• Nem Talált Eredményt

CALCULATION OF HIGHER-ORDER SENSITIVITIES AND HIGHER-ORDER SENSITIVITY INVARIANTS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "CALCULATION OF HIGHER-ORDER SENSITIVITIES AND HIGHER-ORDER SENSITIVITY INVARIANTS "

Copied!
6
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

CALCULATION OF HIGHER-ORDER SENSITIVITIES AND HIGHER-ORDER SENSITIVITY INVARIANTS

By

K. GEHER and J. SOLY}lOS1

Institute of Telecommunication and Electronics, Technical University, Budapest (Received July 27, 1972)

Presented by Prof. Dr 1. Barta

1. Calculation of higher-order sensitivities

First-order semirelative sensitivity functions with respect to arbiratry impedances can easily be computed by the indirect method using transfer functions

[1,

2, 5, 6, 9] (for notations in the transfer functions see Fig.

1):

where

@

tJ

2

KiZ= Vii

Fig. 1. Transfer functions used in calculating semirelative sensitivity functions a) K

u.

U; ;

UU ' i • 1

(1)

The expression is applicable not only for impedances Zi but for network parameter xi(Ri, Li, Cil) as "well, and so the formula can be rewritten as:

oK oK

Q i = - - = - -

8lnZi 81nxi

(2)

It is worthy to remark that there is only one direct path between the input and the output which touches port i and the product KliKi2 can be regarded as the path-product (Fig. 2a). It is useful to apply this technic, for the sake of illustration, but we should like to emphasize that the path-product defined is not to be mistaken for the signal flo·w graph, it is only a demonstra- tion aid.

(2)

326 K. GEHER-SOLYJIOSI

The second-order semirelatiye sensitiyity is to be determined ·with respect to the i-th and the j-th parameter:

(3)

Hence, utilizing Eqs (1) and (2):

(4)

It is again remarkable that there are only two different direct paths between the input and the output which touch both the i-th and the j-th port. Two

(i) ~ (I)

~ ~ Ky '0E

(7) Ki2 (2) (1) K/i Ki2 (2)

~

@ @

Fig. 2a. The direct path between the input and output defining the path product KliKi~

b) The two possible direct paths between the input and output defining the products KliKijKj~

and KljKjiKi~

path-products can he ordered to the two paths which are exactly equal to the two terms of Eq. (4). (Fig. 2b).

B2J(

Expression

(4)

can he interpreted in the case of

Qii

= - - - - B(ln xJ2 too, substituting

j

=

i:

Calculating the third-order semirelati-ve sensitiyity results in:

(5)

(6)

This equation contains six terms that define the six direct paths possible hetween input and output and the path-products (Fig. 3). All these lead to the conclusion that in the third-order case (m 3) the semirelatiye sensitiyity function contains m! = 3 != 6 terms containing all the direct paths between input and output supposed to touch all the m 3 ports. It may also be con- cluded that a path-product contains m

+

1 = 4 factors. This statement is true in general.

(3)

HIGHER- ODEIi SESSITIUTIES :LYD L\TAIiLLYTS 327

Theorem: The m-th order semirelative sensltlnty function Q12"'m =

amK U.,

of an open circuit voltage transfer function K = LT~,

a In Xl a In X 2 ••• a In Xm _

with respect to R, Land

C-l

parameters or arbitrary impedances is always expressible by the sum of

m!

direct path-product. A path-product consists of m

+

1 factors.

Proof: Suppose that our theorem is valid for the m - I-th order sen- sitivity function, i.e. there are (m - 1) ! direct paths and a direct path defines a path-product consisting of m factors. Differcntation is a linear operation so it can he derived hy the terms. Deriving a term, i.e. a path product consisting of m factors,

will

yield m terms. There heing (m - 1) ! path-products, after derivation the number of the terms will he m(m - 1)

!

=

m!

