• Nem Talált Eredményt

NOTE ON AN INTEGRAL INEQUALITY APPLICABLE IN PDEs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "NOTE ON AN INTEGRAL INEQUALITY APPLICABLE IN PDEs"

Copied!
12
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page

Contents

JJ II

J I

Page1of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close

NOTE ON AN INTEGRAL INEQUALITY APPLICABLE IN PDEs

V. ˇCULJAK

Department of Mathematics Faculty of Civil Engineering University of Zagreb

Kaciceva 26, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia EMail:vera@master.grad.hr

Received: 22 April, 2008

Accepted: 06 May, 2008

Communicated by: J. Peˇcari´c

2000 AMS Sub. Class.: Primary 26D15, Secondary 26D99.

Key words: Integral inequality, Nonlinear system of PDEs.

Abstract: The article presents and refines the results which were proven in [1]. We give a condition for obtaining the optimal constant of the integral inequality for the numerical analysis of a nonlinear system of PDEs.

(2)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page2of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Contents

1 Introduction 3

2 Results 4

(3)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page3of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close

1. Introduction

In [1] the following problem is considered and its application to nonlinear system of PDEs is described.

Theorem A. Leta, b∈ R, a < 0, b > 0andf ∈C[a, b], such that: 0< f ≤ 1on [a, b],f is decreasing on[a,0]and

Z 0

a

f dx= Z b

0

f dx

then

(a) Ifp≥2,the inequality

(1.1)

Z b

a

fpdx≤Ap Z a+b2

a

f dx

holds for allAp ≥2.

(b) If1≤p < 2, the inequality

(1.2)

Z b

a

fpdx≤Ap Z a+b2

a

f dx holds for allAp ≥4.

In this note we improve the optimalAp for the case1< p <2.

(4)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page4of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close

2. Results

Theorem 2.1. Leta, b∈ R, a < 0, b > 0andf ∈ C[a, b], such that0 < f ≤ 1on [a, b],f is decreasing on[a,0]and

Z 0

a

f dx= Z b

0

f dx.

(i) Ifa+b ≥0,then for1≤p,this inequality holds

(2.1)

Z b

a

fpdx≤2 Z a+b2

a

f dx.

(ii) Ifa+b < 0then

(a) Ifp≥2,the inequality

(2.2)

Z b

a

fpdx ≤Ap Z a+b2

a

f dx

holds for allAp ≥2.

(b) If1< p <2, the inequality

(2.3)

Z b

a

fpdx ≤Ap

Z a+b2

a

f dx holds for allAp ≥21+x1+xp−1max

max,where0< xmax≤1is the solution of (2.4) xp−1(p−2) +xp−2(p−1)−1 = 0.

(5)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page5of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close

(c) Forp= 1the inequality

(2.5)

Z b

a

f dx≤4 Z a+b2

a

f dx

holds.

Proof. As in the proof in [1], we consider two cases: (i)a+b ≥0and (ii)a+b <0.

(i) First, we suppose that a +b ≥ 0. Using the properties of the function f, we conclude, forp≥1,that:

Z b

a

fpdx≤ Z b

a

f dx= 2 Z 0

a

f dx≤2 Z a+b2

a

f dx.

The constantAp = 2is the best possible. To prove sharpness, we choosef = 1.

(ii) Now we suppose thata+b < 0. Letϕ : [a,0] → [0, b]be a function with the property

Z 0

x

f dt= Z ϕ(x)

0

f dt.

So,ϕ(x)is differentiable andϕ(a) = b, ϕ(0) = 0.

For arbitraryx ∈[a,0],such thatx+ϕ(x)≥ 0,according to case (i) for p≥1, we obtain the inequality

Z ϕ(x)

x

fpdt≤2

Z x+ϕ(x)2

x

f dt.

In particular, forx=a,

Z b

a

fpdt ≤2 Z a+b2

a

f dt.

(6)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page6of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close

If we suppose thatx+ϕ(x) < 0for arbitrary x ∈ [a,0],then we define a new function

ψ : [a,0]→Rby

ψ(x) = Ap

Z x+ϕ(x)2

x

f dt− Z ϕ(x)

x

fpdt.

