• Nem Talált Eredményt

COEFFICIENT INEQUALITIES FOR CERTAIN CLASSES OF ANALYTIC AND UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "COEFFICIENT INEQUALITIES FOR CERTAIN CLASSES OF ANALYTIC AND UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS"

Copied!
20
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

Coefficient Inequalities Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and

H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page

Contents

JJ II

J I

Page1of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

COEFFICIENT INEQUALITIES FOR CERTAIN CLASSES OF ANALYTIC AND UNIVALENT

FUNCTIONS

TOSHIO HAYAMI, SHIGEYOSHI OWA H.M. SRIVASTAVA

Department of Mathematics Department of Mathematics and Statistics

Kinki University, Higashi-Osaka, University of Victoria, Victoria,

Osaka 577-8502, JAPAN British Columbia V8W 3P4, CANADA

EMail:ha_ya_to112@hotmail.com, owa@math.kindai.ac.jp EMail:harimsri@math.uvic.ca

Received: 09 August, 2007

Accepted: 12 September, 2007 Communicated by: Th.M. Rassias

2000 AMS Sub. Class.: Primary 30A10, 30C45; Secondary 26D07.

Key words: Coefficient inequalities, Analytic functions, Univalent functions, Spiral-like functions, Starlike functions, Convex functions.

Abstract: For functionsf(z)which are starlike of orderα, convex of orderα, andλ-spiral- like of orderαin the open unit diskU, some interesting sufficient conditions involving coefficient inequalities forf(z)are discussed. Several (known or new) special cases and consequences of these coefficient inequalities are also consid- ered.

Acknowledgements: The present investigation was supported, in part, by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada under Grant OGP0007353.

(2)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page2of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Contents

1 Introduction, Definitions and Preliminaries 3

2 Coefficient Conditions for Functions in the ClassS(α) 8 3 Coefficient Conditions for Functions in the ClassSP(λ, α) 14

(3)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page3of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

1. Introduction, Definitions and Preliminaries

LetA0be the class of functionsf(z)of the form:

(1.1) f(z) = a0+a1z+

X

n=2

anzn,

which are analytic in the open unit disk

U={z :z ∈C and |z|<1}.

Iff(z)∈ A0is given by (1.1), together with the following normalization:

a0 = 0 and a1 = 1, then we say thatf(z)∈ A.

Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following inequality:

(1.2) R

zf0(z) f(z)

> α (z ∈U; 05α <1),

thenf(z)is said to be starlike of order α in U. We denote byS(α)the subclass ofAconsisting of functionsf(z)which are starlike of orderαin U. Similarly, we say thatf(z)is in the class K(α)of convex functions of orderα inUiff(z) ∈ A satisfies the following inequality:

(1.3) R

1 + zf00(z) f0(z)

> α (z ∈U; 05α <1).

It is easily observed from (1.2) and (1.3) that (see, for details, [3]) f(z)∈ K(α)⇐⇒zf0(z)∈ S(α) (05α <1).

(4)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page4of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

As usual, in our present investigation, we write

S :=S(0) and K:=K(0).

Furthermore, we letBdenote the class of functionsp(z)of the form:

p(z) = 1 +

X

n=1

pnzn, which are analytic inU.

Each of the following lemmas will be needed in our present investigation.

Lemma 1. A functionp(z)∈ Bsatisfies the following condition:

R[p(z)]>0 (z ∈U) if and only if

p(z)6= ζ−1

ζ+ 1 (z∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1).

Proof. For the sake of completeness, we choose to give a proof of Lemma1, even though it is fairly obvious that the following bilinear (or Möbius) transformation:

w= z−1 z+ 1

maps the unit circle∂Uonto the imaginary axisR(w) = 0. Indeed, for allζsuch that

|ζ|= 1 (ζ ∈C), we set

w= ζ−1

ζ+ 1 (ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1).

