Ukraine’s Regional Policy: Setting Socio-Humanitarian Priorities of Development

Ukraine’s Regional Policy:

Setting Socio-Humanitarian Priorities of Development

Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research

Kyiv, 2006

The book presents the first analysis of key issues, directions of development and objectives of Ukraine’s socio-humanitarian policy. The authors studied budget funding of current public and regional socio-humanitarian programs and identified their priorities. The publication highlights some problems of Ukrainian regional policy in the humanitarian area. Specifically, the authors analyzed fundamental values and preferences of the population of different Ukrainian regions and outlined mechanisms for overcoming of existing inter-regional stereotypes. The book covers issues of protection of minority rights, fulfillment of Ukraine’s international obligations, major challenges of implementation of principles of transparency in the context of regional policy development and cooperation of the government with civil society institutions.

CONTENT:

Introduction………3 Chapter 1. Budget Funding of Public Regional Programs in the Socio-Humanitarian Area

Budget Funding of Public Programs in the Socio-Humanitarian Area (Regional Context) ………...5 Funding of Socio-Humanitarian Policy Activities (as of January 1, 2005)

By Olena Nyzhnyk, Head of the Directorate, Department of Regional Policy, Ministry of Economy and European Integration and Tetyana Kravets, Head, Department of Legislative Provision of Regional Development,

Ministry of Economy and European Integration………...……….39 Chapter 2. Economic Challenges of Regional Policy

"Economy of Provinces": Challenges of Regional Development

By Markiyan Datsyshyn, Director, Non-Governmental Analytical Center "Institute of Reforms"…51

Chapter 3. Powers of National Authorities in the Context of Development and Implementation of Ukraine’s Public Socio-Humanitarian Policy

Analysis of Powers of National Executive Authorities Responsible for Development and

Implementation of Public Socio-Humanitarian Policy of Ukraine………60 Chapter 4. Values and Stereotypes in the Context of National Unity

Difference in Values between Various Regions of Ukraine:

Possible Ways to Address the Problem of the "Disunity of Ukraine"

By Rostyslav Pavlenko, Head, Situation Analysis Service, Secretariat of the President of Ukraine and Olena Viter, Senior Consultant, Speech Writing Unit,

Secretariat of the President of Ukraine……….…74

Nationwide and Regional Interests in Modern Ukraine

By Oleksandr Maiboroda, Doctor of History, Head, Department of Ethno-Political Science, Institute of Political and Ethno-National Studies, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine……95 Ukraine in Search of New Reintegration Models

By Volodymyr Lupatsiy, Executive Director, Center for Social Studies "Sofia"………119 Analysis of Issues of Considering Soviet Heritage in Ukraine’s Socio-Humanitarian Policy

By Olexiy Kordun, Senior Advisor, Situation Analysis Service,

Secretariat of the President of Ukraine………130 Chapter 5. Securing of Rights of National Minorities and Peoples

Multiculturalism Policy and Consolidation of the Ukrainian Society: Challenges and Perspectives By Svitlana Kononchuk, Head, Political Programs,

Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research………148 Features of Implementation of Regional and Manpower Policies by National Authorities

in Areas, Where National Minorities are Concentrated Territorially By Andriy Duda, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science,

Kyiv-Mohyla Academy National University……….176 New Regional Policy in the Light of Ukraine’s International Obligations

on the Rights of National and Linguistic Minorities

By Olena Semyorkina, Director, Center for Legal Reform and Legislative Drafting,

Ministry of Justice of Ukraine………..194 Public Policy and Government Actions on Meeting Cultural

and Humanitarian Needs of National Minorities in Ukraine

By Olexiy Koshel, Director, Analytical Center "Rada"………...……205 Chapter 6. Ensuring Transparency of Regional Policy

Specificity of Ensuring Transparent Government Policy-Making in the Context of Regional Development

By Oleksandr Svergunov, Senior Expert, Department of Strategic

and Perspective Projects, Secretariat, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine……….215 Appendixes

Summary on the Focus Group Results………..…237 Policies and Programs that Promote the Development of a Canadian National Identity.

Background Documents and Information……….…259 The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC)……….283

Introduction

In the process of implementing public regional policy, ways and methods for solving social and humanitarian problems have not been addressed for long, which, however, could have facilitated formation of national cohesion and unity in Ukraine. As a matter of fact, setting key directions and priorities of regional policy, the government addressed issues of socio-economic development, especially that of the depressed regions.

On May 25, 2001, the President of Ukraine signed the decree that approved the Concept of the Public Regional Policy. The document dealt mostly with economic problems of further regional development. The Concept declared major goals of public regional policy as follows, “To create conditions for dynamic and balanced social and economic development of Ukraine and its regions;

enhance living standards of the population; ensure compliance with the established public social guarantees for citizens irrespective of place of their residence; accelerate market transformation processes on the basis of increasing efficiency of regions’ potential, enhancing effectiveness of administrative decisions, improving work of governmental agencies and local self-government bodies.” In order to attain these goals, it is necessary “to make an in-depth analysis and appraisal of internal natural, economic, scientific and labor potentials of every region, to work out comprehensive legal, organizational, economic and other mechanisms for their effective use; carry out structural economic reforms in the regions on an innovation basis; gradually reduce territorial differences in economic development of Ukraine and its regions; strengthen economic integration of the regions taking into consideration advantages of territorial division and labor cooperation of as one of the basic economic factors enhancing competitiveness of the state in the international markets.”

In their actions on formulation and implementation of public regional policy, the Ukrainian government very often disregarded the whole number of urgent problems determining the need to carry out an effective and consistent regional policy, which would foster not only decentralization of power, economic reforms, development of the regions and local self-government but also promote formation of a political Ukrainian nation through a shared national identity, maintenance and development of language and cultural diversity of national minorities and territorial communities. Actually, a system approach to public regional policy as a mechanism ensuring unity and cohesion was absent in Ukraine.

At present, socio-cultural problems of public regional policy are getting very acute. Experience of the 2004 political crisis demonstrated the dire need for development of a public regional policy as a package of coordinated strategic actions of the government. Local political elites used to speculate on the issue of the so-called “regional separatism”. These politicians instigate inter-ethnic hostilities and in some way spread derogatory information against others based on race, ethnicity or religious beliefs thereby artificially provoking inter-regional confrontation. Today, both Ukrainian political elites and representatives of the so-called “third force” exploit the old historical myths and stereotypes. It is not only historical realities but also the absence of a consistent and strategic public regional policy based on the shared ideas and values that give grounds for political speculations and impede formation of a political Ukrainian nation consolidated by the shared citizenship. Given its absence, tension in inter-regional relations would only heighten.

Recent events actualized the problem of the absence of social values shared in the eastern and western Ukrainian regions. This is especially true for interpretation and understanding of Ukraine’s history and culture and development of a common vision of the future. First and foremost, polarization of the Ukrainian society is observed in approaches to Euro-Atlantic integration and cooperation with the CIS states.

It is time to comprehend the necessity to elaborate a system approach, which would help to strengthen national unity and form a political and multi-ethnic Ukrainian nation pursuant to the Constitution of Ukraine.

Now, Ukrainian authorities understand these challenges. The matter in question is not only economic elements of a regional policy but also identification of humanitarian and cultural directions and priorities in the government activities, which would contribute to national consolidation, eliminate stereotypes existing in relations between the East and West, promote and strengthen stability in the society.

The Long-Term Development Strategy of Ukraine and GOV Priorities for 2006-2007 emphasizes national unity. This determines the need to take appropriate measures to reduce political and cultural polarization of the East, West and South. The document reads, “The government has worked out the Action Plan aimed at uniting the country. Its objective - all citizens of Ukraine shall feel themselves as parts of an integral nation regardless of nationality, social position, place of residence and religion. Basic instrument is to create conditions for free migration, first of all, due to the development of transport infrastructure.”

For the first time over 15 years of Ukraine’s independence, in his address to the Verkhovna Rada, the President of Ukraine stressed humanitarian aspects of Ukraine’s regional policy, national unity and consolidation. “The focus is now moving onto humanitarian, legal and political instruments and procedures for bringing various interests into agreement and reaching understanding. I am confident that Ukrainians will become the nation that would offer the world new standards of high spiritual values, new examples of democratic culture, international accord and interstate dialogue. This is the core of our global project and of our mission,” said Mr. Yushchenko.

The book highlights a number of problems of development of social consolidation; analysis of current public socio-humanitarian programs and their implementation; methods for shaping a shared national identity and overcoming negative stereotypes existent in inter-regional relations; and issues of protection of minority rights. The publication also studies actions of national authorities responsible for formulation and implementation of Ukraine’s socio-humanitarian policy and presents Canadian experience of national identity policies (Canadian Content).

