volume 5, issue 1, article 10, 2004.
Received 22 August, 2003;
accepted 09 January, 2004.
Communicated by:C.P. Niculescu
Abstract Contents
JJ II
J I
Home Page Go Back
Close Quit
Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics
ON ESTIMATES OF NORMAL STRUCTURE COEFFICIENTS OF BANACH SPACES
Y. Q. YAN
Department of Mathematics Suzhou University
Suzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China, 215006.
EMail:yanyq@pub.sz.jsinfo.net
c
2000Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 114-03
On Estimates of Normal Structure Coefficients of
Banach Spaces Y. Q. Yan
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page2of11
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(1) Art. 10, 2004
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
Abstract
We obtained the estimates of Normal structure coefficientN(X)by Neumann- Jordan constantCNJ(X)of a Banach spaceXand found thatXhas uniform normal structure ifCNJ(X)<(3 +√
5)/4.These results improved both Prus’
[6] and Kato, Maligranda and Takahashi’s [4] work.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:46B20, 46E30.
Key words: Normal structure coefficient, Neumann-Jordan constant, Non-square constants, Banach space
Contents
1 Introduction. . . 3 2 Main Results . . . 5
References
On Estimates of Normal Structure Coefficients of
Banach Spaces Y. Q. Yan
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page3of11
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(1) Art. 10, 2004
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
1. Introduction
LetX = (X,k · k)be a real Banach space. Geometrical properties of a Banach spaceX are determined by its unit ballBX = {x ∈ X : kxk ≤ 1}or its unit sphereSX ={x ∈X : kxk= 1}.A Banach spaceX is called uniformly non- square if there exists aδ∈(0,1)such that for anyx, y ∈SX eitherkx+yk/2≤ 1−δorkx−yk/2≤1−δ.The constant
J(X) = sup{min(kx+yk,kx−yk) :x, y ∈SX}
is called the non-square constant ofX in the sense of James. It is well-known that√
2≤J(X)≤2ifdimX ≥2.The Neumann-Jordan constantCN J(X)of a Banach spaceX is defined by
CN J(X) = sup
kx+yk2+kx−yk2
2(kxk2+kyk2) :x, y ∈X, not both zero
. Clearly, 1≤ CN J(X) ≤ 2.andX is a Hilbert space if and only ifCN J(X) = 1. Kato, Maligranda and Takahashi [4] proved that for any non-trivial Banach spaceX(dimX ≥2),
(1.1) 1
2J(X)2 ≤CN J(X)≤ J(X)2 (J(X)−1)2+ 1.
A Banach spaceX is said to have normal structure ifr(K)< diam(K)for every non-singleton closed bounded convex subsetK ofX,where diam(K) = sup{kx−yk : x, y ∈ K} is the diameter of K and r(K) = inf{sup{kx−
On Estimates of Normal Structure Coefficients of
Banach Spaces Y. Q. Yan
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page4of11
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(1) Art. 10, 2004
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
yk : y ∈ K} : x ∈ K}is the Chebyshev radius of K. The normal structure coefficient ofXis the number
N(X) = inf{diam(K)/r(K) :K ⊂Xbounded and convex,diam(K)>0}.
Obviously,1≤N(X)≤2.It is known [5], [2] that if the spaceX is reflexive, then the infimum in the definition of N(X)can be taken over all convex hulls of finite subsets ofX. The spaceXis said to have uniform normal structure if N(X) > 1.IfX has uniform normal structure, thenX is reflexive and hence X has fixed point property. Gao and Lau [3] showed that if J(X) < 3/2, then X has uniform normal structure. Prus [6] gave an estimate of N(X)by J(X) which contains Gao-Lau’s [3] and Bynum’s [1] results: For any non- trivial Banach spaceX,
(1.2) N(X)≥J(X) + 1− {(J(X) + 1)2−4}12. Kato, Maligranda and Takahashi [4] proved
(1.3) N(X)≥
CN J(X)− 1 4
−12
,
which implies that ifCN J(X)<5/4thenXhas uniform normal structure. This result is a little finer than Gao-Lau’s condition byJ(X). This paper is devoted to improving the above results.
