• Nem Talált Eredményt

MICROECONOMICS II. "B"

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "MICROECONOMICS II. "B""

Copied!
8
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

MICROECONOMICS II.

"B"

Sponsored by a Grant TÁMOP-4.1.2-08/2/A/KMR-2009-0041 Course Material Developed by Department of Economics,

Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University Budapest (ELTE) Department of Economics, Eötvös Loránd University Budapest

Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Balassi Kiadó, Budapest

Authors: Gergely K®hegyi, Dániel Horn, Gábor Kocsis, Klára Major Supervised by Gergely K®hegyi

February 2011

(2)

ELTE Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics

MICROECONOMICS II.

"B"

week 7

Market theory and marketing, part 1

Gergely K®hegyi, Dániel Horn, Gábor Kocsis, Klára Major

Prepared by: Gergely K®hegyi, Dániel Horn, Gábor Kocsis and Klára Major, using Jack Hirshleifer, Amihai Glazer és David Hirshleifer (2009) Mikroökonómia. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó, ELTECON-könyvek

(henceforth: HGH), and Kertesi Gábor (ed.) (2004) Mikroökonómia el®adásvázlatok. http://econ.core.hu/ kertesi/kertesimikro/

(henceforth: KG).

Market theory and marketing

Decision problems of the company in business (if it is considered as a separate decision-maker):

• Examples for monopolistic behaviors

Pricing(should 12 straws of rose cost the same as 12*1 straw? What about occasions such as mothers' day?: Price discrimination

Choosing the product (Should menu be in the restaurant or only à la carte? Should one menu be? should meals cost always the same?): Quality, product range, tie-in sale, package-sale.

• Examples for strategic behavior

Marketing, product support, advertising, etc. (Tisza shoes?): It contains strategic elements.

Market stretching (OTP in Croatia?): It contains strategic elements.

(3)

1 Price discrimination

Price discrimination

1st example: How to determine the price of tickets? (Veszprém Zoo, 2010)

• Single:

Child (age between 318) 1050 HUF Student (older than 18) 1370 HUF Adult 1560 HUF

Pensioner 1050 HUF

• Group:

Child (age between 318) 920 HUF Student (older than 18) 990 HUF Adult 1400 HUF

Pensioner 920 HUF

2nd example: How to determine cell phone charges of a package? (T-Mobile, 2010, Domino Active package)

• Within the T-mobile network:

Within peak periods 26 HUF Outside peak periods 16 HUF

• In domestic xed lines:

Within peak periods 26 HUF Outside peak periods 16 HUF

• In other mobile directions:

Within peak periods 36 HUF Outside peak periods 26 HUF

• Linear pricing (third degree price discrimination)

• Non-linear pricing (rst and second degree price discrimination) Individual pricing

Multiple pricing Block pricing Quantity discounts

Conditions of price discrimination:

• The company market has market power.

• Information of the consumers' willingness to pay (of price sensitivity or demand function) Denition of consumer-groups: Market segmentation

Identication of consumers (or self-selection incentive contract menu), classication into consumer- groups

(4)

• In case of consumption the personality of the consumer can be identied: mostly in case of direct connection between buying and consuming.

Services

Non-storable goods (e.g. electricity, gas)

• Restrictions tied in contract Abolition of guarantee

Prohibition of re-selling by contracts

• Product modication (e.g. drugstore alcohol)

• Increase of transactional costs: searching, travelling, transportation, etc. costs) Market segmentation

Suppose the company divides the customers into two or more segments, oering dierent prices (quan- tities) to dierent classes of buyers.

Linear pricing

Prices and quantities set in certain segments:

• First segment: P1, Q1

• Second segment: P2, Q2

Π =R1(Q1) +R2(Q2)−C(Q1+Q2)→max Π =P1(Q1)Q1+P2(Q2)Q2−C(Q1+Q2)→max Optimum condition:

∂Π

∂Q1

= 0, ∂Π

∂Q2

= 0

mr1=mr2=M C P1

1 + 1

η1

=P2

1 + 1

η2

P1

1 + 1

η1

=P2

1 + 1

η2

Statement 1 Under market segmentation, the segment with more elastic demand will be charged a lower price.

(5)

Paperbacks versus hardbacks

Hardbacks Paperbacks

$ % $ %

price 39,16 17,04

marginal cost 2,95 7,5 1,74 10,2

price-marginal cost (=margin) 36,21 92,5 15,30 89,8 Source: Hirshleifer et al, 2009, 314.

Non-linear pricing

Whereas in market segmentation the seller charges dierent prices to dierent customers, in block pricing the seller charges dierent prices to a single customer. For example, a 1-pound package of detergent might sell for $1.00 while a 2-pound package sold for $1.50. The seller is charging $1.00 for the rst pound bought and $0.50 for the second pound.