( 11 ' f

~~

~

--- =---

~_(2)

~~ ~

Fig. 3. The six possible direct paths appearing in calculation of the third-order semirelatiye sensitivity

It neech verification only that the

m!

tcrms arc really path-products and the numher of the factors in a term is m -:- 1. Let us dcrive a dircct path- product consisting of m factors:

o a

~ lll-,v K1,K'j](j/:' .. Krn ·_, = (le}(", . .. Kr-I ,,) -;-

",~ . alnx '. ," ,-

The derivates in the right side of Eq. (7) arc semirelative sensitivity functions, -which can he calculated according to Eq. (1) and in general they arc of the form raKij

a

In x KixKXj' Suhstituting thcm into

Eq. (7)

the following formula

(4)

328 K. GEHER-SOLY.1IOSI

will

be received:

It appears that the direct path derind 1 -

i

j k - ... - m 2 "fell to pieces", to longer paths, so as to giYe a product of two factors instead of one factor. But this does not alter the path characteristic of the original paths.

The change is merely that there are m

+

1 factOls instead of m ones. Thereby the theorem is proved.

2. Higher-order sensitivity invariants

It is known that the sum of relative sensitivities with respect to different circuit parameters is invariant [2, 3, 7]:

11

~S~ =

l1i

(9)

i=l

Investigating net,Yorks consisting of resistors (R), inductors (L), capacitors (D =

C-l),

current-controlled voltage sources (transfer resistances

r),

gyra- tors (RG) as well as transformers (a), impedance converters (k), yoltage controlled voltage sources (fJ.), current controlled current sources

(f3)

and operational amplifiers (A) it can be shown [3] that if the network characteristic

y

is a

1.

voltage or current transfer function (K), the sensitivity sum is

M

= 0, 2. transfer (or driving point) admittance (Y), the sensitivity sum is

NI =

-1, and

3. transfer (or driving point) impedance (Z), the sensitivity sum is

NI

=

1.

The summation must be extended to all of the parameters

R, L, D,

rand

R

G•

In the summation n means the sum of the numbers of resistors, inductors, capacitors, current controlled yoltage sources and gyrators. Using semirelative sensitivities only number lVI has to be multiplied by the network characteristic

y

to give the semirelative sensitivity sum:

n

~Qi=Aly (10)

i=l

Eq. (10) can be easily generalized for higher-order sensitiyity sums.

The necessary second-order sensitivities can be drawn in a quadratic

(5)

HIGHER· ODER SK,SITIUTIES .·j-YD I.\TARIA.\T-' 329

matrix:

[

Qll

Ql~

... Qll1j

Q~l Q!~:

: Q

= : ....

Qij .. :

. . .

.

. .

Qll1 ... QI1T1

The sum of all the matrix elements

Q

gives the second order semirelatiye sensitivity sum.

Deriving the first-order semirelative sensitiyity sum with respect to In Xj:

8 " 11 8

- -

>~

Qi = :y Qij

~-= - -(Atv) =

lVIQi

8lnxJi=i i=! 8lnxj -

(11)

Thus, summarizing the elements of matrix

Q

in the j-th column will result in

lHQj.

Summarizing all the columns of matrix

Q:

II n T!

5' "Q .. = "c11Q.

... .,.;;;;;", IJ ..;;. J (12)

j = l i=! j = l

The third-order semirelative sensitivity sum can be calculated in a similar manner:

n n n

~ ~ ~

Q ...

= l\.:Pv

~..;;;;;...::;; fjl. J (13)

i=!j=!

I;=!

Theorem: The sum of the moth order semirelative sensitivities of a linear network consisting of parameters

R, L, D,

r,

Rc, a, k,

/-I,

/J

and

A

is

n n r:

2 Qi,.i" ...

i", = Ivjf1ly (14)

ifli=l

'where

n

is the sum of the number of parameters

R, L, D, r

and

Rc.

