One of the main directions of this study is the examination of the economic development and competitiveness of the Visegrad countries since the 2000s.
From the turn of the millennium, development has entered a new phase that visibly shapes the former fields of power in the region and creates new geopo- litical focal points. In this rearrangement, different economic processes play a key role. Although the development of the countries of the Visegrad Group is varied in some of its features. However, the analysis of the V4 countries, due to the above-mentioned homogeneity and central geographical location, is ap- propriate subject of examination to draw conclusions for the situation in the
Central and Eastern European region. Following the 2008 global economic cri- sis, China s economic development and global political expansion has entered a new phase. The effect of this phenomenon is exerted on the geopolitical field.
The New Silk Road Program announced by the Chinese government in 2013 is of paramount importance for the future of the Central and Eastern European region. The new commercial opportunities and potential FDI investments re- sulting from the program are desirable for the entire Visegrad Group. In the course of our study, we intend to include several indicators that better illustrate and measure the economic strategy and geopolitical changes of the period China.
Kulcsszavak:
Keynotes: Economy, Competitiveness, Models of Competitiveness, Visegrad Countries, V4, Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, China
Az ezredfordu-
e ala-
k
toknak kiemelt szerep viszonylag
,
,
- -
-
-ban meghirdetett
- -
A in-
kapcsola- -as
elin -
1 2
aki szerint a ver-
3
4
Dicken
5A
orter a
-
be
6
Egy Lengyel
78
d
or-
9
melyet az ECORYS
10portja dolgozott ki
11
12
-
.
13-
- -
azda-
hatni.
14A
(Global
Competitiveness Report Institute for Manage-
ment Development, World Competitiveness Report) versenyk
2018-ban 140
15
a 2018- 63 gazda-
16
sort
17tek
.
bemutatott pari -
port-
-
V4-ek PPP- -
1.
Figure 1.: Gross domestic product at current market prices, purchasing power standard per inhabitant in percentage of the EU (28 countries) average in
Visegrad Countries, 2004 2017 (percentage)
-
- -
2008 2009-
-
-ben a V4-ek -
-
Figure 2.: The employment rate of the active population aged 15 64 in the Visegrad countries and the European Union, 2004 2018
(percentage of total population)
- -
elor- -ban is az
(
Figure 3.: Nominal labour productivity per person in Visegrad
[percentage of EU28 total (based on million purchasing power standards, current prices)]
(
Figure 4.: Nominal labour productivity per hour worked in Visegrad Countries, 2004 2017 [percentage of EU28 total (based on million purchasing power
standards, current prices)]
-
vultak az
rangsora szerint a 2004-ben a V4- -
- - - - -
37-
- - -es po-
kon 2018- -
-
- -
gyel -
pen egy helyet
18ya vitathatatla- -ben a
19
in
Amerikai
-
Amerikai
2021
-
latok ett
a kelet- -
vetekedhet a vi- a kelet- -
- -
megszen- vedte a 2008 2009-
.
ta vol-
-
amellett, hogy a nyugat-
-
2011-
- -
-
- -
). Az -
.
,
-
222016 2020-
+ korlati-
program
+ -ben
-kelet-
23dol-
24
. A
+ -
- -
kar- + 1 -
kintve. Ami a k
Figure 5.: Export volume of the V4 countries to China in 2008 2016 (1000 USD)
WITS (World Integrated Trade Solution)
-
ban fokozatosan emelkedett 2008- - -ban viszont szinte
12- -
csak
a 2014- - -
lengyel 2014-
6.
Figure 6.: export volume of China to the V4 countries in 2008 2016 (1000 USD)
WITS (World Integrated Trade Solution)
export V4 orsz . A leg-
-os
USD- meg a
V4- d
USD
Len is
257.
- 2017) Figure 7 DI inflow into major EU member states (2000 2017)
(billion euro)
A 2000-
ban Nyugat- -
26
. Az EU-
e -ek r
e masztja azt, hogy a kelet- -
27
28
.
,
-
a tanul-
+
-
-how- -
- +
A 2004-
Mindehhez a bemutatott
latok . Fontos ki-
emel
e -
-
1. Attila
2.
3.
4.
5. Lengyel Imre 6.
7. Lengyel (2000).
8. Lengyel (2000).
9.
- 10.
ival foglalkozik.
11.
12.
13.
14. Lukovics (2008).
15. Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum (2018): The Global Competitive- ness Report, 2018. WEF, Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland.
16. IMD World Competitiveness Center (2018): IMD World Digital Competi-
tiveness Ranking https://www.imd.org/wcc/
world-competitiveness-center-rankings/world-competitiveness-ranking-2018/
17. IMD World Competitiveness Center: offical webpage, https://www.imd.org/
wcc/world-competitiveness-center-rankings/world-digital-competitiveness- rankings-2017/
18. IMD, WEF
19. Wold Bank (2017): Gross Domestic Product
https://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdf 2019. 05. 15.
20.
dban Geopolitika a 21.
21.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/
2078rank.html 22.
173. old.
23. -kelet- -Hercegov
24. +
http://www.geopolitika.hu/hu/2017/11/01/a-16-1-egyuttmukodes- bemutatasa/
25. Goreczky - -
+
-2017/9.
26. Biedemann, Zsuzsanna (2014): Chinese OFDI in Europe and the Central and Eastern European Region in a Global Context. in: Chinese in- vestments and financial engagement in visegrad countries: Myth or reality?
http://mek.oszk.hu/
18300/18374/18374.pdf 27.
28. Sebena, Martin (2018): Chinese trade and investment in the Visegrad coun- tries: mapping increased exposure and volatility. in: Chine-CEE Institute Working Paper, 2018. No.11.
.
- - -
- -riport,
.
emle, LXV.
CIA (2016): The World Factbook, 2016.
N
https://www.ecorys.com/glo-
bal/our-company 019. 05. 15.
+
- - +
-2017/9.
IMD World Competitiveness Center (2018): IMD World Digital Competitive- ness Ranking 2018.
- Debrecen.
Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum (2018): The Global Competitiveness Report, 2018. WEF, Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland.
Lengyel Imre
Lengyel Imre
Szeged.
pest, Magyar Nemzeti Bank.
Sebena, Martin (2018): Chinese trade and investment in the Visegrad countries:
mapping increased exposure and volatility. in: Chine-CEE Institute Work- ing Paper, 2018. No. 11.
Biedemann, Zsuzsanna (2014): Chinese OFDI in Europe and the Central and Eastern European Region in a Global Context. in: Chi- nese investments and financial engagement in visegrad countries: Myth or reality? MTA, Institute of World Economics.