It is necessary to accentuate once again that formulation of a policy promoting national unity requires a system approach, a clear-cut strategic actions and maintenance of a constant dialogue between the government and society - a transparent discussion of challenges concerning shared social values, a common vision of Ukraine’s future by residents of different regions and consolidation of political elites.

The book is published in the framework of the initiative “Developing a Policy of National Consolidation: Regional Context” of Policy Advice for Reform Project funded by the Canadian International Development Agency (www.acdi-cida.gc.ca) and managed by the Canadian Bureau for International Education (www.cbie.ca). The Project is carried out by the Situation Analysis Service of the Secretariat of the President of Ukraine in cooperation with the Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research.

The goal of the Project is to promote development of public policy on meeting regional humanitarian challenges so that to maintain national cohesion and unity, strengthen inter-regional cooperation and consider needs of territorial communities.

We hope the book will help to find ways and methods for building a united civil society in Ukraine.

Yulia Tyshchenko, Head of the UCIPR Board

Budget Funding of Public Programs in the Socio-Humanitarian Area (Regional Context)

Legislative Basis

The March 18, 2004 law of Ukraine “On Public Purpose Programs” lays down fundamental princi- ples of development, approval and implementation of public purpose programs, including socio- humanitarian ones. Under the document, public purpose programs shall be approved on he basis of the Ukrainian laws, while regional and inter-branch projects – by the Cabinet resolutions. Before the above law entered into force, public purpose programs were adopted pursuant to presidential decrees, parliamentary resolutions and Cabinet orders and instructions. Some of these programs are being implemented and funded.

The legislative acts in force provided to implement over 300 public purpose programs in 2004.

Needless to say, the government could not fund all of them. The March 23, 2000 law of Ukraine

“On State Forecasting and Elaboration of Ukraine’s Economic Social and Development Programs”

provides for inclusion of purpose programs into the list of public purpose programs in the frame- work of the short-term Ukraine’s Socio-Economic Development Program (for one year). However, this rule was not applied because after enactment of the document, Ukraine’s Socio-Economic De- velopment Programs, developed by the government and submitted to the Verkhovna Rada for con- sideration, have never been approved.

Therefore, funding of purpose programs looked as follows: executive authorities authorized to im- plement them annually presented the Ministry of Finance with applications for budget funding and, depending on the results of consideration of their applications, were or were not appointed as ad- ministrators of budget funds. According to the Budget Code, major administrators of budget funds had the right to independently select budget programs for implementation of public purpose pro- grams. In case executive authorities failed to prepare the budget application or the Ministry of Fi- nance did not include it into the draft budget, the public purpose program did not receive funding.

Specifically, 172 public purpose programs were funded in 2004 (56% of the total number of the 2003 programs to be implemented pursuant to the adopted legal acts).

Purpose Program Funding in 2003–2004

According to the Ministry of Economy, in 2003–2004, the amount of funds for implementation of public purpose programs totaled UAH 50,800,000,000, including:

• In 2003 – 179 programs (UAH 21,600,000,000)

• In 2004 – 172 programs (UAH 29,200,000,000)

The shares of their funding were, respectively, 92.1% and 114.8% compared to the planned indica- tors, inclusive of:

• In 2003: the national budget – 92.7%, other sources – 91.3%

• In 2004: the national budget – 101.2%, other sources – 146.8%.

In 2003, expenses for public purpose programs for the labor market, social security and the pension reform equaled UAH 218,500,000 or 57.2% of the planned indicator, whereas expenditures for pro- grams in the area of health care, physical culture, sports and youth policy amounted to UAH 1,027,000,000 or 97.1%. Spending for education purpose programs totaled UAH 324,500,000 or 96.5% of the planned indicator, whereas expenses for public culture programs made up UAH

63,100,000 or 33.5%. Expenditures for public purpose programs on tourism and recreation devel- opment constituted UAH 13,100,000 or 96.2%.

Hence, in 2003, the government spent UAH 1,647,000,000 for programs in the social and humani- tarian areas.

In 2004, expenses for public purpose programs included to the Sections “Social Policy” and “Hu- manitarian Area” amounted to UAH 947,900,000 or 82.0% and UAH 1,292,000,000 or 90.8% of the planned indicator respectively. In 2004, the government spent UAH 2,240,000,000 for the socio-humanitarian programs.