Proof: Let the above statemcnt be valid for the (m - 1)-th order, I.C.

r: r;

::E::E ;;;;

Qi1,i, . . i,,,,_,.=J-Im-1y (15)

i1=1 i2=1 iUil_1)=1

Differentating Eq. (15) with respect to In Xr:

j fm - 1 = jfm-l

Qr

8ln Xr

(16)

Summarizing Eq. (16) from r 1 to r = 11 and substituting r = im ) the ob- tained formula will he exactly the Eq. (1-1:).

7

(6)

330 K. GEHER-SOLYJWSl

Summary

In this paper it has been shown that the higher-order semirelative sensitivity functions of an open circuit voltage transfer function can always be calculated by the method using voltage transfer function, i.e. \lithout derivation. It has been shown, too, that the first-order sensitivity invariants can be generalized to higher-order sensitivity invariants. These theorems may be u"sed for high-speed c~alculation of higher-order sensithities 'with an immediate check of the received results.

References

1. (BYKHOYSZKY, ~I.) ,\1. bbIXOBCKllil, OCHOBbI ;.\llHa.\llItlCCKOt! TO'lHOCTlI 3.1eKTplltlCCKIIX H Me- XaHlI'ICCKI!X l.\encil, I13J;. AKaJ;c.\II!II HayK CCCP, ;\loCKBa, 1958.

2. GEHER, K., Theory of l'Ietwork Tolerances, Akademiai Kiadii, Budapest, 1971.

3. GEHER, K.- RosK..\, T., Sensitivity inyariants in the theory of network tolerances and optimization, Proceedings of the Fourth Colloquium on Microwave Communication, Vo!.

n.

CT-8, Akademiai Kiadii, Budapest. 1970.

4. GEHER, K.-SOLY)IOSI, J., Calculation of higher-order sensitivities and higher-order sen- sitivity invariants. International Symposium of the IEEE Circuit Theory Group, Sept.

6-10, 1971. London, England. Digest of technical papers pp. 7-8.

5. KISS, D., Determination of element sensitivity ,\ithout derivation, Proceedings of the International Symposium on l'Ietwork Theory, Belgrade, Sept. 1968. pp. 617-627.

6. KISS, D., Determination of element sensitivity \lithout derivation by state-yariable analysis, Periodica Polytechnic a, El. Eng., Vol. 12., ::\"0. 4., 1969. pp. 411-426.

7. RosK..\, T., Summed sensitivity invariants and their generation, Electronics Letters, Vo!.

4., l'\o. 14., 1968. pp. 281-282.

8. SOLY2IIOSI, J., Calculation of the second-order sensitivity functions by flow graph method, Proceedings of the Fourth Colloquium on Microwave Communication, Vol.

n.

CT-25, Akademiai Kiadii, Budapest, 1970.

9. TO:HOVICH, R., Sensitivity Analysis of Dynamic Systems. ~IcGraw Hill, New York, 1964.

u apest XI Sztoczek u. 2

-4.

Hungary-

Dr. Karoly

GEHER }

B d

Dr. Janos

SOLYc\IOSI - , ~

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

In Section 3, the main result of this paper, Theorem A, provides a general relationship be- tween such distinct notions of higher order averaged functions, which allows the

When Aydogdu [17] com- pared various HSDPT’s (Higher-order Shear Deformation Plate Theories) with available 3D analysis, it has been pointed out that, while the parabolic

This problem can be analyzed by the two-dimensional method of calculation. Let us return to the calculation results shown in Fig. In order to achieve an

Ransford, Potential theory in the complex plane, London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 28, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.... Riordan, An introduction to

The answer proposed in this paper is that we divest model theory from the nar- row meaning it has acquired in linguistics, as being about formulas in some first- or higher-order

Webb, Positive solutions of some higher order nonlocal boundary value problems, Electron.. Anderson, Green’s function for a third-order generalized right focal

In our previous paper [6] it was shown that in the classical state-feedback/observer (SFO) scheme the model error decreases by the sensitivity function of the observer feedback

Keywords: generalized Cahn–Hilliard equation, higher-order models, anisotropy, well- posedness, global attractor, numerical simulations.. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: