• Nem Talált Eredményt

Security of supply

In document 1 | Executive summary (Pldal 29-34)

Croatia is a net importer of electricity in both the ‘no target’ and ‘delayed’

scenarios for most of the modelled time period, until 2050 when the CCS-equipped gas power plant allows Croatia to export electricity. The ‘decarbonisation’ scenario enables Croatia to become a net exporter of electricity from 2030 onwards due to its relatively high renewable energy potential.

Croatia’s generation adequacy margin is positive for all years in all scenarios, meaning that the country has sufficient generation capacity to satisfy demand using only domestic capacity in all hours of all years.

In order to address challenges associated with intermittency that will characterize a large share of the installed RES generation capacity, Croatia should work on the no regret measures discussed above to enable a high share of RES penetration without compromising security of supply, involving demand side measures, increased network connections and storage solutions.

6.3 Sustainability

Croatia has high renewable potential, especially hydro and wind, and thus can make a higher than average contribution to Europe’s 2050 emission reduction targets compared to other countries. In Croatia CO₂ emissions in the electricity sector are reduced by close to 100% in all scenarios by 2050 compared with 2016.

Renewable potential can be harvested with policies eliminating barriers to RES invest-ment. A no-regret step involves de-risking policies addressing high financing costs and high cost of capital to allow for cost-efficient renewable energy investment.

6.4 Affordability and competitiveness

Decarbonisation of the electricity sector does not drive up wholesale electricity prices compared to a scenario with no emission reduction target. The wholesale price of electricity is not driven by the level of decarbonisation but by the CO₂ price, applied across all scenarios, and the price of natural gas, since natural gas based production is the marginal production unit (in the region) needed to meet demand in a significant number of hours of the year.

The wholesale price of electricity follows a similar trajectory under all scenarios and only diverges after 2045, when high levels of low marginal cost RES production puts downward pressure on wholesale electricity prices.

under all scenarios there is a significant rise in wholesale electricity prices compared with current (albeit historically low) price levels. This increase is driven by the price of carbon and natural gas, both of which increase significantly by 2050. While higher wholesale prices will likely transmit through to end user prices, affecting afford-ability, it will help to attract investment needed to replace outgoing capacity.

Ambitious decarbonisation policy will require higher levels of investment in generation capacity, with total investment in the ‘decarbonisation’ scenario 37%

more than the ‘no target’ scenario. However, the cost structure will change with higher up-front investment costs in exchange for lower operation (including fuel) and mainte-nance costs.

Although not modelled in full hourly detail, wholesale price volatility of electricity is also expected to increase, ceteris paribus, in a world with a high share of intermittent renewables. Demand and supply side measures such as increased storage capacity may mitigate volatility. Over the long term policy decisions will need to be made on how to deal with price volatility, and what the acceptable level of price volatility is consid-ering the costs of supply and demand side measures.

Due to the high initial investment costs of RES technologies, profitability is very sensitive to the cost of capital, which is higher in Croatia than in Western European member states.

Although much of the value of the cost of capital depends on country risk linked to the general macroeconomic performance of a country, the cost of capital can be reduced to some extent through interventions by policymakers. This begins with a stable policy framework and the rollout of de-risking measures. As outlined above, such measures should be considered no-regret steps minimising system costs and consumer expenditures.

While the need for RES support is initially high, reaching around 10 EuR/MWh, it is significantly reduced over the modelled time horizon due to increasing electricity wholesale prices that incentivise RES investment even without support over the long term.

DIACORE (2016): The impact of risks in renewable energy investments and the role of smart policies, Project Coordinator Fraunhofer ISI. EU Intelligent Energy Europe Programme, Contract N°: IEE/12/833/SI2.645735

Dominković, Dominik Franjo; Bačeković, Ivan; Ćosić, Boris; Krajačić, Goran; Pukšec, Tomislav; Duić, Neven; Markovska, Nataša, Zero carbon energy system of South East Europe in 2050 // Applied Energy 184; 1517–1528 (2016)

Duić, Neven, Is the success of clean energy guaranteed? // Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17, 8, 2093-2100 (2015)

EC (2008) Communication of the Commission: Europe's climate change opportunity COM (2008) 30 final, and the Joint Impact Assessment on the Package of Implemen-tation measures for the EU's objectives on climate change and renewable energy for 2020, SEC(2008) 85/3

EC (2011) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. COM(2011) 112 final

EC (2013) EU Energy, Transport and GHG Emissions Trends to 2050. Reference Scenario 2013.

(https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/media/publications/doc/trends-to-2050-update-2013.pdf)

EC (2014) Communication of the Commission: European Energy Security Strategy, COM (2014) 330 final

EC (2014b) Communication of the Commission: A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030 COM(2014) 15 final

EC (2016) EU Reference Scenario 2016. Energy, transport and GHG emissions Trends to 2050.

(https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/ref2016_report_final-web.pdf) EC (2016b) Communication of the Commission: Clean Energy For All Europeans, COM (2016) 860 final

Ecofys & Eclareon (2017): Mapping the cost of capital for wind and solar energy in South Eastern European Member States. (http://www.ecofys.com/files/files/ecofys-eclareon-2016-wacc-wind-pv-south-east-europe.pdf)

7 | References

EIA (2017) Annual Energy Outlook 2017 with Projections to 2050. US energy Information Administration, January 2017. (https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2017).pdf) ENTSO-E (2015) Scenario Outlook and Adequacy Forecast 2015. Brussels, 2015. (https://

www.entsoe.eu/Documents/SDC%20documents/SOAF/150630_SOAF_2015_publication_

wcover.pdf)

ENTSO-E (2016) Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2016. (http://tyndp.entsoe.eu/) ENTSO-G (2017) Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2017. (https://www.entsog.eu/public/

uploads/files/publications/TYNDP/2017/entsog_tyndp_2017_main_170428_web_xs.pdf) Fraunhofer ISI (2016) Policy Dialogue on the Assessment and Convergence of RES Policy in EU Member States. Final Report of the DiaCore project. (http://www.diacore.

eu/images/files2/DIACORE_Final_Report.pdf)

IEA (2017) World Energy Outlook. Paris, France. IEA/OECD.

IRENA, Joanneum Research and University of Ljubljana (2017), Cost-Competitive Renewable Power Generation: Potential across South East Europe, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Abu Dhabi.

McKinsey (2010) Transformation of Europe's power system until 2050. Summary of findings. September 2010. Düsseldorf. (http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/

dotcom/client_service/epng/pdfs/transformation_of_europes_power_system.ashx)

TECHNOFI (2013) E-Highway 2050. Selection and characterization of the most impacting demand-side technologies. Paris, 2013, (http://www.e-highway2050.eu/fileadmin/

documents/Results/D3/report_demand_technologies_selection_a.pdf and http://

www.e-highway2050.eu/fileadmin/documents/Results/D3/report_demand_technolo-gies_selection_b.pdf)

CIEMAT (2015) Bringing Europe and Third countries closer together through renewable energies. BETTER project Summary Report (http://better-project.net/sites/default/files/

BETTER_Summary%20Report_0.pdf)

Regional Centre for Energy Policy Research (2015) Decarbonisation modelling in the electricity sector. Regional report. Support for Low Emission Development in South East Europe (SLED) project. (http://sled.rec.org/documents/SLED_Regional_ELEC_ENG.pdf)

In document 1 | Executive summary (Pldal 29-34)

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK