• Nem Talált Eredményt

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy "

Copied!
7
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

State of the Art Review For the 25

th

Anniversary of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Valentina Kutyifa 1, 2

1

Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiology Division, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA, and

2

6HPPHOZHLV8QLYHUVLW\+HDUW&HQWHU%XGDSHVW+XQJDU\

Address reprint requests to:

Valentina Kutyifa, MD, PhD, FHRS, FESC, FACC, Associate Professor of Medicine Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Rochester Medical Center

&ULWWHQGHQ%OYG5RFKHVWHU1HZ<RUN

E-mail: Valentina.Kutyifa@heart.rochester.edu or Valentina.Kutyifa@kardio.sote.hu

3DWLHQWVZLWKKHDUWIDLOXUH+)KDYHDVLJQL¿FDQWPRUELGLW\DQGPRUWDOLW\WKDWFRPSHWHVZLWKWKRVHRIPDQ\FDQFHUV,Q +)SDWLHQWVZLWKDVHYHUHO\GHSUHVVHGOHIWYHQWULFXODUIXQFWLRQDQGDZLGH456UHÀHFWLQJOHIWYHQWULFXODUG\VV\QFKURQ\

FDUGLDFUHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQWKHUDS\&57KDVEHHQVKRZQWRLPSURYHIXQFWLRQDOFDSDFLW\+)V\PSWRPVDQGTXDOLW\RI OLIH6LQFHWKH¿UVWFDVHUHSRUWVZHUHSXEOLVKHGLQWKHUHKDYHEHHQDODUJHQXPEHURIUDQGRPL]HGFRQWUROOHGFOL- QLFDOWULDOVFRQGXFWHGWKDWKDYHSURYHQWKHHႈFDF\RI&57LQGLYHUVH+)SRSXODWLRQVVKRZLQJDVLJQL¿FDQWUHGXFWLRQLQ HF hospitalization and improved survival. CRT has, over the past 25 years, become a guideline-indicated, evidence-ba- VHGGHYLFHWKHUDS\IRUPLOGDQGDGYDQFHG+)SDWLHQWVZLWKVHYHUHO\UHGXFHGOHIWYHQWULFXODUIXQFWLRQDQGDZLGH456 1HYHUWKHOHVVWKHUHDUHDQXPEHURIIDFWRUVQHJDWLQJEHQH¿FLDOUHVSRQVHWR&57DQGPXOWLSOHXQUHVROYHGTXHVWLRQVWR WKLVGD\7KLVUHYLHZDUWLFOHVXPPDUL]HVFXUUHQWDYDLODEOHNQRZOHGJHRQ&57LQ+)SDWLHQWVIURPUDQGRPL]HGFOLQLFDO WULDOVDQGRWKHUUHOHYDQWVWXGLHVGLVFXVVHVLPSRUWDQWGHWHUPLQDQWVRI&57UHVSRQVHDQGSURYLGHVDVHOHFWHGRYHUYLHZ RIXQUHVROYHGTXHVWLRQVZLWKIXWXUHGLUHFWLRQVIRUUHVHDUFK

Keywords:

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Left Ventricular Dyssycnhrony, Clinical Outcomes, Clinical Trials, Future Directions

Mechanism of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in the Failing Heart

3DWLHQWV ZLWK +) RIWHQ SUHVHQW ZLWK DQ HOHFWULFDO FRQ- duction delay, resulting in dyssynchronous left ventricu- lar activation, impaired left ventricular systolic function, PLWUDOUHJXUJLWDWLRQDQGDVLJQL¿FDQWO\UHGXFHGFDUGLDF output (1). An electrical conduction delay is manifes- ted either as a left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), or as an intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD). Electrical activation of the YHQWULFOHV LQ SDWLHQWV ZLWK /%%% DQG 5%%% KDV EHHQ SUHYLRXVO\GHVFULEHGE\)DQWRQLHWDO3DWLHQWVZLWK LBBB typically have multiple right ventricular (RV) bre- akthrough sites in the septum as compared to RBBB

ZLWK D VLQJOH 59 EUHDNWKURXJK VLWH 7UDQVVHSWDO DFWL- vation time, activation time of the RV, and total activa- WLRQWLPHLVVLJQL¿FDQWO\ORQJHULQ5%%%DVFRPSDUHG WR /%%% ,Q SDWLHQWV ZLWK /%%% RU 5%%% WKHUH LV D VORZ OHIW YHQWULFXODU /9 HOHFWULFDO DFWLYDWLRQ IURP WKH septal or anterior breakthrough sites to the apical and lateral regions. Most typically, the postero-lateral basal region is the latest activated LV area in both LBBB and RBBB, providing the rationale for biventricular pacing ZLWKDQ/9ODWHUDOSRVWHURODWHUDOOHDGLQWKLVSRSXODWLRQ

$OWKRXJKSDWLHQWVZLWK5%%%H[KLELWDPRUHDGYDQFHG conduction tissue disease than LBBB that is often less amenable to CRT.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or biventricu-

ODUSDFLQJLVGHOLYHUHGXVLQJDOHDGSDFLQJGH¿EULOOD-

(2)

tor system that delivers electrical stimuli to the right atri- um, right ventricle, and left ventricle to synchronize the G\VV\QFKURQRXV/9DFWLYDWLRQLQSDWLHQWVZLWKFRQGXF- tion tissue disease and a severely reduced LV function.

&57ZDVGHYHORSHGWRUHVWRUHWKHSK\VLRORJLFDODWULDO and ventricular contraction in the failing heart and cor- UHFWDWULRYHQWULFXODUG\VV\QFKURQ\DVZHOODVLQWHUYHQW- ricular dyssynchrony and intraventricular dyssynchrony.

Atrioventricular dyssynchrony, or PR-prolongation is RIWHQ REVHUYHG LQ +) SDWLHQWV OLQNHG WR ZRUVH FOLQLFDO outcomes (3). The pathophysiology of a prolonged-PR interval is primarily based on the atrial systole (A) oc- curring early in diastole and therefore, it is superimpo- VHG RQ WKH HDUO\ OHIW YHQWULFXODU ¿OOLQJ SKDVH ( VXE- sequently leading to the fusion of the diastolic E and A ZDYHVVKRUWHQLQJHႇHFWLYHGLDVWROLF/9¿OOLQJWLPHDQG decreasing cardiac output. The early atrial systole un- couples the mitral valve closure from LV systole resul- ting in diastolic pre-systolic mitral regurgitation, dec- UHDVHGSUHORDGDQGGHFUHDVHGIRUZDUGVWURNHYROXPH IXUWKHUZRUVHQLQJ/9IXQFWLRQ)ROORZLQJ&57LPSODQWD- tion, normalization of the PR-interval restores the phy- siologic AV-sequence, eliminating the pathologic E and A fusion, and diastolic pre-systolic mitral regurgitation.