It is necessary to stress that due to the absence of clear criteria for structuring of purpose programs by branches, their grouping in socio-economic development programs for 2003 and 2004 differed.

Specifically, Sections and directions indicated in Appendixes to the draft socio-humanitarian pro- grams were different, which does not allow a conclusion about their budget funding.

Furthermore, in 2004, the Sections “Social Policy” and “Humanitarian Area” were supplemented with many programs providing for funding of capital investments for development of housing and communal services. Particularly, the Section “Social Policy” was supplemented with sub-sections

“Housing and Communal Services Reform” and “Construction Development and Housing Provi- sion”. These directions apparently have nothing in common with the socio-humanitarian area.

Sample of Socio-Humanitarian Programs

Analysis of budget funding of public purpose programs in 2003–2004 is based on a sample of socio-humanitarian projects. Actions in the framework of socio-humanitarian programs (protection of health, maternity and childhood; education and social security) served as a criterion for their se- lection.

The analysis demonstrated that national and local executive authorities funded 40 public purpose programs, which had a direct or indirect bearing on the socio-humanitarian area.

The above programs were approved by the following legislative acts:

− Laws (3 programs)

− Parliamentary resolutions (26 programs)

− Presidential decrees (11 programs).

They could be grouped as follows:

− Social policy – 8 programs

− Humanitarian area – 25 programs

− Vital activity safety – 1 program

− Providing Conditions for Enhanced Socio-Economic Growth – 1 program

− Real sector development – 1 program

− Protection of human rights and freedoms, strengthening of law and order – 4 programs.

The amount of program funding totaled UAH 2,150,000,000, including 34 programs of UAH 1,150,000,000 in 2003 and 34 programs¹ of UAH 998,000,000 in 2004 or 13.2% down from the previous year (see Table 1).

1 Coincidence of the number does not mean funding of the same programs.

In 2003, the amount of funds earmarked for one socio-humanitarian program averaged UAH 33,900,000, while in 2004 – UAH 29,400,000.

In 2003–2004, expenditure execution was 91.8% of the estimated figure.

In the structure of expenses, the largest shares belonged to:

• Humanitarian area – 70.8% in 2003 and 73.8% in 2004;

• Social policy – 22.3% in 2003 and 19.5% in 2004

• Protection of human rights and freedoms, strengthening of law and order – 5.7% in 2003 and 5.8% in 2004.

Within 2003-2004, the shares of these three directions together in all budget expenditures were 98.8% and 99.1% respectively.

In monetary terms, it looks as follows:

− Humanitarian area – UAH 815,400,000 in 2003 and UAH 736,900,000 in 2004

− Social policy – UAH 256,500,000 in 2003 and UAH 194,300,000 in 2004

− Protection of human rights and freedoms, strengthening of law and order – UAH 65,300,000 in 2003 and UAH 57,900,000 in 2004.

Neither in 2003 nor in 2004, public purpose programs were fully funded (89.8% and 94.3% respec- tively). Specifically, all branch programs lacked funds (see Diagrams 1 and 2).

The humanitarian area ranks the first by the amount of funding and the number of programs (25).

The lion’s share of budget funds was earmarked for the following three directions (98.3% in 2003 and 98.1% in 2004):

− Protection of health, maternity and childhood: 2003 – 63.0% (UAH 514,100,000), 2004 – 80.5% (UAH 576,500,000)

− Education: 2003 – 30.2% (UAH 246,200,000), 2004 – 7.3% (UAH 52,400,000)

− Culture: 2003 – 5.1% (UAH 42,000,000), 2004 – 10.3% (UAH 73,500,000).

The share of expenditures for implementation of the Programs on Tourism Development for 2002- 2010 and “Journalist” amounted to 1.6% and 1.9% in 2003 and 2004 respectively (see Diagrams 3 and 4).

The humanitarian area is followed by social policy (8 programs), which incorporates 4 sub- sections: “Population’s Income and Wages”, “Employment and Labor Market”, “Social Security”

and “Construction Development and Housing Provision”.

The amount of expenses for these programs totaled UAH 256,500,000 or 70,3% in 2003 and UAH 194,300,000 or 89,1% in 2004.

In this field, the Program on Youth Housing was most important. Outlays for its implementation equaled UAH 794,285,000 in 2003 and UAH 1,495,246,000 in 2004, 88.3% up from the previous year. The Program was aimed at providing the youth with housing.

