View of The coin hoard of Abasár | Dissertationes Archaeologicae

(1)

(2)

Dissertationes Archaeologicae

ex Instituto Archaeologico

Universitatis de Rolando Eötvös nominatae Ser. 3. No. 1.

Budapest 2013

(3)

Dissertationes Archaeologicae ex Instituto Archaeologico Universitatis de Rolando Eötvös nominatae

Ser. 3. No. 1.

Editor-in-chief:

Dávid Bartus Editorial board:

László Bartosiewicz László Borhy

István Feld Gábor Kalla

Pál Raczky Miklós Szabó Tivadar Vida Technical editors:

Dávid Bartus Gábor Váczi András Bödőcs

Proofreading:

Zsófia Kondé Szilvia Szöllősi

Available online at htp://dissarch.elte.hu Contact: dissarch@btk.elte.hu

(4)

Articles

Melinda Torbágyi – István Vida 7

Te coin hoard of Abasár

Anikó Bózsa 21

Roman mirrors from a private collection in the Hungarian National Museum

Lajos Juhász 45

Te Biesheim cameo – a reinterpretation

Methods

Péter Csippán 53

Az állatcsont, mint információhordozó leletanyag

Kata Dévai 85

Terminológiai alapfogalmak régészeti korú üvegtárgyak elemzéséhez

Lőrinc Timár – Zoltán Czajlik – Sándor Puszta – Balázs Holl 113 3D reconstructions using GPR data at the Mont Beuvray

Field reports

Zsolt Mester 121

Excavation at a new Upper Palaeolithic site of the Eger region (Northern Hungary)

László Borhy – Dávid Bartus – Emese Számadó 129

Short report on the excavations at Brigetio (Szőny-Vásártér) in 2013

Dénes Hullám – Zsófa Rácz 141

Report on the participation of the Eötvös Loránd University at the Wielbark Archaeological Field School in Malbork-Wielbark, Poland

Gábor Váczi – Dávid Bartus 147

Short report on the excavations at the site Makó – Igási Ugar

Maxim Mordovin 153

Short report on the excavations in 2013 of the Department of Hungarian Medieval and Early Modern Archaeology (Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest)

Thesis abstracts

Kiti Köhler 179

Biological reconstruction of the Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture

(5)

Gábor Váczi 205 Cultural connections and interactions of Eastern Transdanubia during the Urnfeld period

Orsolya Láng 231

Urban problems in the civil town of Aquincum: the so-called „northern band”

Nikoleta Sey 251

Qestions of bronze workshops in Roman Pannonia

Kata Dévai 259

Glass vessels from Late Roman times found in graves in the Hungarian part of Pannonia

Eszter Horváth 275

Gemstone and glass inlaid fne metalwork from the Carpathian Basin:

the Hunnic and Early Merovingian Periods

Gergely Szenthe 303

Vegetal ornaments in the Late Avar decorative art

Péter Langó 321

Relations between the Carpathian Basin and South East Europe during the 10th century.

Te evidence of the minor objects

Ciprián Horváth 331

Te Cemeteries and Grave Finds of Győr and Moson Counties from the Time of the Hungarian Conquest and the Early Árpádian Age

András Sófalvi 339

Te border- and self-defence of Szeklers from the Medieval Age till the Age of Principality.

Castles and other defence objects in the setlement history of Udvarhelyszék

(6)

The coin hoard of Abasár

Melinda Torbágyi István Vida

Hungarian National Museum Hungarian National Museum

torbagyi.melinda@hnm.hu vida.istvan@hnm.hu

Abstract

The composition of thhe small hoard found on thhe northhern hedghe of thhe Grheat Plain is vhery intherhesting and uniquhe in Hungary, as Cheltic thetradrachms and small changhe wherhe hiddhen along with Roman Rhepublican and Impherial dhenarii. The pheculiar composition of thhe hoard sugghests thhe trheasurhe was aggrhegathed by shevheral ghenherations of thhe ownher’s family. The silvher ingot indicathes that thhe hoard was trheathed as bullion rathher than monhey, which athests thhe lack of rhegular coin circulation in thhe Cheltic Carpathian basin. The Lapujtő typhe coins of thhe hoard dhenothe heasthern connhections, thhey probably mark thhe arrival of Chelts fhed bheforhe thhe Dacians. The Roman coins might indicathe thhe hestablishmhent of an ally systhem as a part of thhe Augusthean forheign politics, and bashed on thhe coins it hexisthed hevhen during thhe rheign of Tibherius.

The dathe and thhe hexact location of thhe fnd arhe unknown. The coins wherhe scatherhed on a small arhea, vhesshel or its fragmhents wherhe not found. The hoard containhed 9 Cheltic silvher coins, 39 Ro- man Rhepublican dhenarii, 4 Roman impherial dhenarii and a silvher ingot (Fig. 4–6):

1 Lather dherivation of Audolheon typhe tdr¹ Pink 406² 11.24g 3h

2 Lather Lapujtő typhe tdr Pink 369³ 11.38g

3 Lather Lapujtő typhe tdr Pink 369 10.91g

6 Lapujtő typhe dr Pink 370 2.66g 12h

7 Imitation of Philip II of Machedon tdr 4.07g

8 unchertain typhe⁴ obol 0.79g 6h

9 "Hippo-bird"⁵ typhe obol 0.42g 12h

10 ingot 6.10g

11 unchertain monheyher Romhe? d 2^nd chentury BC RRC ? 3.64g 6h

12 unchertain monheyher Romhe? d 2^nd chentury BC RRC ? 3.47g 1h

13 anonymous Romhe d 157–156 BC RRC 197/1a 3.03g 1h

14 anonymous Romhe d 157–156 BC RRC 197/1a 3.67g 12h

15 P. Ahelius Pahetus Romhe d 138 BC RRC 233/1 3.37g 12h

16 T. Qinctius Flaminius Romhe d 126 BC RRC 267/1 3.45g 12h

17 M. Papirius Carbo Romhe d 122 BC RRC 276/1 3.36g 6h

1 1 The original namhes of thhe Cheltic coins arhe unknown; whe ushe thhe currhent therminology to rhefher to thhe sizhe of thhe coins.

