• Nem Talált Eredményt

(1)http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ Volume 6, Issue 5, Article 140, 2005 REFINEMENTS OF THE HERMITE-HADAMARD INEQUALITY FOR CONVEX FUNCTIONS S.S

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "(1)http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ Volume 6, Issue 5, Article 140, 2005 REFINEMENTS OF THE HERMITE-HADAMARD INEQUALITY FOR CONVEX FUNCTIONS S.S"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

http://jipam.vu.edu.au/

Volume 6, Issue 5, Article 140, 2005

REFINEMENTS OF THE HERMITE-HADAMARD INEQUALITY FOR CONVEX FUNCTIONS

S.S. DRAGOMIR AND A. MCANDREW SCHOOL OFCOMPUTERSCIENCE ANDMATHEMATICS

VICTORIAUNIVERSITY OFTECHNOLOGY

PO BOX14428, MELBOURNEVIC 8001, AUSTRALIA. sever.dragomir@vu.edu.au

URL:http://rgmia.vu.edu.au/dragomir Alasdair.Mcandrew@vu.edu.au URL:http://sci.vu.edu.au/˜amca/

Received 06 April, 2005; accepted 20 September, 2005 Communicated by A. Lupa¸s

ABSTRACT. New refinements for the celebrated Hermite-Hadamard inequality for convex func- tions are obtained. Applications for special means are pointed out as well.

Key words and phrases: Hermite-Hadamard Inequality.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 26D15; Secondary 26D10.

1. INTRODUCTION

The following result is well known in the literature as the Hermite-Hadamard integral in- equality:

(1.1) f

a+b 2

≤ 1 b−a

Z b a

f(t)dt ≤ f(a) +f(b)

2 ,

provided thatf : [a, b]→Ris a convex function on[a, b].

The following refinements of theH·−H·inequality were obtained in [2]

(1.2) 1 b−a

Z b a

f(x)dx−f

a+b 2

1 b−a

Z b a

f(x) +f(a+b−x) 2

dx− f

a+b 2

≥0.

ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 c

2005 Victoria University. All rights reserved.

This paper is based on the talk given by the second author within the “International Conference of Mathematical Inequalities and their Applications, I”, December 06-08, 2004, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia [http://rgmia.vu.edu.au/conference].

106-05

(2)

and

(1.3) f(a) +f(b)

2 − 1

b−a Z b

a

f(t)dt





|f(a)| − b−a1 Rb

a |f(x)|dx

if f(a) =f(b)

1 f(b)−f(a)

Rf(b)

f(a) |x|dx−b−a1 Rb

a|f(x)|dx

if f(a)6=f(b) for the general case of convex functionsf : [a, b]→R.

If one would assume differentiability off on(a, b),then the following bounds in terms of its derivative holds (see [3, pp. 30-31])

(1.4) f(a) +f(b)

2 − 1

b−a Z b

a

f(t)dt ≥max{|A|,|B|,|C|} ≥0 where

A:= 1 b−a

Z b a

x−a+b 2

|f0(x)|dx− 1 4

Z b a

|f0(x)|dx, B := f(b)−f(a)

4 − 1

b−a

"

Z a+b2

a

f(x)dx− Z b

a+b 2

f(x)dx

#

and

C := 1 b−a

Z b a

x− a+b 2

|f0(x)|dx.

A different approach considered in [1] led to the following lower bounds (1.5) f(a) +f(b)

2 − 1

b−a Z b

a

f(t)dt ≥max{|D|,|E|,|F|} ≥0, where

D:= 1 b−a

Z b a

|xf0(x)|dx− 1 b−a

Z b a

|f0(x)|dx· 1 b−a

Z b a

|x|dx, E := 1

b−a Z b

a

x|f0(x)|dx− a+b 2 · 1

b−a Z b

a

|f0(x)|xdx and

F := 1 b−a

Z b a

|x|f0(x)dx− f(b)−f(a) b−a · 1

b−a Z b

a

|x|dx.

For other results connected to theH·−H·inequality see the recent monograph on line [3].

In the present paper, we use a different method to obtain other refinements of the H·−H·

inequality. Applications for special means are pointed out as well.

2. THERESULTS

The following refinement of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality for differentiable convex func- tions holds.

(3)

Theorem 2.1. Assume thatf : [a, b]→ Ris differentiable convex on (a, b).Then one has the inequality:

(2.1) 1 b−a

Z b a

f(t)dt−f

a+b 2

1 b−a

Z b a

f(x)−f

a+b 2

dx−b−a 4 ·

f0

a+b 2

≥0.

