• Nem Talált Eredményt

Seed morphology diversity in some Iranian endemic Silene (Caryophyllaceae) species and their taxonomic significance

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "Seed morphology diversity in some Iranian endemic Silene (Caryophyllaceae) species and their taxonomic significance"

Copied!
8
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

http://www.sci.u-szeged.hu/ABS ARTICLE

Department of Biology, Payame Noor University, 19395-3697 Tehran, Iran

Seed morphology diversity in some Iranian endemic Silene (Caryophyllaceae) species and their taxonomic significance

Mitra Arman, Abbas Gholipour*

ABSTRACT

Seed morphology diversity of 16 endemic Silene species was studied using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) to describe the seed micromorphology features and evaluate their taxonomic significance. Fifteen qualitative and quantitative characters were measured using SEM micrographs and stereomicroscopy. The seeds shape of the most species is reniform. The size of seeds ranges from 0.85 × 0.62 mm in case of S. elymaitica to 2.28 × 1.4 mm in S. nizvana.

The ornamentation of seed coat is papillate in S. elymaitica and S. oligophylla, tuberculate in S. daenesis and the seed surface of the rest is smooth. Three types of the edge of testa cells;

V form, U form and entire were observed. This study indicates that seed characters, such as shape, size, dorsal surface, the shape and size of testa cells, the testa cells edge and testa cells surface ornamentation are useful in identification and classification of the species studied. An identification key is also presented based on seed morphology characters.

Acta Biol Szeged 57(1):31-37 (2013)

KEY WORDS micromorphology Silene

seed coat ornamentation Iran

Accepted May 08, 2013

*Corresponding author. E-mail: Abbas.gholipuor@gmail.com

Silene L. with over 700 annual, perennial herbaceous and rarely subshrub species is the largest genus of the fam- ily Caryophyllaceae, mainly growing in various habitats of temperate regions of the Northern hemisphere (Chowd- huri 1957; Greuter 1995; Oxelman 1995). Due to the large number of species, as well as the wide range of habitats and geographical distribution, the circumscription, classiÞcation and nomenclature of the genus have long been controversial (Chowdhuri 1957; Greuter 1995; Oxelman 1995; Eeggens et al. 2007; Gholipour et al. 2010). In spite of some taxonomic studies on the various aspects of the genus Silene, our knowl- edge about the genus is still incomplete (Ghazanfar 1983 and 1989; Greuter 1995; Oxelman 1995; Oxelman 1996; Oxel- man et al.1997; Yildiz et al. 1998; Oxelman et al. 2001; Popp et al. 2005; Popp et al. 2007; Gholipour and Sheidai 2009;

Gholipour et al. 2010).

The genus Silene is represented by ca. 105 species in the ßora of Iran, mainly growing in the mountainous areas, out of which 36 species are endemic with very limited geographical distribution (Melzheimer 1988; Gholipour and Sheidai 2010).

Endemic species are important on both global and local levels, as they provide unique genetic diversity for further studies and provide local people with priceless services (Newmark 2002).

They increase the amount of genetic diversity and offer insight into biogeographical questions, such as where certain species originated and how distribution patterns have changed over time (Sharbek 2008). Some local endemic Silene species such

as S. daenensis Melzh., S. dschuparensis Boiss., S. hirticalyx Boiss. & Hausskn., S. oligophylla Melzh., S. psudaucheriana Melzh., S. nizvana Melzh. and S. pseudonurensis Melzh. have so far been recorded only from locus classicus, are some important parts of gene pool of the ßora of Iran (Melzheimer 1985; Gholipour and Sheidai 2009).

Seed morphology studies of some species of the genus Silene have been revealed the taxonomic signiÞcance of those characters (El-oqla et al. 1990; Hosny et al. 1993; Hong et al.

1999; Minuto et al. 2006; Yildiz 1998; Perveen 2009; Fawzi et al. 2010). The seed morphology of seven Iranian Silene species including S. bupleuroides L., S. swertifolia Boiss., S. indeprensa Schischk., S. gertraudiae Melzh., S. noctißora L., S. latifolia Poir. and S. conoidea L. have preliminary been described (Jafari et al. 2009) but there are no similar data on the other species. The present study aims to describe the seed micro morphology of 16 Iranian endemic Silene species and evaluate their taxonomic signiÞcance for the Þrst time.