Restoration of interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony via synchronized left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) pacing, or most often, LV pre-ex- citation additionally results in an immediate decrease of intra- and interventricular dyssynchrony, a decrea- se in mitral regurgitation, and an increase in LV cont- ractility (4). Long-term CRT use is linked to a reduction in LV end-diastolic (LVEDV) and LV end-systolic volu- me (LVESV), and improvement in LV ejection fraction (LVEF), described as LV reverse remodeling (5, 6) (Fi-

gure 1). Eliminating LV dyssynchrony, reducing LV vo- lumes, and increasing LVEF is the hallmark of cardiac UHV\QFKURQ]LDWLRQ WKHUDS\ WKDW LV DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK EH- QH¿FLDOFOLQLFDORXWFRPHV(Figure 2).

Randomized Clinical Trials in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

There have been a large number of randomized cont- UROOHGFOLQLFDOWULDOVWRDVFHUWDLQWKHVDIHW\DQGHႈFDF\

of CRT or CRT-D to improve quality of life, HF symp- toms, functional capacity, and clinical outcomes. These VWXGLHV DUH VXPPDUL]HG EHORZ LQ Table 1. As it has been evidenced in the early studies enrolling 50-100 SDWLHQWV LPSODQWDWLRQ RI &57 UHVXOWHG LQ D VLJQL¿FDQW improvement in HF symptoms, functional capacity, and TXDOLW\ RI OLIH LQ +) SDWLHQWV ZLWK DGYDQFHG +) V\PS- WRPV 1<+$ FODVV ,,,,9 UHGXFHG /9()” DQG D SURORQJHG 456 GXUDWLRQ 456• PV ± 7KH

¿UVW GRXEOHEOLQG UDQGRPL]HG FRQWUROOHG FRPSDULVRQ RI&57ZDVFRQGXFWHGLQWKH0,5$&/(WULDOHQUROOLQJ SDWLHQWVFRQ¿UPLQJLQDODUJHUFRKRUWRI+)SDWL- HQWV WKDW &57 LPSURYHV 1HZ <RUN +HDUW $VVRFLDWLRQ 1<+$ FODVV TXDOLW\ RI OLIH PLQXWH ZDON WHVW DQG also reduces left ventricular volumes, and improves OHIWYHQWULFXODUHMHFWLRQIUDFWLRQFRXSOHGZLWKLPSURYH- ments in clinical symptoms.

6XEVHTXHQWZHOOGHVLJQHGUDQGRPL]HGFRQWUROOHGODU- ge clinical trials, Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Fa- ilure (CARE-HF), and Comparison of Medical Therapy, 3DFLQJDQG'H¿EULOODWLRQLQ+HDUW)DLOXUH&203$1,21 KDYHVKRZQIRUWKH¿UVWWLPHWKDW&57DOVRLPSURYHV VXUYLYDOLQSDWLHQWVZLWKDGYDQFHG+)V\PSWRPV1<+$

FIGURE 1. Electrical activation of the left and right ventricle in patients with right bundle branch block and left bundle branch

block (2)

(3)

FODVV,,,,9UHGXFHG/9()”DQGDSURORQJHG456 GXUDWLRQ 456• PV $OWRJHWKHU WKHVH VWX- dies provided the basis for current guideline-based in- GLFDWLRQVIRU&57LQDGYDQFHG+)SDWLHQWVZLWK1<+$

Class III or IV (11). Today, tens of thousands of advan- FHG+)SDWLHQWVDUHLPSODQWHGZLWK&57LQ+XQJDU\LQ (XURSHDQGZRUOGZLGH$PHWDDQDO\VLVRI&57WUL- DOVLQDGYDQFHG+)VKRZHGDQRYHUDOOULVNUHGXF- WLRQLQDOOFDXVHPRUWDOLW\DQGDULVNUHGXFWLRQLQ mortality due to progressive HF (13).

)ROORZLQJ WKH VXFFHVV RI &57 LQ DGYDQFHG +) SDWL- ents, subsequent clinical trials focused on broadening WKHLQGLFDWLRQRI&57WRSDWLHQWVZLWKPLOG+)7KH0XO- WLFHQWHU $XWRPDWLF 'H¿EULOODWRU ,PSODQWDWLRQ 7ULDO&DU- diac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT), the 5HV\QFKURQL]DWLRQ'H¿EULOODWLRQ LQ $PEXODWRU\ +HDUW Failure Trial (RAFT) and Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction 5(9(56(WULDOVHQUROOHGSDWLHQWVSULPDULO\ZLWKPLOG +)SUHVHQWLQJZLWK1<+$FODVV,DQG,,+)V\PSWRPV 7KHVH VWXGLHV KDYH VKRZQ D VLJQL¿FDQW UH- duction in HF events and improvement in clinical sy- PSWRPVDVZHOODVVLJQL¿FDQW/9UHYHUVHUHPRGHOLQJ 7KH VXEVHTXHQWO\ SXEOLVKHG ORQJWHUP IROORZXS RI 0$',7&57DQG5(9(56(VWXGLHVFRQ¿UPHGVXVWD- LQHGEHQH¿WRI&57LQPLOG+)SDWLHQWVXSWR\HDUV ZLWKUHGXFWLRQLQ+)HYHQWVDQGDVLJQL¿FDQWUHGXFWLRQ in mortality (16, 17).

Modifying Factors of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

'HVSLWHWKHRYHUDOOEHQH¿FLDOHႇHFWVRIFDUGLDFUHV\QFK URQL]DWLRQWKHUDS\VKRZQLQQXPHURXVODUJHFOLQLFDOWUL-

als, nearly one third of the patients demonstrate a lack of echocardiographic or clinical response to CRT, they are so-called non-responders. Non-response has been the major focus of CRT research the past 25 years to optimize use, delivery, and care of CRT patients to opti- mize outcomes. Non-response to CRT is multifactorial, including baseline clinical charcteristics linked to unfa- vorable outcomes through CRT delivery, and post-imp- lant factors, such as arrhythmias and CRT program- ming.