(5)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page5of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Then

|ζ|=

1 +w 1−w

= 1, which shows that

R(w) = R

ζ−1 ζ+ 1

= 0 (ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1).

Moreover, by noting thatp(0) = 1forp(z)∈ B, we know that p(z)6= ζ−1

ζ+ 1 (z∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1).

This evidently completes the proof of Lemma1.

Lemma 2. A functionf(z)∈ Ais in the classS(α)if and only if

(1.4) 1 +

X

n=2

Anzn−1 6= 0,

where

An= n+ 1−2α+ (n−1)ζ 2−2α an. Proof. Upon setting

p(z) =

zf0(z) f(z) −α

1−α f(z)∈ S(α) , we find that

p(z)∈ B and R[p(z)]>0 (z ∈U).

(6)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page6of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Using Lemma1, we have (1.5)

zf0(z) f(z) −α

1−α 6= ζ−1

ζ+ 1 (z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1), which readily yields

(ζ+ 1)zf0(z) + (1−2α−ζ)f(z)6= 0

f(z)∈ S(α); z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1 . Thus we find that

(ζ+ 1)z+ (ζ+ 1)

X

n=2

nanzn

!

+ (1−2α−ζ) z+

X

n=2

anzn

! 6= 0 (z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1),

that is, that

2(1−α)z 1 +

X

n=2

n+ 1−2α+ (n−1)ζ

2(1−α) anzn−1

! (1.6) 6= 0

(z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1).

Now, dividing both sides of (1.6) by2(1−α)z (z 6= 0), we obtain 1 +

X

n=2

n+ 1−2α+ (n−1)ζ

2(1−α) anzn−1 6= 0 (z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1),

which completes the proof of Lemma2(see also Remark2below).

(7)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page7of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Remark 1. It follows from the normalization conditions:

a0 = 0 and a1 = 1 that

A0 = 1−2α−x

2−2α a0 = 0 and A1 = 2−2α

2−2α a1 = 1.

Remark 2. The assertion(1.4)of Lemma2is equivalent to 1

z f(z)∗ z+ ζ+2α−12−2α z2 (1−z)2

!

6= 0 (z ∈U),

which was given earlier by Silverman et al. [2]. Furthermore, in its special case whenα = 0, Lemma2yields a recent result of Nezhmetdinov and Ponnusamy[1]

for the sufficient conditions involving the coefficients off(z)to be in the classS. The object of the present paper is to give some generalizations of the aforemen- tioned result due to Nezhmetdinov and Ponnusamy [1]. We also briefly discuss several interesting corollaries and consequences of our main results.

(8)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page8of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

2. Coefficient Conditions for Functions in the Class S

(α)

Our first result for functionsf(z)to be in the classS(α)is contained in Theorem1 below.

Theorem 1. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following condition:

X

n=2

n

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j (j+ 1−2α) β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

+

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j (j −1) β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

!

52(1−α) (2.1)

(05α <1; β ∈R; γ ∈R), thenf(z)∈ S(α).

Proof. First of all, we note that

(1−z)β 6= 0 and (1 +z)γ 6= 0 (z ∈U; β ∈R; γ ∈R).

Hence, if the following inequality:

(2.2) 1 +

X

n=2

Anzn−1

!

(1−z)β(1 +z)γ 6= 0 (z ∈U; β ∈R; γ ∈R)

holds true, then we have

1 +

X

n=2

Anzn−1 6= 0,

(9)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page9of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

which is the relation (1.4) of Lemma2. It is easily seen that (2.1) is equivalent to

(2.3) 1 +

X

n=2

Anzn−1

! X

n=0

(−1)n bnzn

! X

n=0

cnzn

! 6= 0,

where, for convenience,

bn:=

β n

and cn :=

γ n

.

Considering the Cauchy product of the first two factors, (2.3) can be rewritten as follows:

(2.4) 1 +

X

n=2

Bnzn−1

! X

n=0

cnzn

! 6= 0,

where

Bn:=

n

X

j=1

(−1)n−j Ajbn−j.