The third group “Protection of human rights and freedoms, strengthening of law and order”

included 4 public purpose programs funded in the amount of UAH 123,200,000 within 2003–2004 (the 2003 planned indicator – UAH 5,300,000, execution – 95.6%; the 2004 planned indicator – UAH 57,900,000, execution – 99.1%).

The Program on Settlement and Accommodation of Crimean Tatars and Other Repatriates for 2001–2005 played the key role. Within 2003–2004, volume of its funding comprised UAH 112,000,000 or 90.9% of all funds allocated for this direction.

Sources of Purpose Program Funding

Within 2003–2004, public programs were funded mostly from the national budget (see Diagram 4).

Meanwhile, in 2003, purpose programs were funded from different sources (local budgets, funds of establishments and enterprises), whereas in 2004, they were financed almost exclusively from the national budget (see Diagram 5).

In 2003, 68.5% of purpose programs were funded from the national budget, while in 2004, this in- dicator increased to 95.6%, i.e. funding of socio-humanitarian programs became a public concern.

The difference is especially striking in the field of social policy: 48.7% and 89.4% in 2003 and 2004 respectively.

Funding from the National Budget

Within 2003–2004, public purpose programs were fully funded. The shortage of the national budget resources equaled 5% (in 2004) of the planned indicator, whereas funding from other sources was uneven (see Diagrams 7-9).

For instance, in 2003, funding of public purpose programs from other sources made up just 73.6%

mostly due to ineffective planning (overestimated amounts of attracted funds).

Administrators of Budget Funds

Administrators of budget funds for implementation of public purpose programs included 15 minis- tries, 10 State Committees, 6 governmental agencies, the Council of Ministers of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, regional, Kyiv and Sevastopol City State Administrations.

The share of the Ministry of Family, Children and Youth – the major administrator of budget funds – constituted UAH 770,400,000 or 35.8% of all funds spent for public purpose programs in 2003–

2004 (see Diagram 9).

The shares of the Ministry of Health Care, the Ministry of Education and Science, the Ministry of Culture and Arts, the Ministry of Agricultural Policy and the State Committee for Nationalities and Migration were also considerable (see Diagram 9).

Regional, Kyiv and Sevastopol City State Administrations were administrators of local budget funds. Their share in expenses for public purpose programs amounted to UAH 348,700,000 or 16.2%.

The above allows a conclusion that correlation between national and local budget funds was 6/1.

The share of the 7 major administrators (the Ministry of Family, Children and Youth, the Ministry of Culture and Arts, the Ministry of Education and Science, the Ministry of Health Care, the Minis- try of Agricultural Policy, the State Committee for Nationalities and Migration, regional, Kyiv and Sevastopol City State Administrations) in program expenditures was 95.1%. The share of the rest administrators of budget funds did not exceed 5%.

The Most Expensive Purpose Programs

It would be expedient to analyze which programs were the most expensive within 2003–2004. The number of public purpose programs and their shares in the total amount of expenses are as follows:

− 20% of the total amount of funds – 1

− 10%-20% – 1

− 5%-10% – 5

− 1%-5% – 9

− 0,1%-1,0% – 15

− 0,1% – 9 (See Diagram 10).

In the Socio-Humanitarian area, the most expensive was the Program “Physical Culture - the Health of the Nation” elaborated in compliance with the law of Ukraine “On Physical Culture and Sports”

and approved by the September 1, 1998 presidential decree No.963/98. The seven-year Program provided for changes in approaches to protection of health as the highest human value (1999–2005).

However, exact amounts of funding were not indicated in the Program. Administrators of budget funds presented estimates of expenditures in budget applications to the Ministry of Finance.

The Program was carried out in the following spheres: athletic, sport and health-improving activi- ties; athletic and sport activities of persons of specific professions and invalids; development of physical culture and sports, inclusive of personnel, scientific-methodical, material-technical, finan- cial-economic, medical-biological, Informational, legislative and organizational provision and strengthening of international relations. The Program is carried out all over Ukraine though regional distribution of funds is not indicated.

Within 2003–2004, the amount of funds earmarked for its implementation totaled UAH 516,500,000 (95.7% of the planned indicator), of which UAH 507,400,000 were funded from the national budget and UAH 9,100,000 – from other sources (local budgets).

