Kohári Anna
4. A dajkanyelv tulajdonságainak és funkcióinak összefoglalása
A jelen tanulmányban a dajkanyelv akusztikai sajátosságait tekintettük át részletesebben, illetve ezeknek lehetséges szerepét a gyerek-felnőtt interakcióban. A dajkanyelv meghatározó tulajdonságai közé sorolható a lassabb tempó, a magasabb alapfrekvencia és a nagyobb hang-terjedelem, valamint több nyelvben a nagyobb magánhangzótér. A dajkanyelvnek nemcsak
figyelemfelkeltő, figyelemfenntartó, valamint érzelemközvetítő szerepe van a kommunikáció-ban, hanem segíti a beszédfeldolgozást és a nyelvelsajátítást is. Habár már nagyon sok mindent tudunk, illetve tudni vélünk a dajkanyelvről, számtalan nyitott kérdés még megválaszolatlan.
Például az, hogy miért éppen ezek a dajkanyelv tulajdonságai; hogy longitudinálisan (a baba életkorának előrehaladtával) hogyan alakulnak a különböző tulajdonságok; hogy hogyan lassítják beszédüket az édesanyák; hogy mi magyarázhatja a nyelvek közti eltéréseket a kü-lönböző tulajdonságok esetében; és még sorolhatnánk a nyitott kérdéseket, amelyek a jövőben válaszra várnak.
FOGALMAK
beszédalkalmazkodás; dajkanyelv; artikulációs tempó; beszédtempó; frázisvégi nyúlás;
mással hangzós szakasz; magánhangzós szakasz; beszédritmus; prozódia; alapfrekvencia;
dallamhangsúly; magánhangzótér; formáns; zöngeminőség; leheletes zönge; a dajkanyelv funkciói; érzelemközvetítés; expresszív és receptív szókincs; mimikri
IRODALOM
Andruski, Jean E. – Kuhl, Patricia K. – Hayashi, Akiko 1999. Point vowels in Japanese mothers’ speech to infants and adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105/2.
1095–1096.
Benders, Titia 2013. Mommy is only happy! Dutch mothers’ realisation of speech sounds in infant-directed speech expresses emotion, not didactic intent. Infant Behavior and Develop-ment 36/4. 847–862.
Bernhold, Quinten S. – Giles, Howard 2020. Vocal accommodation and mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 44/1. 41–62.
Brannon, Elizabeth M. – Libertus, Melissa E. – Meck, Warren H. – Woldorff, Marty G.
2008. Electrophysiological measures of time processing in infant and adult brains: Weber’s Law holds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20/2. 193–203.
Broesch, Tanya L. – Bryant, Gregory A. 2015. Prosody in infant-directed speech is similar across western and traditional cultures. Journal of Cognition and Development 16/1. 31–43.
Broesch, Tanya L. – Bryant, Gregory A. 2018. Fathers’ infant‐directed speech in a small‐scale society. Child Development 89/2. e29–e41.
Chládková, Kateřina – Černá, Martina – Paillereau, Nikola – Skarnitzl, Radek – Oceláková, Zuzana 2019. Prenatal infant-directed speech: vowels and voice quality. In Calhoun, Sasha – Escudero, Paola – Tabain, Marija – Warren, Paul (eds): Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS). Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc., Canberra. 1525–1529.
Cooper, Robyn P. 1993. The effect of prosody on young infants’ speech perception. Advances in Infancy Research 8. 137–167.
Cooper, Robyn P. – Abraham, Jane – Berman, Sheryl – Staska, Margaret 1997. The develop-ment of infants’ preference for motherese. Infant Behavior and Developdevelop-ment 20/4. 477–488.
Cristià, Alejandrina 2010. Phonetic enhancement of sibilants in infant-directed speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128/1. 424–434.
Cristià, Alejandrina – Seidl, Amanda 2014. The hyperarticulation hypothesis of infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language 41/4. 913–934.
De Palma, Paul – VanDam, Mark 2017. Using automatic speech processing to analyze funda-mental frequency of child-directed speech stored in a very large audio corpus. In 2017 Joint 17th World Congress of International Fuzzy Systems Association and 9th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (IFSA-SCIS). IEEE. 1–6.
Deme Andrea 2016. Magánhangzók ejtése és észlelése a szopránéneklésben. ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, Budapest.
Deme Andrea – Kohári Anna – Reichel, Uwe D. – Szalontai Ádám – Mády Katalin 2019.
A magánhangzós hosszúsági fonológiai kontraszt a dajkanyelvben a csecsemő életkorának függvényében. Beszédkutatás 27. 221–242.