Furthermore, by applying the same method for the Cauchy product in (2.4), we find that

1 +

X

n=2 n

X

k=1

Bkcn−k

!

zn−1 6= 0 (z ∈U) or, equivalently, that

1 +

X

n=2

" n X

k=1 k

X

j=1

(−1)k−jAjbk−j

! cn−k

#

zn−1 6= 0 (z ∈U).

(10)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page10of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Thus, iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following inequality:

X

n=2

n

X

k=1 k

X

j=1

(−1)k−jAjbk−j

! cn−k

51, that is, if

1 2(1−α)

X

n=2

n

X

k=1 k

X

j=1

(−1)k−j[(j + 1−2α) + (j−1)ζ]ajbk−j

! cn−k

5 1 2(1−α)

X

n=2

n

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j (j+ 1−2α)ajbk−j

# cn−k

+|ζ|

n

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j (j−1)bk−jaj

# cn−k

!

51 (05α <1; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1),

thenf(z)∈ S(α). This completes the proof of Theorem1.

Settingα= 0in Theorem1, we deduce the following corollary.

Corollary 1. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following condition:

X

n=2

n

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j (j+ 1) β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

+

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j (j−1) β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

! 52 (2.5)

(β ∈R; γ ∈R),

(11)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page11of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

thenf(z)∈ S.

Remark 3. If, in the hypothesis(2.5)of Corollary1, we set

β−1 =γ = 0 or β =γ = 1 or β−2 =γ = 0,

we arrive at the result given by Nezhmetdinov and Ponnusamy [1]. Moreover, for β =γ = 0in Theorem1, we obtain Corollary2below.

Corollary 2. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following coefficient inequality:

(2.6)

X

n=2

(n−α)|an|51−α (05α <1),

thenf(z)∈ S(α).

In particular, by puttingα = 0in (2.6), we get the following well-known coeffi- cient condition for the familiar classSof starlike functions inU.

Corollary 3. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following coefficient inequality:

(2.7)

X

n=2

n|an|51,

thenf(z)∈ S.

We next derive the coefficient condition for functionsf(z)to be in the classK(α).

(12)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page12of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Theorem 2. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following condition:

X

n=2

n

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j j(j+ 1−2α) β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

+

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j j(j−1) β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

!

52(1−α) (2.8)

(05α <1; β ∈R; γ ∈R), thenf(z)∈ K(α).

Proof. Since zf0(z) belongs to the class S(α) if and only if f(z) is in the class K(α), and since

(2.9) f(z) =z+

X

n=2

anzn

and

(2.10) zf0(z) =z+

X

n=2

nanzn,

upon replacingaj in Theorem1byjaj, we readily prove Theorem2.

By considering some special values for the parametersα, βandγ, we can deduce the following corollaries.

(13)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page13of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Corollary 4. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following condition:

(2.11)

X

n=2

n

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j j(j+ 1)(−1)k−j β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

+

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j j(j −1) β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

!

52 (β ∈R; γ ∈R), thenf(z)∈ K.

Corollary 5. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following coefficient inequality:

(2.12)

X

n=2

n(n−α)|an|51−α (05α <1),

thenf(z)∈ K(α).

Corollary 6. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following coefficient inequality:

(2.13)

X

n=2

n2|an|51,

thenf(z)∈ K.

(14)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page14of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

3. Coefficient Conditions for Functions in the Class SP (λ, α)

In this section, we consider the subclassSP(λ, α)ofA, which consists of functions f(z)∈ Aif and only if the following inequality holds true:

(3.1) R

e

zf0(z) f(z) −α

>0

z ∈U; 05α <1; −π

2 < λ < π 2

. Forf(z)∈ SP(λ, α), we first derive Lemma3below.

