• Nem Talált Eredményt

Syllabus Development Economics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "Syllabus Development Economics"

Copied!
9
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

Syllabus

Development Economics

Instructor: Professor Adam Szeidl szeidla@ceu.edu

Office hours: Wed 3-4pm, by appointment.

4 credits Fall 2022

PhD in Economics, MA in Economics, MA in Economic Policy

1. COURSE DESCRIPTION

Overview. The field of development economics attempts to understand why some countries are poor while others are rich. This overarching question can be broken into many smaller questions, such as why in poor countries farmers fail to adopt superior technologies, why firms do not perform to their potential, why some markets are missing, why government services are inadequate, what these barriers imply for economic growth and welfare, and what policies can do to address these growth barriers. The study of these questions can be called the microeconomics of development, and this course is an

introduction to selected topics in this area, especially focusing on private sector development, i.e., the role of firms. Topics will include financial markets, technology adoption, management, networks and indirect effects, information and infrastructure.

Besides exploring the causes and consequences of lagging development in some domains, the course also offers an introduction to empirical methods that researchers use to make progress in this area. One goal of the course is to identify research topics.

Who should take this course? This course is intended for second year MA students in economics and economic policy, PhD students in economics, and advanced students in the department of public policy. Some familiarity with regression analysis is helpful, but the course has no formal prerequisites and understanding the material does not require

sophisticated technical skills. However, the course requires serious conceptual engagement and has a relatively high workload. Students who have taken Development Economics in 2022 Winter should not take this course because there is substantial overlap in the material.

2. LEARNING OUTCOMES

Key outcomes. By the end of this course, students will have: (1) Knowledge and

understanding of empirical methodologies to evaluate development policies. (2) Knowledge and understanding of barriers to development in several important domains, and possible

(2)

policies to remove these barriers. (3) The ability to critically discuss and evaluate specific development policies addressing frictions and barriers particular domains. (4) Sufficient understanding of open issues to formulate a thesis plan in this field.

Other outcomes. The course will also help develop skills in the following areas. (1) Critical thinking: students will have an improved ability to distinguish between evidence and

interpretation. (2) Quantitative reasoning: students will have an improved understanding of the difference between correlation and causation. (3) Interpersonal communication skills:

students will have an improved ability to conduct and to constructively participate in small- group presentations.

3. READING LIST

There is no required textbook. Recommended texts include

Banerjee, A., and E. Duflo (2011), Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty,

De Janvry, A. and E. Sadoulet (2015), Development Economics: Theory and Practice.

A useful text for empirical methodology is

Angrist, J. and J. Pischke (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics,

from which sections will be recommended as background material. The main readings for the course are research papers listed below and lecture notes that will be made available online.

4. TEACHING METHOD AND LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Classes will combine lecture-style presentations by the instructor, questions to students to encourage participation, student presentations, and seminar-style classroom discussions.

Classroom activities are complemented by one-on-one interactions during office hours.

The instructor for this course is Adam Szeidl. Adam will hold office hours Wednesdays 3- 4pm, in person or via zoom, by appointment.

5. ASSESSMENT

The course grade will be based on problem sets, student presentations, class participation and a final exam. Your grade will be determined as follows.

Problem sets: 30%

(3)

Presentations: 30%

Class participation: 20%

Final exam: 20%

There will be two problem sets. Problem sets will combine elementary theory, conceptual questions, and own empirical work. After week 5 some classes will have student

presentations, in which pairs of students will present a research paper. Class participation is partly based on students preparing a deck of 4 slides each week about a pre-assigned paper, and a random student presenting for 5 minutes. There will be a three-hour final exam.

6. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

Some background in microeconomics and econometrics is helpful but not required.

Familiarity with econometric software such as Stata is helpful but not required.

7. TOPIC OUTLINE AND SCHEDULE

Please see the detailed schedule in section 9 below.

8. SHORT BIO OF THE INSTRUCTOR

Adam Szeidl is Professor of Economics at Central European University and a Research Fellow at the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR). His research studies networks and firms, often in a development context. Adam's research papers have been published in leading economics journals including the American Economic Review, Econometrica, and the Quarterly Journal of Economics. Adam is a recipient of a European Research Council (ERC) grant. Before returning to Europe, Adam was Associate Professor with tenure, (2010- 12) and Assistant Professor (2004-10) of Economics at the University of California, Berkeley.