Materials and methods

The seeds of 16 Silene species belonging to three sections (Auriculatae Boiss., Lasiostemones Boiss. and Sclerocalyci- nae Boiss.) were collected from natural habitats during the fruiting season of 2007-2010 years (Table 1). Plant specimens were identiÞed using Flora Iranica (Melzheimer 1988) and compared with the type specimens deposited in G, W and IRAN herbaria. The vouchers are deposited in Shahid Be- heshti and Sari Payame Noor Universities herbaria. Five fully developed seeds per species were selected using binocular stereoscope at 15x and 30x magniÞcations. Seeds attached

(2)

on stubs, were coated with thin layer of gold-palladium in a sputter-coater. The prepared samples were observed and pho- tographed by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) model Cam Scan MV 2300 at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV at Tehran University. Four micrographs were taken per taxon in lateral, dorsal and ventral views. The data were measured based on micrographs by image tool software and stereomi- croscope observations. Totally 15 qualitative and quantitative characters were studied (Table 2). The scientiÞc literatures on the seed morphology of Silene were followed for terminology (Hong et al. 1999; Minuto et al. 2006; Fawzi et al. 2010).

In order to group the species studied based on the seed morphology features, different clustering methods were per- formed using SPSS ver. 9 software. All characters were coded as multistate characters. Standardized seed morphology data (mean = 0, variance = 1) were used to determine taxonomic and Euclidean distances among the species were used in clustering analysis (Sheidai et al. 2010).

Results

Seed morphology features of 16 Iranian endemic Silene spe- cies were described in detail for the Þrst time (Table 2). The seed shape of 50 percent of the studied species is reniform and the rest have asymmetrical reniform and orbicular reniform seeds in outline (Fig. 1a-p). The size of the seeds range from 0.85 s0.62 mm in case of S. elymaitica to 2.28 s 1.4 mm of S. nizvana (Table 2). The hilum of the seeds in all studied species locates in the median hole on the ventral face, but the ratio of hilum region length to width varies from 1.33 in case of S. pseudaucheriana to 4.4 in S. nizvana (Fig. 1g and m and

Table 2). The lateral surface of the seeds of the most studied species are concave, but convex in S. parrowiana (Fig. 1j) and ßat in S. stapÞi (Fig. 1p and Table 2). Three types of the seed dorsal surface are observed; convex in S. daenesis, S. perse- politana, S. pseudaucheriana, S. oligophylla and S. sojakii, ßat in S. hirticalyx and S. stapÞi and concave in the rest (Fig.

2 a-p). Seed coat ornamentation is papillate in S. elymaitica and S. oligophylla (Fig. 1 c and h), tuberculate in S. daenesis (Fig. 1 a), but in the rest is smooth. The shape of testa cell is fusiform-elliptic in S. daenensis and S. nizvana (Fig. 3 a and g), elliptic in S. persepolitana and S. sojakii (Fig. 3 l and o) and fusiform in the other species. Testa cell edge is sub entire in S. palinotricha (Fig. 3 i) and U form in S.parrowiana (Fig.

3 j) whereas it is V form in the other species (Fig. 3 a, b, c, e, f, g, h, k, l, m, n, o and p).

Based on the seed morphology data the different cluster- ing methods produced similar results. The dendrogram of Ward method is presented here. The studied species arranges in three major clusters, A, B and C (Fig. 4). The Þrst major cluster divides into two sub clusters, A1 and A2. Silene stapÞ belongs to the section Sclerocalycinae along with S.

hirticalyx, S. oligophylla and S. daenensis from the section Auriculatae constitute the first subcluster. A2 subcluster contains S. gynodioica, S. elymaitica, S. gertraudiae, S.

psudonurensis and S. dschuparensis all belong to the sec- tion Auriculatae. The second major cluster (B) comprises of closely related species of section Auriculatae, S. sojakii and S.

persepolitana. S. parrowiana from the section Lasiostemones and remainders of the section Auriculatae place in the third major cluster (C).

