• Nem Talált Eredményt

Conclusions/Recommendations

A huge variety of different RT-PCR assays and protocols are used in public and private diagnostic laboratories throughout Europe. Only some of these assays have been

published, and validation data are in general not available. It is therefore of outermost importance, that research activities are launched with the focus to improve, validate, implement and standardizes the diagnostic procedures used in Europe and globally.

Recently, a ring trial to evaluate PRRSV real-time RT-PCR detection methods in several European laboratories showed, that none of the in-house or commercial assays tested, could identify all different PRRSV strains with an optimal analytical and diagnostic sensitivity (Wernike et al. 2012), and a combination of methods was recommended.

Furthermore, PRRSV is a single stranded RNA virus, which is prone to antigenic drift.

As described, studies have shown that some European countries such as Lithuania, Latvia, Belarus and Russia harbor exceptionally diverse EU-genotype PRRSV strains (Stadejek et al. 2008). Alignments of these strains with the primer and probe sequences of published PRRSV RT-PCR assays indicated that the majority of the assays would not be able to recognize these recent strains. Updated PRRSV sequence data from many parts of Europe is very sparse; therefore, it is not clear if various assays in diagnostic use will produce a substantial number of false negative results when field samples are tested. Thus, it is obvious that there is a need for surveillance programs with the aim to continuously monitor the drift of PRRSV by sequencing subsets of circulating strains and by building joint PRRSV databases with public accessibility. The sequencing should focus on, but not be limited to ORF5 and ORF7. Full genome sequence data are presently sparse in GenBank, but when more such sequences become available, it is the hope to identify a more conserved region than the widely used ORF7, which could be the target for sensitive and robust real-time RT PCR assays.

To maximize the diagnostic performance of RT-PCR assays, it is necessary to perform in-house validation of assays, including the RNA extraction procedures, for each diagnostic specimen. It is also very important to continuously check the applicability of primers and probes for their ability to detect new variants of PRRSV. This can be done by in silico analysis and by participation in ring trials.

References

1. Balka, G., Hornyak, A., Balint, A., Benyeda, Z., Rusvai, M., 2009. Development of a One-Step Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay Based on Primer-Probe Energy Transfer for the Detection of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus. J. Virol. Methods 158, 41-45.

2. Cavanagh, D., 1997. Nidovirales: A New Order Comprising Coronaviridae and Arteriviridae. Arch. Virol. 142, 629-633.

3. Chang, C.-., Yoon, K.-., Zimmerman, J.J., Harmon, K.M., Dixon, P.M., Dvorak, C.M.T., Murtaugh, M.P., 2002. Evolution of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus during Sequential Passages in Pigs. Journal of Virology 76, 4750-4763.

4. Chittick, W.A., Stensland, W.R., Prickett, J.R., Strait, E.L., Harmon, K., Yoon, K., Wang, C., Zimmerman, J.J., 2011. Comparison of RNA Extraction and Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for the Detection of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in Porcine Oral Fluid Specimens. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 23, 248-253.

5. Christopher-Hennings, J., Dammen, M., Nelson, E., Rowland, R., Oberst, R., 2006.

Comparison of RNA Extraction Methods for the Detection of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus from Boar Semen. J. Virol.

Methods 136, 248-253.

6. Christopher-Hennings, J., Nelson, E.A., Nelson, J.K., Hines, R.J., Swenson, S.L., Hill, H.T., Zimmerman, J.J., Katz, J.B., Yaeger, M.J., Chase, C.C., 1995. Detection of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in Boar Semen by PCR.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33, 1730-1734.

7. Egli, C., Thur, B., Liu, L., Hofmann, M.A., 2001. Quantitative TaqMan RT-PCR for the Detection and Differentiation of European and North American Strains of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus. J. Virol. Methods 98, 63-75.

8. Giammarioli, M., Pellegrini, C., Casciari, C., De Mia, G.M., 2008. Development of a Novel Hot-Start Multiplex PCR for Simultaneous Detection of Classical Swine Fever Virus, African Swine Fever Virus, Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus and Porcine Parvovirus. Vet. Res.

Commun. 32, 255-262.

9. Harmon, K.M., Abate, S.A., Chriswell, A.J., Chittick, W.A., Strait, E.L., 2012.

Comparison of Two Commercial Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus. J Swine Health Prod. 20, 184-184-188.

10. Kleiboeker, S.B., Schommer, S.K., Lee, S.M., Watkins, S., Chittick, W., Polson, D., 2005. Simultaneous Detection of North American and European Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus using Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-PCR. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 17, 165-170.

11. Klungthong, C., Chinnawirotpisan, P., Hussem, K., Phonpakobsin, T., Manasatienkij, W., Ajariyakhajorn, C., Rungrojcharoenkit, K., Gibbons, R.V., Jarman, R.G., 2010. The Impact of Primer and Probe-Template Mismatches on the Sensitivity of Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1/2009 Virus Detection by Real-Time RT-PCR. Journal of Clinical Virology 48, 91-95.