On Estimates of Normal Structure Coefficients of
Banach Spaces Y. Q. Yan
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page5of11
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(1) Art. 10, 2004
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
2. Main Results
Our proofs are based on the idea due to Prus [6], who estimated N(X) by modulus of convexity of X. Let C be a convex hull of a finite subset of a Banach spaceX.SinceC is compact, there exists an elementy ∈ C such that sup{kx−yk:x∈C}=r(C).Translating the setCwe can assume thaty= 0.
Prus [6] gave the following
Proposition 2.1. Let C be a convex hull of a finite subset of a Banach space X such thatsup{kxk : x ∈ C} = r(C).Then there exist points x1, . . . , xn ∈ C,norm-one functionalsx∗1, . . . , x∗n ∈ X∗ and nonnegative numberλ1, . . . , λn
such thatPn
i=1λi = 1,
x∗i(xi) =kxik=r(C) fori= 1, . . . , nandPn
i=1λix∗i(x) = 0wheneverλx∈Cfor someλ >0.
Without loss of generality, we assumer(C) = 1thereforeC ⊂BX.
Theorem 2.2. LetX be a non-trivial Banach space with the Neumann-Jordan constantCN J(X).Then
(2.1) N(X)≥ 2
p8CN J(X)−1−1.
Proof. LetC be a convex hull of a finite subset ofX such thatsup{kxk :x ∈ C} = r(C) = 1 and diamC = d. By Proposition 2.1 we obtain elements x1, . . . , xn ∈ C,norm-one functionalsx∗1, . . . , x∗n ∈ X∗ and nonnegative num- bersλ1, . . . , λnsuch thatPn
i=1λi = 1, x∗i(xi) = 1andPn
j=1λjx∗j(xi) = 0for i= 1, . . . , n.
On Estimates of Normal Structure Coefficients of
Banach Spaces Y. Q. Yan
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page6of11
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(1) Art. 10, 2004
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
Define
(2.2) xi,j = 1
d(xi−xj), yi,j =xi
i, j = 1, . . . , n.Clearlyxi,j, yi,j ∈BX andxi,j+yi,j = (1 + 1/d)xi−(1/d)xj, xi,j −yi,j = (−1 + 1/d)xi−(1/d)xj.It follows that
n
X
i,j=1
λiλj
kxi,j+yi,jk2+kxi,j−yi,jk2
≥
n
X
j=1
λj
n
X
i=1
λi[x∗i(xi,j+yi,j)]2+
n
X
i=1
λi
n
X
j=1
λj
x∗j(xi,j−yi,j)2
=
n
X
j=1
λj
n
X
i=1
λi
1 + 1 d− 1
dx∗i(xj) 2
+
n
X
i=1
λi
n
X
j=1
λj 1
d +
1− 1 d
x∗j(xi)
2
=
1− 1 d
2
−2
1−1 d
1 d
n
X
j=1
λj n
X
i=1
λix∗i(xj) + 1 d2
n
X
j=1
λj n
X
i=1
λi[x∗i(xj)]2
+ 1 d2 + 2
1− 1
d 1
d
n
X
i=1
λi
n
X
j=1
λjx∗j(xi) +
1− 1 d
2 n
X
i=1
λi
n
X
j=1
λj[x∗j(xi)]2
≥
1 + 1 d
2
+ 1 d2.
Therefore there existi, j such that
kxi,j +yi,jk2 +kxi,j −yi,jk2 ≥
1 + 1 d
2
+ 1 d2.
On Estimates of Normal Structure Coefficients of
Banach Spaces Y. Q. Yan
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page7of11
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(1) Art. 10, 2004
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
From the definition of Neumann-Jordan constant we see that (2.3) CN J(X)≥ kxi,j +yi,jk2+kxi,j−yi,jk2
4 ≥ 1
4
"
1 + 1
d 2
+ 1 d2
# .
This inequality is equivalent to the following one
(2.4) d≥ 2
p8CN J(X)−1−1.
Therefore, we obtain the desired estimate (2.1) sinceC ⊂ X is arbitrary. The proof is finished.
It is easy to check that 1 q
CN J(X)− 14
< 2
p8CN J(X)−1−1
when 1 < CN J(X) < 5/4.Therefore, the estimate of the above theorem im- proves (1.3). It is also not difficult to check that
(2.5) p
2CN J(X) + 1− (p
2CN J(X) + 1)2 −412
< 2
p8CN J(X)−1−1 when 1 < CN J(X) < 5/4. Since J(X) ≤ p
2CN J(X), and the function x+ 1−((x+ 1)2−4)1/2 is decreasing, we have (1.2) from (2.1) and (2.5). So (1.2) becomes a corollary of (2.1).