Table 1. Silene species studied and voucher information. Abbreviation of the Section: Auriculatae: Au, Sclerocalycinae Scl and Lasios- temones Las.

Taxa Code Section Voucher

S. daenensis Melzh. dae Au Kuhgyloieh va Boyer Ahmad, Yasuj, Sisakht, Dena, 4000 m, 28 July 2008, A. Gholipour 8779.

S. dschuparensis Boiss. dsc Au Kerman, Mahan, Tigran, Kuh-e Jupar, 2811 m, 26 June 2007, A. Gholipour 8673.

S. elymaitica Bornm. ely Au Chaharmahal-o Bakhtiari, Farsan, Kuhrang, Zard kuh, 3350 m, 29 July 2008, A. Gholipour 8781.

S .gynodioica Ghazanfar gyn Au Zanjan, Dandi, Kuh- e Anguran, 2469 m, 21 July 2007, A. Gholipour 8694-1.

S.gertraudiae Melzh. ger Au Semnan, Sorkheh to Firouzkuh, 1284 m, 2 June 2007, A. Gholipour 8620.

S. hirticalyx Boiss. & Hausskn. hir Au Kermanshah, Ravansar to Paveh, km 10, Kuh- e Shaho, 2550 m., 24 July 2007, A. Gholi- pour 86101.

S. nizvana Melzh. niz Au Semnan to Firouzkuh,km 25, Aftar, 1825 m, 2 June 2007, A. Gholipour 8621.

S. oligophylla Melzh. oli Au Zanjan to Manjil, before Abbar, 2160 m, 19 June 2008, A. Gholipour 87066 S. palinotricha Fenzl ex Boiss. pal Au Semnan, Ahvan pass, km 30 semnan, 2056 m, 1 June 2007, A. Gholipour 8618.

S. parrowiana Boiss.&Hausskn. par Las Kermanshah, Bisetoun Mountain, 1295 m, 11 Nov. 1996, T. Khanezad.

S. persica Boiss. pic Au Kuhgyloieh va Boyer Ahmad, Yasuj, Sisakht, Dena, 3200 m, 28 July 2008, A. Gholipour 8777.

S. persepolitana Melzh. pep Au Fars, Shiraz, Bamo protected area, 12 May 2010, A. Gholipour 89016.

S. pseudaucheriana Melzh. pau Au Lurestan, Azna, Drreh tacht, Oshtoran kuh, 2535 m, 30 July 2008, A. Gholipour 87092.

S. pseudonurensis Boiss. pnu Au Kerman, Chatrod, Horjund- e Soud Kuh, 2850 m, 27 June 2007, A. Gholipour 8675.

S. sojakii Melzh. soj Au Semnan to Firouzkuh,km 30,Gandab, 2140 m, 2 June 2007, A. Gholipour 8625 S. stapfii Melzh. sta Scl Yazd, Taft, Dehbala, 2400 m, 2 May. 2007, A. Gholipour 8606

(3)

The studied species can be distinguished based on seed morphology characters. IdentiÞcation key of 16 species of the genus Silene based on seed morphology is presented:

1. Seeds coat surface with papillate or tuberculate orna- mentationÉ.. 2

1. Seeds coat surface without any ornamentation (smooth).... 4

2. Seeds coat surface with tuberculate ornamentationÉ.É S. daenesis

2. Seeds coat surface with papillate ornamentationÉ. 3 3. Seeds reniform, dorsal surface concaveÉÉÉÉ..É..

S. elymaitica

3. Seeds orbicular-reniform, dorsal surface convexÉÉ..

S.oligophylla

4. Seeds symmetrical reniformÉÉÉÉÉÉ.ÉÉ 5 4. Seeds not symmetrical reniform ÉÉÉÉÉÉ. 10

5. Dorsal surface ßat or convexÉÉÉÉÉ.ÉÉ... 6 5. Dorsal surface concaveÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ... 8

