• Nem Talált Eredményt

A STOCHASTIC PROCESS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "A STOCHASTIC PROCESS "

Copied!
5
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

A STOCHASTIC PROCESS

By

A. VETIER

Department of Mathematics of the Faculty of Electrical Engineering Technical University, Budapest

Received June 20, 1978 Presented by Prof. Dr. O. KIS

To make a mathematical description of the transmission of radio-Iocator signs through a ,vide-band micro-wave channel, it is necessary to study the following type of stochastic processes:

' 1 1 "

;, = Icos

la -

t

+ ~ c, ei

cos

(Wi

t

+ cri»)

c=1

where

is the time parameter,

a, Ci' lV, (i = 1, ... , n) are deterministic constants,

el' cri

(i = 1, ... , n) are idependent random variables,

rp, is of uniform distribution betwecn 0 and 2n (i = 1, ... , n),

ei

is a non-negative random variable that likes the low values, that is, its density function is high at the neighbourhood of zero.

It is primarily important to determine the co variance function of this process.

In this article the necessary calculations are 'written down. As it will be seen, the calculations are hased on the assumption that

e,

has a second order x-distribution (i = 1, ... , n). In this case normally distributed random var- iables arise, permitting in fact to calculate the expected value of some random variables. The second-order x-distribution fits the description of the phenom- enon since its density function is

if

x>

0

if x <;; 0

The calculation of the covariance function The covariance function of the stochastic process follo,ving way:

2*

defined in the

(2)

86 A. VETIER

PROPOSITION:

b(t, s) =

[( ', - /i;

ci cos w;(t-s) )'

e 1=1 - 1 cos a(t

+

s) --i-

(

~

C' cos w. (t-S) J '

1

+

e,-1 - 1 cos a (t s).

Proof:

Let us assume that; and 1} are independent random variables and their common distribution is standard normal distribution. Let Q and rp, - also random variables - be the polar co-ordinates of the point (,;, 1}). Q and rp are known to be independent, Q to he of second-order x-distribution, and rp of uniform distribution.

It is ob'vious that also the contrary is true: if Q has a second-order x-distri- bution, cp a uniform distribution, and Q and cp are independent, then';

=

Q' cos cp

and 1}

=

Q • sin cp are independent and their common distribution is a normal distribution.

It follows that if t is fixed, then Qi cos (wit

+-

rpi) has a standard normal distribution. So if t is fixed, then

n

Xt

=

a . t

+

~ ci Qi cos (wi t+ rpJ

i=l

is normally distributed, and its expected value is a . t, and its variance is

~

r-fl ~ i=l

cr·

Lemma 1:

,.. tt c!

J

e-Tcos(c·t)dt=Y2n e - T .

(3)

Proof:

1 . . t

From the identity cos (et) = - [elct

+

e-IC] we get 2

The substitution u = - t transforms the second integral on the right side into the first one, so:

/'

2" e ict dt = e

At the last step the well-known identity was used:

Lemma 2:

If the random variable e has a normal distribution, and its expected value and variance are m and (j respectively, then

0'

1vI (cos c) = e - 2" cos m . Proof:

NI (cos c) =

11 2n a

1

f

e (x-m)' ---r.;::- cos X dx =

Substituting t

= - - - ,

x-m then using the identity cos (m

+

at) =

a

= cos m cos at - sin m sin at we get

2 cos (m

+

at) dt =

co t= eo;. tl

cosm

f --

sIn m

J --

= V2n e 2 cos at dt - V2n e 2 sin at dt.

(4)

88 A. VETIER

Here the second integral is equal to zero, since the integrand is an odd function.

Applying lemma 1 to the first integral we get the proposition of lemma 2.

Now the proof of the PROPOSITION 'will be continued. From lemma 2 it follows that

Hence:

n

:E

c:

i~l

:E n c'

i=l

~ cos (at) .

M(~t)· lVI(~s) = e - -~ - cos (at) e cos as =

- - - ( c o s e aCt

2 s) -1- cos aCt

-s».

llil(~I~s) will be determined from the identity cos (/./ cos 7.s = 1 2 cos (7.[

+

7.5)

If t and s are fixed, then the distribution of the random variable 7./ : 7.5 is normal distibution since

Tl

(/./ 7.5 = a . (t s)

+

~Ci Q/ (cos (Wit efi)

±

cos (Wis

+

rpi») =

= a . (t s)

/=1 Tl

~ Ci

Q/(

(cos Wi t

/=1

Here Q/ cos rpi' Qi sin rpi (i

=

L ... , n) are independent random variables with normal distribution, so (/./ 7.5 is in fact normally distributed, and its expected value and variance are: aCt : s) and

., [( )ry , (. " )9]

Ci

cos Wi t -'- cos W/ S - -;- SIn Wi t ::::: SIn UJi s - =

(5)

So, lemma 2 yields:

= - e 1 2

E n c'. (1 + cos aJ,(I-S)) i=l l

n )

cos a(t s) 1 - E Ci (1 + COS ",,(t - s)

..L. - e i=l cos a(t - s) =

I 2

e

n

E C'

i=l

[e

1/

E

i=l

2

E Il

c:

cos CJt (t

[=1

cj cos "', (t S)

cos a(t s)+

s) cos a (t - s) .

1

Using this result it is easy to derive that b(t, s) = .J!J(;,;s) - lvI(;t) lVI(;:) equals the formula given in the PROPOSITION.

Summary

Theoretically it is no problem to determine the covariance function of a stochastic process but in case of actual stochastic processes it needs sometimes long calculations and some skill. In this work the co variance function of an actual stochastic process is determined. At each step it is indicated what theoretical assumptions the calculations are based on.

Andras VETIER H-1521 Budapest

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

In this study a stochastic model of the rpm and torque process in a simple mechanical system will be described, assuming cycle periods of the operation process

The present stage of the research shows that due to iterative formulation of thicknesses of the ground elements obtained in the stochastic problem it is advised to start the

Analysis of vibrations of vehicles designed for public traffic is usually based on the assumption that Yf is a stationary stochastic process, let f = f(f.l.)

Let us consider now whether in cases of an error-laden independent variable (stochastic variable), it is true that appropriate minimization of SSQ of whichever

When the probability or certainty of the random variable equals one then the stochastic process is a deterministic one, and when this probability is independent

The stochastic character of the change of the amount of cost has its source in the stochastic character of the failure (Of course in the presented model we can

Application of the stochastic approximation principle to the identification of some control elements is described The convergence of the identification process and

All the signals (the variables) in the control system are assumed to be stationary ergodic stochastic processes. The outputs of the controller are the