The result presented in the dissertation brought up some new research topic too.
One of this is the extension of the HAZOP template method for other process unit, like distillation towers, turbines, packages etc.).
Another possibility is the further development of the MARKOV failure model of the actuators of the safety instrumented loops giving the possibility of better understanding of the interaction between the techno-logy and actuators and on this bases providing better and efficient maintenance design.
Bibliography
[AIC_01] Layer of Protection Analysis – Simplified Process Risk Assessment, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY, 2001
[AIC_2] Centre for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guidelines for Safe Automation of Chemical Processes, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY, 1993.
[AIC_85] AIChE. Use of hazard and operability studies in process analysis.
New York, USA, 1985.
[AIC_92] AIChE. Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures, second edition with worked examples, New York, USA, 1992.
[Ake_99] Aken, van Joan E. – Management theory developments on the basis of the design paradigm – The quest for tested and grounded technological rules Eindhoven University of Technology Report EUT/BDK/93, Eindhoven 1999
[ATX_100] DIRECTIVE 94/9/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL of 23 March 1994. Equipment and protective systems intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres.
[ATX_137] DIRECTIVE 1999/92/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 1999. on minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres (15th individual directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)
[BAR_00] V. Bartolozzi, 2000, Qualitative models of equipment units and their use in automatic HAZOP analysis
[BAY_03a] Paul Baybutt, Major Hazard Analysis – An Improved Hazard Analysis Method, Process Safety Progress, Vol. 22, No. 1, pps. 21-26, March, 2003
[BAY_03b] Paul Baybutt, On the Ability of Hazard Analysis Method to Identfy Accidents, Process Safety Progress, Vol. 22, No. 3, September, 2003 [BAY_08] Paul Baybutt and Remigio Agraz-Boeneker, A comparison of the
hazard and operability (hazop) study with major hazard analysis (mha): a more efficient and effective process hazard analysis (pha) method, the1st Latin American Process Safety Conference and Exposition, Center for Chemical Process Safety, Buenos Aires, May 27 – 29, 2008.
[BGS_09] G. Baradits Sr., J. Madár PhD, J. Abonyi PhD*, Optimization of proof test intervals based on a novel model of proof test coverage factor [BIL06] R. Billinton & Jun Pan, Optimal maintenance scheduling in a two
identical component parallel redundant system, Power Systems Research Group, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
[BIN_04] Ken Bingham,m 2004 : Integrating HAZOP and SIL/LOPA Analysis:
[BÖR_06] Functional Safety, Basic Principles of Safety-related Systems, Josef Börcsök
[BÖR_08] Electronic Safety System, Hardware Concepts, Models, and Calculation, Josef Börcsök
[CAG_00] E. Cagno, F. Caron, M. Mancini, Cost Estimation of Industrial Risk in the Bidding Process, Department of Mechanical Engineering Politecnico di Milano
[CAG_02] E. Cagno, F. Caron, M. Mancini, Risk analysis in plant commissioning: the Multilevel Hazop, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 77 (2002) 309–323 [CAM_05] Process System Risk Management, Ian Cameron and Raghu Raman
[CAL07] Jose´ A. Caldeira Duarte a,*, Joa˜o C. Taborda A. Craveiro b, Toma´s Pedro Trigo b, Optimization of the preventive maintenance plan of a series components system, Mathematical Department, Instituto Polite´cnico de Setu´bal/Escola Superior de Tecnologia de Setu´bal, Campus do IPS, Estefanilha, 2914-508 Setubal, Portugal b MIIT, Manutenc¸a˜o Industrial Informatizada e Tecnologia, Lda, Av.
Elias Garcia, 123, 58, Lisboa, Portugal
[CAT_95] Catino, C., & Ungar, L. H. (1995). Model-based approach to automated hazard identification of chemical plants. American Institute of Chemical Engineering Journal, 41 (1), 97–109.
[CCPS_01] Center for Chemical Process Safety, Layer of protection Analysis, Simplified Process Risk Assessment
[CCPS_85] Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) (1985). Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineering.
[CCPS_93] Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guidelines for Safe Automation of Chemical Process, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY, 1993.
[Dap_01] Dapena, P. Rodríguez – Software Safety Verification in Critical Software Intensive Systems Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Beta 2001 (to be published)
[DEV04] Devarun Ghosh 1, Sandip Roy, Maintenance optimization using probabilistic cost-benefit analysis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay 400 076, India5]
[DIM_97] Dimitradis, V. D., Shah, N., & Pantelides, C. C. (1997). Model-based safety verification of discrete:continuous chemical processes.
American Institute of Chemical Engineering Journal, 43 (4), 1041–
1059.