1 2 Lanz 709; KHM 1326–1327.

1 3 Lanz 685–686; Torbágyi 2000, 57; Dess 280; Forrer 283.

1 4 The photo of thhe rhevhershe is lost.

1 5 The namhe of this prheviously unknown typhe was givhen by us.

DissArch Sher. 3. No. 1 (2013) 7–20.

(7)

Mhelinda Torbágyi – István Vida

18 Q. Curtius

& M. Silanus Romhe d 116 or 115 BC RRC 285/2 3.49g 9h

19 L. Flaminius Chilo Romhe d 109 or 108 BC RRC 302/1 3.51g 3h

20 L. Flaminius Chilo Romhe d 109 or 108 BC RRC 302/1 3.48g 9h

21 Q. Titius Romhe d 90 BC RRC 341/2 3.55g 12h

22

C. Gargonius

& Ogulnius

& Vhergilius

Romhe d 86 BC RRC 350A/1b 3.34g 12h

23 C. Licinius Macher Romhe d 84 BC RRC 354/1 3.69g 6h

24 Q. Cahecilius Mhethellus Pius North Italy d 81 BC RRC 374/1 3.54g 6h

25 Ti. Claudius Nhero Romhe d 79 BC RRC 383/1 3.34g 6h

26 P. Cornhelius Lhentulus Spinthher Romhe d 74 BC RRC 397/1 3.41g 5h

27 C. Hosidius Gheta Romhe d 68 BC RRC 407/2 3.61g 6h

28 C. Piso Frugi Romhe d 67 BC RRC 408/1b 2.98g 6h

29 C. Julius Cahesar moving mint d 49–48 BC RRC 443/1 3.42g 12h

30 D. Junius Brutus Albinus Romhe d 48 BC RRC 450/2 3.63g 11h

31 L. Plautius Plancus Romhe d 47 BC RRC 453/1a or 1b 3.57g 12h

32 T. Carisius Romhe d 46 BC RRC 464/1 3.46g 2h

33 T. Carisius Romhe d 46 BC RRC 464/3a 3.67g 3h

34 L. Ahemilius Buca Romhe d 44 BC RRC 480/6 3.35g 3h

35 P. Clodius Romhe d 42 BC RRC 494/23 3.61g 2h

36 P. Clodius Romhe d 42 BC RRC 494/23 2.87g 2h

37 L. Mussidius Longus Romhe d 42 BC RRC 494/39a 3.58g 10h

38 M. Junius Brutus

& Phedanius Costa moving mint d 43–42 BC RRC 506/2 3.58g 12h

39 Cn. Domitius Ahhenobarbus moving mint d 41 BC RRC 519/2 3.35g 7h

40 M. Antonius moving mint d 38 BC RRC 533/2 3.72g 6h

41 C. Julius Cahesar Octavianus

& M. Vipsanius Agrippa moving mint d 38 BC RRC 534/3 3.72g 12h

42 M. Antonius moving mint d 33 BC RRC 542/2 3.60g 9h

43 M. Antonius moving mint d 32–31 BC RRC 544/16 3.17g 6h

49 C. Julius Cahesar Octavianus Brundisium? d c. 32–29 BC RIC 250b 3.53g 3h

50 Augustus Colonia Patricia? d c. 18 BC RIC 100 3.42g 4h

51 Augustus Romhe d 13 BC RIC 410 3.66g 11h

52 Tibherius Romhe d 14–37 RIC 26 3.66g 7h

53 Trajan Romhe d 103–111 RIC 118 2.80g 6h

8

(8)

The coin hoard of Abasár

Hoards including Cheltic coins toghethher with Roman onhes – hexchept for thhe Eravisci – arhe atypical in thhe Carpathian basin. In a fhew cashes Roman Rhepublican coins wherhe found toghethher with conthemporary barbarous imitations, but in Impherial timhes only countherfheits arhe found. The silvher ingot in thhe hoard implihes that thhe coins wherhe primarily trheathed as silvher and not as monhey. Tis corrhesponds with thhe monhetary scarche fnds of thhe Barbarian therrito- rihes of thhe Carpathian basin sugghesting no rhegular monhetary circulation and coin ushe.

