• Nem Talált Eredményt

Future research and conclusions 1. Future research

The model explained above is going to be tested with an extensive survey among higher educational institutes with a focus on business and economics studies. It is necessary to narrow the population to only one specific field, since we know that there are great differences in terms if internationalisation between certain fields of study (e.g. student mobility in medicine draws quite different patterns).

Furthermore, career-tracking method will be used and in-depth personal interviews will be carried out to identify those students who first took part in credit mobility and later decided to get involved in diploma mobility, too. It will also be investigated how many students pursued diploma mobility in the same country and in the same institution where he/she did credit mobility. The above introduced model will be accepted only if significant number of students will be found who return for diploma mobility to their credit mobile receiving institution.

A great difficulty in similar researches is that the database available for student mobility are not consistent, even the volume of certain mobility types is not recorded thoroughly.

Several authors (Rivza - Teichler 2007; Junor - Usher 2008; Woodfield 2010) confirm that information about student mobility is generally imprecise and deficient. Furthermore, Techiler et al (2011) state that in the statistics, in general, foreign students are 25% above the genuine inward mobility. One of the reasons behind the misleading data is that student mobility is usually measured based on nationality, rather than the crossing of country’s borders. This was also realised by the EHEA Ministerial Conference (2012), thus a goal was set to create a reliable data base on the inward mobility in the EU. The database will serve as a supporting background for targeting new EHEA goals in 2015 (EHEA Ministerial Conference, 2012).

4.2. Summary and conclusion

Student mobility has numerous forms worldwide, out of which this paper focused on those ones which are the most relevant to the Central and Eastern European Region, most importantly on the ERASMUS+. The paper presented the various forms of student mobility and explained their importance and effect on the internationalisation endeavours of the universities. An institutional approach and a managerial point of view were taken when introducing mobility types. A significant result of this paper is that a unique logic and typology of student mobility was introduced, namely the income generating and non income generating mobility.

149 So far few studies have been carried out measuring the relationship between the credit- and degree mobility. This deficit has been attempted to be made up by literature review and the drafting of a model. The presented theoretical model shows a possible process for how an increased volume of inward credit mobility may generate increased inward diploma mobility in the same receiving institution on the long run. The model is going to be tested with an extensive survey among higher educational institutes with a focus on business and economics studies. Since the issue is complex and current data on student mobility islimited, to complement the quantitative data, qualitative information will be collected by career path analysis and in depth personal interviews.

After the model is confirmed and/or possibly amended, it may be used as a theoretical base for drafting action plans for increasing the number of inward diploma mobility at given higher education institutions as part of their internationalisation strategy. The research will be rewarding on the long run, at the end of a complex theoretical and empirical study.

Researchers and higher educational professionals are invited to join in the process.

Literature

Bracht, O., Engel, C., Janson, K., Over, A., Schomburg, H., Teichler, U. (2006): The Professional Value of ERASMUS Mobility. International Centre for Higher Education Research University of Kassel, Kassel.

Cubillos, J. H., Ilvento, T. (2013): The Impact of Study Abroad on Students’ Self- Efficacy Perceptions. Foreign Language Annals 45(4):495-511.

Douglas, C., Jones-Rikkers, C. G. (2001): Study Abroad Programs and American Students’

Worldmindedness. Journal of Teaching in International Business 13(1):55-66.

DuFon, M., Churchill, E. (2006): Language Learners in Study Abroad Context, Multilingual Matters Ltd., UK.

Dwyer, M. M. (2004): More Is Better: The Impact of Study Abroad Program Duration.

Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 10(1):151-164.

Engle, L., Engle, J. (2003): Study Abroad Levels: Toward a Classification of Program Types. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 9:1-20.

Fitzsimmonsa, S. R., David J. F., Xiaodan W. (2013): Business Students' Choice of Short-Term or Long-Short-Term Study Abroad Opportunities. Journal of Teaching in International Business 24(2):125-137.