6. Dorsal surface ßat, testa cell fusiformÉÉÉÉÉ.É...

S. hirticalyx

6. Dorsal surface convex, testa cell ellipticÉÉÉ.. 7 7. Hilum region size 469.7 s165 µm, hilum semi hid- den... S. sojakii

7. Hilum region size 370 s211 µm, hilum prominent ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ S. persepoliotana

8. Seeds more than 1 mm width, hilum semi hidden ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ. S. gertraudiae

8. Seeds less than 1 mm width, hilum hidden ÉÉ..É 9 9. Hilum region size 442.9 s173.7 µm ÉÉ..ÉÉ. S.

dschuparensis

9. Hilum region size 348.5 s147.3 µm ÉÉÉ... S.

pseudonurensis

Taxa\character Seed shape Seed length

(mm)

Seed width (mm)

L/W ratio Lateral surface

Dorsal surface

Testa cell outline

S. daenensis R 1.73±0.02 1.24±0.05 1.39 CC CV FU

S. dschuparensis R 1.42±0.02 0.98±0.01 1.44 CC CC FU

S. elymaitica R 0.85±0.02 0.62±0.02 1.37 CC CC FU

S.gertraudiae R 1.45±0.01 1.1±0.05 1.31 CC CC FU

S.gynodioica OR 0.90±0.03 0.77±0.01 1.16 CC CC FE

S. hirticalyx R 1.6±0.02 1.2±0.07 1.33 CC FL FU

S. nizvana AR 2.28±0.01 1.4±0.03 1.62 CC CC FE

S. oligophylla OR 1.18±0.03 0.91±0.04 1.29 CC CV FU

S.palinotricha AR 1.77±0.01 1.32±0.06 1.34 CC CC FU

S. parrowiana AR 1.02±0.01 0.7±0.04 1.34 CV CC FU

S. persica AR 1.41±0.01 1.12±0.06 1.26 CC CC FU

S. persepolitana R 1.2±0.05 0.81±0.06 1.48 CC CV EL

S. pseudaucheriana AR 1.71±0.01 1.2±0.05 1.43 CC CV FU

S. pseudonurensis R 1.41±0.01 0.95±0.04 1.4 CC CC FU

S. sojakii R 1.2±0.03 0.82±0.06 1.46 CC CV EL

S. stapfii OR 1.75±0.04 1.3±0.05 1.34 FL FL FU

Taxa\character Testa cell

length (µm)

Testa cell width (µm)

L/W ratio

Testa cell edge

Seed surface ornamenta- tion

Hilum re- gion length (µm)

Hilum region width (µm)

