• Nem Talált Eredményt

NOTES ON AN INEQUALITY

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "NOTES ON AN INEQUALITY"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

NOTES ON AN INEQUALITY

N. S. HOANG

DEPARTMENT OFMATHEMATICS, KANSASSTATEUNIVERSITY

MANHATTAN, KS 66506-2602, USA nguyenhs@math.ksu.edu

URL:http://www.math.ksu.edu/ nguyenhs

Received 13 November, 2007; accepted 26 April, 2008 Communicated by S.S. Dragomir

ABSTRACT. In this note we prove a generalized version of an inequality which was first intro- duced by A. Q. Ngo, et al. and later generalized and proved by W. J. Liu, et al. in the paper: "On an open problem concerning an integral inequality", J. Inequal. Pure & Appl. Math., 8(3) 2007.

Key words and phrases: Integral inequality, Young’s inequality.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 26D15.

1. INTRODUCTION

In [2] the following result was proved: Iff ≥0is a continuous function on[0,1]such that (1.1)

Z 1

x

f(t)dt≥ Z 1

x

tdt, ∀x∈[0,1], then

Z 1

0

fα+1(x)dx≥ Z 1

0

xαf(x)dx, ∀α >0.

The following question was raised in [2]: If f satisfies the above assumptions, under what additional assumptions can one claim that:

Z 1

0

fα+β(x)dx ≥ Z 1

0

xαfβ(x)dx, ∀α, β >0?

It was proved in [1] that iff ≥0is a continuous function on[0,1]satisfying Z b

x

fα(t)dt≥ Z b

x

tαdt, α, b >0, ∀x∈[0, b], then

Z b

0

fα+β(x)dx≥ Z b

0

xαfβ(x)dx, ∀β >0.

In this paper, we prove more general results, namely, Theorems 2.4 and 2.5 below.

The author wishes to express his thanks to Prof. A.G. Ramm for helpful comments during the preparation of the paper.

339-07

~

(2)

2. RESULTS AND PROOFS

Let us recall the following result:

Lemma 2.1 (Young’s inequality). Letαandβ be positive real numbers satisfyingα+β = 1.

Then for all positive real numbersxandy, we have:

αx+βy ≥xαyβ.

Throughout the paper,[a, b]denotes a bounded interval and all functions are real-valued. Let us prove the following lemma:

Lemma 2.2. Letf ∈L1[a, b],g ∈C1[a, b]. Supposef ≥0,g >0is nondecreasing. If Z b

x

f(t)dt ≥ Z b

x

g(t)dt, ∀x∈[a, b],

then∀α >0the following inqualities hold Z b

a

gα(x)f(x)dx≥ Z b

a

gα+1(x)dx, (2.1)

Z b

a

fα+1(x)dx≥ Z b

a

fα(x)g(x)dx, (2.2)

Z b

a

fα+1(x)dx≥ Z b

a

f(x)gα(x)dx.

(2.3)

Proof. First, let us prove (2.1). LetA, A denote Af(x) :=

Z x

a

f(t)dt, Af(x) :=

Z b

x

f(t)dt, x∈[a, b], f ∈L1[a, b].

Note that these are continuous functions. From the assumption one has Af(x)≥Ag(x), ∀x∈[a, b].

This means

(Af−Ag)(x)≥0, ∀x∈[a, b].

Then∀h∈L1[a, b], h≥0, one obtains (2.4) hAf −Ag, hi:=

Z b

a

(Af−Ag)(x)h(x)dx≥0.

Note that the left-hand side of (2.4) is finite sinceAf, Agare bounded andh∈L1[a, b]. Thus, by Fubini’s Theorem, one has

(2.5) hf −g, Ahi=hAf−Ag, hi ≥0, ∀h≥0, h∈L1[a, b].

Denoteh(x) = αg(x)α−1g0(x). One has Ah(x) =

Z x

a

h(t)dt=gα(x)−gα(a), ∀x∈[a, b].

