• Nem Talált Eredményt

III./3.1.1.1 Pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's disease

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "III./3.1.1.1 Pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's disease"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

III./3.1.1.1 Pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's disease

The recent guidelines of EFNS, AAN and NICE for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) – published in 2006 – are accepted and followed in Hungary.

The guidelines are not obligatory, but they may help in choosing the right treatment. The patient and the physician make a joint decision about the appropriate therapy of the given patient.

The modern pharmacotherapy of PD has three major unsolved problems:

I. In the early phase of the disease, the slowing of disease progression (neuroprotective or disease modifying therapy) and to delay / prevent or to decrease the risk of levodopa induced motor fluctuations and/or dyskinesias (for example with dopamine agonists),

II. The reduction of motor fluctuations (COMT inhibitors), and the improvement of late motor and non-motor symptoms, which are not related to dopamine deficiency (freezing, postural instability, dementia). The pulsatile nature of levodopa administration, altered dopamine storage and dopamine receptor sensitivity may play a role in the development of motor fluctuations.

III. Treatment of non -motor and late motor/non-motor symptoms.

In addition to symptomatic therapeutic effects, disease modifying effects (slowing or modifying disease progression) have been recently attributed to dopamine agonists and COMT inhibitors (e.g. razagiline, a second-generation MAO-B inhibitor). The

introduction of razagiline is recommended very early on, at the time of diagnosis.

Levodopa has been the most effective drug in the treatment of PD. Since its introduction into the therapy, it is considered as the gold standard. Levodopa decreases mortality and motor impairment, and improves quality of life and life expectancy of PD patients.

Its efficacy has been confirmed in the last thirty years, even without evidence based medicine (EBM) trials. The efficacy of levodopa is widely accepted, its efficacy need not to be proved by randomized controlled trials. Recently, it has been reported that levodopa is toxic only in the absence of astrocytes, but if astrocytes are present levodopa may have neurotrophic effects (in vivo experiments). In vivo experiments have shown that the number of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra does not decrease during chronic levodopa treatment.

Levodopa does not cause the damage of dopaminergic cells in the substantia nigra: there was no difference with respect to dopaminergic cells in levodopa-treated and non-treated cases. No degenerative cellular changes were observed in the substantia nigra of healthy individuals who were given levodopa.

The only risk of chronic levodopa treatment is the development of dyskinesias and motor fluctuation. A further disadvantage is that levodopa does not improve late motor symptoms, such as freezing, postural instability, falls, and does not prevent dementia and the progression of PD. It may also cause psychosis.

Therefore, a levodopa-sparing or levodopa-delaying strategy should be followed.

The ELLDOPA trial allows to draw conclusions as to the dose-dependent protective effects of levodopa.

The time of the introduction of levodopa treatment is individually determined, it depends mainly on the degree of functional impairment.

The degree of functional impairment is determined by considering whether dominant or subdominant hemispherical symptoms appear first, whether the patient is employed or retired, and how the patient’s ability to work is influenced by the symptoms of PD.

The modern therapy of PD is called modified levodopa therapy, which aims at avoiding

(2)

or delaying the disadvantages of chronic levodopa treatment that are mentioned above.

Dopamine agonists:

This pharmacological group of drugs acts directly on dopamine receptors, by-passing the nigrostriatal pathway. Ergotamine derivatives (bromocriptine, pergolide, cabergoline) are very effective antiparkinsonian agents, but may have “ergotism” type adverse effects, such as retroperitoneal and pleural fibrosis, erythromelalgia, and mitral fibrosis.

Non-ergotamine derivatives (pramipexole, ropirinole, rotigotine) have a more favorable side effect profile and show different pharmacodynamic effects. (Different efficacy on the different dopamine receptors).

If ropinirole is given instead of levodopa in the early phase of PD, disease progression may be slower and the risk of the development of dyskinesias may be lower, as suggested by PET studies. Similar results have been obtained by beta-CIT SPECT investigations in patients treated with pramipexole. The subcutaneous apomorphine pen is a rescue–drug for the treatment of random fluctuations (independent from drug intake). Rotigotine is favorable when dysphagia, gastrointestinal and hepatic problems are present, and in pre- and post operative situations.

Indications for the use of dopamine agonists: monotherapy in early PD and combined therapy (with levodopa and any other antiparkinsonian drugs).

The advantages of dopamine agonists are emphasized mainly with respect to young patients: the introduction of levodopa may be delayed by several years, and their dose can be increased, if treatment is tolerated, because dopamine agonists are not toxic (use the “therapeutic window”).