Franklin, K. (2010): Long-term Career Impact and Professional Applicability of the Study Abroad Experience. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 19(1):169-191.

150

Freed, B. (1995): What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent? In:

Second language acquisition in a study abroad context, B. Freed (Ed.), John Benjamins, New York, 123-149.

Golay, P. A. (2006): The Effects of Study Abroad on the Development of Global-Mindedness Among Students Enrolled in International Programs at Florida State University.

Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations. Florida State University. Paper 4204.

Junor, S., Usher, A. (2008): Student Mobility & Cradit Transfer: A National and Global Survey. Educational Policy Institute.

King, R., Findlay, A., Ahrens, J. (2010): International student mobility literature review.

Report to HEFCE.

Knight, J. (1994): Internationalization: Elements and checkpoints. Canadian Bureau for International Education, Research Paper No. 7. CBIE, Ottawa.

Knight, J. (2008): Higher Education in Turmoil, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.

Knight, J. (2011) Regional Education Hubs: Mobility for the knowledge economy, In:

International Students and Global Mobility in Higher Education: National Trends and New Directions, R. Bhandari, P. Blumenthal (Eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 211-230.

Kováts, G. (2012): Intézményirányítás – a stratégiai szemléletmód esélyei, In:

Elefántcsonttoronyból világítótorony, I. Hrubos (Ed.), Aula Kiadó, Budapest, 243-292.

Krzaklewska, E., Krupnik, S. (2005): The experience of studying abroad for exchange students in Europe, ERASMUS Student Network.

Lajos, T. (2005): A mobilitás mint a felsıoktatás erıforrása. Educatio, 14(2):267-281.

Messer, D., Wolter, S. C. (2007): Are student exchange programs worth it? Higher Education 54(5):647-663.

Murphy-Lejeune, E. (2002): Student Mobility and Narrative in Europe: The New Strangers.

Routledge, London and New York.

Relyea, C., Cocchiara, F. K., Studdard, N. L. (2008): The Effect of Perceived Value in the Decision to Participate in Study Abroad Programs. Journal of Teaching in International Business 19(4):346-361.

Rexeisen, R. J. (2013): Study Abroad and the Boomerang Effect: The End is Only the Beginning. Frontiers: : The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 22(1):166-181.

Rivzaa, B., Teichler, U. (2007): The Changing Role of Student Mobility. Higher Education Policy 20:457–475.

151 Teichler, U. (2004): The Changing Debate on Internationalisation of Higher Education.

Higher Education 48(1):5-26.

Teichler, U., Steube, W (1991): The logics of study abroad programmes and their impacts.

Higher Education 21(3):325-349.

Teichler U., Ferencz I., Wächter, B. (2011): Mapping mobility in European higher education I-II. DAAD, Bonn.

van der Wende, M. (1997): Missing Links: The Relationship between National Policies for Internationalisation and those for Higher Education in General. In: National Policies for the Internationalisation of Higher Education in Europe, Kälvemark, T., van der Wende, M.

(Eds.), National Agency for Higher Education, Stockholm, 10-41.

Van Hoof, H. B., Verbeeten, M., J. (2005): Wine if for Drinking, Water is for Washing:

Students Opinions about International Exchange Programs. Journal of Studies in International Education 9(1):42-61.

Wiers-Jenssen, J. (2008): Career Impacts of Student Mobility: Stumbling Block or Stepping Stone? In: Borderless Knowledge, A. Gornitzka, L. Langfeldt (Eds.), Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Woodfield, S. (2010): Key Trends and Emerging Issues in International Student Mobility (ISM). In: Globalization and Internationalization in Higher Education, F. Maringe, N. Foskett (Eds.), Continuum International Publishing Group, London and New York, 109-124.

Other literature

Balassi Institute (n.d) The Stipendium Hungaricum programme, www.campushungary.hu (Accessed on 11 December 2014)

EHEA Ministerial Conference (2012): Mobility for Better Learning: Mobility strategy 2020 for the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), Bucharest.

152