Proof. Since f is differentiable convex on (a, b), then for each x, y ∈ (a, b) one has the in- equality

(2.2) f(x)−f(y)≥(x−y)f0(y).

Using the properties of modulus, we have

f(x)−f(y)−(x−y)f0(y) = |f(x)−f(y)−(x−y)f0(y)|

(2.3)

≥ ||f(x)−f(y)| − |x−y| |f0(y)||

for eachx, y ∈(a, b).

If we choosey= a+b2 in (2.3) we get (2.4) f(x)−f

a+b 2

x− a+b 2

f0

a+b 2

f(x)−f

a+b 2

x−a+b 2

f0

a+b 2

for anyx∈(a, b).

Integrating (2.4) on[a, b],dividing by(b−a)and using the properties of modulus, we have 1

b−a Z b

a

f(x)dx−f

a+b 2

−f0

a+b 2

· 1 b−a

Z b a

x−a+b 2

dx

≥ 1 b−a

Z b a

f(x)−f

a+b 2

x− a+b 2

f0

a+b 2

dx

1 b−a

Z b a

f(x)−f

a+b 2

dx−

f0

a+b 2

1 b−a

Z b a

x− a+b 2

dx and since

(2.5)

Z b a

x− a+b 2

dx = 0, Z b

a

x− a+b 2

dx= (b−a)2 4 ,

we deduce by (2.5) the desired result (2.1).

The second result is embodied in the following theorem.

Theorem 2.2. Assume thatf : [a, b]→ Ris differentiable convex on (a, b).Then one has the inequality

(2.6) 1 2

f(a) +f(b)

2 +f

a+b 2

− 1 b−a

Z b a

f(x)dx

≥ 1 2

1 b−a

Z b a

f(x)−f

a+b 2

dx− 1 b−a

Z b a

x−a+b 2

|f0(x)|dx

≥0.

(4)

Proof. We choosex= a+b2 in (2.3) to get (2.7) f

a+b 2

−f(y)−

a+b 2 −y

f0(y)

≥ f

a+b 2

−f(y)

a+b 2 −y

|f0(y)|

. Integrating (2.7) overy, dividing by(b−a)and using the modulus properties, we get (2.8) f

a+b 2

− 1 b−a

Z b a

f(y)dy− Z b

a

a+b 2 −y

f0(y)dy

1 b−a

Z b a

f

a+b 2

−f(y)

dy− 1 b−a

Z b a

a+b 2 −y

|f0(y)|dy . Since

Z b a

y− a+b 2

f0(y)dy= f(a) +f(b)

2 (b−a)− Z b

a

f(t)dt, then by (2.8) we deduce

f

a+b 2

+f(a) +f(b)

2 − 2

b−a Z b

a

f(y)dy

1 b−a

Z b a

f(y)−f

a+b 2

dy− 1 b−a

Z b a

y−a+b 2

|f0(y)|dy

which is clearly equivalent to (2.6).

The following result holding for the subclass of monotonic and convex functions is whort to mention.

Theorem 2.3. Assume thatf : [a, b]→Ris monotonic and convex on(a, b).Then we have:

(2.9) 1 2

f(a) +f(b)

2 +f

a+b 2

− 1 b−a

Z b a

f(x)dx

≥ 1

4[f(b)−f(a)] + 1 b−a

Z b a

sgn

a+b 2 −x

f(x)dx . Proof. Since the class of differentiable convex functions in(a, b)is dense in uniform topology in the class of all convex functions defined on(a, b),we may assume, without loss of generality, thatf is differentiable convex and monotonic on(a, b).

Firstly, assume thatf is monotonic nondecreasing on[a, b].Then Z b

a

f(x)−f

a+b 2

dx= Z a+b2

a

f

a+b 2

−f(x)

dx +

Z b

a+b 2

f(x)−f

a+b 2

dx

= Z b

a+b 2

f(x)dx− Z a+b2

a

f(x)dx,

(5)

Z b a

x− a+b 2

|f0(x)|dx= Z a+b2

a

a+b 2 −x

f0(x)dx+ Z b

a+b 2

x−a+b 2

f0(x)dx

=

a+b 2 −x

f(x)

a+b 2

a

+ Z a+b2

a

f(x)dx +

x−a+b 2

f(x)

b

a+b 2

− Z b

a+b 2

f(x)dx

=−b−a

2 f(a) + Z a+b2

a

f(x)dx+b−a

2 f(b)− Z b

a+b 2

f(x)dx.