He received his PhD from Harvard University in 2004.

9. DETAILED READING LIST

Lecture 1: Course organization, introduction, causal effects, regressions

*Duflo Ted talk:

https://www.ted.com/talks/esther_duflo_social_experiments_to_fight_poverty?language=en

*Mostly Harmless Chapters 2 (experiments), 3.2 (regressions and causality) Lecture 2: Variation in firm performance, measuring management

(4)

*Bloom, Nicholas, John Van Reenen, Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 122, Issue 4, November 2007, Pages 1351–1408.

Mostly Harmless Chapter 5.1 (panel data, fixed effects)

Hsieh, Chang-Tai, and Peter J. Klenow. 2009. “Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (4): 1403–48.

Hsieh, Chang-Tai, Peter J. Klenow, 2014. The Life Cycle of Plants in India and Mexico, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages 1035–1084.

Syverson, Chad. 2011. “What Determines Productivity?” Journal of Economic Literature 49 (2): 326– 65.

Lecture 3: Management: randomized evidence

*Bloom, Nicholas, Benn Eifert, Aprajit Mahajan, David McKenzie, and John Roberts. 2013.

“Does Management Matter? Evidence from India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 (1):

1–51.

Lecture 4: Management: longer-term and cross-industry effects

Bloom, Nicholas, Aprajit Mahajan, David McKenzie, and John Roberts. 2020. "Do Management Interventions Last? Evidence from India." American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12 (2): 198-219.

*Bruhn, Miriam, Dean Karlan, and Antoinette Schoar. 2018. “The Impact of Consulting Services on Small and Medium Enterprises: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in Mexico.”

Journal of Political Economy 126 (2): 635–87 Lecture 5: Network and group effects

*Cai, Jing, and Adam Szeidl. 2018. “Interfirm Relationships and Business Performance.”

Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (3): 1229–82

Fafchamps, Marcel, Simon Quinn, Networks and Manufacturing Firms in Africa: Results from a Randomized Field Experiment, The World Bank Economic Review, Volume 32, Issue 3, October 2018, Pages 656–675

Lecture 6: Training, and combining and fine-tuning approaches

Brooks, Wyatt, Kevin Donovan, and Terence R. Johnson. 2018. “Mentors or Teachers?

Microenterprise Training in Kenya.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 10 (4):

196–221.

(5)

*Iacovone, Leonardo, William Maloney, David McKenzie, 2021. Improving Management with Individual and Group-Based Consulting: Results from a Randomized Experiment in Colombia, The Review of Economic Studies, forthcoming.

*McKenzie, David, Small business training to improve management practices in developing countries: re-assessing the evidence for ‘training doesn’t work’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 37, Issue 2, Summer 2021, Pages 276–301

Lecture 7: Technology diffusion

Duflo, Esther and Emmanuel Saez, "The Role of Information and Social Interactions in Retirement Plan Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, 118 (3), 815-842.

Cai, Jing, Alain de Janvry, and Elisabeth Sadoulet, "Social Networks and the Decision to Insure," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2015, 7 (2), 81-108.

Lecture 8: Organizational barriers to technology adoption

Atkin, David, Azam Chaudhry, Shamyla Chaudry, Amit K. Khandelwal, and Eric Verhoogen,

"Organizational Barriers to Technology Adoption: Evidence from Soccer-Ball Producers in Pakistan," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 03 2017, 132 (3), 1101-1164.

Lecture 9: Learning barriers to technology adoption

Rema Hanna, Sendhil Mullainathan, Joshua Schwartzstein, Learning Through Noticing:

Theory and Evidence from a Field Experiment , The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 129, Issue 3, August 2014, Pages 1311–1353

Lecture 10: Other learning-based and psychological barriers

Abhijit Banerjee, Arun G Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, Matthew O Jackson, Using Gossips to Spread Information: Theory and Evidence from Two Randomized Controlled Trials, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 86, Issue 6, November 2019, Pages 2453–2490

Beaman, Lori, Ariel BenYishay, Jeremy Magruder, and Mushfiq Mobarak (2021), “Can Network Theory-based Targeting Increase Technology Adoption?” American Economic Review, 111(6): 1918-1943.