By the assumption,

(2.6) hf−g, gα(a)i=gα(a) Z b

a

(f(x)−g(x))dx≥0.

Sinceh≥0, from (2.5) and (2.6) one gets

(2.7) hf−g, gαi=hf−g, Ahi+hf −g, gα(a)i ≥0, ∀α≥0.

Hence, (2.1) is obtained.

(3)

Since

(f(x)−g(x))(fα(x)−gα(x))≥0, ∀x∈[a, b], ∀α ≥0, one gets

(2.8) hf −g, fα−gαi ≥0, ∀α ≥0.

Inequalities (2.7) and (2.8) imply

hf−g, fαi=hf −g, fα−gαi+hf −g, gαi ≥0, ∀α >0.

Thus, (2.2) holds.

By Lemma 2.1, 1

α+ 1fα+1(x) + α

α+ 1gα+1(x)≥gα(x)f(x), ∀x∈[a, b].

Thus,

(2.9) 1

α+ 1 Z b

a

fα+1(x)dx+ α α+ 1

Z b

a

gα+1(x)dx≥ Z b

a

gα(x)f(x)dx, ∀α >0.

From (2.1) and (2.9) one obtains Z b

a

fα+1(x)dx≥ Z b

a

gα(x)f(x)dx, ∀α ≥0.

The proof is complete.

In particular, one has the following result

Corollary 2.3. Supposef ∈L1[a, b],g ∈C1[a, b] f, g≥0,g is nondecreasing. If Z b

x

f(t)dt≥ Z b

x

g(t)dt, ∀x∈[a, b]

then the following inequality holds (2.10)

Z b

a

fβ(x)dx≥ Z b

a

gβ(x)dx, ∀β ≥1.

Proof. Denotef :=f +,g :=g+where >0. It is clear thatg >0and Z b

x

f(t)dt ≥ Z b

x

g(t)dt, ∀x∈[a, b].

By (2.1) and (2.3) in Lemma 2.2 one has (2.11)

Z b

a

fβ(x)dx≥ Z b

a

gβ(x)dx, ∀β ≥1.

Inequality (2.10) is obtained from (2.11) by letting→0.

Theorem 2.4. Supposef ∈L1[a, b],g ∈C1[a, b], f, g≥0,g is nondecreasing. If Z b

x

f(t)dt ≥ Z b

x

g(t)dt, ∀x∈[a, b], then∀α, β ≥0,α+β ≥1,the following inequality holds

(2.12)

Z b

a

fα+β(x)dx≥ Z b

a

fα(x)gβ(x)dx.

(4)

Proof. Lemma 2.1 shows that α

α+βf(x)α+β + β

α+βg(x)α+β ≥fα(x)gβ(x), ∀x∈[a, b], ∀α, β >0.

Therefore,∀α, β >0one has

(2.13) α

α+β Z b

a

f(x)α+βdx+ β α+β

Z b

a

g(x)α+βdx≥ Z b

a

fα(x)gβ(x)dx.

Corollary 2.3 implies (2.14)

Z b

a

f(x)α+βdx ≥ Z b

a

g(x)α+βdx, ∀α, β ≥0, α+β ≥1.

Inequality (2.12) is obtained from (2.13) and (2.14).

Remark 1. Theorem 2.4 is not true if we drop the assumptionα+β ≥1. Indeed, takeg ≡1, [a, b] = [0,1], and define

f(x) = c(1−x)c−1, 0≤x≤1, wherec∈(0,1). One has

(1−x)c = Z 1

x

f(t)dt ≥ Z 1

x

g(t)dt= (1−x), ∀x∈[0,1], c∈(0,1), but

2√ c c+ 1 =

Z 1

0

pf(t)dt <

Z 1

0

pg(t)dt= 1, ∀c∈(0,1).