Baseline Clinical Characteristics

There have been a number of clinical factors associ- DWHGZLWKSRRUFOLQLFDOUHVSRQVHWR&57LQFOXGLQJGLD- betes, renal dysfunction, and ischemic cardiomyopathy (18). On the contrary, a superior response to CRT is predicted by female sex, non-ischemic etiology of car- GLRP\RSDWK\OHIWEXQGOHEUDQFKEORFNZLGH456DQG a less dilated left ventricle (19). The amount of scar has EHHQ VKRZQ WR QHJDWLYHO\ FRUUHODWH ZLWK RXWFRPHV LQ SDWLHQWV ZLWK &57 DQG ZDUUDQW IXUWKHU LQYHVWLJDWLRQ It is plau sible that advanced scar formation might not be amenable to CRT and on the contrary, might be arrhyth mogenic, especially if LV pacing occurs near a VFDU UHJLRQ DV VKRZQ E\ SUHYLRXV VWXGLHV ,PSRUWDQW JHQGHU GLႇHUHQFHV LQ &57 RXWFRPHV PLJKW EH OLQNHG WRWKHIDFWWKDWZRPHQRIWHQSUHVHQWZLWKQRQLVFKHPLF cardiomyopathy and LBBB, a substrate that is the most responsive to biventricular pacing (20).

456PRUSKRORJ\DQG456GXUDWLRQ

$OWKRXJK&57KDVEHHQVKRZQWREHEHQH¿FLDOLQ+) SDWLHQWVZLWKDORZ/9()DQGDZLGH456VHYHUDOHDUO\

VWXGLHVQRWHGGLႇHUHQFHVLQUHVSRQVHE\456GXUDWLRQ

and by the underlying ECG pattern at baseline, befo-

FIGURE 2. Electrical activation of the left and right ventricle in patients with right bundle branch block and left bundle branch

block (2)

(4)

UH &57 LPSODQWDWLRQ 7KH ¿UVW ODUJH UDQGRPL]HG WULDOV GHVLJQHG WR HYDOXDWH WKH HႇHFW RI &57 RQ DOOFDXVH mortality, Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF), and Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pa- FLQJDQG'H¿EULOODWLRQLQ+HDUW)DLOXUH&203$1,21 HQUROOHG RQO\ DQG RI WKHLU SDWLHQWV ZLWK QRQ /%%%UHVSHFWLYHO\7KH5(9(56(VWXG\HQUROOHG RI SDWLHQWV ZLWK QRQ/%%% DQG 0$',7&57 HQUROOHG DOORZLQJ XV ZLWK DQ RSSRUWXQLW\ WR DQDO\]H response by QRS morphology.

3DWLHQWV ZLWK D /%%% (&* SDWWHUQ EHIRUH GHYLFH LP SODQWDWLRQKDYHEHHQVXJJHVWHGWRGHULYHDVLJQL¿FDQW EHQH¿WIURP&57'ZKLOHWKRVHZLWKQRQ/%%%(&*

SDWWHUQZHUHVKRZQWRGHULYHOHVVRUQREHQH¿WDQGRXU sub-study from MADIT-CRT suggested potential harm 6XEVHTXHQW VWXGLHV FRQ¿UPHG DQ DVVRFLDWLRQ EHWZHHQ 456 GXUDWLRQ DQG RXWFRPHV LQ WKH 5(9(5- 6(WULDO$VXEDQDO\VLVIURPWKH5$)7WULDOFRQ¿U- PHG D OLQN EHWZHHQ 456 PRUSKRORJ\ 456 GXUDWLRQ DQG RXWFRPHV LQ /%%% DQG QR EHQH¿W LQ QRQ/%%%

SDWLHQWV VLPLODUO\ WR D ODUJH 86 QDWLRQZLGH UH- gistry, the National Cardiovascular Database Registry (NCDR) ICD Registry (25). Based on these observa-

tions, CRT today is a Class I or Class IIa indication for

&57 LQ V\PSWRPDWLF +) SDWLHQWV ZLWK /%%% • PV ZLWKD&ODVV,LQGLFDWLRQIRUWKRVHZLWKD456•PV )RUSDWLHQWVZLWKQRQ/%%%&57LVD&ODVV,,DLQGLFD- WLRQIRUD456GXUDWLRQ•PVDQGD&ODVV,,ELQGLFD- tion for a QRS duration of 120 to 149 ms (26).

The previously conducted and published ECHO-CRT (27) and RethinQ (28) studies assessed CRT indication IRU +) SDWLHQWV ZLWK D QDUURZ 456 FRPSOH[ PV EXWIDLOHGWRGHPRQVWUDWHDEHQH¿W7KHUHIRUH&57LV FXUUHQWO\QRWLQGLFDWHGIRUSDWLHQWVZLWKDQDUURZ456 complex, unless they require frequent ventricular pa- FLQJ!WRWUHDWEUDG\FDUGLDDQLQGLFDWLRQWHVWHGLQ the BLOCK-HF study (29).

3URORQJHG35LQWHUYDO

A prolonged PR-interval may result in atrioventricular G\VV\QFKURQ\ ZLWK DOWHUHG WUDQVPLWUDO OHIW YHQWULFXODU

¿OOLQJDQGSRVVLEOHVHULRXVDGYHUVHFOLQLFDOFRQVHTXHQ ces as discussed above (3), and it could potentialy- ly be another important determinant of CRT response.

:H KDYH SUHYLRXVO\ VKRZQ LQ D VXEVWXG\ RI WKH 0$- ',7&57 WULDO WKDW +) SDWLHQWV ZLWK QRQ/%%% (&*

TABLE 1. Randomized Past and *Ongoing Controlled Trials of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Abbreviations: 6MWT, 6-min

walk test; CARE-HF, Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure; COMPANION, Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defib- rillation in Heart Failure; HF, heart failure; LV, left ventricular; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; MADITCRT, Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; MIRACLE, Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation; MIRACLE ICD, Multicenter InSync Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator trial; MR, mitral regurgitation; MUSTIC, Multisite Simulation in Cardiomyopathies;

NYHA, New York Heart Association; PATH-CHF, Pacing Therapies in Congestive Heart Failure trial; QOL, quality-of-life score;

RAFT, Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure; REVERSE, Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systo- lic Left Ventricular Dysfunction; VO

2

, volume of oxygen

Clinical Trial Patients (n) Primary end points Secondary end points LVEF (%) QRS (ms)