On Estimates of Normal Structure Coefficients of
Banach Spaces Y. Q. Yan
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page8of11
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(1) Art. 10, 2004
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
Prus [6] gave the result that ifJ(X)<4/3,thenN(X)>1.Gao and Lau [3]
gave a condition that ifJ(X)<3/2thenN(X)>1.Then they asked whether the estimateJ(X)<3/2is sharp forXto have uniform normal structure. Kato, Maligranda and Takahashi [4] found that if CN J(X) < 5/4, which implies J(X) < √
10/2, then N(X) > 1. The following theorem will give a wider interval ofCN J(X)forXto have uniform normal structure.
Theorem 2.3. LetX be a non-trivial Banach space with the Neumann-Jordan constantCN J(X)and normal structure coefficientN(X). Then
(2.6) CN J(X)≥
qN2(X)
4 +N21(X) +N(X)− N(X)1 2
+N21(X)
2
1 +q
N2(X)
4 +N21(X) +N(X)− N(X)2 2. Moreover, ifCN J(X)< (3 +√
5)/4orJ(X) <(1 +√
5)/2,thenN(X)> 1 and henceX has uniform normal structure.
Proof. We modify the first step in the proof of Theorem2.2. In (2.2), let
(2.7) xi,j = 1
d(xi−xj), yi,j =txi
witht >0.Thenkxi,jk ≤1,kyi,jk=t.Similar to (2.3), we obtain
(2.8) CN J(X)≥ t+1d2
+d12
2(1 +t2)
On Estimates of Normal Structure Coefficients of
Banach Spaces Y. Q. Yan
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page9of11
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(1) Art. 10, 2004
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
for anyt >0.The function
f(t) = t+1d2
+d12
2(1 +t2)
reach the maximum at the point t0 =
rd2 4 + 1
d2 +d− 2 d.
It is decreasing ont > t0 and increasing on0< t < t0.Therefore, we have
(2.9) CN J(X)≥
q
d2
4 +d12 +d−1d 2
+d12
2
"
1 + q
d2
4 +d12 +d−2d 2#.
Since the function
c=g(d) :=
q
d2
4 +d12 +d−1d 2
+d12
2
"
1 + q
d2
4 +d12 +d−2d 2#
is strictly decreasing and continuous on 1 ≤ d ≤ 2, we know that the in- verse function d = g−1(c) exists and must also be decreasing. Thus, we have from (2.9) that d ≥ g−1(CN J(X)). It follows by take the infimum of d that
On Estimates of Normal Structure Coefficients of
Banach Spaces Y. Q. Yan
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page10of11
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(1) Art. 10, 2004
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
N(X) ≥ g−1(CN J(X)). Equivalently, we have (2.6). From the above state- ments of monotony property, we deduce that N(X) = 1 is corresponding to CN J(X) = (3 +√
5)/4.Therefore, ifCN J(X)<(3 +√
5)/4,thenN(X)>1.
Since the non-square constant J(X)≤ √
2CN X,we have in other word that if J(X)<(1 +√
5)/2,thenN(X)>1.
On Estimates of Normal Structure Coefficients of
Banach Spaces Y. Q. Yan
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page11of11
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 5(1) Art. 10, 2004
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
References
[1] W.L. BYNUM, About some parameters of normed linear spaces, Pacific J.
Math., 86 (1980), 427–436.
[2] T. DOMINGUEZ BENAVIDES, Normal structued coefficients of Lp(Ω), Proc. Roy. Soc. Sect., A117 (1991), 299–303.
[3] J. GAO AND K.S. LAU, On two classes of Banach spaces with uniform normal structure, Studia Math., 99 (1991), 41–56.
[4] M. KATO, L. MALIGRANDA AND Y. TAKAHASHI, On James and Jordan-von Neumann constants and the normal structure coefficient of Ba- nach spaces, Studia Math., 144 (2001), 275–295.
[5] E. MALUTA, Uniformly normal structure and telated coefficients, Pacific J. Math., 111(1984), 357–369.
[6] S. PRUS, Some estimates for the normal structure coefficient in Banach spaces, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 40 (1991), 128–135.
[7] M.M. RAOANDZ.D. REN, Applications of Orlicz spaces, Marcel Dekker, New York, (2002), 49–53.