Dodane, Christelle – Al-Tamimi, Jalaleddin 2007. An acoustic comparison of vowel systems in adult-directed-speech and child-directed speech: Evidence from French, English and Japanese. In Trouvain, Jürgen – Barry, William J. (eds): 16th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences. Pirrot GmbH, Dudweiler. 6–10.
Dunst, Carl – Gorman, Ellen – Hamby, Deborah 2012. Preference for infant-directed speech in preverbal young children. Center for Early Literacy Learning 5/1. 1–13.
Englund, Kjellrun – Behne, Dawn 2006. Changes in infant directed speech in the first six months. Infant and Child Development: An International Journal of Research and Practice 15/2. 139–160.
Fernald, Anne – Kuhl, Patricia 1987. Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech. Infant Behavior and Development 10/3. 279–293.
Fernald, Anne – Simon, Thomas 1984. Expanded intonation contours in mothers’ speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology 20/1. 104.
Fernald, Anne – Taeschner, Traute – Dunn, Judy – Papousek, Mechthild – de Boysson-Bardies, Bénédicte – Fukui, Ikuko 1989. A cross-language study of prosodic modifica-tions in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language 16/3.
477–501.
Garellek, Mark 2019. The phonetics of voice. In Katz, William F. – Assmann, Peter F. (eds):
The Routledge Handbook of Phonetics. Routledge, New York. 75–106.
Gergely, Anna – Faragó, Tamás – Galambos, Ágoston – Topál, József 2017. Differential effects of speech situations on mothers’ and fathers’ infant-directed and dog-directed speech:
An acoustic analysis. Scientific Reports 7/1. 1–10.
Gósy Mária 2004. Fonetika, a beszéd tudománya. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest.
Grabe, Esther – Low, Ee Ling 2002. Durational variability in speech and the Rhythm Class Hypothesis. Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7. 515–546.
Grieser, DiAnne L. – Kuhl, Patricia K. 1988. Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language:
Support for universal prosodic features in motherese. Developmental Psychology 24/1. 14–20.
Háden, Gábor P. – Mády, Katalin – Török, Miklós – Winkler, István 2020. Newborn in-fants differently process adult directed and infant directed speech. International Journal of Psychophysiology 147. 107–112.
Han, Mengru – de Jong, Nivja H. – Kager, René 2018. Infant-directed speech is not always slower: Cross-linguistic evidence from Dutch and Mandarin Chinese. In Bertolini, Anne B.
– Kaplan, Maxwell J. (eds): Proceedings of the 42nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Cascadilla Press, Sommerville. 331–344.
Hartman, Kelly M. – Bernstein Ratner, Nan – Newman, Rochelle S. 2017. Infant-directed speech (IDS) vowel clarity and child language outcomes. Journal of Child Language 44/5.
1140–1162.
Hoequist, Charles 1983. Syllable duration in stress-, syllable and mora-timed languages.
Phonetica 40. 203–237.
Kalashnikova, Marina – Burnham, Denis 2018. Infant-directed speech from seven to nineteen months has similar acoustic properties but different functions. Journal of Child Language 45/5. 1035–1053.
Kalashnikova, Marina – Carignan, Christopher – Burnham, Denis 2017. The origins of babytalk: smiling, teaching or social convergence? Royal Society Open Science 4/8. 170306.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170306
Ko, Eon-Suk 2012. Nonlinear development of speaking rate in child-directed speech. Lingua 122/8. 841–857.
Ko, Eon-Suk – Soderstrom, Melanie 2013. Additive effects of lengthening on the utterance- final word in child-directed speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 56/1. 364–371.
Kohári Anna 2018. Időzítési mintázatok a magyar beszédben. ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, Budapest.
Kohári Anna – Deme Andrea – Reichel Uwe D. – Szalontai Ádám – Mády Katalin 2019. A dajkanyelv temporális jellemzői 4 és 8 hónapos csecsemőkhöz szóló beszédben.
Beszédkutatás 27. 243–258.
Kohári Anna – Deme Andrea – Reichel Uwe D. – Szalontai Ádám – Mády Katalin 2020.
A beszédritmus időbeli dimenziójának jellegzetességei a dajkanyelvben. In Bóna Judit – Krepsz Valéria (szerk.): Nyelvfejlődés csecsemőkortól kamaszkorig. ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, Budapest. 195–208.
Kohári, Anna – Mády, Katalin – Deme, Andrea – Reichel, Uwe D. – Szalontai, Ádám 2019.
Utterance-final lengthening in infant-directed speech. In Fivela, Barbara Gili – Avesani, Cinzia – Savino, Michelina – d’Apolito, Sonia – Lorusso, Paolo – Grimaldi, Mirko – Sigona, Francesco (eds): 3rd Phonetics and Phonology in Europe (PaPE). LabPhon – Fondazione Puglia – AISV, Lecce. 196–197.