MUSTIC-SR 58 6MWT NYHA, QOL, Peak VO2, MR, LV,

Hosp, Mortality “ 174

MUSTIC-AF 64 6MWT NYHA, QOL, Peak VO2, Hosp,

Mortality “ 206

PATH-CHF 2 41 6MWT, peak VO2 NHYA class, QOL,

Hospitalizations “ 175

PATH-CHF-II:

(Europe)

86 6MWT, peak VO2 NHYA class, QOL,

Hospitalizations “ 175

MIRACLE 453 6MWT, NHYA, QOL Peak VO2, LVEF, LVEDD, MR,

Clin Response “ 166

COMPANION 1520 All-cause mortality or hospitalization

All-cause mortality and cardiac mortality

21 159

CARE-HF 814 All-cause mortality NYHA, QOL, LVEF, LVESV,

Hospitalization for heart failure

25 160

REVERSE 610 HF clinical composite score LVESVi “ 153

MADIT-CRT 1820 HF or death LVESV, LVEDV change, multiple

HF events “ 162

RAFT 1798 All-cause mortality or HF

hospitalization

All-cause mortality, cardiac

mortality, HF hospitalization “ 158 RAFT AF* 412 HF hospitalization or death Mortality, HF hosp, QoL, 6MWT, n.a. n.a.

BUDAPEST CRT Upgrade*

360 HF hospitalization, death, or lack of LV remodeling

Mortality, HF hospitalization n.a. n.a.

(5)

SDWWHUQ DQG D SURORQJHG 35LQWHUYDO • PV GHULYH DVLJQL¿FDQWFOLQLFDOEHQH¿WIURP&57'DVFRPSDUHG WR,&'ZLWKDULVNUHGXFWLRQLQ+)RUGHDWK DQGDQULVNUHGXFWLRQLQDOOFDXVHPRUWDOLW\1RQ /%%%SDWLHQWVZLWKDQRUPDO35LQWHUYDOPVZHUH KRZHYHUH[SRVHGWRDKDUPIURP&57'ZLWKDPRUH WKDQWZRIROGLQFUHDVHLQPRUWDOLW\ZKHQFRPSDUHGWR ,&'RQO\LQWHUDFWLRQSYDOXH:HVXEVHTX- HQWO\FRQ¿UPHGLQWKH0$',7&57ORQJWHUPIROORZXS VXEVWXG\VXJJHVWLQJDVXVWDLQHGFOLQLFDOEHQH¿WGXULQJ DPHGLDQIROORZXSRI\HDUV$SULRUVWXG\VKR- ZHGVLPLODUDVVRFLDWLRQVIURP&203$1,21ZLWKDSUR- longed PR-interval in more advanced HF patients (32), DQG LQ WKRVH ZLWK D QDUURZ 456 HQUROOHG LQ 5HWKLQ4 +RZHYHU PRUH UHFHQW VWXGLHV FKDOOHQJHG WKHVH

¿QGLQJV XVLQJ GDWD IURP WKH 1&'5 ,&' 5HJLVWU\ KR- ZHYHU WKLV FRKRUW ODFNHG UDQGRPL]DWLRQ )XUWKHU studies are needed in this cohort.

Controversies in CRT and Future Directions

)UHTXHQW5LJKW9HQWULFXODU3DFLQJDQG&57 7KH XQGHUO\LQJ FRQFHSW IRU WKH EHQH¿W RI SK\VLRORJLF

$9VHTXHQWLDO SDFLQJ LQ +) SDWLHQWV ZLWK D SURORQJHG 35LQWHUYDO LV ZHOO NQRZQ 3UHYLRXVO\ UHSRUWHG FDVH VHULHVRQULJKWYHQWULFXODU59'''SDFLQJZLWKVKRU- WHU$9GHOD\LQ+)SDWLHQWVDQGORZHMHFWLRQIUDFWLRQLQ the 1990’s reported an improvement in HF symptoms ,WKDVEHHQSUHYLRXVO\VKRZQWKDWIUHTXHQWDSLFDO ULJKWYHQWULFXODUSDFLQJKDVGHOHWHULRXVHႇHFWV HVSHFLDOO\ LQ SDWLHQWV ZLWK D GHSUHVVHG OHIW YHQWULFX- lar duntion. In this population, upgrading the pacing or ICD device to CRT could potentially improve outcomes.

7KHUH KDYH EHHQ D IHZ UHWURVSHFWLYH VWXGLHV HYDOXD- WLQJWKHHႇHFWVRI&57XSJUDGHLQSDWLHQWVZLWKIUHTX- HQW59DSLFDOSDFLQJVKRZLQJLPSURYHPHQWVLQUHYHUVH UHPRGHOLQJDQGIXQFWLRQDOFDSDFLW\KRZHYHUQRQHRI WKHVHVWXGLHVZHUHUDQGRPL]HGRUKDGDQDSSURSULDWH control group (38). A large, randomized controlled cli- nical trial, the BUDAPEST CRT Upgrade study is cur- UHQWO\ RQJRLQJ WR SURVSHFWLYHO\ HYDOXDWH WKH HႇHFWV RI CRT upgrade from conventional PM or ICD therapy in SDWLHQWVZLWKLQWHUPLWWHQWRUSHUPDQHQWULJKWYHQWULFXODU (RV) septal/apical pacing, reduced LVEF, and sympto- matic HF. This prospective, randomized, multicentre, LQYHVWLJDWRUVSRQVRUHGFOLQLFDOWULDOZLOOHQUROODWRWDORI VXEMHFWVZLWK/9()”1<+$IXQFWLRQDOFODVV ,,,9DSDFHG456•PVDQG59SDFLQJ•3D- WLHQWVZLOOEHUDQGRPL]HGWR&57'YV,&'LQDUD- WLRDQGWKH\ZLOOEHIROORZHGIRUPRQWKV7KHSULPD- ry composite endpoint is all-cause mortality, or a HF HYHQWRUOHVVWKDQUHGXFWLRQLQ/9HQGV\VWROLFYR- lume at 12 months (Table 2). Secondary endpoints are all-cause mortality, all-cause mortality or HF event, and LV volume reduction at 12 months (https://clinicaltrials.