Perfect Discrimination Four-part pricing

In case of perfect price discrimination, the company charges a dierent price (which equals to the reser- vation prices of consumers) for each successive unit bought by each consumer (e.g. auction). In this case the company applies a four-part pricing schedule.

(6)

• It can be applied in such cases when access to the good and dierent units of the good can be charged too (e.g. network services).

• 1st part: Lump-sum 'access fee' for the right to buy (T)

• 2nd part: Unit-price paid for the bought units of product (p)

• Can be an instrument of price discrimination (rst and second degree price discrimination)

• All consumer surplus can be skimmed if Consumers are the same

Consumers can be identied

In this case perfect (rst degree) price discrimination exists.

1. E.g.: Disco

• Dening prices of drinks (linear pricing)

• Dening the entrance fee (access charge)+ drink prices (unit charge) (two-part pricing)

• Entrance fee + coupons (amount that can be consumed) + dening drink prices (block pricing) 2. E.g.: Cell phone charges

• Dening per-minute rate of calls (linear pricing)

• Dening monthly fee + per-minute fee (two-part pricing)

• Dening monthly fee + amount of minutes can be applied + per-minute charges (block pricing)

(7)

Two-part price(T, p)=(access fee, unit fee):

• the old: Ti= (a−c)∗b∗0,5, pi=c

• the young: Tf = (e−c)∗f∗0,5, pf =c Block price: (T, q, p)=(access fee, coupon, unit fee):

• the old: Ti= (a−c)∗b∗0,5 +c∗b, qi=b, pi ≥c

• the young: Tf = (e−c)∗f∗0,5 +c∗f, qf =f, pf ≥c Second degree price discrimination

• Two consumers with dierent valuations (willingness to pay).

• The company cannot identify the certain consumers.

• Dierent packages (quality, quantity) should be combined for certain types and should be priced in such a way that every consumer chooses the one which is aimed at him (moreover it should be worth to him to buy that particular one) →Self-selection (incentive constraint).

• The prices of packages are limited by the price oered to the other-type consumer (the other's willingness to pay)→Extra surplus (information benet) should be ensured for the good type consumer forcing him to choose the package aimed him (to reveal his type).

Possible solution: T1=AandT2=A+C (Namely the company is obliged to go without the surplus of area B in case of consumer 2.)

(8)

If the quantity of goods in the package of the worse type consumer is reduced (prot loss), then the consumer surplus (benet) of the good type consumer can decrease (extra prot).

Optimum: where the prot loss caused by the reduced bundle of low-demand consumer equals to the prot gained from the reduced information benet of high-demand consumer.

Other methods of self-selection:

• Well- and badly-informed consumers

• Dierence of consumers' time-preference (opportunity cost)

• 'Impatient' early buyers vs. consumers waiting for price-reductions Welfare eects of price discrimination

• First degree price discrimination:

Ecient output but income rearrangement

Higher level of welfare in contrast to non-discriminating monopolistic pricing

• Third degree price discrimination:

Ambiguous welfare eects

P > M C (allocation eciency-loss)

Results in higher welfare if discrimination-output is greater than non-discrimination-output

• Second degree price discrimination:

Ambiguous welfare eects

Results in higher welfare if discrimination-output is greater than non-discrimination-output It is common because the company supplies at Pareto ecient level (rst best) for consumers

with high willingness-to-pay and supplies below Pareto ecient level (but frequently above non-discriminating quantity) for consumers with low willingness-to-pay.

BUT! Price discrimination might turn such markets protable which wouldn't have supply without it.

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

2010. Calculate the values of sales for each product. b) Calculate and interpret the simple price indices. c) Calculate and interpret the simple quantity indices. d) Calculate

Taking into consideration the price of Grosal (containing 12% Salinomycin-Na), at 43 kn per kg, increase in the unit price of fodder for the experimental treatments was marginal,

This is a question about what it means to take the market price, which is one model assumption of the perfect competition. a) Because they are satisfied with the

In case of perfect price discrimination, the company charges a dierent price (which equals to the reservation prices of consumers) for each successive unit bought by each consumer

In case of perfect price discrimination, the company charges a dierent price (which equals to the reservation prices of consumers) for each successive unit bought by each consumer

The reaction curves now have positive slopes: each rm rationally raises price if the competitor does and similarly follows a price reduction but by less than 1:1 in either case. As s

In case of perfect price discrimination, the company charges a dierent price (which equals to the reservation prices of consumers) for each successive unit bought by each consumer

the converters in series. The simplest method of doing this is to connect each successive converter in series along the length of each radiator tube. The electrical potential of