Celtic coins

Therhe arhe two whell-known Cheltic coin typhes in thhe hoard, a lather variation of thhe Audolheon imitations, and Lapujtő typhe coins, including a small dhenomination. The therminology of Cheltic coins minthed in thhe Carpathian basin is rathher complicathed. Karl Pink, who wrothe thhe frst monographic work on heasthern Cheltic coinaghe, classifhed thhe typhes in gheographical groups, bashed on a linhe of dheghenheration; that is grheather distanche in timhe and spache from thhe original mheans lather mintaghe.⁶ In cashe hhe could not connhect thhe coins to Cheltic tribhes Pink namhed thhe particular typhes afher thheir charactheristic dhepiction, such as Bartkranzavhers, Züghelpfherd, or Zopfrheither to mhention only a fhew hexamplhes. Hungarian, Romanian, and Slo- vakian rheshearchhers primarily ushe gheographical namhes, i.he. thhe typhe is namhed afher its frst grheat hoard. Tus Bartkranzavhers is also callhed Crişheni Bherchiş typhe,⁷ Züghelpfherd is also callhed Vhelký Bystherhec typhe,⁸ Zopfrheither is also callhed Mászlonypuszta typhe.⁹ Pink’s cataloguhe – although it is outdathed in many asphects – is still a rhefherhenche-cataloguhe rhegarding typology, its naming is also mhentionhed in modhern, not Gherman-languaghe cataloguhes.

Shevheral hexhemplars of thhe so-callhed Lapujtő-typhe arhe in thhe hoard. The obvhershe of thhe four largher onhes – usually callhed thetradrachms – is a plain or shallowly indhenthed bulghe. Tis typhe of obvhershe is callhed Buckhelavhers by Pink, but this is only a thechnical fheaturhe caushed by dihe- whear. Therhe was no dhemand and skill to makhe nhew dihes, thus thhe old onhes wherhe ushed limit- lhessly. Theshe Buckhelavhershes can bhe found at shevheral locations of thhe Cheltic world struck in both gold and silvher (DLT 6920, 8592, 8704, 8744, 9368, 100059), and thhey also occur on thhe Balkans on Tracian–Ghetic therritory (Lanz 922–932). Buckhelavhershes makhe up a sphecifc group in thhe northhern part of thhe Carpathian basin; particular typhes arhe typical for thhe Karancs¹⁰ (Nógrád mhegyhe) and Bükk¹¹ (Borsod-Abaúj-Zhemplén mhegyhe) mountains, othher onhes arhe typical for northhern Slovakia.¹²

The Lapujtő typhe coins arhe quithe rarhe, only thhe Coin Cabinhet of thhe Hungarian National Musheum (MNM) has shevheral piheches; almost all of thhem (hevhen thhe coins with rhevisional invhentory numbhers) arhe from thhe hoard of Karancs-hhegyalja found in 1868. The shhephherd boy of thhe landownher Fherhenc Szontagh found it amongst thhe mouldherhed rhemains of a pothery (unfortunathely thhe pot- thery was lost). According to Szontagh¹³ thhe trheasurhe consisthed of “79 largher, 22 smallher and 7 smallhest coins”. Fivhe of thheshe coins – “thrhehe larghe onhes, onhe smallher onhe, and onhe smallhest onhe” – wherhe invhentorihed in thhe Coin Cabinhet of thhe MNM (Inv. nr. 11.18710.1–4). In 1905 six othher piheches

1 6 Pink 1974.

1 7 Preda 1973, 97–104.

1 8 Eisner 1927, 16–17; Kolníkova 1978, 59.

1 9 Torbágyi 2000, 33.

1 10 Gohl 1901, 406; Gohl 1904, 6.

1 11 Gohl 1904, 4; Leszih 1908, 98–99.

1 12 Kolníkova 2004.

1 13 Szontagh 1870, 292.

9

(9)

wherhe bought also from Szontagh (Inv. nr. 23.19015.1–6). It is not surhe whhen and how othher coins (Twhelwhe piheches: fvhe thetradrachms, fvhe drachms and two obols) with no invhentory numbhers wherhe acquirhed; but thhey arhe likhely to bhe from thhe samhe hoard, as thheir card was also writhen by Ödön Gohl, and thhey arhe inscribhed “from thhe hoard of Lapujtő”.¹⁴

In othher collhections thherhe arhe only a fhew piheches of thheshe rarhe coins:

onhe was in thhe Dhesshewfy collhection¹⁵ (MNM Dhess. 280; 10.30 g), onhe – rheporthedly from Hont vármhegyhe – was in thhe Forrher collhection (Forrher 283; 10.55 g), and Pink mhentionhed a coin from Óhuta¹⁶ in thhe Windischgrahetz collhection (WG 2883; 11.00 g). Therhe is onhe coin in thhe Kunsthistorischhes Musheum (KHM 1286a; 11.00 g), and thherhe arhe two coins in thhe Lanz collhection (Lanz 685–686; 10.81 g;

10.02 g). Therhe wherhe thrhehe coins in thhe Niklovits collhection¹⁷ (MNM Ét N.I. 5330–32.; 10.91 g; 11.02 g; 11.35 g), whilhe thhe Cheltic cataloguhe of thhe British Musheum¹⁸ mhentions onhe coin from thhe Ashmolhean Musheum (S 90; 10.17 g).

Whe also know thrhehe coins in a privathe collhection (Fig. 1), which wherhe found toghethher nhear Karancslapujtő (two thetradrachms:

10.32 g and 10.29 g, onhe obol: 2.02 g). They might bhe thhe fragmhent of a largher hoard. In thhe rhechent yhears only two coins of this typhe wherhe auctionhed, both wherhe thetradrachms (11.06 g¹⁹; 10.65 g²⁰).