JRYFWVKRZ1&7

8VHRI&57'HÀEULOODWRUYV&573DFHPDNHU ,W KDV EHHQ D ORQJ GHEDWH ZKHWKHU &57 ZLWK D GH¿E- ULOODWRU &57' LV VXSHULRU WR &57 ZLWK D SDFHPDNHU

&573DQGZKRPVKRXOGEHLPSODQWHGZLWKD&57' vs. a CRT-P device. There have been no studies directly FRPSDULQJWKHEHQH¿WRI&57'WR&573LQXQVHOHF- WHGSDWLHQWVLQDUDQGRPL]HGIDVKLRQ3DWLHQWVZLWKQRQ LVFKHPLF FDUGLRP\RSDWK\ WKRVH ZLWK /%%% ZRPHQ DUHDWDVLJQLILFDQWO\ORZHUULVNRIYHQWULFXODUDUUK\W- KPLDV DQG GHULYH VLJQL¿FDQW /9 UHYHUVH UHPRGHOLQJ IURP &57 DOO QHJDWLQJ WKH SRWHQWLDO QHHG DQG EHQH¿W of an added defibrillator (39). In addition, defibrilla- WRUOHDGVDUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKDKLJKHUULVNRIFRPSOLFD- tions, lead fractures, and infections. Currently, CRT-P XVHLVFRPPRQLQ(XURSHGXHWRWKH¿QDQFLDOFRQVWUD- LQWVRIPDQ\FRXQWULHV2XUYHU\RZQVLQJOHFHQWHU high volume registry data additionally suggested that VHOHFWHG QRQLVFKHPLF SDWLHQWV ZKR ZHUH PRUH RIWHQ ZRPHQ DQG ROGHU GLG QRW KDYH DQ LPSURYHG VXUYLYDO ZLWK &57' DV FRPSDUHG WR &573 )XUWKHU VWX- GLHV DUH FXUUHQWO\ XQGHUZD\ WR SURVSHFWLYHO\ HYDOXDWH outcomes of CRT-D vs. CRT-P in a randomized fashion in both ischemic and non-ischemic patients.

/HIW9HQWULFXODU/HDG/RFDWLRQDQG&57 3URJUDPPLQJ

Several previous studies highlighted the importance of LV lead location for CRT outcomes. Early studies sug- gested that lateral or posterolateral LV lead location LVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKEHWWHURXWFRPHVZKLOHVWXGLHVIURP MADIT-CRT and REVERSE highlighted the importan- ce of avoiding apical LV lead locations to reduce the risk of HF or death (42). A subsequent analysis also suggested that anterior LV lead placement is linked to an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and should be avoided (43). Several attempts have been made to individually optimize LV lead placement and target the ODWHVWDFWLYDWHGDUHDLGHQWL¿HGE\LPDJLQJVWXGLHV KRZHYHUGHVSLWHLQLWLDOSURPLVLQJ¿QGLQJVQRQHRI these techniques are currently employed in routine cli- nical practice. A recent study focusing on CRT non-res- ponder non-LBBB patients to optimize lead placement using LV electrical delay measured by Q-LV, also failed to meet its primary end point (https://clinicaltrials.gov/

FWVKRZ1&7 1HZHU WHFKQLFDO DGYDQFH- PHQWVVXFKDVTXDGULSRODU/9OHDGVZLWKPXOWLSRLQWSD- cing, and individually optimized pacing sequences are currently studied to further improve outcomes of CRT non-responders.

2SWLPDO&57SURJUDPPLQJLVDFRUQHUVWRQHRIEHQH¿- FLDO &57 RXWFRPHV ZLWK VHYHUDO VWXGLHV VXJJHVWLQJ that the higher the biventricular pacing percentage is, WKHEHWWHUWKHRXWFRPHV5XZDOGHWDOVKRZHGWKDW

!RIELYHQWULFXODUSDFLQJZDVOLQNHGZLWKLPSURYHG

survival in MADIT-CRT. Prior studies assessing optimal

CRT programming and outcomes using echocardiog-

raphy optimization vs. “out of the box” device settings

(6)

YVG\QDPLFRSWLPL]DWLRQWHFKQLTXHVKDYHEHHQKRZH- ver unsuccessful in de novo CRT recipients (47–49), EXWVKRZHGVRPHEHQH¿WVLQ&57QRQUHVSRQGHUV

Atrial Fibrillation

+) SDWLHQWV ZLWK DWULDO ¿EULOODWLRQ KDYH EHHQ VKRZQ WR KDYHDGYHUVHRXWFRPHVZLWKDQLPSODQWHG&57,Q&57 recipients, lack of biventricular pacing and abrogation of the remodeling process are of particular concern. Many UDQGRPL]HG FOLQLFDO WULDOV DOVR H[FOXGHG SDWLHQWV ZLWK SHUVLVWHQWSHUPDQHQW DWULDO ¿EULOODWLRQ VLJQL¿FDQWO\ OLPL- ting our understanding of CRT outcomes in this cohort.

A currently ongoing randomized clinical trial, RAFT-AF KWWSVFOLQLFDOWULDOVJRYFWVKRZ1&7LVHYD- OXDWLQJ WKH UROH RI FDWKHWHU DEODWLRQ ZLWK 39 DQWUDO LVR- lation and LA substrate ablation vs. rate control in CRT recipients, hopefully shedding more lights on treatment RXWFRPHVLQWKLVGLႈFXOWWRWUHDWSDWLHQWSRSXODWLRQ Another prospective, randomized clinical trial of 80 pa- tients, JAVA-CRT is assessing the role of AV-junctional DEODWLRQLQ&57SDWLHQWVZLWKKLJKEXUGHQRIDWULDO¿EULO- lation to improve outcomes (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/

VKRZ1&7

Conclusions

Cardiac resynchronization therapy has evolved as a PDLQVWUHDP WKHUDS\ IRU KHDUW IDLOXUH LQ SDWLHQWV ZLWK mild to advanced heart failure symptoms, severely de- SUHVVHG OHIW YHQWULFXODU HMHFWLRQ IUDFWLRQ DQG D ZLGH QRS. Short- and long-term outcomes have been favo- UDEOH QHYHUWKHOHVV LQÀXHQFHV E\ YDULRXV FOLQLFDO FKD- racteristics, and comorbidities. Tailored LV lead implan- tation or CRT programming does not further improve RXWFRPHVKRZHYHUIXUWKHUVWXGLHVDUHFXUUHQWO\XQGHU- ZD\7KHXWLOLW\RI&57XSJUDGHLQSDWLHQWVZLWKFKURQLF RV apical/septal pacing, rhythm control/AV junctional DEODWLRQ LQ SDWLHQWV ZLWK DWULDO ¿EULOODWLRQ DQG WKH DS- propriate use of CRT-D vs. CRT-P are currently unre- solved issues that need further investigation to optimize outcomes.

