• Nem Talált Eredményt

Two problems related to the Bernoulli numbers.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "Two problems related to the Bernoulli numbers."

Copied!
4
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

T w o p r o b l e m s r e l a t e d t o t h e Bernoulli n u m b e r s

FERENC MÁTYÁS*

A b s t r a c t . In t h i s p a p e r we deal w i t h t w o similar p r o b l e m s . F i r s t we look for t h o s e p o l y n o m i a l s / j t ( n ) w i t h r a t i o n a l coefficients for which t h e e q u a l i t y Sk (n)—ík+2k H \-nk = ( f k ( n ) )m h o l d s for e v e r y p o s i t i v e i n t e g e r n w i t h s o m e p o s i t i v e integer k a n d m ( > 2 ) . In our first t h e o r e m we p r o v e for m>2 t h a t Sk ( n ) = ( fk(n))m h o l d s for every p o s i t i v e i n t e g e r

n if a n d only if m—2, k—3 a n d J3(n)— f n2 + \n. In t h e s e c o n d p a r t of t h i s p a p e r we look for t h o s e p o l y n o m i a l s f(n) with c o m p l e x c o e f f i c i e n t s for which t h e e q u a l i t y

2 n — 2

Pk(n,c) = £ n ^ (2" -1) B2 n_ , = ( / ( n ) r j=k

h o l d s f o r every i n t e g e r n>k w i t h s o m e i n t e g e r m>2, w h e r e /c€{2,3,4}, Bj is t h e jth

B e r n o u l l i n u m b e r a n d c is a c o m p l e x p a r a m e t e r . In o u r second t h e o r e m we p r o v e for m > 2 t h a t P2( n , c ) = ( / ( r i ) )m holds for e v e r y i n t e g e r n>2 if a n d only if m = 2, c—l±i2\/2 a n d / ( n ) = n + p w h e r e p— — while in t h e cases of 3 or 4 and m>2 t h e e q u a l i t y Pk(n,c)—{ f(n))m d o e s n ' t hold for any p o l y n o m i a l / ( n ) .

Let us introduce the following notations: (£) is the usual binomial coef- ficient; Bj is the jth Bernoulli number defined by the recursion

(1) E Í J ^ O (k > 2)

3=0

with B0 = 1. Sk(n) = lk + 2k + • • • + nk (n > 1, k > 1 are integers);

2n —2

Pk(n,c) = Yh 712n—j (2 UJ1) - j > where n> k >2 are integers and c is a

j=k

complex parameter; and / ( n ) are polynomials of n with rational and complex coefficients, respectively.

The problem of looking for those polynomials fk(n) and integers m > 2 for which Sk{n) = f°r every positive integer n was proposed and

Research supported by the Hungarian OTKA foundation, N£ T 020295.

(2)

2 4 Ferenc Mátyás

solved in [1] and the author of this paper also was among the solvers. In our Theorem 1., using the Bernoulli numbers, we give a new proof for this problem.

T h e o r e m 1. If m > 2 is an integer then there exists a polynomial fk{n) such that Sk{n) = for every positive integer n if and only if m = 2, k = 3 and /3(n) = \n2 + \n.

Proof. It is known that Sk{n) can be expressed by the Bernoulli num- bers and the binomial coefficients, that is

(2) ' x •

+ „ 2 . fk + 1

+ •••+1 fc_JW + ( k \Bkn

moreover

(3) B0 = l,Bl = -l-,B2 = i , J ?3 = 0 , . . . and Bj — 0 if and only if j > 3 and j is odd.

Let fk(n) = CLjU3 + • • - + 0171 + 00 be a polynomial of n over the rationals and a j í 0. If Sk{n) = ^fk(n)) f °r some m, then by (2) öq = 0 follows and since m > 2 so the degree of the polynomial (Vfc(n)j is at least two, that is Bk = 0 in (2). But by (3) Bk — 0 implies that k > 3, k is an odd integer and B k - i / 0.

From the equality Sfc(n) = it follows that

Í T I ( C 1 0 + • • •+ ( Í - 1) = a > m ' + " •+

and from this we get m = 2 and a\ ^ 0.

So we have to investigate the equality

w r h r ("

k+1 +

' ' '

+

C - ! )

B k

~

i n 2

)

= { a j n 3 +

" '

+ a i n ) 2

from which we obtain that k + 1 = 2j and j- = a2. Moreover d j is a rational number, therefore k + 1 = 4 / and j = 2 / . (4) can be written in the following form:

1 ( M I + ( 5 )

= (a2jn2f + b a2n2 + <nn)

(3)

T w o P r o b l e m s Related to t h e Bernoulli N u m b e r s 25 and from (5) by 0 and (3) a2 = a4 = . . . + a2/_2 = 0 follows. But 2Ö2/«I = k^[{k k^2f)Bk-2f í 0, that is Bk.2f = ^ / - 1 - 2 / = £2/ - I / 0. It implies that 2 / — 1 = 1, and so / = 1, j = 2 and k — 3. Thus we have got the only solution m = 2, k = 3, h{n) = | n2 + \n and 63(71) = (~n2 -f | n )2

In [2], using the definition i \ ( n , c), one can find the proof of the equality -P2{n, 3) = n — 3 + ^ ; - I n our Theorem 2. we generalize this result and the proof will be similar to that proof which was sent for the original problem by the author of this paper.