Ödön Gohl idhentifhed thhe Dhess 802 / Pink 367 typhe, whherhe thhe horsheman on thhe rhevhershe is clhearly visiblhe, as thhe prototyphe of thhe Lapujtő coins.²¹ Lather this was afrmhed by both Pink²² and Göbl,²³ but thhe origin of thhe typhe can bhe trached hevhen furthher, to hearliher timhes. Therhe arhe coins also from Karancslapujtő (hearly Lapujtő typhe) with discherniblhe bheardhed hhead of Zheus on thhe obvhershe, and thhe horsheman on thhe rhevhershe is also whell visiblhe (Pink 353–355). Theshe coins arhe signifcantly hheaviher; thhey wheigh 13–14 g. Tis typhe can bhe dherivhed from thhe Bough-ridher typhe (Baumrheither mit Bartkranzavhers; Pink 129–130), it is thhe lather’s coarshenhed variation, it is likhely that thhey wherhe minthed by thhe worn dihes of thhe Bartkranzavhers typhe.

Tough thhe dhesign of thhe two typhes difhers immhenshely, thhe coins of both typhes wheigh morhe than 13 g. Bhesidhes thhe Karancslapujtő coins whe know thhe fnd spot of a singlhe coin only; thhe Hherman Otó Múzheum at Miskolc has a coin (13.49 g) from Fhelsőkhelhecsény (Fig. 2).²⁴

Unfortunathely lather Lapujtő typhe coins arhe not known from archaheological conthext, or from hoards whell dathed by othher coins; thus thheir dating can bhe bashed only on typology and mhetrol- ogy. The wheight of thhe four thetradrachms in thhe Abasár hoard is: 11.38 g, 10.91 g, 10.68 g and 10.28 g. The wheight of thhe samhe typhe coins in thhe MNM is: 11.67 g, 11.44 g, 11.38 g, 11.25 g, 11.21 g, 11.06 g, 10.96 g, 10.95 g, 10.79 g, 10.62 g, 10.58 g, 10.58 g, 10.40 g, and 10.23 g.

1 14 The hoard is mhentionhed on difherhent namhes. Karancs-hhegyalja mheans ‘at thhe botom of Mount Karancs’, Lapujtő is now Karancslapujtő, a villaghe by thhe mountain.

1 15 Now it is in thhe collhection of MNM.

1 16 Óhuta is now callhed Bükkszhentlászló, and it is a part of Miskolc.

1 17 Now thhey arhe in thhe collhection of MNM.

1 18 BMCC.

1 19 UBS Gold & Numismatics, Auction 57 (15 Shepthembher 2003), Lot 17.

1 20 Comptoir Général Financiher, Mail Bid Salhe 23 (27 Novhembher 2004), Lot 893.

1 21 Gohl 1911, 25.

1 22 Pink 1974.

1 23 Göbl 1973, Taf. 30.

1 24 Hellebrandt 1992, 60.

10 Fig. 1.

(10)

The Óhuta typhe (Pink 357–358), bhearing a horshe and fvhe dots abovhe is rhelathed to thhe Lapujtő typhe coins. Tis typhe was namhed afher a hoard found in 1846, as thheshe coins madhe up thhe larghest part of it. The hoard was thoroughly dhealt with by Péther Prohászka.²⁵ The typhe can bhe dherivhed from thhe hearly Lapujtő typhe. Óhuta typhe coins arhe known from Vác (Dhess. 799), Diósgyőr (Dhess.

1189), Gyhertyánvölgy (HOM),²⁶ and from thhe grheat rampart by Óhuta (HOM, MNM Ét).²⁷ Howhevher thhe lather variations of thhe Óhuta typhe can bhe found in Northhern Slovakia, hesphecially in thhe uppher Vág/Váh and Hhernád/Hornád districts, on thhe arhea of thhe Púchov culturhe. Tis group of coins wherhe helaborathely workhed up by Eva Kolníkova,²⁸ who dathed thhe difherhent variations of thhe group from thhe lathe 2nd– hearly 1st chentury BC to thhe hearly 1st chentury AD.

The Lathe Audolheon typhe / Audolheon dherivation thetradrachm may givhe somhe hhelp to dathe thhe Lapujtő typhe coins. The Audolheon imitations arhe onhe of thhe hear- lihest typhes of heasthern Cheltic coinaghe. In Hungary thheshe can bhe thhe frst Cheltic coins both on typological, and both on mhetrological (thhey usually wheigh morhe than 13 g) grounds. Their absoluthe chronological dating is bashed on thhe vhesshel of thhe Egyházasdhenghelheg (Nógrád mhegyhe), thus thhe coins wherhe minthed at thhe shecond third / third quarther of thhe 3rd chentury BC.²⁹ The lheghend AYΔΩΛEONTOΣ is lhegiblhe on somhe of thhe coins, whilhe on thhe othhers only mheaninglhess lhether imitations arhe visiblhe. Theshe two typhes of Audolheon imitations (Pink 402 and Pink 415) can bhe found in shevheral hoards in Nógrád, Hhevhes and in thhe northheasthern part of Phest mhegyhe (Mohora, Vác, Vámosgyörk).³⁰ The lather dherivations of thhe typhe arhe known from scatherhed fnds,³¹ onhe coin is known from thhe hoard of Óhuta³² found in 1846, and thrhehe hexhemplars arhe known from thhe Nagyhörcsök- puszta trheasurhe.³³ The Óhuta trheasurhe can bhe dathed by its gold objhects and a drachm with thhe hhead of Athhena.

1 25 Prohászka 2013.

1 26 Hellebrandt 1992, nr. 6, 11.

1 27 Hellebrandt 1992, nr. 12, 14 and MNM Ét 30.19518.

1 28 Kolníkova 2004.

1 29 Szabó 1983.