5HIHUHQFHV

1. Ghio S, Constantin C, Klersy C, et al. Interventricular and intraventri- cular dyssynchrony are common in heart failure patients, regardless of QRS duration. European heart journal 2004; 25: 571–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.

ehj.2003.09.030

2. )DQWRQL&.DZDEDWD00DVVDUR5HWDO5LJKWDQGOHIWYHQWULFXODU DFWLYDWLRQVHTXHQFHLQSDWLHQWVZLWKKHDUWIDLOXUHDQGULJKWEXQGOHEUDQ- FKEORFNDGHWDLOHGDQDO\VLVXVLQJWKUHHGLPHQVLRQDOQRQÀXRURVFRSLF electroanatomic mapping system. Journal of cardiovascular elect- rophysiology 2005; 16: 112–9: discussion 120–1. DOI: 10.1046/j.1540- 8167.2005.40777.x

3. Salden F, Kutyifa V, Stockburger M, Prinzen FW, Vernooy K. Atrio- ventricular dromotropathy: evidence for a distinctive entity in heart fa- LOXUHZLWKSURORQJHG35LQWHUYDO"(XURSDFH(XURSHDQSDFLQJDUUK\W- KPLDVDQGFDUGLDFHOHFWURSK\VLRORJ\MRXUQDORIWKHZRUNLQJJURXSV

on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 2018; 20: 1067–1077. DOI:

10.1093/europace/eux207

4. %UHLWKDUGW 2$ 6LQKD $0 6FKZDPPHQWKDO ( HW DO $FXWH HႇHFWV of cardiac resynchronization therapy on functional mitral regurgitation in advanced systolic heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2003; 41: 765–70. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02937-6 5. $XULFFKLR$6WHOOEULQN&6DFN6HWDO/RQJWHUPFOLQLFDOHႇHFWRI hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in pa- WLHQWV ZLWK KHDUW IDLOXUH DQG YHQWULFXODU FRQGXFWLRQ GHOD\ -RXUQDO RI the American College of Cardiology 2002; 39: 2026–33. DOI: 10.1016/

S0735-1097(02)01895-8

6. &D]HDX6/HFOHUFT&/DYHUJQH7HWDO(ႇHFWVRIPXOWLVLWHELYHQW- ULFXODUSDFLQJLQSDWLHQWVZLWKKHDUWIDLOXUHDQGLQWUDYHQWULFXODUFRQGXF- WLRQGHOD\7KH1HZ(QJODQGMRXUQDORIPHGLFLQH±

DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200103223441202

7. 6RORPRQ 6' )RVWHU ( %RXUJRXQ 0 HW DO (ႇHFW RI FDUGLDF UHV\- nchronization therapy on reverse remodeling and relation to outcome:

PXOWLFHQWHUDXWRPDWLFGH¿EULOODWRULPSODQWDWLRQWULDOFDUGLDFUHV\QFKUR- nization therapy. Circulation 2010; 122: 985–92. DOI:10.1161/CIRCU- LATIONAHA.110.955039

8 Young JB, Abraham WT, Smith AL, et al. Combined cardiac resy- QFKURQL]DWLRQDQGLPSODQWDEOHFDUGLRYHUVLRQGH¿EULOODWLRQLQDGYDQFHG chronic heart failure: the MIRACLE ICD Trial. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 2003; 289: 2685–94. DOI:10.1001/

jama.289.20.2685

9. %ULVWRZ056D[RQ/$%RHKPHU-HWDO&DUGLDFUHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQ WKHUDS\ZLWKRUZLWKRXWDQLPSODQWDEOHGH¿EULOODWRULQDGYDQFHGFKURQLF KHDUWIDLOXUH7KH1HZ(QJODQGMRXUQDORIPHGLFLQH±

50. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032423

10. &OHODQG -* 'DXEHUW -& (UGPDQQ ( HW DO 7KH HႇHFW RI FDUGLDF UHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQRQPRUELGLW\DQGPRUWDOLW\LQKHDUWIDLOXUH7KH1HZ England journal of medicine 2005; 352: 1539–49. DOI: 10.1056/NEJ- Moa050496

11. Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. 2013 ESC Gui- delines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration ZLWKWKH(XURSHDQ+HDUW5K\WKP$VVRFLDWLRQ(+5$(XURSHDQKHDUW journal 2013; 34: 2281–329. DOI:10.1093/europace/eut206

12. Dickstein K, Normand C, Auricchio A, et al. CRT Survey II: a Europe- an Society of Cardiology survey of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in SDWLHQWVZKRLVGRLQJZKDWWRZKRPDQGKRZ"(XURSHDQMRXUQDO of heart failure 2018; 20: 1039–1051. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1142

13. Rivero-Ayerza M, Theuns DA, Garcia-Garcia HM, Boersma E, 6LPRRQV 0 -RUGDHQV /- (ႇHFWV RI FDUGLDF UHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQ WKHU- apy on overall mortality and mode of death: a meta-analysis of ran- domized controlled trials. European heart journal 2006; 27: 2682–8.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl203

14. Tang AS, Wells GA, Talajic M, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization WKHUDS\IRUPLOGWRPRGHUDWHKHDUWIDLOXUH7KH1HZ(QJODQGMRXUQDORI medicine 2010; 363: 2385–95. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1009540 15. Linde C, Abraham WT, Gold MR, St John Sutton M, Ghio S, Dau- bert C. Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly sympto- PDWLFKHDUWIDLOXUHSDWLHQWVDQGLQDV\PSWRPDWLFSDWLHQWVZLWKOHIWYHQW- ricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2008; 52: 1834–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.

jacc.2008.08.027

16.*ROGHQEHUJ,.XW\LID90RVV$-6XUYLYDOZLWKFDUGLDFUHV\QFKUR- QL]DWLRQWKHUDS\7KH1HZ(QJODQGMRXUQDORIPHGLFLQH±

8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401426

17. Linde C, Gold MR, Abraham WT, et al. Long-term impact of cardi- ac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure: 5-year results from the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricu- lar dysfunction (REVERSE) study. European heart journal 2013; 34:

2592–9. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht160

18.1DTYL6<-DZDLG$*ROGHQEHUJ,.XW\LID91RQUHVSRQVHWR&DU- diac Resynchronization Therapy. Current heart failure reports 2018;

15: 315–321. DOI: 10.1007/s11897-018-0407-7

19. Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Hall WJ, et al. Predictors of response to FDUGLDFUHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQWKHUDS\LQWKH0XOWLFHQWHU$XWRPDWLF'H¿E- ULOODWRU,PSODQWDWLRQ7ULDOZLWK&DUGLDF5HV\QFKURQL]DWLRQ7KHUDS\0$- DIT-CRT). Circulation 2011; 124: 1527–36. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIO- NAHA.110.014324