Kohári, Anna – Reichel, Uwe D. – Markó, Alexandra – Mády, Katalin 2020. Breathiness in speech directed to 4-month-old infants. In Tiede, Mark – Whalen, Doug – Gracco, Vince (eds): 12th International Seminar on Speech Production. Haskins Laboratories – Yale University, New Haven, CT. 1–2.
Kuhl, Patricia K. – Andruski, Jean E. – Chistovich, Inna A. – Chistovich, Ludmilla A.
– Kozhevnikova, Elena – Ryskina, Viktoria –Stolyarova, Elvira I. – Sundberg, Ulla – Lacerda, Francisco 1997. Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science 277/5326. 684–686.
Ladefoged, Peter 1975. A Course in Phonetics. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
Lee, Christopher S. – Kitamura, Christine – Burnham, Denis. – McAngus Todd, Neil P. 2014.
On the rhythm of infant-versus adult directed speech in Australian English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136/1. 357–365.
Liu, H. M. – Kuhl, Patricia K. – Tsao, Feng‐Ming 2003. An association between mothers’
speech clarity and infants’ speech discrimination skills. Developmental Science 6/3. F1–F10.
Ma, Weiyi – Golinkoff, Roberta M. – Houston, Derek M. – Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy 2011. Word learning in infant-and adult-directed speech. Language Learning and Development 7/3.
185–201.
Mády, Katalin – Reichel, Uwe D. – Szalontai, Ádám – Kohári, Anna – Deme, Andrea 2018.
Prosodic characteristics of infant-directed speech as a function of maternal parity. In Klessa, Katarzyna – Bachan, Jolanta – Wagner, Agnieszka – Karpiński, Maciej – Śledziński, Daniel (eds): Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018.
International Speech Communication Association (ISCA), Poznań, Poland. 294–298.
ManyBabies Consortium 2020. Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed-speech preference. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 3/1. 24–52.
Markó Alexandra 2013. Az irreguláris zönge funkciói a magyar beszédben. ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, Budapest.
Martin, Andrew – Igarashi, Yosuke – Jincho, Nobuyuki – Mazuka, Reiko 2016. Utterances in infant-directed speech are shorter, not slower. Cognition 156. 52–59.
Masapollo, Matthew – Polka, Linda – Menard, Lucie 2016. When infants talk, infants listen:
Pre-babbling infants prefer listening to speech with infant vocal properties. Developmental Science 19/2. 318–328.
McMurray, Bob – Kovack-Lesh, Kristine A. – Goodwin, Dresden – McCechron, William 2013. Infant directed speech and the development of speech perception: Enhancing deve-lopment or an unintended consequence? Cognition 129/2. 362–378.
McCloy, Daniel R. 2014. Phonetic effects of morphological structure in Indonesian vowel re-duction. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 12/1. 1–14.
Miyazawa, Kouki – Shinya, Takahito – Martin, Andrew – Kikuchi, Hideaki – Mazuka, Reiko 2017. Vowels in infant-directed speech: More breathy and more variable, but not clearer. Cognition 166. 84–93.
Narayan, Chandan R. – McDermott, Lily C. 2016. Speech rate and pitch characteristics of infant-directed speech: Longitudinal and cross-linguistic observations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139/3. 1272–1281.
Nazzi, Thierry – Bertoncini, Josiane – Mehler, Jacques 1998. Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24/3. 756–766.
Payne, Elinor – Post, Brechtje – Astruc, Lluïsa – Prieto, Pilar – Vanrell, Maria del Mar 2012. Measuring child rhythm. Language and Speech 55/2. 203–229.
Payne, Elinor M. – Post, Brechtje – Astruc, Lluïsa – Prieto, Pilar – Vanrell, Maria del Mar 2009. Rhythmic modification in child directed speech. Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics. Philology & Phonetics 12. 123–144.
Pegg, Judith E. – Werker, Janet F. – McLeod, Peter J. 1992. Preference for infant-directed over adult-directed speech: Evidence from 7-week-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development 15/3. 325–345.
Pickering, Martin J. – Garrod, Simon 2006. Alignment as the basis for successful communi-cation. Research on Language and Computation 4/2–3. 203–228.
Pike, Kenneth 1945. The Intonation of American English. University of Michigan Press, Ann-Arbor.
Polka, Linda – Masapollo, Matthew – Menard, Lucie 2014. Who’s talking now? Infants’
perception of vowels with infant vocal properties. Psychological Science 25/7. 1448–1456.