L/W ratio

S. daenensis 198.5±12.8 61.3±4.9 3.2 V T 420.2±16.2 289.2±13.3 1.45

S. dschuparensis 176.4±11.9 49.3±6.5 3.6 V A 442.9±16.3 173.7±11.5 2.54

S. elymaitica 108.2±9.9 24.5±2.7 4.4 V P 233.3±14.5 115.5±9.7 2.01

S.gertraudiae 172.9±11.9 42.3±4.3 4.08 V A 372.1±11.2 146.8±7.5 2.5

S.gynodioica 116.2±8.2 44.2±7.1 2.6 V A 216.3±14.8 109.8±6.3 1.96

S. hirticalyx 194.6±14.5 55.8±7.5 3.4 V A 439.6±13.8 275.1±10.3 1.59

S. nizvana 150.1±13.4 55.1±3.2 2.7 V A 596.3±17.9 134.4±8.7 4.4

S. oligophylla 160.8±13.4 29.9±7.2 5.4 V P 282.6±12.4 147.7±14.7 1.91

S.palinotricha 159.5±10.1 36.1±6 3.6 E A 245.1±13.2 164.3±6.2 1.49

S. parrowiana 178.1±12.1 31.1±5.9 5.7 U A 225.5±9.5 118.9±5.7 1.9

S. persica 195.2±11.3 49.3±6.7 3.9 V A 448.4±12.6 170.9±8.6 2.62

S. persepolitana 148.3±13.4 58.1±7.2 2.55 V A 370.6±7.4 211.2±9.6 1.75

S. pseudaucheriana 247.8±11.3 52.5±4.6 4.7 V A 436.3±14.8 322.8±11.7 1.33

S. pseudonurensis 172.4±7.1 52.7±4.3 3.2 V A 348.5±18.4 147.3±9.8 2.36

S. sojakii 145.4±12.7 89±6.2 1.63 V A 469.7±12.1 165±7.6 2.84

S. stapfii 184.9±10.2 33.1±4.7 5.5 V A 515.4±15.8 224.5±11 2.29

Table 2. Seed morphology features of Silene species studied. Abbreviations: Seed shape: R reniform, OR orbicular reniform and AR asymmetrical reniform. Lateral and dorsal surface: CC concave, CV convex and FL flat. Testa cell outline: FU fusiform, FE fusiform- elliptic, EL elliptic. Testa cell edge: V v form, U u form, E entire. Seed surface ornamentation: A absent, T tuberculate and P papillate.

(4)

10. Seeds orbicular reniformÉÉÉÉ..É... 11 10. Seeds asymmetrical reniformÉÉÉÉ.. 12 11. Lateral and dorsal surface concaveÉ S. gynodioica 11. Lateral and dorsal surface ßatÉÉ... S. stapÞi 12. Testa cell edge U form or entireÉÉÉ.ÉÉÉ 13 12.Testa cell edge V formÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ. 14 13. Testa cell edge U form, lateral surface convexÉ...

S. parrowiana

13. Testa cell edge entire, lateral surface concaveÉ.É

S. palinotricha

14. Seeds size 2.28 s1.44mm, testa cell fusiform-ellip- tic... S. nizvana

14. Seeds size shorter, testa cell fusiformÉ..É.. 16 15. Seeds size 1.7 1.2 mm, hilum region size 436.3 s 322.8 µm ÉÉÉÉÉ...S. psudaucheriana

15. Seeds size 1.4 s 1.1mm, hilum region size 448.4 s 170.9 µm ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ S. persica

Figure 1. SEM micrographs of the seed shape of Silene species studied. Reniform: a, b, c, d, f, l, n and o. Orbicular reniform: e, h and p. Asym- metrical reniform: g, i, j, k and m. a. S. daenensis; b. S. dschuparensis; c. S. elymaitica; d. S. gertraudiae; e. S. gynodioica; f. S. hirticalyx; g. S.

nizvana; h. S. oligophylla; i. S. palinotricha; j. S. parrowiana; k. S. persica; l. S. persepolitana; m. S. psudaucheriana; n. S. psudonurensis; o. S.

sojakii; p. S. stapfii (Scale bar: g, m, p 1 mm and in the other cases 500 µm).

(5)

Discussion

It has been reported that, the seed shape of the most species of the genus Silene is generally reniform in outline and the size of seeds is small (Yildiz and Cirpici 1998; Zareh 2005;

Perveen 2009; Fawzi et al. 2010). The results of present study are in accordance with that study (Table 2 and Þg.1a-p). The range of variation in dorsal surface of the studied species is in accordance with the available data (Hong et al. 1999;

Fawzi et al. 2010).

Sheidai et al. (2010) indicated that S. dschuparensis and S. pseudonurensis as well as S. sojakii and S. persepolitana are morphologically closely related species. These pairs of species show the most similarity based on seed morphology features (Fig. 4). S. hirticalyx (section Auriculatae) and S.

stapÞ (section Sclerocalycinae) are closely related species according to seed morphology analysis. Therefore the result of the present study is in accordance with the suggestion

Figure 2. SEM micrographs of seed dorsal surface of Silene species studied.Concave: b, c, d, e, i, j, k, n. Convex: a, h, l, m, o. Flat: f, p. a. S. daen- ensis; b. S. dschuparensis; c. S. elymaitica; d. S. gertraudiae; e. S. gynodioica; f. S. hirticalyx; g. S. nizvana; h. S. oligophylla; i. S. palinotricha; j.

S. parrowiana; k. S. persica; l. S. persepolitana; m. S. psudaucheriana; n. S. psudonurensis; o. S. sojakii; p. S. stapfii (Scale bar: g, m, p 1mm; a, b, d, f, h, i, j, k, l, n, o 500 µm; c, e 200 µm).

