• Nem Talált Eredményt

For some real α(α &gt

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "For some real α(α &gt"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

http://jipam.vu.edu.au/

Volume 3, Issue 5, Article 72, 2002

COEFFICIENT ESTIMATES FOR CERTAIN CLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

SHIGEYOSHI OWA AND JUNICHI NISHIWAKI DEPARTMENT OFMATHEMATICS

KINKIUNIVERSITY

HIGASHI-OSAKA, OSAKA577-8502 JAPAN.

owa@math.kindai.ac.jp

URL:http://163.51.52.186/math/OWA.htm

Received 9 September, 2002; accepted 10 October, 2002 Communicated by H.M. Srivastava

ABSTRACT. For some real α(α > 1), two subclassesM(α)andN(α)of analytic fuctions f(z)withf(0) = 0andf0(0) = 1inUare introduced. The object of the present paper is to discuss the coefficient estimates for functionsf(z)belonging to the classesM(α)andN(α).

Key words and phrases: Analytic functions, Univalent functions, Starlike functions, Convex functions.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 30C45.

1. INTRODUCTION ANDDEFINITIONS

LetAdenote the class of functionsf(z)of the form:

f(z) = z+

X

n=2

anzn,

which are analytic in the open unit disk U = {z : z ∈ C and |z| < 1}. Let M(α) be the subclass ofAconsisting of functionsf(z)which satisfy the inequality:

Re

zf0(z) f(z)

< α (z ∈U)

for some α (α > 1). And letN(α)be the subclass of A consisting of functions f(z)which satisfy the inequality:

Re

1 + zf00(z) f0(z)

< α (z ∈U)

for someα(α >1). Then, we see thatf(z)∈ N(α)if and only ifzf0(z)∈ M(α).

ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756

c 2002 Victoria University. All rights reserved.

109-02

(2)

Remark 1.1. For 1 < α ≤ 43, the classesM(α)andN(α)were introduced by Uralegaddi et al. [3].

Remark 1.2. The classesM(α)andN(α)correspond to the casek= 2of the classesMk(α) andNk(α), respectively, which were investigated recently by Owa and Srivastava [1].

We easily see that Example 1.1.

(i) f(z) =z(1−z)2(α−1) ∈ M(α).

(ii) g(z) = 2α−11 {1−(1−z)2α−1} ∈ N(α).

2. INCLUSIONTHEOREMSINVOLVING COEFFICIENT INEQUALITIES

In this section we derive sufficient conditions forf(z)to belong to the aforementioned func- tion classes, which are obtained by using coefficient inequalities.

Theorem 2.1. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies

X

n=2

{(n−k) +|n+k−2α|} |an|52(α−1)

for somek(05k 51)and someα(α >1), thenf(z)∈ M(α).

Proof. Let us suppose that (2.1)

X

n=2

{(n−k) +|n+k−2α|} |an|52(α−1)

forf(z)∈ A.

It suffices to show that

zf0(z) f(z) −k

zf0(z)

f(z) −(2α−k)

<1 (z∈U).

We note that

zf0(z) f(z) −k

zf0(z)

f(z) −(2α−k)

=

1−k+P

n=2(n−k)anzn−1 1 +k−2α+P

n=2(n+k−2α)anzn−1

5 1−k+P

n=2(n−k)|an||z|n−1 2α−1−k−P

n=2|n+k−2α| |an||z|n−1

< 1−k+P

n=2(n−k)|an| 2α−1−k−P

n=2|n+k−2α| |an|. The last expression is bounded above by 1 if

1−k+

X

n=2

(n−k)|an|52α−1−k−

X

n=2

|n+k−2α| |an|

which is equivalent to our condition:

X

n=2

{(n−k) +|n+k−2α|}|an|52(α−1)

of the theorem. This completes the proof of the theorem.

If we takek = 1and someα 1< α5 32

in Theorem 2.1, then we have

(3)

Corollary 2.2. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies

X

n=2

(n−α)|an|5α−1

for someα 1< α5 32

, thenf(z)∈ M(α).

Example 2.1. The functionf(z)given by f(z) =z+

X

n=2

4(α−1)

n(n+ 1)(n−k+|n+k−2α|)zn belongs to the classM(α).

For the classN(α), we have Theorem 2.3. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies

(2.2)

X

n=2

n(n−k+ 1 +|n+k−2α|)|an|52(α−1)

for somek(05k 51)and someα(α >1), thenf(z)belongs to the classN(α).

Corollary 2.4. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies

X

n=2

n(n−α)|an|5α−1

for someα 1< α5 32

, thenf(z)∈ N(α).

Example 2.2. The function f(z) = z+

X

n=2

4(α−1)

n2(n+ 1)(n−k+|n+k−2α|)zn belongs to the classN(α).

Further, denoting byS(α)andK(α)the subclasses ofAconsisting of all starlike functions of orderα, and of all convex functions of orderα, respectively (see [2]), we derive

Theorem 2.5. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the coefficient inequality (2.1) for someα 1< α5 k+22 5 32 , then f(z) ∈ S 4−3α3−2α

. If f(z) ∈ A satisfies the coefficient inequality (2.2) for some α 1< α5 k−22 5 32

thenf(z)∈ K 4−3α3−2α . Proof. For someα 1< α5 k+22 5 32

, we see that the coefficient inequality (2.1) implies that

X

n=2

(n−α)|an|5α−1.

