• Nem Talált Eredményt

Let d “ ś

ppνppdq be a divisor of the integer n “ ś

ppνppnq. Then d is called an exponential divisorof n, if νppdq |νppnq for every primep. Notation: d|en. This concept was introduced by Subbarao [87]. According to the definition, 1 |e 1, but 1 is not an

exponential divisor of n ą1. The smallest exponential divisor of n ą1 is its squarefree kernelκpnq “ś

p|np.

Let τpeqpnq and σpeqpnq denote the number and the sum of exponential divisors of n, respectively. The function τpeq is called the exponential divisor function, already quoted in Section 2.1. The integer n “ ś

ppνppnq is called exponentially squarefree if all the exponents νppnq ě 1 are squarefree. By convention, 1 is also exponentially squarefree.

Letqpeqdenote the characteristic function of exponentially squarefree integers. Properties of these and related functions were investigated by several authors. See Cao and Zhai [16], Lelechenko [60, 61], P´etermann and Wu [75], Smati and Wu [85], Subbarao [87], Wu [121].

Two integers m, n ą 1 have common exponential divisors if and only if they have the same prime factors and in this case, i.e., for m “ śr

i“1paii, n “ śr

i“1pbii, ai, bi ě 1 (1ďiďr), the greatest common exponential divisor of m and n is

pm, nqpeq :“

r

ź

i“1

ppai i,biq.

Herep1,1qpeq “1 by convention and p1, nqpeq does not exist for ną1.

2.4.1 Exponential Euler function

The integers m, n ą 1 are called exponentially coprime, if they have the same prime factors and pai, biq “ 1 for every 1 ď i ď r, with the notation of above. In this case pm, nqpeq “ κpmq “ κpnq. 1 and 1 are considered to be exponentially coprime. 1 and ną1 are not exponentially coprime.

Forn “śr

i“1paii ą1 withai ě1 (1ďiďr), denote byφpeqpnqthe number of integers śr

i“1pcii such that 1 ď ci ď ai and pci, aiq “ 1 for 1 ď i ď r, and let φpeqp1q “ 1. Thus φpeqpnqcounts the number of divisorsd ofn such that dand n are exponentially coprime.

The function φpeqpnq is called the exponential Euler function, it is multiplicative and for every prime power pν (ν ě1), φpeqppνq “ φpνq, whereφ is Euler’s function.

As another consequence of Theorem 2.1.1 and Remark 2.1.2, by selecting fpnq “ φpeqpnqr with ` “3, k “2r, we have the following result.

Theorem 2.4.1 (T´oth [96, Th. 1], [98, Eq. (6)]). Let rě1 be an integer. Then ÿ

nďx

φpeqpnqr “Brx`x1{3T2r´2plogxq `Opxtrq, (2.14) for every εą0, where

Br:“ ź

p

˜ 1`

8

ÿ

a“3

φpaqr´φpa´1qr pa

¸ ,

T2r´2 is a polynomial of degree 2r´2 and t1 “1{5, tr:“ 23¨2r`1r`1´1 for r ě2.

In the case r “ 1, P´etermann [74, Th. 1] improved the error term in (2.14) into Opx1{5logxq. Cao and Zhai [17] obtained new results on the four dimensional divisor problem of pa, b, c, cq type, where 1 ď a ď b ă c are fixed integers. As an application, they proved in [17, Th. 3] the following more precise asymptotic formula:

ÿ

nďx

φpeqpnq “B1x`B2x1{3`D1x1{5logx`D2x1{5` `Opx18{95`εq, (2.15) where 18{95 .

“0.189473ă1{5. They also showed that the error term in (2.15) is Ωpx1{8q. In the case r ě 3 the error term of (2.14) can be improved by takingtr3p22rr`1`2q, as shown by Lelechenko [60]. See Remark 2.1.6.

2.4.2 Exponential M¨ obius function

The exponential convolution of the arithmetic functions f and g is defined by pf dgqpnq “ ÿ

b1c1“a1

. . . ÿ

brcr“ar

fppb11¨ ¨ ¨pbrrqgppc11¨ ¨ ¨pcrrq, wheren “pa11¨ ¨ ¨parr.

The convolution d is commutative, associative and has the identity element µ2. Fur-thermore, a function f has an inverse with respect to d if and only if fp1q ‰ 0 and fpp1¨ ¨ ¨psq ‰ 0 for any distinct primes p1, . . . , ps. The inverse with respect to d of the constant 1 function is called theexponential M¨obius functionand is denoted byµpeq. Hence for every ně1,

ÿ

d|en

µpeqpdq “ µ2pnq.

Hereµpeqp1q “ 1 and forn “pa11¨ ¨ ¨parr ą1,

µpeqpnq “µpa1q ¨ ¨ ¨µparq.

Observe that |µpeqpnq| “1 or 0, according as n is exponentially squarefree or not. Wu [121, Th. 2] deduced, improving a result by Subbarao [87] that

ÿ

nďx

peqpnq| “ C1x`Opx1{4δpxqq, whereδpxqis defined by (1.3) and

C1 “ź

p

˜ 1`

8

ÿ

a“4

µ2paq ´µ2pa´1q pa

¸ .