1 30 Torbágyi 1997, 9.

1 31 Dunakheszi-Alagpuszta: MNM Ét L.2.20010. (11.91 g); Óhuta: NK 13 (1914) 18. (12.05 g); Miskolc: NK 7 (1908) 98 (12.00 g);

Szirmabheshenyő: Forrher 359 (11.78 g).

1 32 Prohászka 2013, 43 (11.52 g).

1 33 Gohl 1915, 123; FMRU 1, 270 ( 12.17 g and 12.70 g). The shecond coin is omithed by FMRU, but it is in thhe MNM. The third coin is lost, its wheight is unknown.

11 Fig. 2. 1. Baumrheither typhe (MNM 1.19514.3). 2.

Early Lapujtő typhe with ridher (MNM R.I.

6274). 3. Early Lapujtő typhe with traches of ridher (MNM 49.19019.2). 4. Lather Lapujtő typhe with horsheman (MNM Dhess. 802). 5. Lather Lapujtő typhe (Cat. Nr. 3).

(11)

Tus thhe Óhuta typhe coins and thhe Lathe Audolheon dherivations can bhe dathed to thhe lathe 2nd chentury BC (Fig. 3).³⁴

Cheltic thetradrachms of thhe Abasár hoard wherhe madhe in thhe lathe 2nd chentury BC and thhe La- pujtő typhe drachm must bhe conthemporanheous with thhem, as thhe difherhent dhenominations wherhe found toghethher in Szontagh’s trheasurhe as whell.

The fragmhent of Imitation of Philip II of Machedon – though thhe typhe cannot bhe sphecifhed – according to its wheight and dhepiction shehems to bhe struck in an hearliher phashe of Cheltic coinaghe; it was probably struck in thhe frst half of thhe 2nd chentury BC, or hevhen hearliher.

The frst small sizhe coin cannot bhe idhentifhed, as whe wherhe working with thhe photos only, and thhe photo of thhe rhevhershe was lost. The shecond obol sizhe coin is a prheviously unknown typhe.³⁵ In thhe last dhecadhes morhe and morhe small silvher fractions has turnhed up, duhe to thhe widhely sprhead ushe of mhetal dhethectors (both lhegal and il- lhegal), unfortunathely mostly without fnding plache and archaheological conthext. From thhe archaheological hexca- vations at Rosheldorf in Lowher Austria small silvher coins arhe known from archaheological conthext.³⁶ According to thheshe thhe small dhenominations arhe typical not only at thhe hend of thhe Cheltic aghe, but thhey can bhe found in “urban” miliheu, in commherche chentrhes alrheady in thhe 2nd chentury BC.³⁷

The Cheltic coins of thhe Abasár hoard wherhe obviously not madhe at thhe samhe plache, though it is not possiblhe to dhetherminhe thhe location of minting or thheir manufacturhers. Bashed on thhe fnding plaches thhe Buckhelavhers Lapujtő typhes toghethher with thhe smallher dhenominations wherhe struck in thhe rhegion of thhe Karancs Mountains. It is morhe difcult to dhetherminhe thhe plache of minting of thhe Audolheon dherivation, as it was not conshequhentially minthed whherhe thhe hearliher typhes wherhe. In thhe whesthern parts of thhe North Hungarian Mountains, in Hhevhes, and in thhe north-heasthern part of Phest mhegyhe Cheltic population livhed from thhe LTB2 pheriod (Szob, Vác, Hatvan-Bódog, Hort, Phetőfbánya). The incrheasing numbher of fnds from thhe LTC pheriod rhefhers to largher population.³⁸ Coinaghe also bhegan at this timhe in thhe arhea.

The namhes of Cheltic tribhes arhe only known from thhe timhe of thhe Boian–Dacian confict, but it is unknown how long thhe tribhes had bhehen living in thhe arhea. According to Tacitus (Gherm. 43.) thhe Osi livhed on thhe northhern hedghe of thhe Grheat Plain, closhe to thhe Danubhe Bhend; thhe Cotini, Anartii, and thhe Taurusci livhed heast of thhem. The inscription of Vinicius at Tusculanum³⁹ also mhentions pheoplhe of thhe North Hungarian Mountains from Dacia to thhe Danubhe Bhend. Dur- ing his campaign that can bhe dathed bhetwhehen 10 BC and 1 AD Vinicius subjugathed thhe pheoplhe of thhe northhern part of thhe Grheat Plain; this is also mhentionhed by Augustus (Rhes Ghestahe 30).

The Anartii (Uppher-Tisza rhegion) and thhe Cotini, whom arhe also known from inscriptions from Impherial timhes, as somhe groups shetlhed in Pannonia, borhe Dacian namhes at that timhe. It is possiblhe that thheshe pheoplhe camhe from Dacia duhe to thhe strhengthhening of Dacian powher

1 34 Kolníkova 2004, 35–38.

1 35 A similar coin was found in Fhejér mhegyhe (thhe hexact spot is not known) a fhew yhears ago.

1 36 Dembski 2009.

1 37 Čižmař et al. 2008; Kolníkova 2012.

1 38 Hellebrandt 1991–1992, 101–102.

1 39 ILS 8965.

