• Nem Talált Eredményt

ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION"

Copied!
20
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION

(2)

ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION

Sponsored by a Grant TÁMOP-4.1.2-08/2/A/KMR-2009-0041 Course Material Developed by Department of Economics,

Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University Budapest (ELTE) Department of Economics, Eötvös Loránd University Budapest

Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Balassi Kiadó, Budapest

(3)
(4)

ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION

Author: Júlia Varga

Supervised by Júlia Varga June 2011

ELTE Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics

(5)

ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION

Week 12

Education production functions

Júlia Varga

(6)

How resources (inputs) can be transformed into outputs?

Output = f (inputs)

(7)

• Wage levels?

• Employment probabilities?

• Job satisfaction?

• Technical ability?

• Creativity?

• Basic skills?

• Attitudes?

What is output?

(8)

• Test scores?

• Graduation rates?

• College attendance?

• Multiple outputs?

What is output?

(9)

• Most studies use test scores.

• We have data for test scores.

• To use things that are measured while students are in school.

What is output?

(10)

Test scores can be used different ways:

• levels: Ait = X’ it В + uit

• gains: Ait − Ait-1 = X’itб + vit

• new level conditional on old level: Ait = α Ait−1 + X’it γ + εit

What is output?

(11)

What are inputs?

• School inputs (manipulable)

• Non-school (not manipulable) inputs

(12)

What are inputs?

School inputs (manipulable)

• expenditures

• student-teacher ratio

• class size

• teacher quality,

• peers,

• other school inputs

(13)

What are inputs?

How can we measure teacher quality?

• Salaries?

• Experience?

• Teachers’ test scores?

• Teaching methods?

• A good teacher would be one who consistently obtained high learning growth from students, while a poor teacher would be one who consistently produced low learning growth – teacher fixed effect models (control for all possible characteristics of teachers – even without

measuring them – so long as those characteristics do not change over time).

(14)

• Linear?

• Non-linear?

• With interaction?

What is f(.)?

(15)

) ,

,

( it 1 , it , i i it

it f A F TA t P t ISK

A

achievement of student i at period t

achievement of student i at period

t–1

Family input cumulative to t

Teacher inputs cumulative to t

Peer inputs

Other school inputs cumulative to t

Education production function

(output conditional on old output)

(16)

Helyi környezeti hatások

Measurement problems – a lot

• Endogeneity of school quality – is school quality positively correlated with wealth and social advantage? Are greater resources

allocated to poorer areas?

• Omitted variables problem (e.g. teachers’

motivation, parents’ help, ability of children)

• Test measurement errors

(17)

• Value added models (omitted variables bias)

• Instrumental variables method (very difficult to find instruments)

• Fixed effect models

• Randomized trials

Some solutions to measurement

errors

(18)

Input Number of studies

Statistically significant

Statistically insignificant

+ + Unknown sign

Teacher/pupil ratio 152 14 13 34 46 45

Teacher education 113 8 5 31 32 37

Teacher experience 140 40 10 44 31 15

Teacher salaries 69 11 4 16 14 24

Expenditure/pupil 65 13 3 25 13 11

Source: Hanushek, E. A.: Education Production Functions. 1995

Results of early education production functions

Estimated expenditure parameter coefficients from 147 studies of educational production functions (US)

(19)

Input Number of studies Statistically significant Statistically insignificant

+

Teacher/pupil ratio 30 8 8 14

Teacher education 63 35 2 26

Teacher experience 46 16 2 28

Teacher salaries 13 4 2 7

Expenditure/ pupil 12 6 0 6

Source: Hanushek, E. A.: Education Production Functions. 1995

Estimated expenditure parameter coefficients

of educational production functions for developing countries

(20)

Recent results

• Use of large administrative datasets, panel data

• Class size effects – mixed results

• Teacher effects

– teachers matter in terms of student performance – the differences are not closely correlated with measured teacher characteristics

(Rivkin, Hanushek, Kain 2005; Rockoff, 2004; Nye–

Konstantopoulos–Hedges, 2004; Rivkin–Hanushek–

Kain, 2005; Aaronson–Barrow–Sander, 2007; Kane–

Staiger, 2008; Slater–Davies–Burgess, 2009)

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

These findings are identical with the findings of other studies investigating university students at the beginning of the new millennium (Gábor 2001), namely, that

1. Nóra Nemes, who graduated as a kindergarten teacher in 1979 and since 1983 she has been the head kindergarten teacher of Fáy András Kindergarten. Before she started to work

This study set out to explore whether our students are ready for the autonomy approach and whether their teacher and learning beliefs would alter by the end of the

teacher/parent perspectives and student results. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Integration exercise programme for children with learning difficulties

This first component of the common ELTE Horizon/EDiTE research program will be implemented by ESR13 as part of her/his individual research project entitled “The evolution

In my study I would like to present the motivations, learning methods and results of those persons who represent the different types of autonomous learning and who developed them

The low level of mathematical content knowledge and skills of students who want to become an elementary school teacher is increasingly being considered a major issue of concern

On the one hand we find the students who are using e-learning - or who we would like to use e-learning - ; their learning back-ground - that is how they