Duflo, Esther, Michael Kremer, and Jonathan Robinson (2011), “Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya,” American Economic Review, 101(6): 2350-2390

Lecture 11: Microfinance

(6)

Banerjee, Abhijit, Dean Karlan, and Jonathan Zinman. ”Six randomized evaluations of microcredit: Introduction and further steps.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 7.1 (2015): 1-21.

Banerjee, Abhijit, Esther Duflo, Rachel Glennerster, and Cynthia Kinnan. 2015. "The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation." American Economic Journal:

Applied Economics, 7 (1): 22-53.

Lecture 12: Return to capital in small firms

de Mel, Suresh, David McKenzie, and Christopher Woodruff. 2008. “Returns to Capital in Microenterprises: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (4): 1329–72.

Lecture 13: Return to capital in large firms

Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo. (2010). “Giving credit where it is due.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3):61-80.

Banerjee, Abhijit and Esther Duo, "Do Firms Want to Borrow More? Testing Credit Constraints Using a Directed Lending Program," Review of Economic Studies, 2014, 81, 572- 607.

Lecture 14: Indirect effects of credit

Cai, Jing, and Adam Szeidl, "Indirect Effects of Financial Access" Working paper.

Lecture 15: Indirect effects of training and subsidies

+McKenzie, David and Susana Puerto, "Growing Markets through Business Training for Female Entrepreneurs: A Market-Level Randomized Experiment in Kenya," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, April 2021, 13 (2), 297-332.

Rotemberg, Martin, "Equilibrium Effects of Firm Subsidies," American Economic Review, October 2019, 109 (10), 3475-3513.

Lecture 16: General equilibrium price and wage effects

+Marshall Burke, Lauren Falcao Bergquist, Edward Miguel, Sell Low and Buy High: Arbitrage and Local Price Effects in Kenyan Markets, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 134, Issue 2, May 2019, Pages 785–842

Fink, Gunther, B. Kelsey Jack, and Felix Masiye. (2020). “Seasonal Liquidity, Rural Labor Markets and Agricultural Production.” American Economic Review, 110(11): 3351-3392.

Lecture 17: General equilibrium aggregate effects

+Breza, Emily and Cynthia Kinnan, "Measuring the Equilibrium Impacts of Credit: Evidence

(7)

from the Indian Microfinance Crisis," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 05 2021, 136 (3), 1447-1497.

Buera J. Francisco, Joseph P. Kaboski, and Yongseok Shin. (2020). “The Macroeconomics of Microfinance.” The Review of Economic Studies, 0, 1-36.

Lecture 18: Organizing the workforce: peer effects and pay inequality

Mas, Alexandre and Enrico Moretti (2008), “Peers at Work”, American Economic Review, 99(1): 112-145.

Breza, Emily, Supreet Kaur and Yogita Shamdasani (2018), “The Morale Effects of Pay Inequality”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(2): 611-663.

Lecture 19: Conflict in the workplace

+Hjort, Jonas (2014), “Ethnic Divisions and Production in Firms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4): 1899-1946.

Lowe, Matt (2021), “Types of Contact: A Field Experiment on Collaborative and Adversarial Caste Integration,” American Economic Review 111(6): 1807-1844.

Lecture 20: International trade

+Atkin, David, Amit K. Khandelwal, and Adam Osman, 2017. "Exporting and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132 (2), 551-615.

Bastos, Paulo, Joana Silva, and Eric Verhoogen. 2018. "Export Destinations and Input Prices." American Economic Review, 108 (2): 353-92.

Lecture 21: Market structure and competition

+Jensen, Robert. 2007. “The Digital Provide: Information (Technology), Market Performance, and Welfare in the South Indian Fisheries Sector.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (3):

879–924.

Aker, J. 2010. Information from markets near and far: the impact of mobile phones on grain markets in Niger.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. (2), pp. 46-59.

Bergquist, Lauren Falcao, and Michael Dinerstein. 2020. "Competition and Entry in Agricultural Markets: Experimental Evidence from Kenya." American Economic Review, 110 (12): 3705-47.

Lecture 22: Market integration and firm performance

(8)

+Jensen, Robert, and Nolan H. Miller. 2018. "Market Integration, Demand, and the Growth of Firms: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in India." American Economic Review, 108 (12): 3583-3625.

