• Nem Talált Eredményt

FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPEN PROBLEM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPEN PROBLEM"

Copied!
14
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page

Contents

JJ II

J I

Page1of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPEN PROBLEM

YU MIAO AND JUNFEN LI

College of Mathematics and Information Science Henan Normal University

Henan Province, 453007, China

EMail:yumiao728@yahoo.com.cn junfen_li@yahoo.com.cn

Received: 06 March, 2008

Accepted: 5 October, 2008

Communicated by: N.S. Barnett 2000 AMS Sub. Class.: 26D15; 60E15.

Key words: Integral inequality, Cauchy inequality, Open problem.

Abstract: In this paper, we generalize an open problem posed by Ngô et al. in [Notes on an Integral Inequality, JIPAM, 7(4) (2006), Art.120] and give some answers which extend the results of Boukerrioua-Guezane-Lakoud [On an open question regarding an integral inequality, JIPAM, 8(3) (2007), Art. 77.] and Liu-Li-Dong [On an open problem concerning an integral inequality, JIPAM, 8 (3) (2007), Art.

74.].

Acknowledgements: The authors are indebted to the referees and the editor for their many helpful and valuable comments.

(2)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page2of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Contents

1 Introduction 3

2 Main Results 5

3 Further Discussion 11

(3)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page3of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

1. Introduction

In [4], the following inequality is found.

Theorem A. Letf(x)≥0be a continuous function on[0,1]satisfying

(1.1)

Z 1

x

f(t)dt≥ Z 1

x

tdt, ∀x∈[0,1], then

(1.2)

Z 1

0

fα+1(x)dx≥ Z 1

0

xαf(x)dx,

and

(1.3)

Z 1

0

fα+1(x)dx≥ Z 1

0

xfα(x)dx, hold for every positive real numberα >0.

The authors next proposed the following open problem:

Open Problem 1. Letf(x)≥0be a continuous function on[0,1]satisfying

(1.4)

Z 1

x

f(t)dt≥ Z 1

x

tdt, ∀x∈[0,1].

Under what conditions does the inequality

(1.5)

Z 1

0

fα+β(x)≥ Z 1

0

xαfβ(x)dx hold forαandβ?

(4)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page4of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Several answers and extension results have been given to this open problem [1,3].

In the present paper, we obtain a generalization of the above Open Problem1 and provide some resolutions to it. Here, and in what follows, we useXto denote a non- negative random variable (r.v.) on [0,∞) with probability density function p(x).

E(X) denotes the mathematical expectation of X and 1A := 1A(X) denotes the indicator function of the eventA. LetAt = [t,∞). We now consider the following generalization of Open Problem1.

Open Problem 2. Letf(x) ≥ 0be a continuous function on [0,∞). Under what conditions does the inequality

(1.6) E(fα+β(X))≥E(Xαfβ(X))

hold forαandβ?

Remark 1. Let X possess a uniform distribution on the support interval [0,1], i.e., the probability density function of X is equal to 1, x ∈ [0,1] and zero elsewhere, then the above open problem becomes Open Problem1.

For convenience, we assume that all the necessary functions in the following are integrable.

(5)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page5of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

2. Main Results

Theorem 2.1. Letf(x)≥0be a continuous function on[0,∞)satisfying (2.1) E(fβ(X)1At)≥E(Xβ1At), ∀t ∈[0,∞).

Then

(2.2) E(fα+β(X))≥E(Xαfβ(X))

holds for every positive real numberαandβ.

Proof. By Fubini’s Theorem and (2.1), we have

E(Xαfβ(X)) = Z

0

xαfβ(x)p(x)dx (2.3)

= 1 α

Z

0

Z x

0

tα−1dt

fβ(x)p(x)dx

= 1 α

Z

0

tα−1 Z

t

fβ(x)p(x)dx

dt

= 1 α

Z

0

tα−1E(fβ(X)1At)dt

≥1 α

Z

0

tα−1E(Xβ1At)dt

= 1 α

Z

0

tα−1 Z

t

xβp(x)dx

dt

= 1 α

Z

0

Z x

0

tα−1dt

xβp(x)dx

(6)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page6of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

= Z

0

xβ+αp(x)dx=E(Xβ+α).