By the amount of expenditures, programs are ranked as follows (see Diagram 10):

227. Public Program on Youth Housing

245. Population’s Immunoprophylaxis Program for 2002–2006 027. Public Program on “Children of Ukraine”

188. Inter-branch Program “The Health of the Nation”

217. Actions on improvement of medical services for rural population

147. Public Program on Settlement and Accommodation of Crimean Tatars and Other Repatri- ates for 2001–2005.

The Public Program on Youth Housing ranked the second in volume of funding. Unlike others, the Youth Housing Program provides for both annual calculation of the amount of funds for youth housing and their regional distribution.

The Program is geared towards settlement of the housing issue through creation of conditions for youth housing development, improvement of mechanisms for the purchase of housing and devel- opment of a system of mortgage housing loans. Within 2002–2012, around UAH 5,800,000,000 shall be invested in construction (reconstruction) and the purchase of youth housing in the frame- work of the Program.

In 2002–2005, it was envisaged to fund the Program actions from the national and local budgets and gradually attract inter-budget sources. The planned volumes of funding from the national budget are set pursuant to the law on the national budget for the respective year, whereas those from local

budgets – by resolutions of local councils according to annually adopted long-term regional pro- grams on youth housing.

In 2003–2004, the Program provided for allocation of UAH 250,900,000 for youth housing con- struction. Under-execution of expenditures was 9.8% (the national budget – 3.6%, other sources – 35.6%). Budget estimated indicators did not comply with those indicated in the Program’s Table 1 – they were underestimated and constituted just 39.4% of the budgeted figures.

Hence, actual funding of the Program substantially differed from the planned amounting to just 36.0% within 2003–2004. In general, regional distribution of Program funds reflects a hierarchy of regions based on the number of population and the level of economic development (see Diagram 11).

From the viewpoint of their socio-humanitarian role, the Public Program “Children of Ukraine” ap- proved by the January 18, 1996 presidential decree No.63/96 and the Inter-branch Program “The Health of the Nation” approved by the January 10, 2002 Cabinet resolution No.14 are the most in- teresting.

The Public Program “Children of Ukraine” is designed to secure the right of every child to be born healthy, survive, develop and enjoy social and psychological security. These objectives shall be achieved through national and regional activities to improve health of children and youth.

The goal of the Inter-branch Program “The Health of the Nation” is to improve the demographic situation, care and enhance the population’s health, quality and effectiveness of medical and sani- tary services, secure social justice and the right of citizens to health protection. It is the medical Program.

The Program on Settlement and Accommodation of Crimean Tatars and Other Repatriates for 2001–2005 approved by the May 16, 2002 Cabinet resolution No.618 is targeted toward meeting socio-economic, political, legal, educational and cultural challenges of the repatriates. The Program determines the list of top priority measures to be taken by executive authorities for settlement and accommodation of Crimean Tatars and other repatriates.

The Program aims at provision of Crimean Tatars and other deported minorities, who voluntary re- turned to the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, with housing and creation of infrastructure in areas, where the repatriates were concentrated territorially, namely:

− Purchase of 117,000 m² of finished houses (apartments) and putting into operation of all un- finished houses

− Engineering/land surveying services

− Creation of 78 km of electric power network

− Creation of units of communal and socio-cultural infrastructure

− Completion of 529.5 km of a water-supply system, putting into operation of 182 km of a drainage system, 322 km of gas pipeline and 178.7 km of highways

− Development of material and technical basis for educational and cultural establishments, in- cluding restoration of the building of the Crimean Music and Drama, completion of 5 schools for 4,000 schoolchildren and 8 medical and obstetric stations.

Moreover, the Program provides for such activities as commemoration of the day of deportation of Crimean Tatars and other ethnicities, training of specialists for priority economic and socio-cultural branches, funding of ethno-cultural and other actions to obviate social and cultural needs of the re- patriates.

Within 2003–2004, volume of the Program funding equaled UAH 112,000,000 or 5.2% of the total amount of expenses. Specifically, expenditures for execution of the Program totaled UAH 57,100,000 and UAH 54,900,000 in 2003 and 2004 respectively (see Diagram 10). This is the least expensive of the above 7 programs. It was funded by 97.4% (the national budget – 97.8%, other sources – 96.4%). The share of the national budget funds spent for this Program was 72.4%.

This social program is implemented in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.

Conclusions

1. Within 2003–2004, only 40 out of over 300 public purpose programs directly or indirectly related to the socio-humanitarian sphere.