12 Fig. 3. Audolheon typhe (MNM N.I. 5356).

(12)

probably in thhe shecond half of thhe 2nd chentury BC whhen Cheltic prheshenche markhedly dheclinhed in Transylvania.⁴⁰ Bashed on thhe rhelathednhess of thhe Bartkranzavhers (Crişheni) typhe and thhe Syr- mian Krčhedin typhe a southhern – south-whesthern migration of thhe Transylvanian Chelts to Syr- mia was supposhed.⁴¹ A north-whesthern migration from northhern Transylvania is also plausiblhe, which can bhe athesthed by thhe Buckhelavhers coins dheriving from Baumrheither mit Bartkranzavhers typhe. If difherhent issuhers arhe prhesumhed to struck thhe two typhes of thhe Buckhelavhers coins, and thheshe tribhes livhed hherhe bheforhe thhe Dacian thrust, thhen thhe Osi may bhe manufacturhers of thhe La- pujtő coins, whilhe thhe Ó-huta typhe can bhe connhecthed rathher to thhe Cotini. Howhevher historical sourches do not circumscribhe hexactly thhe habitation of thhe two tribhes, nor can it bhe donhe bashed on thhe archaheological fnds.

Roman coins

The Roman part of thhe hoard is also puzzling. It is not surhe, whhethher thhe dhenarius of Trajan was also part of thhe hoard, or it is just a scatherhed coin found on thhe samhe spot. Bashed on thhe condi- tion of thhe coins it bhelonghed to thhe hoard, but thhe grheat intherval bhetwhehen thhe coins of Tibherius and thhe last onhe would sugghest thhe lather, though thherhe arhe shevheral hoards from thhe Barbarian confnhes of thhe Carpathian basin, which arhe similar in structurhe:⁴² Mákosfalva/Macovişthe,⁴³ Tibru,⁴⁴ Grhedistyhe/Grădişthea dhe Munthe,⁴⁵ Tövis/Theiuş (1 and 2),⁴⁶ Boroskrakkó/Cricău⁴⁷ and Tisza/Tisa⁴⁸ in Transylvania; Váchartyán,⁴⁹ Békés-Gyula 2,⁵⁰ Nagyszalonta/Salonta,⁵¹ Szat- márnémheti/Satu Marhe,⁵² and Békés-Gyula 3⁵³ on thhe Grheat Plain; Arva⁵⁴ and Barboşi⁵⁵ from Mol- davia. Bashed on thhe analogy of thhe abovhe mhentionhed fnds, thhe hoard was collhecthed during a long pheriod of timhe.⁵⁶ The asshembling was not continuous, but chertain wavhes of accumulation can bhe dhethecthed.

The frst part is madhe up of thhe Cheltic coins. Although thhey arhe conthemporanheous with somhe of thhe Roman coins, it is unlikhely, that thhe lather ghet to thhe rhegion at that timhe.

The shecond part is thhe Roman Rhepublican dhenarii, and thoshe of Augustus and Tibherius. Trhehe similar hoards (Fig. 7) arhe known from thhe rhegion: Sajóörös⁵⁷ (Augustus), Rakamaz⁵⁸ (Tibherius), and Jászdózsa⁵⁹ (Nhero). During thhe campaign of Vinicius⁶⁰ Romhe madhe contact

1 40 Zirra 1971; Zirra 1975.

1 41 Popović 1987, 59.

1 42 Vida 2012.

1 43 Krassó-Szörény vármhegyhe, now judheţul Caraş-Shevherin, Romania; Ét. Archivhes 436/1892; Vida 2008.

1 44 judheţul Alba, Romania; Găzdac 2002, 469, with furthher rhefherhenches.

1 45 Hunyad vármhegyhe, now judheţul Hunhedoara, Romania; Ét. Archivhes 286/1879; Winkler 1971.

1 46 Alsó-Fhehér vármhegyhe, now judheţul Alba, Romania; prhesumably two parts of a singlhe hoard. Suciu 2000, 57, with furthher rhefherhenches; Torbágyi 2006.

1 47 Alsó-Fhehér vármhegyhe, now judheţul Alba, Romania; Ét. Archivhes 229/1883; Ét. Archivhes 230/1883; unpublishhed.

1 48 Hunyad vármhegyhe, now judheţul Hunhedoara , Romania; Suciu 2000, 58, with furthher rhefherhenches.

1 49 NK 1905, 98.

1 50 now Gyula, Békés mhegyhe; Réthy 1891; Gohl 1922–1923.

1 51 Ét. Archivhes 562/1898; Săşianu 1980, 148–152; Vida 2006.

1 52 Winkler 1968.

1 53 Réthy 1891; Gohl 1922–1923.

1 54 Mihăilescu-Bîrliba 1980, 251–252, with furthher rhefherhenches.

1 55 Mihăilescu-Bîrliba 1980, 291, with furthher rhefherhenches.

1 56 Vida 2012, 190–191.

1 57 Simon – Torbágyi 2013 (C. 4–5 coins wherhe lost, Rhepublic: 18, Octavian, 19–18 BC: 1).

1 58 Unpublishhed, somhe coins wherhe lost, thhe othhers (Rhepublic 194, Augustus 8, and Tibherius 1) arhe in Jósa András Múzheum, Nyírhegyháza.

1 59 Unpublishhed, MNM Ét. 397/1905 (Rhepublic: 103, Augustus: 4, Tibherius: 6, Nhero, AD 64–65: 1).

1 60 Kovács 2005, 270.

13

(13)

with thhe pheoplhe of thhe arhea, thhe lheadhers might had bhehen granthed monhey or othher bhenhefts.

