• Nem Talált Eredményt

 2 – ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Ossza meg " 2 – ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic"

Copied!
11
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

 2 – ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic

1- Territorial development engines: how entrepreneur interferes?

2 - What is this invisible hand that is linking entrepreneurship with territory in France?

3 - Could we explain the paradox of the “Nord-Pas-de- Calais” Region?

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

CONTENTS

budapest 1

SECTION 1

Territorial development engines: how does the entrepreneur interfere?

A – Endogen growth model

B – Exogenous Growth model, the base model

C – New Base theory

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic

(2)

A – Endogen growth model Growth comes from local resources

 Unsatisfied with Solow growth model, Romer (1986) introduced positive externalities stressing on

“knowledge”

 Audretsch and Keilbach (2004): the entrepreneur is the man who turns “knowledge” into “economic

knowledge” and drive then spillover effects.

 A variable “entrepreneur” is associated with the model, then measuring the relationship between “labor

productivity” and “entrepreneur capital”

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic Territorial development engines: how does the entrepreneur interfere?

budapest 3

B – Exogenous Growth model, the base model The “base “theory puts forward a sectorial approach where a local economy is divided in two activities:

 “basic” activities (from industrial sector) meaning exporting for grabing income from outside

 “local” activities (domestic sector) or residential or proximity activities that lies on local demand

territorial development lies on external demand ( Keynesian growth theory) at the opposite of endogen models that stress on productivity gain (supply)

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic Territorial development engines: how the entrepreneur interferes?

(3)

B – Exogenous Growth model, the base model an implicit relationship is built between “basic”

entrepreneurs (most of them in industrial sector) and

“local” entrepreneurs (retailers, local service sectors) It is performing for explaining the development process of suburban cities (they grab people that work outside and spend inside).

As development depends on external demand chock, the “base” growth theory fits more to small territories than to large one (Aydalot, 1988)

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic Territorial development engines: how the entrepreneur interferes?

budapest 5

C – New Base theory

 This model is a new paradigm as well as an extension of the base theory.

 If only “productive” base was initially considered, the New Base’s theory is enlarged to three other bases:

 “residential” base (income from tourism, new migrants as commuters and retirees who settle on the territory)

 “public” base (income from national civil-servant paid by external institution)

 “social” base (income get from redistribution function of the state or other region contribution)

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic Territorial development engines: how the entrepreneur interferes?

(4)

C – New Base theory (Laurent Davezies)

 French work area, only 25% of the basic income comes from the “productive” base.

75% comes from other basic income: tourist, new migrants who settle on the territory as commuters or retirees, social transfer, public agents)

 Focusing upon income instead of production highlight “opportunist” or “adaptation”

entrepreneurship process

Territorial development engines: how the entrepreneur interferes?

budapest 7

SECTION 2 What is this invisible hand that is linking entrepreneurship with territory in France?

 A - Development engine in French territories

 B - Growth is not enough

 C - The territorial redistribution machine

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic

(5)

A – Development engines

8th international confrence INHA -Le HAVRE 9

Productive base Public base Residential

base Social base

Basic income

Basic jobs Domestic jobs

Domestic sector Base sector

Domestic income

Base and domestic income

Employment Income

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic

What is this invisible hand that is linking entrepreneurship with territory in France?

DEVELOPMENT ENGINE

(6)

 B – Growth is not enough to capture territorial dynamics

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic

What is this invisible hand that is linking entrepreneurship with territory in France?

budapest 11

B – Growth is not enough to capture territorial dynamics

 The more productive an urban area is, the less attractive the urban area may be.

 “Vocation” entrepreneurs may explain productivity, value added, growth but may be a brake for other entrepreneur profile

 The running territorial model in France is not a productive one, the less productive an area is, the more income earning an area may be

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic

What is this invisible hand that is linking entrepreneurship with territory in France?