Lemma 3. A functionf(z)∈ Ais in the classSP(λ, α)if and only if

(3.2) 1 +

X

n=2

Cnzn−1 6= 0,

where

Cn:= n−1 + 2(1−α)e−iλcosλ+ (n−1)ζ 2(1−α)e−iλcosλ an. Proof. Letting

p(z) =

ezf0(z) f(z) −α

−i(1−α) sinλ (1−α) cosλ , we see that

p(z)∈ B and R[p(z)]>0 (z ∈U).

It follows from Lemma1that

(3.3) e

zf0(z) f(z) −α

−i(1−α) sinλ

(1−α) cosλ 6= ζ−1

ζ+ 1 (z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1).

(15)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page15of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

We need not consider Lemma1for the case whenz = 0, because (3.3) implies that p(0)6= ζ−1

ζ+ 1 (ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1).

It also follows from (3.3) that

e[zf0(z)−αf(z)]−i(1−α)f(z) sinλ

(1−α) cosλ 6=

ζ−1 ζ+ 1

f(z) (z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1),

which readily yields (ζ+ 1)

e[zf0(z)−αf(z)]−i(1−α)f(z) sinλ 6= (ζ−1)(1−α)f(z) cosλ (z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1)

or, equivalently,

(3.4) (ζ+ 1)ezf0(z)−αef(z)−ζαef(z)

−i(1−α)f(z) sinλ−iζ(1−α)f(z) sinλ

6=ζ(1−α)f(z) cosλ−(1−α)f(z) cosλ (z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1).

We find from (3.4) that

(ζ+ 1)ezf0(z)−αef(z)−ζαef(z)−ζ(1−α)ef(z) + (1−α)e−iλf(z)6= 0 (z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1),

that is, that

(1 +ζ)ezf0(z) + (e−iλ−2αcosλ−ζe)f(z)6= 0 (z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1),

(16)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page16of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

which, in light of (1.1) witha0 =a1−1 = 0,assumes the following form:

(ζ+ 1)e z+

X

n=2

nanzn

!

+ (e−iλ−ζe−2αcosλ) z+

X

n=2

anzn

! 6= 0 (z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1)

or, equivalently,

2(1−α)zcosλ 1+

X

n=2

n+e−2iλ−2αe−iλcosλ+(n−1)ζ

2(1−α)e−iλcosλ anzn−1

! 6= 0 (3.5)

(z ∈U; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1). Finally, upon dividing both sides of (3.5) by

2(1−α)zcosλ 6= 0 and noting that

e−2iλ =−1 + 2e−iλcosλ, we obtain

1 +

X

n=2

n−1 + 2(1−α)e−iλcosλ+ (n−1)ζ

2(1−α)e−iλcosλ an6= 0

05α <1; −π

2 < λ < π

2; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1

,

which completes the proof of Lemma 3 (see also the proof of a known result [1, Theorem 3.1]).

By applying Lemma3, we now prove Theorem3below.

(17)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page17of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Theorem 3. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following condition:

X

n=2

n

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j [j−α+ (1−α)e−2iλ] β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

+

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j (j−1) β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

!

52(1−α) cosλ (3.6)

05α <1; −π

2 < λ < π

2; β ∈R; γ ∈R

,

thenf(z)∈ SP(λ, α).

Proof. Applying the same method as in the proof of Theorem1, we see thatf(z)is in the classSP(λ, α)if

(3.7)

X

n=2

n

X

k=1 k

X

j=1

(−1)k−j Cjbk−j

! cn−k

51

where, as before,

bn:=

β n

and cn :=

γ n

,

the coefficientsCnbeing given as in Lemma3. It follows from the inequality (3.7) that

1

|2(1−α)e−iλcosλ|

·

X

n=2

n

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j(j−1+2(1−α)e−iλcosλ)+ζ(j−1) ajbk−j

# cn−k

(18)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page18of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

5 1

2(1−α) cosλ

·

X

n=2

n

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j

j−α+(1−α)(−1+2e−iλcosλ) bk−jaj

# cn−k

+ |ζ|

n

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j (j −1)bk−jaj

# cn−k

!