2. The share of the seven major programs in the total amount of expenditures was 95%.

3. The priority funding areas were health protection of children and youth and prevention of crime among youth.

4. The law in force did not provide for a clear and transparent procedure for program funding – the administrator set funding priorities within the limits approved by the Ministry of Finance.

5. Transparency of indicators of national and local budget funding was insufficient (the list of pur- pose programs to be funded was absent both in the national budget and reports on budget execu- tion).

6. Scattered budget resources did not allow funding purpose programs in many spheres – actually, only health care and youth housing were prioritized. However, no government would undertake to finance over 300 programs.

7. Budget administrators were not interested either in optimization of the number of purpose pro- grams or application of strict control measures for their execution, which allows for proposals to increase budget funding of the administrators’ key functions on the one hand and explanation of a failure to execute purpose programs by the lack of funds on the other.

Material is prepared by an expert on economic questions Markiyan Datsyshyn, Director, Non-Governmental Analytical Center “Institute of Reforms”

Table 1 Funding of Public Purpose programs in the Socio-Humanitarian Area (2003–2004) Funding in 2003 Funding in 2004 Amounts of purpose program funds Total National Budget Other Sources

Planned (UAH thou- sand)

Actual (UAH thou- sand)

Actual / Planned (%)

Planned (UAH thou- sand)

Actual (UAH thou- sand)

Actual / Planned (%)

Planned (UAH thou- sand)

Actual (UAH thou- sand)

Actual / Planned (%) Social Policy Population’s Income and Wages 187Program on Im- plementation of Anti- Poverty Strategy477,0470,798,777,070,791,8400,0400,0 100,0 State Committee for Family and Youth 77,070,791,877,070,791,80,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations 400,0400,0100,00,00,0-400,0400,0 100,0 Employment and Labor Market 137Public Employ- ment Programfor 2001–2004 121253,096482,579,611365,210315,690,8109887,886166,9 78,4 Ministry of Labor and Social Policy 9552,59552,5100,09552,59552,5100,00,00,0 - State Committee for Family and Youth1161,8552,147,51161,8552,147,50,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth 650,9211,032,4650,9211,032,40,00,0 -

Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations109887,886166,978,40,00,0-109887,886166,9 78,4 148Public Program on Professional Reha- bilitation and Em- ployment of Handi- capped

65,0143,1220,265,0143,1220,20,00,0 - State Committee for Family and Youth65,0143,1220,265,0143,1220,20,00,0 - Social Security 1192001–2005 Action Program Promoting the Women’s Status and Gender Equality in Society

29970,06175,920,61929,02137,8110,828041,04038,1 14,4 State Committee for Family and Youth1005,0914,191,01005,0914,191,00,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth924,01223,7132,4924,01223,7132,40,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations 28041,04038,114,40,00,0-28041,04038,1 14,4 129Public Program “Ukrainian Family” 21740,021716,999,95719,95697,399,616020,116019,6 100,0 State Committee for Family and Youth2247,52329,4103,62247,52329,4103,60,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth3472,43367,997,03472,43367,997,00,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations16020,116019,6100,00,00,0-16020,116019,6 100,0

192Program Promot- ing Social Integration and Adaptation of Crimean Tatar Youth for 2002–2005

198,041,320,9198,041,320,90,00,0 - State Committee for Family and Youth78,028,536,578,028,536,50,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth120,012,810,7120,012,810,70,00,0 - 215Public Program on Social Development of the Village for the period till 2005

158210,996857,561,280300,077422,096,477910,919435,5 24,9 Ministry of Agricultural Policy 37000,037422,0101,137000,037422,0101,10,00,0 - Ministry of Agricultural Policy43300,040000,092,443300,040000,092,40,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations77910,919435,524,90,00,0-77910,919435,5 24,9 Construction Development and Housing Provision 227Public Program on Youth Housing 250946,0228953,191,2210208,5202703,796,440737,526249,4 64,4 State Committee for Family and Youth 73332,273807,4100,673332,273807,4100,60,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth169699,7149524,688,1136876,3128896,394,232823,420628,3 62,8 Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations7914,15621,171,00,00,0-7914,15621,1 71,0

Humanitarian Area Protection of Health, Maternity and Childhood 064Public purpose program“Physical Culture - the Health of the Nation”

