E CONOMICS I.
ELTE Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics
Economics I.
week 11
ECONOMICS OF TIME
Authors: Gergely K®hegyi, Dániel Horn, Klára Major Supervised by Gergely K®hegyi
June 2010
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Prepared by: Gergely K®hegyi, using Jack Hirshleifer, Amihai Glazer és David Hirshleifer (2009) Mikroökonómia. Budapest:
Osiris Kiadó, ELTECON-könyvek (henceforth: HGH), and Kertesi Gábor (ed.) (2004) Mikroökonómia el®adásvázlatok.
http://econ.core.hu/ kertesi/kertesimikro/ (henceforth: KG).
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Draft
1 Intertemporal decision
2 Savings and investment
3 Project evaluation
4 Exogenous eects
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Present versus future
E.g.:
Product: C0 (present corn); C1 (next year's corn); C2 (corn two years from now); . . .
Consumed quantities: c0;c1;c2;. . .
Prices (prices paid today for the corn delivered in the given time): P0;P1;P2;. . .
Numeraire: P0≡1
Denition
r1 annual real interest rate is the additional amount of future corn that have to be paid to receive a unit of present corn:
−∆c1
∆c0 ≡P0
P1 ≡1+r1
Naturally, we can use this line of thinking to compare any two consumptions in dierent points in time (C0;C1;. . .;CT)
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Present versus future (cont.)
short run interest long run interest
P1
P0 =1+1r
1
P1
P0 = 1+1R
P2 1
P1 =1+1r
2
P2
P0 = (1+1R
2)2
. . . .
PT
PT−1 = 1+1r
T
PT
P0 =(1+R1
T)T
Denition
TheW¯0endowed wealth is the present value of one's endowment c¯0; ¯c1) of her present and future claims:
W¯0≡P0c¯0+P1c¯1≡c¯0+ c¯1
1+r1 Intertemporal budget constraint:
P0c0+P1c1= ¯W0≡P0c¯0+P1c¯1
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Present versus future (cont.)
c0+ c1
1+r1 = ¯W0≡c¯0+ c¯1 1+r1
Intertemporal utility function:
U(c0;c1) Optimum:
MRSC =1+r
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Present versus future (cont.)
Optimal intertemporal decision
In the optimum the intertemporal budget constraint is tangent to the highest possible level of intertemporal utility.
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Present versus future (cont.)
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Real interest rate and nominal interest rate
So far we have only considered real changes behind the "money curtain". That is, the 1000HUF, that we put in the bank with 8%
interest rate, worth 1080HUF in one year. What happens,
however, when living costs increase (exogenously)? Then our 1000 forints might worth lot less...
Real interest rate (r1) is the price of changing a unit of future corn with a unit of today's corn:
1+r1≡ −∆c1
∆c0
Nominal interest rate (r10): is the price of changing future money with today's money:
1+r10 ≡ −∆m1
∆m0
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Real interest rate and nominal interest rate (cont.)
Price level: the amount of money needed to buy a unit of today's goods (some sort of an average of the prices of goods):
P0m≡ −∆m0
∆c0;P1m≡ −∆m1
∆c1
Ination rate (a1): The ratio of future price level and today's price level:
1+a1≡ P1m P0m
Note
The link relation between the price levels in dierent times are determined by macroeconomics processes (which of course stem from microeconomic processes, but are exogenous for us now).
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Real interest rate and nominal interest rate (cont.)
Note
Since the factual ination rate are usually unknown, because it is determined in the future (ex post), thus we usually talk about expected ination rate.
Statement
The real interest rate added with the expected ination is a good-enough approximation of the nominal interest rate:
r10 'r1+a1
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Real interest rate and nominal interest rate (cont.)
Proof
Discrete version of interest rate calculation Let's look at the following identity:
∆m1
∆m0 ≡ ∆m1
∆c1
∆c1
∆c0
∆c0
∆m0 1+r10 ≡P1m
P0m(1+r1) 1+r10 ≡(1+a1)(1+r1)
r10 ≡r1+a1+r1a1
Since r1a1is a very small number, that is r1a1'0, thus r10 'r1+a1
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Real interest rate and nominal interest rate (cont.)
Proof
Continuous version of interest rate calculation
If i is the annual compound interest rate and k is the frequency of payments, then the value of the unit investment in time 0. (H0) is H1at the end of the rst period:
H1=
1+ i k
k
H0
With continuous interest, i.e. if k→ ∞, limk→∞ 1+ki
=e, thus H1=ekH0. Therefore
∆m1
∆m0 ≡ ∆m1
∆c1
∆c1
∆c0
∆c0
∆m0
er10 =er1ea1 r10 =r1+a1
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Real interest rate and nominal interest rate
Example
Nominal and real annual yields of USA stocks, 19262002 (percentage)
annual average nominal yield
annual av- erage real yield
variance of the real yield
Treasury bill 3,8 0,8 4,0
long term govt. bonds 5,8 2,9 10,6
long term corp. bonds 6,2 3,2 9,9
large comp. stocks 12,2 9,0 20,6
small comp. stocks 16,9 13,5 32,6
Source: Hirshleifer et al., 2009, 635.