Using Cauchy’s inequality, we have

(2.4) β

α+βfα+β(X) + α

α+βXα+β ≥Xαfβ(X), which, by (2.3), yields

(2.5) β

α+βE(fα+β(X)) + α

α+βE(Xα+β)≥E(Xαfβ(X))≥E(Xβ+α).

Remark 2. If we assume that X possesses a uniform distribution on the support interval[0,1](or[0, b]), then the above theorem is Theorem 2.1 (or Theorem 2.4) of Liu-Li-Dong in [3].

Theorem 2.2. Letf(x)≥0be a continuous function on[0,∞)satisfying (2.6) E(f(X)1At)≥E(X1At), ∀t∈[0,∞).

Then

(2.7) E(fα+β(X))≥E(Xβfα(X))

holds for every positive real numberα≥1andβ.

Proof. By Fubini’s Theorem and (2.6), we have

E(Xα+1f(X)) = Z

0

xα+1f(x)p(x)dx (2.8)

= 1

α+ 1 Z

0

Z x

0

tαdt

f(x)p(x)dx

(7)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page7of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

= 1

α+ 1 Z

0

tα Z

t

f(x)p(x)dx

dt

≥ 1 α+ 1

Z

0

tα Z

t

xp(x)dx

dt

= 1

α+ 1 Z

0

xp(x) Z x

0

tαdt

dx=E(Xα+2).

Applying Cauchy’s inequality, we get

(2.9) 1

αfα(X) + α−1

α Xα ≥f(X)Xα−1. Multiplying both sides of (2.9) byXβ, we have

(2.10) 1

αE(fα(X)Xβ) + α−1

α E(Xα+β)≥E(f(X)Xα+β−1)≥E(Xα+β), which implies

(2.11) E(fα(X)Xβ)≥E(Xα+β).

The remainder of the proof is similar to that of Theorem2.1.

Remark 3. If we assume that X possesses a uniform distribution on the support interval[0,1]then the above theorem is Theorem 2.3 of Boukerrioua and Guezane- Lakoud in [1].

Next we consider the case “α > 0, β > 2” by using the ideas of Dragomir-Ngô in [2].

(8)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page8of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Lemma 2.3 ([2]). Letf : [a, b]→ [0,∞)be a continuous function andg : [a, b] → [0,∞)be non-decreasing, differentiable on(a, b)satisfying

Z b

x

f(t)dt ≥ Z b

x

g(t)dt.

Then

Z b

x

fβ(t)dt≥ Z b

x

gβ(t)dt holds forβ >1.

Lemma 2.4. Let f(x) ≥ 0be a continuous function on[0,∞)with f0(x) ≥ 0 on (0,∞)and satisfying

(2.12) E(f(X)1At)≥E(X1At), ∀t∈[0,∞).

Then

(2.13) E(fβ(X)1At))≥E(Xβ1At) holds for every positive real numberβ ≥1.

Proof. The proof is a direct extension of Theorem 3 in [2].

Theorem 2.5. Letf(x) ≥ 0be a continuous function on[0,∞)withf0(x) ≥ 0on (0,∞)and satisfying

(2.14) E(f(X)1At)≥E(X1At), ∀t∈[0,∞).

In addition, for every positive real numberα >0, β > 2satisfying

(2.15) lim

x→∞fα(x)xβ−1E[(f(X)−X)1Ax] = 0,

(9)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page9of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

and

(2.16) lim

x→∞fα(x)xE[(fβ−1(X)−Xβ−1)1Ax] = 0, then

(2.17) E(fα+β(X))≥E(Xβfα(X)).