(7)

20. Arshad A, Moss AJ, Foster E, et al. Cardiac resynchronization ther- DS\LVPRUHHႇHFWLYHLQZRPHQWKDQLQPHQWKH0$',7&570XOWLFHQ- WHU$XWRPDWLF'H¿EULOODWRU,PSODQWDWLRQ7ULDOZLWK&DUGLDF5HV\QFKUR- nization Therapy) trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2011; 57: 813–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.061

21. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al. Cardiac-resynchroniza- WLRQWKHUDS\IRUWKHSUHYHQWLRQRIKHDUWIDLOXUHHYHQWV7KH1HZ(QJ- land journal of medicine 2009; 361: 1329–38. DOI:10.1056/NEJ- Moa0906431

22.=DUHED:.OHLQ+&\JDQNLHZLF],HWDO(ႇHFWLYHQHVVRI&DUGL- ac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter

$XWRPDWLF 'H¿EULOODWRU ,PSODQWDWLRQ 7ULDO&DUGLDF 5HV\QFKURQL]DWLRQ Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Circulation 2011; 123: 1061–72. DOI:10.1161/

CIRCULATIONAHA.110.960898

23.*ROG057KHEDXOW&/LQGH&HWDO(ႇHFWRI456GXUDWLRQDQG morphology on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in mild heart failure: results from the Resynchronization Reverses Remodel- ing in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Circula- tion 2012; 126: 822–9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.097709 24. Birnie DH, Ha A, Higginson L, et al. Impact of QRS morphology and duration on outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: Results IURPWKH5HV\QFKURQL]DWLRQ'H¿EULOODWLRQIRU$PEXODWRU\+HDUW)DLOXUH Trial (RAFT). Circulation Heart failure 2013; 6: 1190–8. DOI:10.1161/

CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000380

25. Peterson PN, Greiner MA, Qualls LG, et al. QRS duration, bund- OHEUDQFKEORFNPRUSKRORJ\DQGRXWFRPHVDPRQJROGHUSDWLHQWVZLWK heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Jama 2013;

310: 617–26. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.8641

26.3RQLNRZVNL39RRUV$$$QNHU6'HWDO(6&6FLHQWL¿F'RFXPHQW Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed ZLWKWKHVSHFLDOFRQWULEXWLRQRIWKH+HDUW)DLOXUH$VVRFL- ation (HFA) of the ESC. European Heart Journal, Volume 37, Issue 27, 14 -XO\3DJHV±KWWSVGRLRUJHXUKHDUWMHKZ 27. Ruschitzka F, Abraham WT, Singh JP, et al. Cardiac-resynchroni- ]DWLRQWKHUDS\LQKHDUWIDLOXUHZLWKDQDUURZ456FRPSOH[7KH1HZ England journal of medicine 2013; 369: 1395–405. DOI:10.1056/NEJ- Moa1306687

28. Beshai JF, Grimm RA, Nagueh SF, et al. Cardiac-resynchroniza- WLRQ WKHUDS\ LQ KHDUW IDLOXUH ZLWK QDUURZ 456 FRPSOH[HV 7KH 1HZ England journal of medicine 2007; 357: 2461–71. DOI:10.1056/NEJ- Moa0706695

29. Curtis AB, Worley SJ, Adamson PB, et al. Biventricular pacing for DWULRYHQWULFXODUEORFNDQGV\VWROLFG\VIXQFWLRQ7KH1HZ(QJODQGMRXU- nal of medicine 2013; 368: 1585–93. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1210356 30..XW\LID96WRFNEXUJHU0'DXEHUW-3HWDO35LQWHUYDOLGHQWL¿HV FOLQLFDOUHVSRQVHLQSDWLHQWVZLWKQRQOHIWEXQGOHEUDQFKEORFND0XO- WLFHQWHU$XWRPDWLF'H¿EULOODWRU,PSODQWDWLRQ7ULDO&DUGLDF5HV\QFKUR- nization Therapy sub-study. Circulation Arrhythmia and electrophysio- logy 2014; 7: 645–51. DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001299

31.6WRFNEXUJHU00RVV$-.OHLQ+8HWDO6XVWDLQHGFOLQLFDOEHQH¿W RIFDUGLDFUHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQWKHUDS\LQQRQ/%%%SDWLHQWVZLWKSURORQ- JHG35LQWHUYDO0$',7&57ORQJWHUPIROORZXS&OLQLFDOUHVHDUFKLQ FDUGLRORJ\RႈFLDOMRXUQDORIWKH*HUPDQ&DUGLDF6RFLHW\

944–952. DOI:10.1007/s00392-016-1003-z

32. Olshansky B, Day JD, Sullivan RM, Yong P, Galle E, Steinberg JS.

'RHVFDUGLDFUHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQWKHUDS\SURYLGHXQUHFRJQL]HGEHQH¿W LQSDWLHQWVZLWKSURORQJHG35LQWHUYDOV"7KHLPSDFWRIUHVWRULQJDWULR- ventricular synchrony: an analysis from the COMPANION Trial. Heart UK\WKPWKHRႈFLDOMRXUQDORIWKH+HDUW5K\WKP6RFLHW\±

DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.07.038

33. Joshi NP, Stopper MM, Li J, Beshai JF, Pavri BB. Impact of baseli- ne PR interval on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in patients ZLWK QDUURZ 456 FRPSOH[HV DQ DQDO\VLV RI WKH 5H7KLQ4 7ULDO -RXUQDO of interventional cardiac electrophysiology: an international journal of ar- rhythmias and pacing 2015; 43: 145–9. DOI:10.1007/s10840-015-9999-y 34. Friedman DJ, Bao H, Spatz ES, Curtis JP, Daubert JP, Al-Khatib 60 $VVRFLDWLRQ %HWZHHQ D 3URORQJHG 35 ,QWHUYDO DQG 2XWFRPHV of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation 2016; 134: 1617–1628.

DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022913

35. Hochleitner M, Hortnagl H, Ng CK, Gschnitzer F, Zechmann W.

Usefulness of physiologic dual-chamber pacing in drug-resistant idio-

pathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The American journal of cardiology 1990; 66: 198–202.