(6)

of Melzheimer (1988) about the afÞnity of S. hirticalyx to the section Sclerocalycinae species (Fig. 4). Silene nizvana morphologically showed the most dissimilarity to the other species of the section Auriculatae (Sheidai et al. 2010). S.

nizvana placed far away from the other species in the den- drogram of clustering analysis of the species based on seed

morphology characters (Fig. 4).

S. parrowiana was clearly separated from the section Au- riculatae species based on RAPD markers analysis (Sheidai et al. 2010) but is placed in the third major cluster (C) together with the section Auriculatae species based on seed morphol- ogy analysis as well as S. stapÞi from the section Scleroca-

Figure 3. SEM micrographs of seed coat surface features of Silene species studied.Testa cell: Fusiform; a, b, c, d, f, h, I, j, k, m ,n, p. Fusiform – elliptic; e, g. Elliptic, l, o. a. S. daenensis; b. S. dschuparensis; c. S. elymaitica; d. S. gertraudiae; e. S. gynodioica; f. S. hirticalyx; g. S. nizvana; h.

S. oligophylla; i. S. palinotricha; j. S. parrowiana; k. S. persica; l. S. persepolitana; m. S. psudaucheriana; n. S. psudonurensis; o. S. sojakii; p. S.

stapfii (Scale bar: a, b, c, f, n 100 µm and in the other cases 200 µm).

(7)

lycinae (Fig. 4). Therefore in accordance with the previous study (Fawzi et al. 2010) the seed morphology characters are not useful in the species distinction at the section level.

In conclusion the taxonomic signiÞcance of some seed characters such as seed shape, dorsal surface shape, the shape and size of testa cell, the edge of testa cells and testa cell surface ornamentation have been indicated at the species level. However further studies contributing broader species sampling is needed for a more comprehensive conclusion.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank A.R. Khosravi; curator of Shiraz University herbarium for kindly providing the seeds of S. parrowiana. This study was funded by grants from the Hormozgan and Mazandaran Payame Noor University Research Councils.

References

Chowdhuri PK (1957) Studies in the genus Silene. Notes from the Royal Botanical Garden Edinburgh 22:221-278.

Eggens F, Popp M, Nepokroef M, Wagner WL, Oxelman B (2007) The origin and number of introductions of the Hawaiian endemic Silene L.

(Caryophyllaceae). Am J Bot 94 (2):210-218.

El-Oqlah AA, Karim FM (1990) Morphological and anatomical studies of seed coat in Silene species (Caryophyllaceae) from Jordan. Arab Gulf Journal of ScientiÞc Research 8:121-139.

Fawzi NM, Fawzy AM, Mahmod AAA (2010) Seed morphological studies on some species of Silene L. (Caryophyllaceae). Int J Botany 6(3):287-292.

Ghazanfar SA (1989) Hybridization studies in the genus Silene sect.

Siphonomorpha and Auriculatae (Caryophyllaceae). Pl Syst Evol 168:143-148.

Ghazanfar S A (1983) New taxa, combinations and notes on typiÞcation and nomenclature in Silene sect. Siphonomoepha and Auriculatae. Notes from the Royal Botanical Garden Edinburgh 41(1):97-107.

Gholipour A, Sheidai M (2009) A new record and some rediscovered endemic Silene (Caryophyllaceae) species in Iran. Rostaniha 10(2):212-220.

Gholipour A, Sheidai M, Mozaffarian M (2010) A taxonomic study of Silene goniocaula complex in Iran. Rostaniha 11(1):83-86.

Greuter W (1995) Silene (Caryophyllaceae) in Greece: a subgeneric and sectional classiÞcation. Taxon 44(4):543-581.

Hong SP, Han MJ, Kim KJ (1999) Systematic signiÞcance of seed coat morphology in Silene L. s. str. (Sileneae-Caryophyllaceae) from Korea.

J Plant Biol (Korea) 42:146-150.