Proof. It is obvious that

(f(x)−x)(fβ−1(x)−xβ−1)≥0, which implies that

(2.18) fβ+α(x)≥xβ−1f1+α(x) +xfβ−1+α(x)−xβfα(x).

Integrating by parts and using (2.14) and (2.15), we have E(fα(X)Xβ−1(f(X)−X))

= Z

0

fα(x)xβ−1(f(x)−x)p(x)dx

=− Z

0

fα(x)xβ−1d Z

x

(f(t)−t)p(t)dt

dx

=−fα(x)xβ−1 Z

x

(f(t)−t)p(t)dt

0

+ Z

0

αf0(x)fα−1(x)xβ−1+ (β−1)xβ−2fα(x)Z x

(f(t)−t)p(t)dt

dx

= Z

0

αf0(x)fα−1(x)xβ−1+ (β−1)xβ−2fα(x)Z x

(f(t)−t)p(t)dt

dx

= Z

0

αf0(x)fα−1(x)xβ−1+ (β−1)xβ−2fα(x)

E((f(X)−X)1Ax) dx≥0,

(10)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page10of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

which yields

(2.19) E(fα+1(X)Xβ−1)≥E(fα(X)Xβ).

Furthermore, by Lemma2.4and the condition (2.16), we have E(fα(X)X(fβ−1(X)−Xβ−1))

= Z

0

fα(x)x(fβ−1(x)−xβ−1)p(x)dx

=− Z

0

fα(x)xd Z

x

(fβ−1(t)−tβ−1)p(t)dt

dx

=−fα(x)x Z

x

(fβ−1(t)−tβ−1)p(t)dt

0

+ Z

0

(αxf0(x)fα−1(x) +fα(x)) Z

x

(fβ−1(t)−tβ−1)p(t)dt

dx

= Z

0

(αxf0(x)fα−1(x) +fα(x))E (fβ−1(X)−Xβ−1)1Ax

dx≥0,

which yields

(2.20) E(fα+β−1(X)X)≥E(fα(X)Xβ).

From (2.18)-(2.20), inequality (2.17) holds.

(11)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page11of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

3. Further Discussion

Letg(x) ≥ 0, 0 < R

0 g(x)dx < ∞. If p(x) := Rg(x)

0 g(x)dx, then it is easy to check thatp(x)is a probability density function on the interval [0,∞). Thus we have the following:

Theorem 3.1. Letf(x)≥0be a continuous function on[0,∞)satisfying (3.1)

Z

t

fβ(t)g(t)dt ≥ Z

t

tβg(t)dt ∀t∈[0,∞).

Then

(3.2)

Z

0

fα+β(x)g(x)dx≥ Z

0

xβfα(x)g(x)dx

holds for every positive real numberαandβ.

Theorem 3.2. Letf(x)≥0be a continuous function on[0,∞)satisfying (3.3)

Z

t

f(t)g(t)dt ≥ Z

t

tg(t)dt, ∀t∈[0,∞).

Then

(3.4)

Z

0

fα+β(x)g(x)dx≥ Z

0

xβfα(x)g(x)dx

holds for every pair of positive real numbers “α ≥ 1and β > 0”. Furthermore, for every positive real number “α > 0, β > 2” satisfying (2.15) and (2.16), the inequality (3.4) holds.

Two more general results follow.

(12)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page12of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Theorem 3.3. Let f(x) ≥ 0, g(x) ≥ 0 be two continuous functions on [0,∞) satisfying

(3.5)

Z

t

fβ(t)dt≥ Z

t

gβ(t)dt ∀t ∈[0,∞).

Furthermore, for any positive real numbersα andβ, let g(x)be differentiable with [gα(x)]0 ≥0andg(0) = 0, then

(3.6)

Z

0

fα+β(x)dx≥ Z

0

gβ(x)fα(x)dx.