[DIN_00] DIN 3100 – General Requirement, AK 1…8
[DIN_250] DIN V 19250, Grundlegende Sicherheitsbatrachtungen für MSR-Schutzeinrichtungen
[DIN_54] DIN EN 954 Safety for Machinery
[DIN_81] DIN V VDE 081 Microprocessors in Safety Application
[DIN_BAS] DIN V 19250 Basic Safety Evaluation for Measurement & Control [DIN_REQ] DIN V 19250 Requirements & Measures, Qualitative Consideration [DOW_00] Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd., 2000: Safer Safety
[DOW_02] Arthur M. (Art) Dowell, III, P.E. Dennis C. Hendershot, Simplified Risk Analysis – Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA), AIChE 2002 National Meeting Paper 281a
[DOW_97] Dowell, A.M., III, Layer of Protection Analysis: A New PHA Tool. After HAZOP, Before Fault Tree Analysis
[EN_1127] Application of electric and electronic equipment in explosive atmosphere. Definition, calculation and statement.
[Eur_1] Eurostat, Work and health in the EU, A statistical portrait, Data 1994–2002 (2004), ISBN 92-894-7006-2
[EXI_1] EXIDA, ExSILentia SOFTWARE, www.exida.com
[FAN_00] Dr. Ch.E. P. Fanelli, Invensys Process Systems, Applying LOPA Methodology for SIL Determination: a worked example
[FEN-00] P Fenelon, 2000: Applying HAZOP to Software Engineering Models [FEW_00] Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd., 2000: Safer Safety
[FTH_81] Fault Tree Handbook, US, 1981
[GOB_98] Control Systems Safety Evaluation & Reliability, 2nd Edition, William M. Goble, 1998
[GOB07] W.M. Goble and J.V. Bukowski, “Development of a Mechanical Component Failure Database,” 2007 Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainabiltiy Symposium, NY: NY, IEEE, 2007.
[GRU_98] Safety Shutdown Systems: Design, Analysis and Justification, Paul Gruhn, P.E. and Harry L. Cheddie, P.E.
[HOU04] M. J. M. Houtermans, J. L. Rouvroye, D. Karydas, Risk Reduction Through Partial Stroke Testing, 2004
[HSE_02] Safety Line Institute: Occupational Health & Safety Practitioner, management of major hazard facilities
[IEC_508] IEC 61508 1 – 7: Functional safety of electrical / electronic / programmable electronic safety - related systems.
[IEC_511] IEC 61511 1 – 3 : Functional Safety: Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Sector
[IEC_61] Safety of machinery. Functional safety of safety-related electrical, electronic and programmable electronic control systems. (IEC 62061:2005)
[IEC_882] 10IEC 61882, Hazard and operability studies, First Edition, 2001-05 [ISA_84] The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society (ISA),
ANSI/ISA 84.01-1996, Application of Safety Instrumented Systems to the Process Industries, The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1996.
[KAR_90] Karvonen, I., Heino, P., & Suokas, J. (1990). Knowledge-based approach to support HAZOP studies. Technical Research Center of Finland: Research Report.
[KHA_00] Faisal I. Khan, S.A. Abbasi, Towards automation of HAZOP with a new tool EXPERTOP, Environmental Modelling & Software 15 (2000) 67–77
[KHA_97a] Faisal I Khan and S A Abbasi, 1997, Mathematical model for HAZOP study time estimation
[KHA_97b] Faisal I. Khan and S. A. Abbasi, 1997, TOPHAZOP: a knowledge-based software tool for conducting HAZOP in a rapid, efficient yet inexpensive manner
[KLE_76] Kletz T. HAZOP and Hazan, notes on the identification and assessment of hazards. Rugby, UK: Institution of Chemical Engineers; 1974.
[KLE_99] Trevor A Kletz, 1999: Hazop, past and future
[Kne_00] Knegtering, B. Brombacher, A.C. – A method to prevent excessive numbers of Markov states in Markov models for quantitative safety and reliability ISA-transactions 39, 363-369, 2000
[Kne_98] Knegtering, B. Application of Micro Markov models for quantitative safety assessment to determine safety integrity levels ISA-Expo, Houston 1998
[LAB_07] Juraj Labovsky, 2007, Model-based HAZOP study of a real MTBE plant, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 20 (2007) 230–237
[LAW_74] Lawley HG. Operability studies and hazard analysis. Chemical Engineering Progress 1974;70.
[Lee_96] Lees F. P. – Loss prevention in the process industries Butterworth-Heinemann (second edition) 1996
[LIN_01] Morten Lind: Functional Approach to HAZOP studies, 2001
[MAR_02] Marszal, E., Scharpf, E., Safety Integrity Level Selection, Systematic Methods including Layer of Protection Analysis
[Min_00] Ministry of Defence Standard 00-58 Issue 2 Publication Date 19 May 2000, HAZOP Studies on Systems Containing Programmable Electronics Part 2 General Application Guidance
[Moo_83] Moore, N - How to do research, The library association - London 1983
[MUK_94] Mukesh D. Include HAZOP analysis in process development. Chem Engng Prog 1994;76.