(7)

 B – Growth is not enough to capture territorial dynamics

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic

What is this invisible hand that is linking entrepreneurship with territory in France?

budapest 13

C - The territorial redistribution machine

A LOST OF 100 € DUE TO PRODUCTIVE DECLINE IS GAIN OF 80€ IN SOCIAL TRANSFER

 Which impact on entrepreneur?

 no entrepreneur without transfer. The shift from workers to entrepreneur is a costly process.

 the money transfer is individually and territorially a driving factor for a territory to regenerate from a decline to a booming territory and for individual to regenerate from a worker to an entrepreneur.

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic

What is this invisible hand that is linking entrepreneurship with territory in France?

(8)

TERRITORIAL “INCOME” MATTERS MORE THAN

“GROWTH” IN THE REGENERATIVE PROCESS

 A case study

 Firm: vocation entrepreneur in B2B biological laboratory.

 Finance: How it survives the first year

 Market: customers are located in Nord-Pas-de Calais Region. The entrepreneur is located in IDF.

 Redistributive externalities: It helps the Nord region to grow, to improve productivity, but its income is flowing to IDF Region

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic

What is this invisible hand that is linking entrepreneurship with territory in France?

budapest 15

SECTION 3

Could we explain the paradox of the “Nord-Pas-de- Calais” Region?

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic

(9)

TERRITORIAL DYNAMIC IN PAS-DE-CALAIS

Annual growth rate in mean for French New-Region 1990 – 2012 (%)

12 regions average: 1.6%

Nord-Pas-de-Calais: 1.2 %

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic Could we explain the paradox of the “Nord-Pas-de-Calais” Region?

budapest 17

ENTREPRENEURIAL DYNAMIC IN PAS-DE-CALAIS

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic Could we explain the paradox of the “Nord-Pas-de-Calais” Region?

(10)

Rising sectors: “construction”, “retail trade” and

“service”, “consulting firms”

(1)

Agglomeration effects matter (NEG model) bear by

metropolitan area, Lille and Roubaix-Tourcoing. urbanization level, economic density, infrastructure, skill or degree level and R&D are positively correlated to the rate of firm creation.

(2)

Rate of unemployment matters as the propensity of out of job people to create their own business or the ease to find available workers for new entrepreneur settlers.

We can’t explain more than a third of firm creation phenomenon ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic Could we explain the paradox of the “Nord-Pas-de-Calais” Region?

budapest 19

Conclusion on the paradox: the invisible Hand

 Decline in Growth, but the redistribution of income is high, allowing a regenerative economy

 Growth has become a poor indicator ( in short- term or mid-term period ) of the ability of a Region to regenerate

Territorial dynamic of entrepreneurship

ENTREPRENEUR as a key component of territorial dynamic Could we explain the paradox of the “Nord-Pas-de-Calais” Region?

(11)

THANK YOU

Acknowledgments to

Students of Obudai University

8th international confrence INHA -Le HAVRE 21

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

The monthly payment of unconditional income was well below the poverty line, but even the villagers who received this basic income showed an improvement in their ability to meet

The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply to income, other than income from immovable property as defined in paragraph 2 of Article 6, if the recipient of such income, being

As a result of the stability of the population gravity centre and the motion of income gravity centre the two gravity centres have moved relatively far from each other (in 1988

Serbian citizens who now live near the border (on the Hungarian side) mainly arrived from areas next to the border (78%), while many Serbian migrants from other parts of

One part of the philosophical problems of technology comes from the direct* challenges of technical progress towards philosophy, and the other part arises in the

On the other hand, the deviation of the temperature coefficient comes from the inhomogeneity of the composition of the resistor paste and from the spread of

Semi-dynamic data concerning other components comes additionally from subsystem of the economic planning (planning of tariff system), and dynamic data comes from the following

The beautiful theorem from [4] led Gy´ arf´ as [3] to consider the geometric problem when the underlying graph is a complete bipartite graph: Take any 2n points in convex position