Assuming that the conditiong ∈ C1[a, b]can be dropped and replaced by g ∈ L1[a, b], we have the following result:

Theorem 2.5. Supposef, g∈L1[a, b], f, g ≥0,g is nondecreasing. If (2.15)

Z b

x

f(t)dt ≥ Z b

x

g(t)dt, ∀x∈[a, b], then

(2.16)

Z b

a

fα+β(x)dx≥ Z b

a

fα(x)gβ(x)dx, ∀α, β ≥0, α+β ≥1.

Proof. SinceC1[a, b]is dense inL1, there exists a sequence(gn)n=1 ∈C1[a, b]such thatgnis nondecreasing,gn%g a.e. Sincegn%g a.e.,

(2.17)

Z b

x

g(t)dt≥ Z b

x

gn(t)dt, ∀x∈[a, b],∀n.

Inequalities (2.15), (2.17) and Theorem 2.4 imply (2.18)

Z b

a

fα+β(x)dx≥ Z b

a

fα(x)gnβ(x)dx, ∀n, ∀α, β ≥0, α+β ≥1.

Sincefαgβn % fαgβ a.e., fαgnβ ≥ 0is measurable satisfying (2.18), by the Monotone conver- gence theorem (see [3, 4])kfαgnβ →fαgβkL1 →0asn → ∞. Hence,

Z b

a

fα+β(x)dx≥ Z b

a

fα(x)gβ(x)dx, ∀α, β ≥0, α+β ≥1.

The proof is complete.

(5)

Remark 2. One may wish to extend Theorem 2.5 to the case where[a, b]is unbounded. Note that the caseb =∞is not meaningful. It is because ifg 6= 0a.e., then both sides of (2.15) are infinite. If b < ∞anda = −∞and inequality (2.15) holds for a = ∞, then it holds as well for all finitea < 0. Hence, inequality (2.16) holds for alla < 0. Thus, by lettinga → −∞in Theorem 2.5, one gets the result of Theorem 2.5 in the casea=−∞.

REFERENCES

[1] W.J. LIU, C.C. LI AND J.W. DONG, On an open problem concerning an integral inequality, J.

Inequal. Pure & Appl. Math., 8(3) (2007), Art. 74. [ONLINE:http://jipam.vu.edu.au/

article.php?sid=882].

[2] Q.A. NGO, D.D. THANG, T.T. DAT AND D.A. TUAN, Notes on an integral inequality, J. In- equal. Pure & Appl. Math., 7(4) (2006), Art. 120. [ONLINE: http://jipam.vu.edu.au/

article.php?sid=737].

[3] M. REED AND B. SIMON, Methods of Modern Mathematicals Physics, Functional Analysis I, Academic Press, Revised and enlarged edition, (1980).

[4] W. RUDIN, Real and Complex Analysis, McGraw-Hill Series in Higher Mathematics, Second edi- tion, (1974).

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

In order to see the early modern problematic of representation and the themes of the subject, abjection and the body in their social and theatrical context,

Finnish University Careers – study of academic work, academic careers and recruitments in Finnish universities (2015 – 2016). - Analysis of structures of and recruitment into

Burton, Stability and Periodic Solutions of Ordinary and Functional Differ- ential Equations, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, 1985..

We give a condition for obtaining the optimal constant of the integral inequality for the numerical analysis of a nonlinear system of PDEs.... Note on an Integral

SIMON, Methods of Modern Mathematicals Physics, Func- tional Analysis I, Academic Press, Revised and enlarged edition, (1980).

The proof of (1.3) is valid for infinite sums, too, because both the superadditivity of power functions with exponent α ≥ 1, and the α-power mean inequality remain true for an

Abstract: In this paper, an integral inequality and an application of it, that imply the Cheby- shev functional for two 3-convex (3-concave) functions, are given.... Integral

in [Notes on an Integral Inequality, JIPAM, 7(4) (2006), Art.120] and give some answers which extend the results of Boukerrioua-Guezane-Lakoud [On an open question regarding an