Hosny A, Zareh MM (1993) Taxonomic studies of Silenoideae (Caryo- phyllaceae) in Egypt. 2. Taxonomic signiÞcance of seed characters in the genus Silene L. with special reference to the seed coat sculpture.

Takholmia 14:37-144.

Jafari A, Fathi Z, Bemani M (2009) Using morphology and micromorphology characters for identiÞcation of Silene L. species in North-East of Iran.

Res J Environ Sci 3(6):667-679.

Melzheimer V (1985) New species of Silene (Caryophyllaceae) from the ßora Iranica area. Pl Syst Evol 150. (3-4):307-318.

Melzheimer V (1988) Silene L. (Caryophyllaceae). In Rechinger, KH, in ed., Flora Iranica, Academische Druck-U. Verlagsanatalt Graz - Austria, 163:341-508.

Minuto L, Fior S, Roccotiello E, Casazza S (2006) Seed morphology in Moehringia L. and its taxonomic signiÞcance in comparative studies within the Caryophyllaceae. Pl Syst Evol 262:189-208.

Newmark WD (2002) Conserving biodiversity in East African forests:

a study of the Eastern Arc Mountains. Springer, Berlin, New York.

Oxelman B, LidŽn M (1995) Generic boundaries in the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae) as inferred from nuclear rDNA sequences. Taxon 44:525-542.

Oxelman B (1996) RAPD patterns, nrDNA ITS sequences and morphologi- cal patterns in Silene section Sedoideae (Caryophyllaceae). Pl Syst Evol 201:93-116.

Oxelman B, LidŽn M, Berglund D (1997) Chloroplast rps16 intron phyloge- ny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Pl Syst Evol 206:411-420.

Oxelman B, LidŽn M, Rabeler RK, Popp M (2001) A revised generic classification of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophylaceae). Nordic J Bot 20:743-748.

Perveen A (2009) Seed morphology of the genus Silene L. From Pakistan and Kashmir. Int J Biol Biotech 6(4):219-227.

Popp M, Erixon P, Eggens F, Oxelman B (2005) Origin and evolution of a circumpolar polyploid species complex in Silene (Caryophyllaceae) inferred from low copy nuclear RNA polymerase introns, rDNA and chloroplast DNA. Syst Bot 30:302-313.

Popp M, Oxelman B (2007) Origin and evolution of North American polyploid Silene (Caryophyllaceae). Am J Bot 94:330-349.

Sheidai M, Gholipour A, Noormohammadi Z (2010) Species relationship in the genus Silene L. Sect. Auriculatae (Caryophyllaceae) based on morphology and RAPD analyses. Acta Biol Szeged 54(1):25-31.

Skarbek C (2008) A review of endemic species in the East Arc Afromontane region: Importance, inferences and conversation. Macalester Reviews in Biogeography 1(1):1-20.

Yildiz K, Cirpici A (1998) Seed morphological studies in Silene L. from Turkey. Pak J Bot 30(2):173-188.

Figure 4. Ward dendrogram of Silene species studied based on seed morphology features. Acronyms refer to Table 1.

(8)

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

In this study, the effects of four landscape metrics (mean patch size, total edge, mean shape index, and fractal dimension) on the thematic accuracy of satellite image-based land

2011 Antibacterial activities of extracts and essential oils of three Origanum species against plant pathogenic bacteria and their potential use as seed disinfectants..

Major research areas of the Faculty include museums as new places for adult learning, development of the profession of adult educators, second chance schooling, guidance

Albeit several general geometric factors such as shape and size of ventricles, wall thickness and structure play a critical role in medical diagnosis, the proper orientation of

Since brain metastasis formation depends on the characteristics of both cancer cells (the seed) and the brain microenvironment (the soil), 25 here we present both tumor cell

 Physical characterisation of the developed apigenin containing pellets with modified drug release, such as particle shape and size, particle size distribution,

similibispirata Hirschmann & Zirngiebl-Nicol based on the shape of peritremes, but the dorsal and ventral setae situated in small rounded depression in the new species and

In our current study, the GP8 rat brain endothelial cell line was used, as it retains both cerebral endothelial morphology (cobblestone shape) and the expression of adhesion