Themaximumofthemethaneformationrateoccurredatthe sametemperaturemeaningthatthereactivityofthesurfacecar- bonequalsinallcases.Themethane-waterreactionresultedin moresurfacecarbonwhichcorrespondswithlargerphotocatalytic methaneconversionsobservedinthiscase(notshown).Thetime integralof theTPRcurves givesustheoverall formedmethane relatedtocatalystquantitywhichis354mol/gand528mol/g for the used catalysts respectively. The 354mol/g value is in goodagreementwiththecalculatedcarbondeficitalreadyshowed inTable1. becausethematching iswithinthemarginoferror.
38mol/gmethaneformedintheblankexperimentwhichisone orderofmagnitudesmallerthanintheothercases.Wecancon- cludethatthemissingcarbonisonthesurfaceintheformofsome kindofeasilyreduciblecarboncontainingdeposit.
3.8. Presumedreactionmechanism
Wecanestablishthemechanismofmethanetransformationon thebasisofthepreviousconclusions.Electron-holepairsweregen- eratedonmetal(goldorrhodium)promotedtitanatenanotubes uponabsorptionofUV-lightirradiation[Eq.(2)].
TNT→hTNT
e−,h+
(2) TNT
e−,h+
TNT
e−
+TNT
h+
(3) Afterthedissociation oftheexciton describedbyEq.(3) the electronandtheholestartstomigratetotheenergeticallyfavorable positions.Electronshavehigherpossibilitytobefoundonthemetal particles[Eq.(4).]duetoFermi-levelequilibrationwhichappears betweenthemetalandtheoxide[74].
TNT
e−
M
e−
(4) Inthecaseofcontinuousirradiationthis processresultsina potentialdifferencethatbuildsupbetweenthemetalandtheoxide henceanadditionaldriftcurrentstartsinthereversedirection.The chargeseparationreachesanequilibriumcontrolledbythediffu- sionanddriftcurrentsandstronglydependsontheratesofcharge carriergenerationandrecombination.
Surfacewatermoleculescancatchtheholeandproducereactive OH-radicalandH+whichdelocalisesonthenearbywatermolecules [Eq.(5)].Hydroxideradicalcanformfromhydroxideion,too,bythe sameprocess[Eq.(6)].
TNT
h+
+H2O(TNT)→TNT+OH•(TNT)+H+ (5) TNT
h+
+OH−(TNT)→TNT+OH•(TNT) (6)
Theasgenerated hydroxideradicals areveryaggressiveoxi- dantsandstarttooxidizemethaneinaradical-typereaction[Eq.
(7)].Theformedmethylradicaladsorbsonthemetalsurface.
OH•(TNT)+CH4(g)
→MH2O(TNT)+CH•3(M) (7)
Wecannotexcludethatmethanedirectlyreactingwithholes resultsinmethylradicalsonthetitanatesurface[Eq.(8)].
TNT
h+
+CH4(g)→TNT+CH•3(TNT)+H+ (8)
Thefurtherreactionrouteisdeterminedbythenatureofthe metal.Itisgenerallyacceptedthatthecouplingofmethylradicalsis favouredongold[75][Eq.(9)],whilethedehydrogenationprocess ratheroccursonrhodium[63][Eq.(10)].