Polka, Linda – Masapollo, Matthew – Menard, Lucie 2020. Setting the stage for speech pro-duction: Infants prefer listening to speech sounds with infant vocal properties. In Tiede, Mark – Whalen, Doug – Gracco, Vince (eds): 12th International Seminar on Speech Production.
Haskins Laboratories – Yale University, New Haven, CT. 1–2.
Porritt, Laura L. – Zinser, Michael C. – Bachorowski, Jo-Anne A. – Kaplan, Peter S. 2014.
Depression diagnoses and fundamental frequency-based acoustic cues in maternal infant- directed speech. Language Learning and Development 10/1. 51–67.
Quigley, Jean – Nixon, Elizabeth – Lawson, Sarah 2019. Exploring the association of infant receptive language and pitch variability in fathers’ infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language 46/4. 800–811.
Ramus, Franck – Nespor, Marina – Mehler, Jacques 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 75/1. 1–28.
Raneri, Daniele – von Holzen, Katie – Newman, Rochelle – Bernstein Ratner, Nan 2020.
Change in maternal speech rate to preverbal infants over the first two years of life. Journal of Child Language 47/6. 1263–1275.
Réger Zita 2002. Utak a nyelvhez. Soros Alapítvány – MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet, Budapest.
Roach, Peter 1982. On the distinction between ’stress-timed’ and ’syllable-timed’ languages. In Crystal, David (ed.): Linguistic Controversies. Edward Arnold, London. 73–79.
Roach, Peter 2002. A Little Encyclopaedia of Phonetics. University College Dublin, Dublin.
Saint-Georges, Catherine – Chetouani, Mohamed – Cassel, Raquel – Apicella, Fabio – Mahdhaoui, Ammar – Muratori, Filippo – Laznik, Marie-Christine – Cohen, David 2013. Motherese in interaction: At the cross-road of emotion and cognition? (A systematic review). Plos One 8/10. e78103. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078103
Saito, Yasuhiro – Aoyama, Shinya – Kondo, Takeo – Fukumoto, Rie – Konishi, Nakao – Nakamura, Kazuhiro – Kobayashi, Masao – Toshima, Tamotsu 2007. Frontal cerebral blood flow change associated with infant-directed speech. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition 92/2. F113–F116.
Scherer, Klaus R. 2003. Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms.
Speech Communication 40/1–2. 227–256.
Segal, Judith – Newman, Rochelle S. 2015. Infant preferences for structural and prosodic properties of infant‐directed speech in the second year of life. Infancy 20/3. 339–351.
Senju, Atsushi – Csibra, Gergely 2008. Gaze following in human infants depends on commu-nicative signals. Current Biology 18/9. 668–671.
Shute, Brenda – Wheldall, Kevin 1999. Fundamental frequency and temporal modifications in the speech of British fathers to their children. Educational Psychology 19/2. 221–233.
Singh, Leher – Morgan, James L. – Best, Catherine T. 2002. Infants’ listening preferences:
Baby talk or happy talk? Infancy 3/3. 365–394.
Song, Jae Yung – Demuth, Katherine – Morgan, James 2010. Effects of the acoustic properties of infant-directed speech on infant word recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128/1. 389–400.
Spinelli, Maria – Fasolo, Mirco – Mesman, Judi 2017. Does prosody make the difference?
A meta-analysis on relations between prosodic aspects of infant-directed speech and infant outcomes. Developmental Review 44. 1–18.
Swanson, Lori A. – Leonard, Laurence B. – Gandour, Jack 1992. Vowel duration in mothers’
speech to young children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 35/3.
617–625.
Szalontai, Ádám – Mády, Katalin – Deme, Andrea – Kohári, Anna 2018. Prosodic bounda-ries in Hungarian infant-directed speech. In Proceedings Experimental and Theoretical Advances in Prosody (ETAP) 4. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA. 53. http://real.
mtak.hu/89350/1/ETAP4_paper_53.pdf (A letöltés ideje: 2021. február 8.)
Thanavisuth, Chayada – Luksaneeyanawin, Sudaporn 1998. Acoustic qualities of IDS and ADS in Thai. In Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ISCA, Sydney, Australia. 445–448.
Wang, Yuanyuan – Llanos, Fernando – Seidl, Amanda 2017. Infants adapt to speaking rate differences in word segmentation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141/4.
2569–2578.
KÖSZÖNETNYILVÁNÍTÁS
A tanulmány az „A dajkanyelv longitudinális vizsgálata multimodális módszerekkel” című pályázat (NKFI-134775) keretében készült. Ez az írás nem jöhetett volna létre Vincze Benedek Gergő és Vincze Miklós inspiráló javaslatai, valamint Mády Katalin segítsége és támogatása nélkül.