T h e o r e m 2. a) If m > 2 is an integer then there exists a polynomial f(n) such that P2( ^ c ) = ( f (n) )m f °r every integer n > 2 if and only if m = 2, c = 1 db i2\[2 and f(n) = n - l ±

b) If m > 2 and k — 3 or 4 then the equahty Pjt(n,c) — (f(n))"1 can not be solved by any polynomial f(n) and parameter c.

Proof. One can easily verify the following equality:

j — c (2n — 1\ (2n — 1\ c f 2n

^ 2n - j V j J \2n - jJ 2n \2n - j

Using (6), we have

2^2 /2n - 1\ c 2 ^ f 2n \

(?) />*(», c) = n E (2 n _ j ) B — - 2 E U - J ^

j — k j — k

By the recursive definition (1) of the Bernoulli number we can write that

2n —2

(8)

and

(9)

j—k

£ ( Í I - Í J ^ - ^ - U - i

2 n - j 1

)

5

* -

1

í : , V r , - > - C

,

. -

,

' i *

£ ( 2 n - j ) ^ = -(iT-i)02"-1 " G - M0 * - 1 j — k

2 n \ / 2 r c \ „ / 2 n \ „

i - 2 í w - - l i l "

U K

(4)

2 6 Ferenc Mátyás

First let us deal with the case a) of the Theorem 2. If k = 2 then by (7), (8), (9) and (3)

, v / (2n - 1 \ (2n - l \ n

P2( n , c ) = n ( - i x J ^ i - ^ 0 ) B o

c ( ( 2n \ ^ (2n\ ^ (2n\ ^ \ 2 3 -f c c

follows. From this, investigating the polinomial equality P2(n,c) = ( f ( n ) )m

in the case m > 2, we can see that m = 2 and f(n) = (n + p) , where

= - 1 ± a n d c = 1 ± i2\[2.

V

Now let us consider the case b) of the Theorem 2.

If ft = 3 then by (7), (8), (9), and (3)

, , ( (2n - 1 \ / 2 n - 1 \ „ (2n - 1 \

- K - O - C r ) » - C K

n3 9 + c , 7c + 20 c

= • • • = b n2 n + - . 3 6 12 2

If n) = (f{n))m and m > 2 then m = 3 and f(n) should have the form f[n) = — + -{/J- But it is easy to verify that such complex numbers c don't exist.

If k — 4 then B3 appears on the right side of (8) and (9). But i?3 = 0 and so P3( n , c ) = P4( n , c ) . Therefore P4( n , c ) = {f(n))m (m > 2) is also unsolvable.

R e m a r k . The statement of the Theorem 2 can also be extended for k > 5 too, but it seems, that there is no polynomial / ( n ) such that Pk(n, c) = ( / ( n ) )m where m > 2.

R e f e r e n c e s

[1] B . B U G G I S H , H . H A R B O R T H and O . P . L O S S E R , Aufgabe 7 9 0 . ,

Elemente der Mathematik, Nr 4. ( 1 9 7 8 ) , 9 7 - 9 8 .

[2] P . A D D O R , R . W Y S S , Aufgabe 8 1 3 . , Elemente der Mathematik, Nr.

6. ( 1 9 7 9 ) , 1 4 6 - 1 4 7 .

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

From the result we obtain a proof for the conjecture of Brown, Nowakowski and Rall, stating that asymptotic value of the independence ratio for disjoint union of two graphs is

While inequality (1.3) was proved in [4], we now give an alternative proof, which inspired the proof of our main result presented later.. Proof

More precisely in section 3 we give the measure of noncompactness for which the integral multioperator is condensing, this will allow us to give an existence result for the

Liapunov Stability, Functional Equations, Unbounded Delay, Volterra Equations. EJQTDE,

Abstract: In this note we give a completely different proof to a functional inequality estab- lished by Ismail and Laforgia for the survival function of the gamma distribution and

In this note we give a completely different proof to a functional inequality estab- lished by Ismail and Laforgia for the survival function of the gamma distribution and we show

Remark 6.. The proof is similar to Lemma 4.. Here, Z denotes the set of ring of integers.. Since the proof is very similar, we consider only Case 3) and Case 4) by Lemma 3...

Note that this equation is not a typical eigenvalue problem since it has an inhomogeneous character (in the sense that if u is a nontrivial solution of the equation then tu fails to