I showed that the corresponding error term can be improved on the assumption of the Riemann hypothesis (RH).

Theorem 2.4.2 (T´oth [97, Th. 3]). If RH is true, then ÿ

nďx

peqpnq| “C1x`Opx1{5`εq, for every εą0.

Later on, Cao and Zhai [16, Th. 1] proved the following more precise asymptotic formula: If RH is true, then

ÿ

nďx

peqpnq| “C1x`C2x1{5`Opx38{193`εq, (2.16) whereC2 is a computable constant and 38{193 .

“0.196891. Cao and Zhai [16, Th. 2] also proved that the error term in (2.16) is Ωpx1{8q. Shevelev [80] investigated the asymptotic density of S-exponential numbers defined as the positive integers such that all exponents in their prime power factorization are inS, where S is a fixed subset of N. If S is the set of squarefree numbers, then one reobtains the exponentially squarefree integers.

For the functionµpeqpnqwe have the next result.

Theorem 2.4.3 (T´oth [97, Th. 2]). (i) The Dirichlet series of µpeq is of the form

8

ÿ

n“1

µpeqpnq

ns “ ζpsq

ζ2p2sqUpsq, <są1, where Upsq:“ř8

n“1 upnq

ns is absolutely convergent for <są1{5.

(ii)

ÿ

nďx

µpeqpnq “ Kx`Opx1{2expp´cplogxq9{25´δq, (2.17) for any δ ą0, where cą0 is a constant and

K “ź

p

˜ 1`

8

ÿ

a“2

µpaq ´µpa´1q pa

¸ .

(iii) Assume RH. Let 1{4 ără1{3 be an exponent such that Dpxq:“ř

nďxµ2pnq ´ x{ζp2q “ Opxr`εq for every ε ą 0. Then the error term in (ii) is Opxp2´rq{p5´4rq`ε

q for every εą0.

The best known value – to our knowledge – of r is r “ 17{54 .

“ 0.314814, obtained by Jia [50]. See also Pappalardi [73]. Therefore the error term in (2.17), assuming RH, is Opx91{202`εqfor every εą0, where 91{202 .

“0.450495.

By using analytic arguments (Perron’s formula and complex integration), Cao and Zhai [16, Th. 1] improved the error term (2.17) under RH intoOpx37{94`εq, where 37{94 .

“ 0.393617, and showed in [16, Th. 2] that this error term is Ωpx1{4q.

2.4.3 The function t

peq

p n q

I introduced and investigated in paper [97] the functions tpeqpnq and κpeqpnq, de-noting the number of exponentially squarefree exponential divisors of n and the max-imal exponentially squarefree exponential divisor of n, respectively. These are the ex-ponential analogues of the functions representing the number of squarefree divisors of n (i.e. θpnq “ 2ωpnq) and the maximal squarefree divisor of n (the squarefree kernel κpnq “ś

p|np), respectively.

The functions tpeqpnq and κpeqpnqare multiplicative and for n “pa11¨ ¨ ¨parr ą1, tpeqpnq “ 2ωpa1q¨ ¨ ¨2ωparq,

κpeqpnq “pκpa1 1q¨ ¨ ¨pκpar rq.

Here I discuss only the function tpeqpnq. Note that for every prime p, tpeqppq “ 1, tpeqpp2q “ tpeqpp3q “ tpeqpp4q “ tpeqpp5q “ 2, tpeqpp6q “4, etc. We have

Theorem 2.4.4 (T´oth [97, Th. 4]). (i) The Dirichlet series of tpeq is of form

8

ÿ

n“1

tpeqpnq

ns “ζpsqζp2sqVpsq, <s ą1, where Vpsq “ ř8

n“1 vpnq

ns is absolutely convergent for <s ą1{4.

(ii)

ÿ

nďx

tpeqpnq “C1x`C2x1{2`Opx1{4`εq, (2.18) for every εą0, where C1, C2 are constants given by

C1 :“ ź

p

˜ 1` 1

p2 `

8

ÿ

a“6

2ωpaq´2ωpa´1q pa

¸ ,

C2 :“ζp1{2qź

p

˜ 1`

8

ÿ

a“4

2ωpaq´2ωpa´1q´2ωpa´2q`2ωpa´3q pa{2

¸ .

P´etermann [74, Th. 1] improved the error term in (2.18) intoOpx1{4q. Cao and Zhai [16, Th. 1] obtained that under RH it isOpx3728{15469`εq, where 3728{15469 .

“0.240998ă1{4.

Cao and Zhai [16, Th. 2] also proved that the error term in (2.18) is Ωpx1{6q.

By generalizing results of R´enyi and Ivi´c, Zurita [128] established asymptotic formulas for the sums

ÿ

nďx Ωpnq´ωpnq“q

fpnq,

where fpnq are certain multiplicative functions, which apply, among others, to the func-tions fpnq “ τpeqpnq, φpeqpnq, tpeqpnq, σpeqpnq{n, Ppnq{n, Ppeqpnq{n, apnq. Here Ppeqpnq is the exponential analog of the gcd-sum function Ppnq. See Section 2.5.2.