2CH•3(M)→MC2H6(M)→C2H6(g) (9) CH•3(M)→MCH•2(M)+H•(M)→→C(M)+3
2H2(g) (10)
Gasphasehydrogenformsinthefollowingcouplingreaction [eq.(11)]:
2H•(M)→MH2(M)→H2(g) (11)
Therecombinationofamethylandhydrogenradicalalsohasto beconsidered[eq.(12)]
CH•3(M)+H•(M)→MCH4(M)→CH4(g) (12) HydrogenradicalcanformfromH+,too,bythecaptureofa photoelectronatthemetal-supportinterface:
M
e−
+H+→MM+H•(M) (13) Thesourceof thesurplusCO canbemostlythereductionof carbondioxide.Duringthereductionprocessphotoelectronsand
hydrogenionsbringsabouttheCO2 reductionviaCO2•−radical anion:
M
e−
+CO2(g)→M+CO•2(M)− (14) TNT
e−
+CO2(TNT)→TNT+CO•2(TNT)− (15)
TNT
e−
+CO•2(TNT)− +H+→TNT+CO(TNT)+OH−(TNT) (16) ConsequentlybothCH4andCO2arefirstadsorbedoverthecat- alystsurfaceandthenconvertedtoCH3•andCO2•−species.TiO2
[19]andmodifiedTiO2nanocomposites[12]arealsoactiveinCO2 photoinducedactivationbutthepresenceofmetaladatoms(Auor Rh)significantlyincreasesthespeedoftheactivationprocesses.
Monodentateformatecanformfromcarboxylateradicalanion andhydrogenion[Eq.(17)]:
CO•2(TNT)− +H+→HCOO•(TNT) (17)
The formation of oxygen containing compounds can be explainedbythefollowing equations:Methanolisformedby a couplingreaction[Eq.(18)]ontheperimeterofthemetal-support interfacethenitrecombineswithaholetooxidizefurther[Eq.(19)].
CH•3(M)+OH•(TNT)→MCH3OH(TNT)→
slowCH3OH(g) (18)
TNT
h+
+CH3OH(TNT)→TNT+CH3O•(TNT)+H+ (19) Formaldehydemostprobablyformonthesupportasconcluded frominfraredresults[Eq.(20)]butmetalisneededforitsfurther reactions[Eqs.(21)–(22).]
CH3O•(TNT)+OH•(TNT)→CH2O(TNT)+H2O(TNT) (20) CH2O(TNT)+OH•(TNT)→CHO•(M)+H2O(TNT) (21)
CHO•(M)→MCO(M)+H•(M) (22)
Itisremarkablethattherearemanyroutesinwhichhydrogenis formed.Asaconsequencethemainproductofthephoto-induced methanetransformationisthehydrogen.
3.9. Surface-modifiedtitanatenanotubesphotocatalysis
Thepristinetitanatenanotubesshowedmeasurablephotocat- alyticactivitysincethetimescaleofelectron-holerecombinationis commensuratewiththeredoxreaction.Inthisprocesstheincrease amountofdefects(Ti3+andoxygendeficient)intitanatesplayalso asignificantrole[34,76,77].Modificationoftheopticalandelec- tronicpropertiesofTiO2 resultsinnotonlythereductionofthe bandwidthviatheincorporationofadditionalenergylevelsbut increasedlifetimeofthephotogeneratedelectronsandholesvia effectivechargecarrierseparationandsupressonofelectron-hole recombination[20].Thisisvalidfortitanatenanotubes,too.UV irradiationinducesFermilevelequilibrationbetweenTiO2andAu viachargedistributionand thereby Fermilevel shiftbyaround
−22mV[74,78].Such Fermilevel shiftincreasesthenumber of morereductiveelectronsonthemetalandpromotesefficientpho- tocatalyticreaction.Aswediscussedabovethismechanismcould playasignificantroleinourphoto-inducedreactionsintheCO2- methanesystemontitanatenanotubesmodifiedwithAuandRh nanoparticles.
ThenanoparticlesofAu(andsomeothermetals)arecoupled toTiO2(includingtitanatenanorods)toutilizetheirpropertyof localized surface plasmonic resonance (LSPR) in photocatalysis [42,79–82].LSPRisthecollectivefreeelectronchargeoscillation inthemetallicnanoparticlesthatareexcitedbylight[83].This phenomenonusuallyoccursinnanoparticles(>3nm),andstrongly dependsontheparticlesize,shapeandlocaldielectricenvironment
[80].Duringlightirradiation,theelectrontransferfromthephoto- excitedAunanoparticlestotheTiO2conductionbandmayoccur.