In the late phase of PD and if motor fluctuations are present, dopamine agonists allow the decrease of levodopa dose.

A new possibility is the controlled-release formulation of ropinirole and the extended- release formulation pramipexole and rotigotine. These CR formulations, as opposed to the standard (SR) formulations, provide stable plasma levels for 24 hours, allowing continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS).

COMT inhibitors:

With COMT inhibitors, the bioavailability of each levodopa dose is improved. So COMT inhibitors, such as entacapone and tolcapone given together with levodopa, provide continuous dopaminergic stimulation.

The role of CDS has been recently emphasized and accepted in the prevention of motor fluctuations. The therapy of first choice may be controlled released levodopa

preparations, even if there is no evidence for these preparations in delaying motor fluctuation. If motor fluctuation, even wearing off becomes apparent, the introduction of a COMT inhibitor is suggested. The most recently recommended mode of levodopa therapy is the combination of levodopa + peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor + COMT inhibitor in one tablet (Stalevo = levodopa + carbidopa + entacapone).

Severe motor fluctuations may be favorably influenced with the administration of levodopa + COMT inhibitor in 6-8 divided doses. In order to achieve CDS with

levodopa + COMT inhibitor therapy, it is recommended to give four divided doses from the very beginning of therapy. The risk of dyskinesias decreases if levodopa is combined with a COMT inhibitor.

MAO-B inhibitors (selegiline, rasagiline) are indicated as monotherapy in early PD and in combination with levodopa and other antiparkinsonian drugs in advanced PD.

The results of the DATATOP trial suggest that selegiline has some neuroprotective effects. Patients treated with selegiline from the time of diagnosis needed levodopa treatment significantly later than those treated with comparator agents (tocopherole, placebo).

Rasagiline is a second generation, irreversible, selective monoaminooxidase – B

(3)

(MAO-B) inhibitor. Rasagiline enhances dopaminergic activity and thus improves the symptoms of PD. Rasagiline has no amphetamine metabolites, which is an advantage in comparison to selegiline. Its main metabolite, aminoindane, may have a disease

modifying effect, meaning it may slow down the progression of PD. This disease modifying effect has been confirmed in the ADAGIO study. Early rasagiline therapy showed a significant benefit in comparison to treatment delayed by 6 months, both with respect to symptoms and progression.

Both rasagiline and selegiline may be indicated in the form of monotherapy. The efficacy of rasagiline in monotherapy is long-lasting; according to the most recent publications, it may be longer than 6.5 years.

Rasagiline combined with levodopa and other antiparkinsonian drugs (dopamine agonists, COMT-inhibitors) decreases the time of “off” periods in motor fluctuation, increases “on” time and provides good symptomatic control. The LARGO study showed that rasagiline is as effective as entacapone in “on-off” symptoms.

The once daily dose – without the need for titration – allows convenient use. According to the results of the ADAGIO study, published in the summer of 2008, the once daily rasagiline dose of 1 mg has a disease modifying effect. Thus, rasagiline should be given from the time of diagnosis.

NMDA antagonists (amantadine derivatives): it is the only pharmacological group of drugs, which has no dopaminergic effects, but shows glutamate antagonistic properties.

These drugs may reduce dyskinesias without the need to decrease the daily levodopa dose. In life-threatening akinetic crisis, amantadine sulfate infusion is the first drug of choice. They are effective in early monotherapy, and later on they may administered combined with any other antiparkinsonan drugs.

Anticholinergic drugs: they are indicated in young non – demented patients (with disease onset before the age of 65 years), who have a tremor dominant disease.

Anticholinergic drugs may also have a benefit in neuroleptic parkinsonism and in the treatment of certain dystonias.

Neurosurgery (DBS – deep brain stimulation) may be considered if modern pharmacotherapy does not bring further improvement in the quality of life of PD patients.

Duodenal/jejunal levodopa infusion (Duodopa) is another possibility before surgery or when surgery is contraindicated. Using a PEG and a pump, levodopa is continuously administered into the jejunum where it is absorbed. Stable plasma levels and continuous dopamine receptor stimulation protect against dyskinesias and motor fluctuations.