Lecture 23: E-commerce

Bai, Jie, Maggie Chen, Jin Liu and Daniel Xu. (2020), “Search and Information Frictions on Global E-Commerce Platforms: Evidence from Aliexpress.” NBER Working paper No. 28100.

+Couture, Victor, Benjamin Faber, Yizhen Gu, and Lizhi Liu. (2021), “Connecting the Countryside via E-Commerce: Evidence from China.” American Economic Review: Insights, 3(1): 35-50

Sun, Zhengyun and Yizhou Jin. (2020). “Lifting Growth Barriers for New Firms: Evidence from an Entrepreneur Training Experiment with Two Million Online Businesses.” Working paper.

Hjort, Jonas and Jonas Poulsen. (2019), “The Arrival of Fast Internet and Employment in Africa.” American Economic Review, 17(3): 876-916

Lecture 24: Summary and Review

Other potential topics

Reputation

Bai, Jie (2021), “Melons as lemons: Asymmetric information, consumer learning and seller reputation,” Working paper, MIT.

Banerjee, Abhijit and Esther Duflo (2000), “Reputation effects and the limits of contracting:

A study of the Indian software industry,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115: 989-1017.

Macchiavello, Rocco and Ameet Morjaria (2015), “The Value of Relationships: Evidence from a Supply Shock to Kenyan Rose Exports,” American Economic Review, 105(9): 2911-45.

Macchiavello, Rocco and Ameet Morjaria (2020), “Competition and Relational Contracts in the Rwanda Coffee Chain,” Forthcoming, The Quarterly Journal of Economics.

Bold. T., Kaizzi, D. Svensson, J and D. Yanagizawa-Drott. 2017. “Lemon technologies and adoption: measurement, theory, and evidence from agricultural markets in Uganda.”

Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132 (3): pp. 1055-1100

(9)

Infrastructure

Donaldson, Dave (2018) "Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the Impact of Transportation Infrastructure", American Economic Review 108(4-5):899-934.

Faber, Ben (2014) “Trade Integration, Market Size, and Industrialization: Evidence from China’s National Trunk Highway System” Review of Economic Studies 81 (3): 1046–1070.

Lending contract form

Field, Erica, Rohini Pande, John Papp, and Natalia Rigol. 2013. "Does the Classic Microfinance Model Discourage Entrepreneurship among the Poor? Experimental Evidence from India." American Economic Review, 103 (6): 2196-2226.

Battaglia, Marianna, Selim Gulesci and Andreas Madestam (2021) Repayment Flexibility and Risk-Taking: Experimental Evidence from Credit Contracts, Working paper

Methodology

de Quidt, Jonathan, Johannes Haushofer, and Christopher Roth. 2018. “Measuring and Bounding Experimenter Demand.” American Economic Review 108 (11): 3266–3302.

McKenzie, David. 2012. “Beyond Baseline and Follow-up: The Case for More T in Experiments.” Journal of Development Economics 99 (2): 210–21.

Muralidharan, Karthik, and Paul Niehaus. 2017. “Experimentation at Scale.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (4): 103–24.

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

OGS-1: One-year post-transplant graft survival; RR: Relative risk; RCTs: Randomized controlled trials; ES: Effect size; UW: University of Wisconsin solution;

A pooled analysis of 7 controlled trials (5 randomized and 2 non-randomized) and 3 non- controlled trials confirmed that a low-FODMAP diet significantly improves general

The expert group indicated a need for more well-controlled clinical trials in children with JIA-related uveitis to provide the scientific best evidence in the areas of

• For instance, how can one separate the economics of property rights and transaction costs from the new theory of the firm, contract theory, industrial

1 Department of Computer Science and Information Theory, Budapest University of Technology and Economics.. 1 Introduction

Once the proposed syllabus has been implemented, it is necessary for the teachers involved with the syllabus to establish a means to measure how far the syllabus does in

Once the proposed syllabus has been implemented, it is necessary for the teachers involved with the syllabus to establish a means to measure how far the syllabus does in

Using a digitally-controlled actuator to meter fuel flow into the engine together with digitally-controlled auxiliary systems allows us to build a flexible control and