Theotherscenarioisalsoplausible,namely;electronsexcitedfrom metaltransfertoreactantmolecules.SuchkindofAumediated reductionofC60wasdemonstrated[74].
We believe thatsimilar Auand Rh mediated photo-assisted reactionoccursinCO2 activation[Eq.(14)]intheCH4+H2Oand CH4+CO2reactionsontitanatenanotubes.Asitisdemonstratedin Table1thegoldcontainingtitanatenanotubesexhibitsignificantly higherphotocatalyticactivitythanAu/TiO2(anatase),thoughthe puretitanatenanotubesalonedonotshowhighactivity.Theinten- sityofplasmonabsorption(at2.31eV)washigheronAu/TNTthan onAu/TiO2 (Fig.4).Consequently,theelectrontransferfromthe metaltothereactantsismorefavorable.Itshouldbenotedthat theLSPR-inducedphotoeffectsaresignificantlyinfluencedbythe propertiesofTiO2(size,shape,surfacearea,crystallinity)[80].We believethatthetitanatenanostructureshaveapositivefeatureto localizethemetalnanoparticlesinthispointofview.
Theotherimportantobservationisthattitanatenanotubescan stabilizegold(andalsoRh)insmallsizes,below3nm(Figs.2and3).
Insuchdimensiontheplasmonicfeature(LSPR)doesnotoperate.
Atthesametimemultiplemolecular-liketransitionsofthegold clusterwasobservedbyUV–visspectroscopy(Fig.4).Theintensi- tiesofthesetypesoftransitionswerealsosignificantlyhigheron titanatenanotubes.Aswehavealreadydiscussedabove,thesmall metalclusterscanstronglybondtothedefectsitesintitanatenano- tubes.Theseclustersmaybedirectlyinvolvedinthephoto-induced reactions.Themolecular-likeclustersmayformcomplexeswith thereactantswheretheelectrontransferdirectlyoccursduringUV irradiation.
In the light of the possible photocatalytic mechanisms it seemsthatthetypesofinteractionbetweenmetalandsubstrate (titanates)playimportantrole.Fromthisrespectthelong-range andshortrange interactions shouldbetaken intoaccount[84].
Whilethereisnosignificantbandgapdecreaseduetothemetal adatoms,theAuandRhchangesthebandgappopulationandshift- ingoftheFermilevel.SuchFermilevelshiftincreasesthenumberof electronsonthemetalandpromotesefficientphotocatalyticreac- tion.Thisshiftisa consequenceof chargetransferbetweenthe metalandsupport[48,84].Besidesofthislong-rangeinteraction, short-rangeinteraction,affectingtheatomsoratomclusters(for exampleAu25inpresentcase)atthegas-metal-supportinterface, couldbemoreimportant.Theshort-rangeinteractioncanbecon- sideredasa consequenceofthestrongelectricfields,whichare presentattheinterface.
Finally wecalculated photo-conversion efficienciesfromthe amount of hydrogen formed in each photo-induced reactions (Table.1).Thecalculatedvaluesareratherlow.Itiswell-known thatthecomplicated charge-carrier dynamicsand surfacereac- tionkinetics mainlylead tothe low quantum efficiency inthe multi-step processes of heterogeneousphotocatalysis [85]. The suitablethermodynamicproperties(includingbandgapsandCB/CV levels)donotguaranteegoodphotocatalyticefficiency.Itiscom- monly accepted that the mechanism governing heterogeneous photocatalysisconsistsoffourconsecutivetandemsteps;(1)light harvesting,(2)chargeexcitation/separation,(3)chargemigration, transportandrecombination,and(4)chargeutilization[86].There- fore,theoverallphotocatalysisefficiencyisstronglydependenton thecumulativeeffectsofthesefourconsecutivesteps.
4. Conclusions
Itwasdemonstratedinthepresentstudythattitanatenano- tubeshavenumerousadvantageouspropertiesthatplayimportant role in theinvestigated reactions. It is well knownthat larger