36. .XWDOHN 63 6KDUPD $' 0F:LOOLDPV 0- HW DO (ႇHFW RI SDFLQJ for soft indications on mortality and heart failure in the dual cham- EHU DQG 99, LPSODQWDEOH GH¿EULOODWRU '$9,' WULDO 3DFLQJ DQG FOLQL- cal electrophysiology: PACE 2008; 31: 828–37. DOI:10.1111/j.1540- 8159.2008.01106.x

37. /DPDV *$ /HH ./ 6ZHHQH\ 02 HW DO 9HQWULFXODU SDFLQJ RU GXDOFKDPEHU SDFLQJ IRU VLQXVQRGH G\VIXQFWLRQ 7KH 1HZ (QJODQG journal of medicine 2002; 346: 1854–62. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa013040 38. Kosztin A, Vamos M, Aradi D, et al. De novo implantation vs. up- JUDGH FDUGLDF UHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQ WKHUDS\ D V\VWHPDWLF UHYLHZ DQG PHWDDQDO\VLV +HDUW IDLOXUH UHYLHZV ± '2, s10741-017-9652-1

39.%DUUD63URYLGHQFLD5%RYHGD6HWDO'RZRPHQEHQH¿WHTXDOO\

DVPHQIURPWKHSULPDU\SUHYHQWLRQLPSODQWDEOHFDUGLRYHUWHUGH¿EULOOD- WRU"(XURSDFH(XURSHDQSDFLQJDUUK\WKPLDVDQGFDUGLDFHOHFWURSK\- VLRORJ\MRXUQDORIWKHZRUNLQJJURXSVRQFDUGLDFSDFLQJDUUK\WKPLDV and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Car- diology 2017. DOI:10.1093/europace/eux203

40. Merkely B, Roka A, Kutyifa V, et al. Tracing the European cour- se of cardiac resynchronization therapy from 2006 to 2008. Europace:

European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal RIWKHZRUNLQJJURXSVRQFDUGLDFSDFLQJDUUK\WKPLDVDQGFDUGLDFFHO- lular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 2010; 12:

692–701. DOI:10.1093/europace/euq041

41..XW\LID9*HOOHU/%RJ\L3HWDO(ႇHFWRIFDUGLDFUHV\QFKURQL]D- WLRQ WKHUDS\ ZLWK LPSODQWDEOH FDUGLRYHUWHU GH¿EULOODWRU YHUVXV FDUGLDF UHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQWKHUDS\ZLWKSDFHPDNHURQPRUWDOLW\LQKHDUWIDLOXUH patients: results of a high-volume, single-centre experience. European journal of heart failure 2014; 16: 1323–30. DOI:10.1002/ejhf.185 42. Singh JP, Klein HU, Huang DT, et al. Left ventricular lead position DQGFOLQLFDORXWFRPHLQWKHPXOWLFHQWHUDXWRPDWLFGH¿EULOODWRULPSODQWD- tion trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial. Circula- tion 2011; 123: 1159–66. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.000646 43. Kutyifa V, Zareba W, McNitt S, et al. Left ventricular lead location and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in the MADIT-CRT trial. European heart journal 2013; 34: 184–90. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs334 44. Khan FZ, Virdee MS, Palmer CR, et al. Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The TARGET Study: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Journal of the Ameri- can College of Cardiology 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.030 45. Barra S, Yu E, Khan F, Dutka D, Virdee M. An individualized left ventricular lead-targeting strategy improves long-term survival of car- GLDF UHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQ WKHUDS\ SDWLHQWV DQG LQÀXHQFHV WKH EHQH¿W RI WKHLPSODQWDEOHFDUGLRYHUWHUGH¿EULOODWRUDORQJWHUPIROORZXSRIWKH 7$5*(7VWXG\-RXUQDORIFDUGLRYDVFXODUPHGLFLQH+DJHUVWRZQ0G 2017; 18: 553–555. DOI:10.2459/JCM.0000000000000396

46.5XZDOG$&.XW\LID95XZDOG0+HWDO7KHDVVRFLDWLRQEHWZHHQ ELYHQWULFXODU SDFLQJ DQG FDUGLDF UHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQ WKHUDS\GH¿EULOOD- WRUHႈFDF\ZKHQFRPSDUHGZLWKLPSODQWDEOHFDUGLRYHUWHUGH¿EULOODWRU on outcomes and reverse remodelling. European heart journal 2014.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu294

47. Stein KM, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, et al. SmartDelay determi- ned AV optimization: a comparison of AV delay methods used in car- diac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV): rationale and design.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology: PACE 2010; 33: 54–63. DOI:

10.1111/j.15408159.2009.02581.x

48. Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Meyer TE, et al. Primary results from the SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison to ot- her AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV) trial: a randomized trial comparing empirical, echocar- diography-guided, and algorithmic atrioventricular delay programming in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation 2010; 122: 2660–8.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.992552

49. Kedia N, Ng K, Apperson-Hansen C, et al. Usefulness of atrio- ventricular delay optimization using Doppler assessment of mitral LQÀRZ LQ SDWLHQWV XQGHUJRLQJ FDUGLDF UHV\QFKURQL]DWLRQ WKHUDS\ 7KH American journal of cardiology 2006; 98: 780–5. DOI:10.1016/j.amj- card.2006.04.017

50. Mullens W, Grimm RA, Verga T, et al. Insights from a cardiac resy- nchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease ma- nagement program. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2009; 53: 765–73 DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.024

Ábra

FIGURE 1. Electrical activation of the left and right ventricle in patients with right bundle branch block and left bundle branch  block (2)
TABLE 1. Randomized Past and *Ongoing Controlled Trials of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

The latest ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy recommends CRT upgrade as a class I indication (level B) for symptomatic patients (New York Heart

We hypothesized that CRT-D is associated with more pronounced mortality benefit in patients with an ischaemic aetiology of cardiomyopathy compared with CRT-P due to the reduction

Early and sustained effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with moderate to severe heart failure and cardiac

Our results showed, in LBBB patients with a longer or equal to 86 ms right to left ventricular activation delay, a significantly lower risk of composite of heart

(2013) An individual patient meta-analysis of five randomised trials assessing the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on morbidity and mortality in patients

The changes in renal and inflammatory parameters of the patients with heart failure after cardiac resynchronization therapy were assessed using the Friedman test with Dunn

CI ⴝ confidence interval CRT ⴝ cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D ⴝ cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator EF ⴝ ejection fraction HF ⴝ heart failure HR ⴝ

Our study shows that device-derived measures of physical activity can help predict clinical outcome and ventricular remodeling in patients receiving