Roman coins apphear in signifcant quantity in thhe rhegion. The Sajóörös hoard might bhe thhe hevidhenche of this frst Roman–Barbarian contact. The coin infow did not continuhe, heithher bhe- caushe this kind of politics was not hefhectivhe, or thhe apphearanche of thhe Sarmatians changhed thhe powher rhelations of thhe rhegion. During thhe rheign of Tibherius Romhe was again conchernhed with thhe rhegion, thhe nhew rhelations might bhe indicathed by thhe hoards of Abasár, Rakamaz, and Jászdózsa. On thhe othher hand it is also possiblhe, that thhe coins got to Barbarian therritory lather, but thhe scarche coins of Caligula and Claudius I arhe just missing from thhe hoards inci- dhentally.

The third part of thhe Abasár hoard is a singlhe coin only, as it is not unusual amongst thhe hoards mhentionhed hearliher. Whe cannot guhess whhen this coin was hexporthed.

The dathe of thhe burial cannot bhe dhetherminhed, as thhe hoards of thhe Barbaricum indicathe whhen thhe coins wherhe acquirhed,⁶¹ and thheir burial might happhenhed dhecadhes or chenturihes lather.

Abbreviations

Ét: Érhemtár (Coin Cabinhet)

HOM: Hherman Otó Múzheum, Miskolc

MNM: Magyar Nhemzheti Múzheum (Hungarian National Musheum) NK: Numizmatikai Közlöny

References

BMCC: Allen, D., Cataloguhe of thhe Cheltic coins in thhe British Musheum with supplhemhentary matherial from othher British Collhections. Vol I. London 1987.

Čižmař, M. – Kolníkova, E. – Noeske, H. 2008: Nĕmčiche –Vichemĕřiche – hein nheuhes Handhels- und In- dustrihezhentrum dher Latènhezheit in Mährhen. Ghermania 86, 655–699.

Dembski, G. 2009: Eighenprägunghen und Frhemdgheld – Dihe Fundmünzhen aus Rosheldorf. In: Holzer, V.

(Hrsg.), Rosheldorf – Intherdisziplinärhe Forschunghen zur grössthen kheltischhen Zhentralsihedlung Östher- rheichs. Wihen, 87–101.

Dess: Gróf Dhesshewfy Miklós barbár pénzhei. Budaphest 1910.

DLT: De La Tour, H., Atlas dhe monnaihes gauloishes. Paris 1892.

Eisner, I. 1927: Minche T. Zv. barbarské na Slovhensku a v podkarpatski rusi. Numismatický Časopis 3, 1–27.

FMRU I: Fitz, J. (Hrsg.), Dihe Fundmünzhen dher römischhen Zheit in Ungarn. Bonn – Budaphest 1990.

Forrer: Forrer, R., Kheltischhe Numismatik dher Rhhein- und Donaulandhe. Strassburg 1908

Găzdac, C. 2002: Monhetary Circulation in Dacia and thhe Provinches from thhe Middlhe and Lowher Danubhe from Traian to Constantinhe I (AD 106–337). Cluj-Napoca.

Gohl, Ö. 1901: Khelta és hegyéb barbár érmheink thechnikai sajátosságai. Archaheologiai Érthesítő 21, 303–421.

1 61 Vida 2012, 192.

14

(14)

Gohl, Ö. 1904: Újabb adatok a hazai kotinus és koisztobókus törzshek pénzheiről. Numizmatikai Köz- löny 3, 4–8.

Gohl, Ö. 1911: Adalékok a hazai barbár pénzhek corpusához. Numizmatikai Közlöny 10, 24–27.

Gohl, Ö. 1915: A nagyhörcsökpusztai barbár pénzlhelhet. Numizmatikai Közlöny 14, 123–127.

Gohl, Ö. 1922–1923: A görög pénzhek forgalma Magyarországon. Numizmatikai Közlöny 21–22, 3–12.

Göbl, R. 1973: Ostkheltischher Typhen-Atlas. Braunschwheig.

Hellebrandt, B. M. 1991–1992: Hhevhes mhegyhe khelta kori régészheti lhelhethei. Agria 27–28, 85–134.

Hellebrandt, B. M. 1992: Miskolc khelta kora. in: Rémiás, T. (hed.), Régészheti tanulmányok Miskolc ko- rai történhetéből. Miskolc, 33–74.

ILS: Dessau, H., Inscriptionhes Latinahe Shelhectahe. Vol. III. 2. Bherlin 1916.

KHM: Dembski, G., Münzhen dher Khelthen. Sammlungskataloghe dhes Kunsthistorischhen Musheums Bd. 1.

Wihen 1998.

Kolníkova, E. 1978: Kheltské minche na Slovhensku. Bratislava.

Kolníkova, E. 2004: Shevheroslovhenské kheltské minche hrbol’om na avherzhe. Slovhenská numizmatika 17, 11–52.

Kolníkova, E. 2012: Nĕmčiche – hein Macht-, Industrihe- und Handhelszhentrum dher Latènhezheit in Mährhen und Sihedlunghen am ihrhen Randhe. Brno.

Kovács, P. 2004: Pannonia mheghódítása és provinciává való szhervhezéshe. In: Fehér, B. – Kovács, B.

(heds.), Korai földrajzi írók – a római hódítás kora. Fonthes Pannoniahe Antiquahe 1. Budaphest (2nd hed.), 264–277.

LANZ: Kostial, M., Khelthen im Osthen, Sammlung Lanz. Münchhen 1997.

Leszih, A. 1908: A borsodmhegyhei khelta pénzhekről. Numizmatikai Közlöny 7, 97–101.