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Income tax versus consumption tax
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Income tax versus consumption tax (cont.)
Consequence
Income taxes might not reduce savings as compared to
consumption taxes, but they certainly reduce future consumption.
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Savings and investment
Autarchy
Robinson Crusoe has intertemporal exchange opportunities, but can engage in productive transformation between consumption this year and consumption next year.
QQ is the
Production-Possibility curve through his
endowment E. The Crusoe optimum is at R∗ where QQ is tangent to the highest attainable indierence curve.
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Savings and investment (cont.)
Market exchange
The individual here has intertemporal productive opportunities
(Production-Possibility curve QQ), as well as exchange opportunities.
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Savings and investment (cont.)
Consequence
In a regime of pure exchange, a person can achieve a preferred intertemporal patter of consumption only by borrowing or lending.
At the equilibrium interest rate the overall market supply of lending equals the overall market demand for borrowing
(L∗=B∗). But when intertemporal production (investing) is also possible, each individual chooses his or her optimal scale of investment and lending or borrowing. The equilibrium interest rate balance the optimum supply of saving with the aggregate demand for investment (S∗=I∗), and also equates the aggregate supply of lending with the aggregate demand for borrowing (L∗=B∗).
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Savings and investment (cont.)
Intertemporal equilibrium with productive investment
When productive investment takes place, the equilibrium interest rate r∗ simultaneously balances (1) the aggregate supply of saving S with the aggregate demand for investment I, and (2) the aggregate supply of lending L with the aggregate demand for borrowing B. The
dierence between the two magnitude is nanced out of investor's own savings.
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Savings and investment (cont.)
Growth, investment and saving (1973-1984, percent) growth rate investment
rate savings rate
The ve highest growth rate
Egypt 8,5 25 12
Yemen 8,1 21 -22
Cameroon 7,1 26 33
Syria 7,0 24 12
Indonesia 6,8 21 20
The ve lowest growth rates
Zambia 0,4 14 15
Salvador -0,3 12 4
Ghana -0,9 6 5
Zaire -1,0 n.a. n.a.
Uganda -1,3 8 6
Source: Hirshleifer et al., 2009, 614.
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Investment decision and project analysis
Statement
The separation theorem A person's production optimum position Q∗ is entirely independent of his or her personal preferences.
Present value for two periods:
V0≡z0+ z1
1+r1
1 Present value rule (Independent projects). Adopt any project with positive present value, and reject any project with negative present value.
2 Present value rule (Mutually exclusive projects). Adopt the project with the largest present value V0, provided it is positive.
3 Present value rule. Tabulate all the possible combinations of projects available, including doing nothing. Then choose the set of projects that maximizes overall present value.
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Investment decision and project analysis (cont.)
Present value for more periods:
V0≡z0+ z1
1+r1+ z2
(1+r2)(1+r1)+. . .+ zT
(1+rT). . .(1+r2)(1+r1) with identical interest rates:
V0≡z0+ z1
1+r + z2
(1+r)2+. . .+ zT (1+r)T with long term interest rates:
V0≡z0+ z1
1+R1+ z2
(1+R2)2+. . .+ zT
(1+RT)T
Denition
(Internal) Rate of Return (RoR) (ρ):
0=z0+ z1
1+ρ+ z2
(1+ρ)2+. . .+ zT
(1+ρ)T
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Investment decision and project analysis (cont.)
Statement
All projects should be adopted with higher RoR than the market interest rate, i.e. where (ρ >r).
Consequence
For independent projects, if the payment stream has only a single reversal of signs (an investment followed by a payo phase), then the present value rule (adopt if V0>0) is equivalent to the rate of return rule (adopt ifρ >r00).
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Investment decision and project analysis (cont.)
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Investment decision and project analysis (cont.)
Social rates of return to education
Region Primary Secondary Higher
Asia (non-OECD) 16,2 11,1 11,0
Latin-America 17,4 12,9 12,3
OECD 8,5 9,4 8,5
Sub-Saharan Africa 25,4 18,4 11,3
World 18,9 13,1 10,8
Source: Hirshleifer et al., 2009, 629.
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Exogenous eects
Main factors aecting investments, savings and interest rates Time preference
Time-endowment Time-productivity Degree of isolation Risk
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Eect of time preference
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects
Eect of time-endowment
week 11 K®hegyi-Horn-Major
Intertemporal decision Savings and investment Project evaluation Exogenous eects