• Nem Talált Eredményt

JJ II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "JJ II"

Copied!
9
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

volume 6, issue 2, article 28, 2005.

Received 10 January, 2005;

accepted 03 February, 2005.

Communicated by:A. Lupa¸s

Abstract Contents

JJ II

J I

Home Page Go Back

Close

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

ON THE INEQUALITY OF P. TURÁN FOR LEGENDRE POLYNOMIALS

EUGEN CONSTANTINESCU

University of Sibiu Faculty of Sciences Department of Mathematics Str. I.Ra¸t nr. 7,

2400 Sibiu, Romania

EMail:egnconst68@yahoo.com

(2)

On the Inequality of P. Turán for Legendre Polynomials

Eugen Constantinescu

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page2of9

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(2) Art. 28, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Abstract Our aim is to prove the inequalities

1−x2

n(n+ 1)hn≤ Pn(x) Pn+1(x)

Pn−1(x) Pn(x) ≤1−x2

2 , ∀x∈[−1,1], n= 1,2, . . . , wherehn:=Pn

k=11

k and(Pn)n=0are the Legendre polynomials . At the same time, it is shown that the sequence having as general term

n(n+ 1)Pn(x) Pn+1(x) Pn−1(x) Pn(x) is non-decreasing forx∈[−1,1].

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:33C10, 26D20.

Key words: Orthogonal polynomials, Legendre polynomials, Turán Inequality, Posi- tivity.

Contents

1 Introduction. . . 3 2 Main Results . . . 5

References

(3)

On the Inequality of P. Turán for Legendre Polynomials

Eugen Constantinescu

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page3of9

1. Introduction

Let(Pn)n=0be the sequence of Legendre polynomials, that is

Pn(x) = 1

n!2n (x2 −1)n(n)

=2F1

−n, n+ 1; 1;1−x 2

, where

2F1(a, b;c;z) :=

X

k=0

(a)k(b)k (c)k

· zk k!, (a)k:=a(a+ 1)· · ·(a+k−1), (a)0 = 1.

Denote

n(x) := Pn(x) Pn+1(x)

Pn−1(x) Pn(x) = [Pn(x)]2−Pn−1(x)Pn+1(x).

Note that Pn(1) = 1, Pn(−x) = (−1)nPn(−x), i.e. ∆n(1) = ∆n(−1) = 0.

For instance

1(x) = 1−x2

2 , ∆2(x) = 1−x4 4 . Paul Turán [3] has proved the following interesting inequality

(4)

On the Inequality of P. Turán for Legendre Polynomials

Eugen Constantinescu

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page4of9

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(2) Art. 28, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Lemma 1.1 (A. Lupa¸s). Supposeϕ(x, t) := x2 +t(1−x2)andPn(xk) = 0.

Then

(1.2) ∆n(x) = 1

πn(n+ 1) Z 1

−1

1−Pn(ϕ(x, t))

1−t · dt

√1−t2 and

(1.3) ∆n(x) = 1−x2 n(n+ 1)

n

X

k=1

Pn(x) x−xk

2

(1−xxk) .

(5)

On the Inequality of P. Turán for Legendre Polynomials

Eugen Constantinescu

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page5of9

2. Main Results

In this article our aim is to improve the Turán inequality (1.1).

Theorem 2.1. Ifx∈[−1,1],n ∈N, hn :=Pn k=1

1 k,then

(2.1) 1−x2

n(n+ 1)hn≤∆n(x)≤ 1−x2 2 .

Proof. Let us denote Tk(t) = cos (k·arccost), γ0 = π1, γk = π2 for k ≥ 1, and ϕ(x, t) = x2 + t(1 −x2). According to addition formula for Legendre polynomials, we have

Pn(ϕ(x, t)) =π

n

X

k=0

(n−k)!

(n+k)!(1−x2)k

Pn(k)(x)2

γkTk(t).

Ift= 1we find

1 = π

n

X

k=0

(n−k)!

(n+k)!(1−x2)k

Pn(k)(x)2

γk.

Therefore

1−Pn(ϕ(x, t)) 1−t = 2

n

X

k=1

(n−k)!

(n+k)!(1−x2)k

Pn(k)(x)2 1−Tk(t) 1−t

(6)

On the Inequality of P. Turán for Legendre Polynomials

Eugen Constantinescu

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page6of9

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(2) Art. 28, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

This shows us that max

t∈[−1,1]

1−Pn(ϕ(x, t)) 1−t

= 1−Pn(ϕ(x, t)) 1−t

t=1

= (1−x2)Pn0(1)

= n(n+ 1)

2 (1−x2).

Using the Lupa¸s identity (1.2) we obtain

n(x)≤ 1−x2

2 , (n ≥1, x∈[−1,1]).