Proof. Denoting the derivative ofgα(x)byG(x), we obtain, Z

0

gα(x)fβ(x)dx= Z

0

Z x

0

G(t)dt

fβ(x)dx (3.7)

= Z

0

G(t) Z

t

fβ(x)dx

dt

≥ Z

0

G(t) Z

t

gβ(x)dx

dt

= Z

0

gβ(x) Z x

0

G(t)dt

dx

= Z

0

gβ+α(x)dx.

Using Cauchy’s inequality, we have

(3.8) β

α+βfα+β(x) + α

α+βgα+β(x)≥gα(x)fβ(x),

(13)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page13of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

which, by (3.7), yields β

α+β Z

0

fα+β(x)dx+ α α+β

Z

0

gα+β(x)dx≥ Z

0

gα(x)fβ(x)dx (3.9)

≥ Z

0

gβ+α(x)dx.

The desired result then follows.

A similar proof yields the following:

Theorem 3.4. Let f(x) ≥ 0, g(x) ≥ 0 be two continuous functions on [0,∞) satisfying

(3.10)

Z

t

f(t)dt≥ Z

t

g(t)dt, ∀t∈[0,∞).

Furthermore, for every pair of positive real numbers satisfying “α ≥1andβ >0”, letg(x)be differentiable with[gα(x)]0 ≥0andg(0) = 0, then

(3.11)

Z

0

fα+β(x)dx≥ Z

0

gβ(x)fα(x)dx.

Additionally, for every positive real number “α > 0, β > 2” satisfying (2.15) and (2.16), inequality (3.11) holds.

(14)

Further Development of an Open Problem Yu Miao and Junfen Li vol. 9, iss. 4, art. 108, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page14of 14 Go Back Full Screen

Close

References

[1] K. BOUKERRIOUA AND A. GUEZANE-LAKOUD, On an open question re- garding an integral inequality, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 8(3) (2007), Art. 77.

[ONLINE:http://jipam.vu.edu.au/article.php?sid=885].

[2] S.S. DRAGOMIRANDQ.A. NGÔ, On an integral inequality, RGMIA Research Report Collection, 11(1) (2008), Art. 13. [ONLINE: http://www.staff.

vu.edu.au/RGMIA/v11n1.asp].

[3] W.J. LIU, C.C. LIANDJ.W. DONG, On an open problem concerning an integral inequality, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 8(3) (2007), Art. 74. [ONLINE:http:

//jipam.vu.edu.au/article.php?sid=882].

[4] Q.A. NGÔ, D.D. THANG, T.T. DAT AND D.A. TUAN, Note on an integral inequality, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 7(4) (2006), Art. 120. [ONLINE:

http://jipam.vu.edu.au/article.php?sid=737].

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

We give a condition for obtaining the optimal constant of the integral inequality for the numerical analysis of a nonlinear system of PDEs.... Note on an Integral

We give a condition for obtaining the optimal constant of the integral inequality for the numerical analysis of a nonlinear system of PDEs.. Key words and phrases: Integral

SIMON, Methods of Modern Mathematicals Physics, Func- tional Analysis I, Academic Press, Revised and enlarged edition, (1980).

SIMON, Methods of Modern Mathematicals Physics, Functional Analysis I, Academic Press, Revised and enlarged edition, (1980).

The proof of (1.3) is valid for infinite sums, too, because both the superadditivity of power functions with exponent α ≥ 1, and the α-power mean inequality remain true for an

In view of the interest in this type of inequalities, much attention has been paid to the problem and many authors have extended the inequality to more general cases (see [1, 3,

in [Notes on an Integral Inequality, JIPAM, 7(4) (2006), Art.120] and give some answers which extend the results of Boukerrioua-Guezane-Lakoud [On an open question regarding an

Abstract: The aim of this short note is to establish an integral inequality and its reverse which give an affirmative answer to an open problem posed by QUÔC ANH NGÔ, DU DUC