12. Liu, S., Zhao, Y., Hu, Q., Lv, C., Zhang, C., Zhao, R., Hu, F., Lin, W., Cui, S., 2011. A Multiplex RT-PCR for Rapid and Simultaneous Detection of Porcine Teschovirus, Classical Swine Fever Virus, and Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in Clinical Specimens. J. Virol. Methods 172, 88-92.

13. Lurchachaiwong, W., Payungporn, S., Srisatidnarakul, U., Mungkundar, C., Theamboonlers, A., Poovorawan, Y., 2008. Rapid Detection and Strain Identification of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) by Real-Time RT-PCR. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 46, 55-60.

14. Martinez, E., Riera, P., Sitja, M., Fang, Y., Oliveira, S., Maldonado, J., 2008.

Simultaneous Detection and Genotyping of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) by Real-Time RT-PCR and Amplicon Melting Curve Analysis using SYBR Green. Res. Vet. Sci. 85, 184-193.

15. Oleksiewicz, M.B., Botner, A., Madsen, K.G., Storgaard, T., 1998. Sensitive Detection and Typing of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus by RT-PCR Amplification of Whole Viral Genes. Vet. Microbiol. 64, 7-22.

16. Peters, I.R., Helps, C.R., Hall, E.J., Day, M.J., 2004. Real-Time RT-PCR:

Considerations for Efficient and Sensitive Assay Design. J. Immunol. Methods 286, 203-217.

17. Revilla-Fernandez, S., Wallner, B., Truschner, K., Benczak, A., Brem, G., Schmoll, F., Mueller, M., Steinborn, R., 2005. The use of Endogenous and Exogenous Reference RNAs for Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of PRRSV in Porcine Semen. J. Virol. Methods 126, 21-30.

18. Rossow, K.D., 1998. Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome. Vet. Pathol.

35, 1-20.

19. Rovira, A., Clement, T., Christopher-Hennings, J., Thompson, B., Engle, M., Reicks, D., Muñoz-Zanzi, C., 2007. Evaluation of the Sensitivity of Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction to Detect Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus on Individual and Pooled Samples from Boars. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 19, 502-509.

20. Stadejek, T., Oleksiewicz, M.B., Potapchuk, D., Podgorska, K., 2006. Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Strains of Exceptional Diversity in Eastern Europe Support the Definition of New Genetic Subtypes. J. Gen. Virol. 87, 1835-1841.

21. Stadejek, T., Oleksiewicz, M.B., Scherbakov, A.V., Timina, A.M., Krabbe, J.S., Chabros, K., Potapchuk, D., 2008. Definition of Subtypes in the European Genotype of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus:

Nucleocapsid Characteristics and Geographical Distribution in Europe. Arch.

Virol. 153, 1479-1488.

22. Suárez, P., Zardoya, R., Prieto, C., Solana, A., Tabarés, E., Bautista, J.M., Castro, J.M., 1994. Direct Detection of the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) Virus by Reverse Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR).

Archives of Virology 135, 89-99.

23. Tian, H., Wu, J., Shang, Y., Cheng, Y., Liu, X., 2010. The Development of a Rapid SYBR One Step Real-Time RT-PCR for Detection of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus. Virol. J. 7, 90.

24. Toplak, I., Rihtaric, D., Hostnik, P., Grom, J., Stukelj, M., Valencak, Z., 2012.

Identification of a Genetically Diverse Sequence of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in Slovenia and the Impact on the Sensitivity of Four Molecular Tests. J. Virol. Methods 179, 51-56.

25. Van Woensel, P., Van Der Wouw, J., Visser, N., 1994. Detection of Porcine Reproductive Respiratory Syndrome Virus by the Polymerase Chain Reaction. J.

Virol. Methods 47, 273-278.

26. Wernike, K., Bonilauri, P., Dauber, M., Errington, J., Leblanc, N., Revilla-Fernandez, S., Hjulsager, C., Isaksson, M., Stadejek, T., Beer, M., Hoffmann, B., 2012. Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus: Interlaboratory Ring Trial to Evaluate Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection Methods. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 24, 855-866.

27. Xu, X., Chen, G., Huang, Y., Ding, L., Li, Z., Chang, C., Wang, C., Tong, D., Liu, H., 2012. Development of Multiplex PCR for Simultaneous Detection of Six Swine DNA and RNA Viruses. J. Virol. Methods 183, 69-74.

28. Yoon, S.H., Kim, H., Park, B., Kim, H., 2012. Tracing the Genetic History of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Viruses Derived from the Complete ORF 5-7 Sequences: A Bayesian Coalescent Approach. Arch.Virol.

CHARACTERIZATION OF A CIRCULATING