51

05α <1; −π

2 < λ < π

2; ζ ∈C; |ζ|= 1 , (3.8)

which implies that, iff(z)satisfies the hypothesis (3.6) of Theorem3, then f(z) ∈ SP(λ, α). This completes the proof of Theorem3.

In its special case when

β−1 =γ = 0 or β =γ = 1 or β−2 =γ = 0, Theorem3would immediately yield the following corollary.

Corollary 7 (cf. [1]). Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies any one of the following conditions:

(3.9)

X

n=2

[n−α+ (1−α)e−2iλ](an−an−1) +an−1

+|(n−1)(an−an−1) +an−1| 52(1−α) cosλ

05α <1; −π

2 < λ < π 2

or

(3.10)

X

n=2

[n−α+ (1−α)e−2iλ](an−an−2) + 2an−2

(19)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page19of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

+|(n−1)(an−an−2) + 2an−2| 52(1−α) cosλ

05α <1; −π

2 < λ < π 2

or

(3.11)

X

n=2

[n−1−α+ (1−α)e−2iλ](an−2an−1+an−2) +an−an−2

+|(n−2)(an−2an−1+an−2) +an−an−2| 52(1−α) cosλ

05α <1; −π

2 < λ < π 2

, thenf(z)∈ SP(λ, α).

Remark 4. Forλ = 0,Theorem3implies Theorem1. Furthermore, by settingα= 0 in Theorem3,we arrive at the following sufficient condition for functionsf(z)∈ A to be in the classSP(λ).

Corollary 8. Iff(z)∈ Asatisfies the following condition:

(3.12)

X

n=2

n

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j (j+e−2iλ) β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

+

X

k=1

" k X

j=1

(−1)k−j (j −1) β

k−j

aj

# γ n−k

!

52 cosλ

05α <1; β ∈R; γ ∈R; −π

2 < λ < π 2

, then

f(z)∈ SP(λ) :=SP(λ,0).

(20)

Coefficient Inequalities

Toshio Hayami, Shigeyoshi Owa and H.M. Srivastava vol. 8, iss. 4, art. 95, 2007

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page20of 21 Go Back Full Screen

Close

References

[1] I.R. NEZHMETDINOVANDS. PONNUSAMY, New coefficient conditions for the starlikeness of analytic functions and their applications, Houston J. Math., 31 (2005), 587–604.

[2] H. SILVERMAN, E.M. SILVIA ANDD. TELAGE, Convolution conditions for convexity, starlikeness and spiral-likeness, Math. Zeitschr., 162 (1978), 125–130.

[3] H.M. SRIVASTAVA AND S. OWA (Editors), Current Topics in Analytic Func- tion Theory, World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, New Jersey, Lon- don and Hong Kong, 1992.

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

In this paper, we consider univalent log-harmonic mappings of the form f = zhg defined on the unit disk U which are starlike of order α.. Representation theorems and distortion

In this paper, we consider univalent log-harmonic mappings of the form f = zhg defined on the unit disk U which are starlike of order α.. Representation theorems and distortion

General companion inequalities related to Jensen’s inequality for the classes of m-convex and (α, m)-convex functions are presented.. We show how Jensen’s inequality for these

In this paper we introduce the class B(p, n, µ, α) of analytic and p-valent functions to obtain some sufficient conditions and some angular properties for functions belonging to

For functions belonging to each of the subclasses M ∗ (α) and N ∗ (α) of nor- malized analytic functions in the open unit disk U , which are investigated in this paper when α &gt;

For functions belonging to each of the subclasses M ∗ (α) and N ∗ (α) of normal- ized analytic functions in the open unit disk U , which are investigated in this paper when α &gt;

KÜSTNER, Mapping properties of hypergeometric functions and con- volutions of starlike or convex functions of Order α, Comput. Methods

KÜSTNER, Mapping properties of hypergeometric functions and convolutions of starlike or convex functions of Order α, Comput.. Methods