It is well-known that iff(z)∈ Asatisfies

X

n=2

n−β

1−β|an|51

for someβ(05 β < 1), thenf(z) ∈ S(β)by Silverman [2]. Therefore, we have to find the smallest positiveβsuch that

X

n=2

n−β 1−β|an|5

X

n=2

n−α

α−1|an| 5 1.

(4)

This gives that

(2.3) β 5 (2−α)n−α

n−2α+ 1

for alln = 2,3,4,· · ·. Noting that the right-hand side of the inequality (2.3) is increasing for n, we conclude that

β 5 4−3α 3−2α, which proves thatf(z) ∈ S 4−3α3−2α

. Similarly, we can show that iff(z) ∈ Asatisfies (2.2), thenf(z)∈ K 4−3α3−2α

.

Our result for the coefficient estimates of functionsf(z)∈ M(α)is contained in Theorem 2.6. Iff(z)∈ M(α), then

(2.4) |an|5 Πnj=2(j+ 2α−4)

(n−1)! (n =2).

Proof. Let us define the functionp(z)by

p(z) = α− zff(z)0(z) α−1

forf(z)∈ M(α). Thenp(z)is analytic inU, p(0) = 1andRe(p(z))>0 (z ∈U). Therefore, if we write

p(z) = 1 +

X

n=1

pnzn,

then|pn|52 (n =1). Since

αf(z)−zf0(z) = (α−1)p(z)f(z), we obtain that

(1−n)an= (α−1)(pn−1+a2pn−2+a3pn−3+· · ·+an−1p1).

Ifn = 2, then−a2 = (α−1)p1 implies that

|a2|= (α−1)|p1|52α−2.

Thus the coefficient estimate (2.4) holds true for n = 2. Next, suppose that the coefficient estimate

|ak|5 Qk

j=2(j+ 2α−4) (k−1)!

is true for allk= 2,3,4, · · · , n. Then we have that

−nan+1 = (α−1)(pn+a2pn−1+a3pn−2+· · ·+anp1),

(5)

so that

n|an+1|5(2α−2)(1 +|a2|+|a3|+· · ·+|an|) 5(2α−2)

1 + (2α−2) + (2α−2)(2α−1)

2! +· · ·+Πnj=2(j+ 2α−4) (n−1)!

= (2α−2)

(2α−1)2α(2α+ 1)· · ·(2α+n−4) (n−2)!

+ (2α−2)(2α−1)2α· · ·(2α+n−4) (n−1)!

= Πn+1j=2(j+ 2α−4) (n−1)! .

Thus, the coefficient estimate (2.4) holds true for the case ofk = n+ 1. Applying the mathe- matical induction for the coefficient estimate (2.4), we complete the proof of Theorem 2.6.

For the functionsf(z)belonging to the classN(α), we also have Theorem 2.7. Iff(z)∈ N(α), then

|an|5 Qn

j=2(j+ 2α−4)

n! (n =2).

Remark 2.8. We can not show that Theorem 2.6 and Theorem 2.7 are sharp. If we can prove that Theorem 2.6 is sharp, then the sharpness of Theorem 2.7 follows.

REFERENCES

[1] S. OWA AND H.M. SRIVASTAVA, Some generalized convolution properties associated with cer- tain subclasses of analytic functions, J. Ineq. Pure Appl. Math., 3(3) (2002), Article 42. [ONLINE http://jipam.vu.edu.au/v3n3/033_02.html]

[2] H. SILVERMAN, Univalent functions with negative coefficients, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 51 (1975), 109–116.

[3] B.A. URALEGADDI, M.D. GANIGIANDS.M. SARANGI, Univalent functions with positive co- efficients, Tamkang J. Math., 25 (1994), 225–230.

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

Abstract: For functions f (z) which are starlike of order α, convex of order α, and λ-spiral- like of order α in the open unit disk U , some interesting sufficient conditions

For functions f (z) which are starlike of order α, convex of order α, and λ-spiral- like of order α in the open unit disk U , some interesting sufficient conditions

The purpose of this paper is to obtain sufficient bound estimates for harmonic func- tions belonging to the classes S H ∗ [A, B], K H [A, B] defined by subordination, and we give

In this paper, we study the weakly convergent sequence coefficient and obtain its estimates for some parameters in Banach spaces, which give some sufficient conditions for a

General companion inequalities related to Jensen’s inequality for the classes of m-convex and (α, m)-convex functions are presented.. We show how Jensen’s inequality for these

General companion inequalities related to Jensen’s inequality for the classes of m-convex and (α, m)-convex functions are presented.. We show how Jensen’s inequality for these

In this section we give sufficient and necessary conditions for the reversed prob- lem: Characterize positive functions f that satisfy (RQI).

In this paper we introduce the class B(p, n, µ, α) of analytic and p-valent func- tions to obtain some sufficient conditions and some angular properties for func- tions belonging