Using (2.6) we have 1

2

f(a) +f(b)

2 +f

a+b 2

− 1 b−a

Z b a

f(x)dx

≥ 1

2 (b−a)

Z b

a+b 2

f(x)dx− Z a+b2

a

f(x)dx

"

b−a

2 f(b)− b−a

2 f(a) + Z a+b2

a

f(x)dx− Z b

a+b 2

f(x)dx

#

= 1

2 (b−a) 2

Z b

a+b 2

f(x)dx−2 Z a+b2

a

f(x)dx− b−a

2 [f(b)−f(a)]

, which is clearly equivalent to (2.9).

A similar argument may be done iffis monotonic nonincreasing and we omit the details.

3. APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIALMEANS

Let us recall the following means:

a) The arithmetic mean

A(a, b) := a+b

2 , a, b >0, b) The geometric mean

G(a, b) :=

ab; a, b≥0, c) The harmonic mean

H(a, b) := 2

1

a +1b; a, b >0, d) The identric mean

I(a, b) :=





 1 e

bb aa

b−a1

if b6=a

a if b=a

; a, b > 0

(6)

e) The logarithmic mean L(a, b) :=





b−a

lnb−lna if b6=a

a if b=a

; a, b >0 f) Thep−logarithmic mean

Lp(a, b) :=





bp+1−ap+1 (p+ 1) (b−a)

1p

if b6=a, p∈R\ {−1,0}

a if b=a

; a, b >0.

It is well known that, if, on denoting L−1(a, b) := L(a, b) and L0(a, b) := I(a, b),then the functionR3p→Lp(a, b)is strictly monotonic increasing and, in particular, the following classical inequalities are valid

(3.1) min{a, b} ≤H(a, b)≤G(a, b)≤L(a, b)≤I(a, b)≤A(a, b)≤max{a, b}

for anya, b >0.

The following proposition holds:

Proposition 3.1. Let0< a < b <∞.Then we have the following refinement for the inequality A≥L:

(3.2) A−L≥ AL

b−a

"

G A

2

−ln G

A 2

−1

#

≥0.

The proof follows by Theorem 2.1 on choosingf : [a, b]→(0,∞), f(t) = 1/tand we omit the details.

The following proposition contains a refinementof the following well known inequality 1

2 A−1+H−1

≥L−1. Proposition 3.2. With the above assumption foraandbwe have

(3.3) 1

2 A−1+H−1

−L−1 ≥ 1 b−a

"

A G

2

−ln A

G 2

−1

#

≥0.

The proof follows by Theorem 2.3 for the same funcionf : [a, b] → (0,∞), f(t) = 1/t, which is monotonic and convex on[a, b],and the details are omitted.

One may state other similar results that improve classical inequalities for means by choosing appropriate convex functionsf.However, they will not be stated below.

REFERENCES

[1] S.S. DRAGOMIR AND S. MABZELA, Some error estimates in the trapezoidal quadrature rule, Tamsui Oxford J. of Math. Sci., 16(2) (2000), 259–272.

[2] S.S. DRAGOMIR, Refinements of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality for convex functions, Tamsui Oxford J. of Math. Sci., 17(2) (2001), 131–137.

[3] S.S. DRAGOMIR AND C.E.M. PEARCE, Selected Topics on Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequali- ties and Applications, RGMIA, Monographs, 2000. [ONLINE:http://rgmia.vu.edu.au/

monographs.html].

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

Abstract: A class of univalent functions which provides an interesting transition from star- like functions to convex functions is defined by making use of the Ruscheweyh

A class of univalent functions which provides an interesting transition from starlike functions to convex functions is defined by making use of the Ruscheweyh derivative.. Some

In this paper we establish several Hadamard type inequalities for differentiable m- convex and (α, m)-convex functions.. We also establish Hadamard type inequalities for products of

Our goal is to establish all possible inequalities between the above operators in the class of 3–convex functions and to give the error bounds for convex combina- tions of

Abstract: A generalized form of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality for convex Lebesgue integrable functions are obtained.. Acknowledgements: The authors thank to

A generalized form of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality for convex Lebesgue in- tegrable functions are obtained.. Key words and phrases: Convex function, Hermite-Hadamard inequality,

2 The Convexity Method on Products of Convex Sets 5 3 Exact Bounds in the Case of Convex Functions 7 4 Exact Bounds in the Case of Concave Functions 12.. 5 Multiple

Making use of the generalized hypergeometric functions, we introduce some gen- eralized class of k−uniformly convex and starlike functions and for this class, we settle the