Table 1: Levodopa, COMT-inhibitor and MAO-B inhibitor treatment

Table 2:Dopamine agonist and amantadine treatment

Recommended treatment strategy:

At the time of diagnosis or in the following 6 months (irrespective of the degree of functional impairment) neuroprotective treatment should be started:

(4)

selegiline (5 mg bid daily) and/or razagiline (1 mg qd daily) and/or

dopamine agonist (individual dose) and/or

amantadine (amantadine hydrochloride 100 mg bid or amantadine sulfate 100 mg tid) Functional impairment:

dopamine agonists, levodopa + COMT inhibitors (individual doses) anticholinergic agents in tremor dominant forms (individual doses)

amantadine (amantadine hydrochloride 100 mg bid or amantadine sulfate 100 mg tid up to 600 mg daily)

Progression of functional impairment (advanced disease):

Dose increase of dopamine agonists

Dose increase of levodopa (individually determined)

Introduction of a dopamine agonist (late combination with levodopa) Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias:

Controlled released and/or soluble levodopa formulations, Dividing daily levodopa dose (several, smaller doses) Introduction of a dopamine agonist

Introduction of amantadine without the decrease of levodopa dose Introduction of a COMT inhibitor (entacapone up to 2400 mg daily) Duodenal/jejunal levodopa infusion

Surgery: if modern pharmacological therapy allows no further improvement in quality of life

References:

Parkinson Study Group: Management of Parkinson's Disease: An Evidence – Based Review. Mov Disord Vol 17/Suppl 4, 2002

W.H. Oertel, A. Berardelli, B.R. Bloem, U. Bonucelli, D. Burn, G. Deuschl, E.

Dietrichs, G. Fabbrini, J.J. Ferreira, A. Friedman, P. Kanovsky, V. Kostic, A. Nieuwboer, P. Odin, W. Poewe, O. Rascol, C. Sampaio, M. Schüpbach, E. Tolosa, C. Trenkwalder.

Early (uncomplicated) Parkinson's disease. In: N.E. Gilhus, M.P. Barnes and M. Brainin (editors), European Handbook of Neurological Management. Volume 1, 2nd edition.

Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2011:217-236.

W.H.Oertel, A. Berardelli, B.R. Bloem, U. Bonucelli, D. Burn, G. Deuschl, E. Dietrichs, G. Fabbrini, J.J. Ferreira, A. Friedman, P. Kanovsky, V. Kostic, A. Nieuwboer, P. Odin, W. Poewe, O. Rascol, C. Sampaio, M. Schüpbach, E. Tolosa, C. Trenkwalder. Late Parkinson's disease. In: N.E.Gilhus, M.P. Barnes and M. Brainin (editors), European Handbook of Neurological Management: European Handbook of Neurological Management. Volume 1, 2nd edition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2011:237- 266.

Management of Parkinson's Disease: An Evidence – Based Review. The Movement Disorder Society's, September 2004, Vienna

Martin Horstink: Review of the therapeutic management of Parkinson′s disease.10th Congress of the European Federation of Neurological Societies, Teaching Course 1.1, Glasgow, 18 October 2006.

(5)

Nyholm D, Lewander T, Johansson A, et al: Enteral Levodopa/Carbidopa Infusion in Advanced Parkinson’s Disease: Long-term Exposure. Clin Neuropharmacol Vol 31, No 2, April 2008.

Olanow CW, Rascol O: ADAGIO: a prospective, double-blind, delayed –start study to examine the potential disease-modifying effect of rasagiline in early Parkinsons's disease. Mov Dis Society 12th International Congress, 2008 Chicago, IL, USA, poster

Ábra

Table 1: Levodopa, COMT-inhibitor and MAO-B inhibitor treatment

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

The present study was designed to (1) generate utilities for common CD health states featuring luminal or luminal and concomitant perianal disease from the perspective of

[1] and extend the model to include demographic turnover and study the conditions for disease propagation in the population in the context of age-of-infection dependent treatment

In the group of patients with Addison’ disease, carriers of the A3669G polymorphism had significantly higher serum ACTH levels at the diagnosis of the disease compared

The incidence of IBD, disease phenotpye, medical therapy and disease outcomes in the multicenter, population-based ECCO-EpiCom study from 2011 In this study,

The decision on which direction to take lies entirely on the researcher, though it may be strongly influenced by the other components of the research project, such as the

III./11.3.2.: Heart disease as a potential source of emboli; sudden decrease of cardiac output associated with heart disease as a cause of neurological symptoms III./11.3.2.1.:

Late motor symptoms: freezing of the gait, freezing of movements after initiation, sudden block of gait, postural instability, falls, motor fluctuation with dyskinesias

Flagellates apparently cause the phloem necrosis disease of coffee, the hartrot disease of coconut palm, and the marchitez sorpresiva (sudden wilt) disease of oil palms.. •