The functionψ is differentiable and

ψ0(x) = 1

2Ap(1 +ϕ0(x))f

x+ϕ(x) 2

−Apf(x)−fp(ϕ(x))ϕ0(x) +fp(x)

andψ(0) = 0.

If we prove thatψ0(x)≤0then the inequality Z ϕ(x)

x

fpdt ≤Ap

Z x+ϕ(x)2

x

f dt holds.

Using the properties of the functions f, ϕ and the fact that f(ϕ(x))ϕ0(x) =

−f(x), we consider f(ϕ(x))ψ0(x) and try to conclude that f(ϕ(x))ψ0(x) ≤ 0 as follows:

f(ϕ(x))ψ0(x)

=f(ϕ(x)) 1

2Ap(1 +ϕ0(x))f

x+ϕ(x) 2

−Apf(x)−fp(ϕ(x))ϕ0(x) +fp(x)

= 1

2Apf(ϕ(x))f

x+ϕ(x) 2

+1

2Apf(ϕ(x))ϕ0(x)f

x+ϕ(x) 2

−Apf(x)f(ϕ(x))

−fp(ϕ(x))ϕ0(x)f(ϕ(x)) +fp(x)f(ϕ(x))

(7)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page7of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close

= 1

2Apf(ϕ(x))f

x+ϕ(x) 2

−1

2Apf(x)f

x+ϕ(x) 2

−Apf(x)f(ϕ(x)) +fp(ϕ(x))f(x) +fp(x)f(ϕ(x))

= 1

2Ap[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]f

x+ϕ(x) 2

−Apf(x)f(ϕ(x)) +fp(ϕ(x))f(x) +fp(x)f(ϕ(x)).

Forp≥1, if[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]≤0,then f(ϕ(x))ψ0(x)

≤ 1

2Ap[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]f

x+ϕ(x) 2

−Apf(x)f(ϕ(x)) + [f(ϕ(x))f(x) +f(x)f(ϕ(x))]

= 1

2Ap[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]f

x+ϕ(x) 2

−(Ap−2)f(x)f(ϕ(x)).

Then, obviously,ψ0(x)≤0forAp−2≥0.

If we suppose that[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)] >0then using the properties ofϕ, we can conclude thatf

x+ϕ(x) 2

≤f(x)and we estimatef(ϕ(x))ψ0(x)as follows:

f(ϕ(x))ψ0(x)

≤ 1

2Ap[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]f(x)−Apf(x)f(ϕ(x)) +fp(ϕ(x))f(x) +fp(x)f(ϕ(x))

≤ 1

2Ap[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]f(x)−Apf(x)f(ϕ(x)) +f(ϕ(x))f(x) +f(x)f(ϕ(x))

(8)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page8of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close

=−1

2Apf2(x) +

2− 1 2Ap

f(ϕ(x))f(x)≤ −1

2Apf2(x) +

2−1 2Ap

f2(ϕ(x))

≤ −1

2(Ap−4)f2(ϕ(x)).

So,ψ0(x)≤0forAp−4≥0.

Now, we will consider the sign off(ϕ(x))ψ0(x) forp= 1, p≥2,and1< p <2.

(a) Forp ≥ 2,we try to improve the constant Ap ≥ 4 for the casea+b < 0 and [f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]>0.We can estimatef(ϕ(x))ψ0(x)as follows:

f(ϕ(x))ψ0(x)

≤ 1

2Ap[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]f(x)−Apf(x)f(ϕ(x)) +fp(ϕ(x))f(x) +fp(x)f(ϕ(x))

≤ 1

2Ap[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]f(x)−Apf(x)f(ϕ(x)) +f2(ϕ(x))f(x) +f2(x)f(ϕ(x))

≤ 1

2f(x)[f(x) +f(ϕ(x))][2f(ϕ(x))−Ap].

Hence,ψ0(x)≤0forAp ≥2.

(b) For 1 < p < 2, we can improve the constant Ap ≥ 4 for the case a+b < 0 and [f(ϕ(x))−f(x)] > 0. We can estimatef(ϕ(x))ψ0(x)(for 0 < f(x) = y <

f(ϕ(x)) =z ≤1),as follows:

f(ϕ(x))ψ0(x)

≤ 1

2Ap[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]f(x)−Apf(x)f(ϕ(x)) +fp(ϕ(x))f(x) +fp(x)f(ϕ(x))

(9)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page9of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close

≤y

−1

2Apz− 1

2Apy+zp+yp−1z

=y

−1 2Apz

1 + y z

+zp

1 +y z

p−1

≤yz

−1 2Ap

1 + y z

+ 1 +y z

p−1 .