[MYL_94] Mylarasoftwareamy, D., Kavuri, S. N., & Venkatasubramanian, V.
(1994). A framework for automated development of causal models for fault diagnosis. San Francisco: American Institute of Chemical Engineering Annual Meeting.
[Nag_79] Nagel, E. – The structure of science Hackett, Indianapolis - USA 1979
[NAG_91] Nagel, C. J. (1991). Identification of hazards in chemical process systems. Ph.D. Thesis, USA, MIT.
[OHS_00] Safety Line Institute: Occupational Health & Safety Practitioner, MANAGEMENT OF MAJOR HAZARD FACILITIES
[Phi_87] Phillips, E. M., Pugh, D. S. – How to get a Ph.D. Managing the peaks and troughs of research Open university press Milton Keynes, Philadelphia USA 1987
[RAH_09] Shibly Rahman, Faisal Khan, Brian Veitch, Paul Amyotte, ExpHAZOPţ: Knowledge-based expert system to conduct automated HAZOP Analysis, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22 (2009) 373–380
[RISK_96] Risk Guidelines as a Risk Management Tool, Prepared for presentation at the 1996 Process Plant Safety Symposium Houston, Texas April 1-2, 1996 Session 3
[ROS_05] Netta Liin Rossing, Morten Lind*, Johannes Petersen*, Sten Bay Jørgensen and Niels Jensen1Morten, A Functional approach to HAZOP studies.
[RUS_94] Rushton AG, Gowers RE, Edmondson JN, Al-Hassan T. Hazard and operability studies: a survey of variations in practice. In: IchemE, editor. Hazards XII: European advances in process safety. Rugby, UK: Institute of Chemical Engineers; 1994.
[SEV_HU] 18/2006. (I. 26.) Korm. rendelet a veszélyes anyagokkal kapcsolatos súlyos balesetek elleni védekezésről
[SEV_II] DIRECTIVE 2003/105/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2003 amending Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances.
[SLI_02] Safety Line Institute: Occupational Health & Safety Practitioner, Management of major hazard facilities, 2002
[SOL_99] Solingen, R. van – Product focused Software Process Improvement.
SPI in the embedded software domain BETA. Ph.D. thesis. Eindhoven University of Technology, 1999
[SRI_98] Srinivasan, R., Dimitradis, V. D., Shah, N., & Venkatasubramanian, V. (1998). Safety verification using a hybrid knowledge-based mathematical programming framework. American Institute of Chemical Engineering Journal, 44 (2), 361–371.
[SUH_97] Suh, J. C., Lee, S., & Yon, E. S. (1997). New strategy for automated hazard analysis of chemical plant. Part 1 & 2. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 10 (2), 113–134.
[TEX_96] Risk Guidelines as a Risk Management Tool, Prepared for presentation at the 1996 Process Plant Safety Symposium Houston, Texas April 1-2, 1996 Session 3
[TIE03] R.J. Tiezema, Risk Reduction in the Process Industry - Proof testing, 2003
[Tool4S] Tool4S, Tool for Safety, www.sil4.com
[TOR05] A.C.Torres-Echeverrı, S.Martorell, H.A.Thompson, Modelling and optimization of proof testing policies for safety instrumented systems.
[TÜV_73] TÜV Book, Microcomputer in Safety Application, Safety Classis 1…5 level
[TWE_03] Managing Risk and Reliability of Process Plant, Mark Tweeddale [VDE_16] VDE 0116 Electrical Equipment for Burner Application
[VEN_00] Venkat Venkatasubramanian, 2000, Intelligent systems for HAZOP analysis of complex process plants
[VEN_94] Venkatasubramanian, V., & Vaidhyanathan, R. (1994). A knowledgebased framework for automating HAZOP analysis.
American Institute of Chemical Engineering Journal, 40, 496–505.
[VIN_98] James W. Vinson, 1998: Putting the “OP” Back in “HAZOP”
[WIN_99] K. Wintermantel, Process and product engineering – achievements, present and future challenges, Chemical Engineering Science, 54 (1999) 1601–1620
[Yin_94] Yin, Robert K – Case study research: design and methods - 2nd ed.
– London : Sage, 1994. – XVII
[ZHA_09] Jinsong Zhao, Lin Cui, Lihua Zhao, Tong Qiu, Bingzhen Chen, Learning HAZOP expert system by case-based reasoning and ontology, Computers and Chemical Engineering 33 (2009) 371–378 [ZHA_98] Zhao, J., Visoftwareanathan, S., Venkatasubramanian, V., Vinson, J.,
& Basu, P. (1998). Automated process hazard analysis of batch chemical plants. American Institute of Chemical Engineering Annual Meeting, Miami:, USA.