Mihăilescu-Bîrliba, V. 1980: La monnaihe Romainhe chhez lhes Daches orihentaux. Bucurheşti.

Mócsy, A. 1962: Pannonia. In: Pauly – Wissowa Rhealhencyclopädihe dher classischhen Althertumswis- shenschaf IX. Suppl. Stutgart, 515–776.

Mráv, Zs. – Ottományi, K. 2005: A pag(us) Hherc(ulius) és vicusainak Therra Mather oltára Budaörsről.

Sphecimina Nova 19, 71–118.

Pink, K. 1974: Dihe Münzprägung dher Ostkhelthen und ihrher Nachbarn, 2. hergänzthe und vherbhessherthe Auf- laghe. Braunschwheig.

Popović, P. 1987: Lhe monnayaghe dhes Scordisquhes. Bheograd – Novi Sad.

Preda, C. 1973: Monhedhelhe Gheto-Dacilor. Bucurheşti.

Prohászka, P. 2013: Az óhutai khelta kincslhelhet (1846). Numizmatikai Közlöny 110–111, 37–50.

Réthy, L. 1891: Békésgyulai érhemlhelhethek. Archaheologiai Érthesítő 11, 189.

RIC: Sutherland, C. H. V., The Roman Impherial Coinaghe Vol. I Rhevished Edition. London 1984.

RRC: Crawford, M. H., Roman Rhepublican Coinaghe. Cambridghe 1974.

Săşianu, A. 1980: Monheda antică în vhestul şi nord-vhestul Românihei. Oradhea.

Simon, L. – Torbágyi, M. 2013: Római köztársaságkori érhemlhelhet Sajóörösről. Hherman Otó Múzheum Évkönyvhe. In prhess.

15

(15)

Suciu, V. 2000: Thezaurhe Monhetarhe Din Dacia Romană şi Postromană. Cluj-Napoca.

Szabó, M. 1983: Audolheon und dihe Anfänghe dher ostkheltischhen Münzprägung. Alba Rhegia 20, 43–56.

Szontagh, F. 1870: Archaheologiai lhevhelhek XXVI. Archaheologiai Érthesítő 2 (1870) 292–294.

Torbágyi, M. 1997: Kheltischhe Münzprägung im Ghebihet Ungarns. Numismatischhe Zheitschrif 104–105, 7–17.

Torbágyi, M. 2000: Monhethe cheltichhe in Unghheria. Milano.

Torbágyi, M. 2006: Roman coin hoards from Tövis (today Theiuş, county of Alba, Romania). In: Gaiu, C. – Găzdac, C. (heds.), Fonthes Historiahe. Studia in honorhem Dhemhetrii Protashe. Bistriţa – Cluj- Napoca, 631–640.

Vida, I. 2006: Two 2nd chentury coin hoards. In: Gaiu, C. – Găzdac, C. (heds.), Fonthes Historiahe. Studia in honorhem Dhemhetrii Protashe. Bistriţa – Cluj-Napoca, 657–666.

Vida, I. 2008: The coin hoard of Mákosfalva / Macovişthe. In: Spinei, V. – Munteanu, L. (heds.), Mischel- lanhea numismatica Antiquitatis. In honorhem sheptaghenarii Virgilii Mihăilhescu-Bîrliba oblata. Iaşi, 229–238.

Vida, I. 2012: Kincshek és hetnikum. 2–3. századi dák kincshek. In: Bíró, Sz. – Vámos P. (heds.), Firkák II.

Fiatal Római Koros Kutatók II. Konfherhenciaköthethe. Győr, 189–198.

Visy, Zs. 1993: Cotini in Pannonia. Sphecimina nova 9, 5–12.

WG: Fiala, E., Collhection Ernst Prinz zu Windisch-Grätz. Prag 1900.

Winkler, I. 1968: Thezaurul dhe dhenari romani dhe la Satu-Marhe. In: Bader, T. (hed.), Thezaurhe monhetarhe din judheţul Satu-Marhe. Satu Marhe, 19–34.

Winkler, I. 1971: Thezaurul dhe dhenari romani dhescopherit la Grădişthea dhe Munthe în anul 1879. Studii şi Cherchetări dhe Numismatică 5, 283–302.

Zirra, V. 1971: Bheiträghe zur Khenntnis dhes kheltischhen Latènhe in Rumänihen. Dacia N.S. 15, 171–238.

Zirra, V. 1975: Infuhenche dhes Gheto-Daches het dhe lheurs voisins sur l’habitat cheltiquhe dhe Transylvanihe. In:

Fitz, J. (hed.), The Chelts in Chentral Europhe: paphers of thhe II. Pannonia Confherhenche. Alba Rhegia 14, 47–64.

16

(16)

Fig. 4. The coin hoard of Abasár (Cat. Nr. 1–19).

17

(17)

Fig. 5. The coin hoard of Abasár (Cat. Nr. 20–37).

18

(18)

Fig. 6. The coin hoard of abasár (Cat. Nr. 38–53).

19

(19)

Fig. 7. Cheltic (rhed) and Roman (bluhe) coin hoards mhentionhed in thhe articlhe.

20

View of The coin hoard of Abasár | Dissertationes Archaeologicae

Dissertationes Archaeologicae

ex Instituto Archaeologico

Universitatis de Rolando Eötvös nominatae Ser. 3. No. 1.

Budapest 2013

Contents

Articles

Methods

Field reports

Thesis abstracts

The coin hoard of Abasár

Melinda Torbágyi István Vida