So, we conclude thatψ0(x)≤0if

−1

2Ap(1 +t) + 1 +tp−1)

<0,

for0< t= yz ≤1.

Therefore, for1< p <2the constantAp ≥2 max0<t≤1 1+tp−1 1+t .

The function 1+t1+tp−1 is concave on(0,1]and the pointtmax where the maximum is achieved is a root of the equation

tp−1(p−2) +tp−2(p−1)−1 = 0.

Numerically we get the following values ofAp :

forp= 1.01, the constant Ap ≥3.8774, forp= 1.99, the constant Ap ≥2.0056, forp= 1.9999, the constant Ap ≥2.0001.

If we consider the sequencepn = 2− 1n,then thelimn→∞ 1+tpn−1

1+t = 1,but we find that the pointtmaxwhere the function 1+t1+tpn−1 achieves the maximum is a fixed point of the functiong(x) = (1−1+xn )n.

We use fixed point iteration to find the fixed point for the function g(x) = (1−

(10)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page10of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close 1+x

100)100,by starting witht0 = 0.2and iteratingtk=g(tk−1), k = 1,2, ...7 : t0 = 0.200000000000000,

t1 = 0.299016021496423, t2 = 0.270488141422931, t3 = 0.278419068898826, t4 = 0.276191402436672, t5 = 0.276815328895026, t6 = 0.276640438571483, t7 = 0.276689450339917.

Whenn → ∞,i.e. pn → 2, the pointtmax where the function 1+t1+tpn−1 achieves the maximum is a fixed point of the functiong(x) =e−(1+x).

We use fixed point iteration to find the fixed point for the function g(x) = e−(1+x),by starting witht0 = 0.2and iteratingtk =g(tk−1), k = 1,2, ...7 :

t0 = 0.200000000000000, t1 = 0.301194211912202, t2 = 0.272206526577512, t3 = 0.280212642489384, t4 = 0.277978184195021, t5 = 0.278600009316777, t6 = 0.278426822683543, t7 = 0.278475046663319

(11)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page11of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close

If we consider the sequence pn = 1 + n1 then limn→∞ 1+tpn−1

1+t = 1+t2 , and supt∈(0,1] 1+t2 = 2fort→0 +.

(c) Forp= 1,

• if[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]≤0thenψ0(x)≤0forA1−2≥0;

• if[f(ϕ(x))−f(x)]>0thenψ0(x)≤0forA1−4≥0, so, the best constant isA1 = 4.

(12)

Note on an Integral Inequality V. ˇCuljak

vol. 9, iss. 2, art. 38, 2008

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page12of 12 Go Back Full Screen

Close

References

[1] V. JOVANOVI ´C, On an inequality in nonlinear thermoelasticity, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 8(4) (2007), Art. 105. [ONLINE: http://jipam.vu.edu.

au/article.php?sid=916].

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

in [Notes on an Integral Inequality, JIPAM, 7(4) (2006), Art.120] and give some answers which extend the results of Boukerrioua-Guezane-Lakoud [On an open question regarding an

Abstract: The aim of this short note is to establish an integral inequality and its reverse which give an affirmative answer to an open problem posed by QUÔC ANH NGÔ, DU DUC

Acknowledgements: The first author was supported by the Science Research Foundation of NUIST and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province Education Department under

Acknowledgements: The authors thank the referee for making several suggestions for improving the presentation of this paper.... Open Question Regarding an Integral

The results presented in this section aim to demonstrate the main ideas of the proof of Theorem 3.1 in a more simpler problem.. Corollaries have an

The authors establish the Hardy integral inequality for commutators generated by Hardy operators and Lipschitz functions.. Key words and phrases: Hardy’s integral

An Integral Inequality Similar to Qi’s Inequality Lazhar Bougoffa.. Title

The inequalities, which Pachpatte has derived from the well known Hadamard’s inequality for convex functions, are improved, obtaining new integral inequalities for products of