Taking into account the following well-known equalities

Pn(x) = 2n−1

n xPn−1(x)− n−1

n Pn−2(x), P0(x) = 1, P1(x) =x, (1−x2)Pn0(x) =n(Pn−1(x)−xPn(x)) = (n+ 1) (xPn(x)−Pn+1(x)), we obtain

k(k+1)∆k(x)−(k−1)k∆k−1(x) = (1−x2)

Pk0(x)Pk−1(x)−Pk(x)Pk−10 (x) . The Christofell-Darboux formula for Legendre polynomials enables us to write

k(k+ 1)∆k(x)−(k−1)k∆k−1(x) = 1−x2 k

k−1

X

j=0

(2j+ 1) [Pj(x)]2, k≥2.

(7)

On the Inequality of P. Turán for Legendre Polynomials

Eugen Constantinescu

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page7of9

By summing fork ∈ {2,3, . . . , n}we give

n(n+ 1)∆n(x) = (1−x2)hn+ (1−x2)

n−1

X

k=1

1 k+ 1

k

X

j=1

(2j+ 1) [Pj(x)]2,

which implies∆n(x)≥ (1−xn(n+1)2)hn forx∈[−1,1].

Another remark regarding∆n(x)is the following :

Theorem 2.2. The sequence(n(n+ 1)∆n(x))n=1, x∈[−1,1], is non-decreasing, i.e.

n(x)≥ n−1

n+ 1∆n−1(x), x∈[−1,1], n≥2.

Proof. Let Πm be the linear space of all polynomials, of degree≤ m, having real coefficients. Using a Lagrange-Hermite interpolation formula, every poly- nomialf fromΠ2n+1 withf(−1) = f(1) = 0may be written as

(2.2) f(x) = (1−x2)

n

X

k=1

Pn(x) Pn0(xk)(x−xk)

2

Ak(f;x),

where

Ak(f;x) = f(xk) + (x−xk)f0(xk) 1−x2k .

(8)

On the Inequality of P. Turán for Legendre Polynomials

Eugen Constantinescu

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page8of9

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(2) Art. 28, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Let us observe that

Pn−1(xk) = 1−x2k

n Pn0(xk), Pn+1(xk) = −1−x2k

n+ 1 Pn0(xk), Pn−2(xk) = 2n−1

n(n−1)xk(1−x2k)Pn0(xk), (2.3)

Pn−10 (xk) = Pn+10 (xk) = xkPn0(xk).

In (2.2) let us considerf ∈Π2n,where

f(x) =n(n+ 1)∆n(x)−n(n−1)∆n−1(x).

From (2.3) we find

f(xk) = (1−x2k)2

n [Pn0(xk)]2, f0(xk) = 0.

BecauseAk(f;x) = 1−xn2k [Pn0(xk)]2,using (2.2) we give

f(x) = 1−x2 n

n

X

k=1

Pn(x) x−xk

2

(1−x2k)≥0, x∈[−1,1].

Therefore

(n+ 1)∆n(x)−(n−1)∆n−1(x)≥0 for x∈[−1,1].

(9)

On the Inequality of P. Turán for Legendre Polynomials

Eugen Constantinescu

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page9of9

References

[1] A. LUPA ¸S, Advanced Problem 6517, Amer. Math. Monthly, (1986) p. 305;

(1988) p. 264.

[2] A. LUPA ¸S, On the inequality of P. Turán for ultraspherical polynomials, in Seminar on Numerical and Statistical Calculus, University of Cluj-Napoca, Research Seminaries, Preprint Nr. 4 (1985) 82–87.

[3] P. TURÁN, On the zeros of the polynomials of Legendre, ˘Casopis pro pe˘stovani matematiky i fysky, 75 (1950) 113–122.

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

The work reported in this volume draws on the experiences of several de- cades’ research on educational assessment at the University of Szeged and on the achievements of the

Higher order Bernstein- and Markov-type inequalities are established for trigonometric polynomials on compact subsets of the real line and algebraic polynomials on compact subsets

Since 2009 he holds the po- sition of assistant lecturer at Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca (Faculty of Reformed Theology, Department of Music Pedagogy), teaching Music

PATKÓ Gyula, Ph.D., University of Miskolc, Hungary PÁY Gábor, PhD., University of Nyíregyháza, Hungary POP-SITAR Petricà, Ph.D., Technical University Cluj Napoca,

Then, I will discuss how these approaches can be used in research with typically developing children and young people, as well as, with children with special needs.. The rapid

* University of Osijek, Croatia, ** University of Rijeka, Croatia, *** Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary, § Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Mathematical

The numerical method based on the Chebyshev polynomials is very powerful in the case of the analysis of continuum pipe models.. Discretization

Numerical research is carried out on the fracture mode, propagation path, failure pattern and propagation rate of the SCB model, which pro- vides a numerical basis for 3-D