experienced an extraordinary development in the 1930s. The cities of the country, getting over the trauma of the 1st World War and the Great Eco- nomic Crisis, realised the economic opportunities of tourism and their majority started a conscious development of this branch of economy. Its importance was also
th
March 1933. the municipality committee adjudicated to establish the tourism com- mittee and the tourism bureau. An enthusi
launched and a conscious product development work has been realised primarily con- centrating on cultural and ecotourism. The tourism supply was based on the heritage values of the city and on the natural beauties of the Mecsek Mountains. The hosting conditions, such as the accommodations and guest catering places, were established with the adequate quality. Such transport connections were realised which can make us envious even today as the direct flight connections be accessed within 3 hours by train and due to the cheap railways domestic tourism opment decisions payed regard to the needs of tourism and there was also an intention to utilise the local products in tourism which is even fashionable today. Presently the market of local products has its renaissance. The results of the 1930s have their im-
Kulcsszavak:
Keynotes catering, Mecsek
-
- rel. A Balatonon is alig 20
lyett.1 -
2
- 3 Az 1930-as
4
-
5
- 6
7
8 9
10 -
11
-
12
13 Sajnos ez a sze
rsadalom- el kellett szenvedni.14, 15
16 de a gy
17
ius
28- 18
-
19
20 -
-
n, az 1 adata lett:
fe
-
enfor-
sabb feladatai:
-
az 21
nforgalmi
Az OMIH-
a kereskedelem-
- rende
tc.-
km-
22
-
1935-
- -
-
-na- l
23
- -
al.24 -
- iratra kell hagyatkoznunk.
1932- tok, 1936-
25
1.
ipar) 2.
3.
4.
5. -
- 6.
7. -
8.
kiterjedt.
kulcstokok,
1930-
26
27 1931-
28 1933-
rkot is.29
rint a Havi- -
hamarosan megalakul a Havi-
hogy -hegyet
30
-
31
sor.32
mellett rendez
- i Mise) nagysza-
33
34 -
35
36
-
37 A kor-
1930- -
-
38
39
40
- Mecsekre.
-
len -
41
i -
Velence Fiume 42
-
43 -
ber 15- - -
ez nem lehetett kevesebb, mint 10 44
-ben itt forgatott Hotel
-ben
45 -as
-
is rendel -
1930-
-ben
.46
mus volt. 1933-
-
resszus). 1934- -
2- -
1936- Sollemnis-t.
-
tettek.47 1934-
-
-, bor-, vi- -
48
jel-
1937-
49 -
-ban
csak 30 -
58 -
ez
-ban 63
50 1938- r meg- haladta a 70 000-
-
194 196
-
51 sban
- hogy eze
-
52
be sza -
tot
ahhoz, hogy a 60- -
1. http://mek.oszk.hu/02100/02185/html/366.html 2.
dapest. p. 70.
3.
. 4.
5.
a., s. l.
6.
7. n. Budapest. p. 151.
8.
g 9.
10.
forgal 11.
Bu
12. -Baranyai
13.
14.
15.
- 16.
- 17.
18.
19.
20. (6720/1931. sz. ME rendelettel) 21. Csizmadia (1979): i. m.
22.
23. -Berki
25.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
egyetem I 37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45. -
pp.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
Szakirodalom
-
gpolitika. s. n. Budapest. p. 151.
ga-
-Baranyai Ke-
s
-
zad
-
- 02-9250-5
- s vonatokkal kapcsolatos iratanya- gok
-
a., s. l. (1935): A magyar idegenfor- a., s. l. (1936): A magyar idegenfor-
-Baranyai Ke-
n -02-9250-