539424,0516461,795,7530267,8507365,595,79156,29096,2 99,3 Ministry of Interior3500,03500,0100,03500,03500,0100,00,00,0 - Ministry of Interior3750,03750,0100,03750,03750,0100,00,00,0 - Ministry of Agricultural Policy5000,05000,0100,05000,05000,0100,00,00,0 - Ministry of Agricultural Policy6000,08970,0149,56000,08970,0149,50,00,0 - State Committee for physi- cal Culture and Sports 158729,7158785,6100,0158729,7158785,6100,00,00,0 - State Committee for physical Culture and Sports 353288,1327359,992,7353288,1327359,992,70,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations9156,29096,299,30,00,0-9156,29096,2 99,3 127Public Program “Reproductive Health 2001–2005” 15534,413331,285,812569,912437,898,92964,5893,4 30,1 Ministry of Health Care 2072,92072,9100,02072,92072,9100,00,00,0 - Ministry of Health Care 5657,75621,099,45657,75621,099,40,00,0 - State Committee for Family and Youth 870,5826,394,9870,5826,394,90,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth1156,11133,598,01156,11133,598,00,00,0 -

Academy of Medical Sciences1147,51147,5100,01147,51147,5100,00,00,0 - Academy of Medical Sciences1454,11454,0100,01454,11454,0100,00,00,0 - Academy of Pedagogi- cal Sciences59,459,4100,059,459,4100,00,00,0 - Academy of Pedagogi- cal Sciences151,7123,281,2151,7123,281,20,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations2964,5893,430,10,00,0-2964,5893,4 30,1 188Inter-branch Pro- gram “The Health of the Nation” 154450,1151681,898,21541,41482,596,2152908,7150199,3 98,2 Ministry of Family, Children and Youth78,578,5100,078,578,5100,00,00,0 - Academy of Medical Sciences376,2376,2100,0376,2376,2100,00,00,0 - Academy of Medical Sciences476,0475,499,9476,0475,499,90,00,0 - Academy of Pedagogi- cal Sciences292,8292,8100,0292,8292,8100,00,00,0 - Academy of Pedagogi- cal Sciences317,9259,681,7317,9259,681,70,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations152908,7150199,398,20,00,0-152908,7150199,3 98,2 217Actions on im- provement of medical services for rural population

150024,0143417,095,6141684,1139127,198,28339,94289,9 51,4 Ministry of Health Care 59745,959745,9100,059745,959745,9100,0 0,0 - Ministry of Health Care 81938,279381,296,981938,279381,296,90,0 -

Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations8339,94289,951,40,00,0-8339,94289,9 51,4 223Public Program on Youth Support 935,83313,4354,1600,03058,4509,7335,8255,0 75,9 Ministry of Family, Children and Youth600,03058,4509,7600,03058,4509,70,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations335,8255,075,90,00,0-335,8255,0 75,9 245Population’s Im- munoprophylaxis Programfor2002– 2006

207767,1207325,599,8206498,7206465,6100,01268,4859,9 67,8 Ministry of Health Care 101598,7101598,7100,0101598,7101598,7100,00,00,0 - Ministry of Health Care 104900,0104866,9100,0104900,0104866,9100,00,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations1268,4859,967,80,00,0-1268,4859,9 67,8 253Public Program for Children’s Recrea- tion and Sport for the period till 2008

19779,429224,5147,88200,018537,2226,111579,410687,3 92,3 State Committee for Family and Youth4200,04091,097,44200,04091,097,40,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth4000,014446,2361,24000,014446,2361,20,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations11579,410687,392,30,00,0-11579,410687,3 92,3 260Public Program on Prevention of Child Neglect and Home-967,7561,158,0945,5538,957,022,222,2 100,0

lessness for 2002–2005 State Committee for Family and Youth 395,5252,563,8395,5252,563,80,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth550,0286,452,1550,0286,452,10,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations22,222,2100,00,00,0-22,222,2 100,0 283Public Program on Development of the National Children’s Health Resort Yevpa- toria for 2004–2007

10289,47606,873,94000,01503,237,66289,46103,6 97,0 Council of Ministers of the Autonomous Repub- lic of the Crimea 10289,47606,873,94000,01503,237,66289,46103,6 97,0 311National HIV/AIDS Prevention, Care and Support Program for 2004–2008

17852,217622,098,717852,217622,098,70,00,0 - Ministry of Health Care 17852,217622,098,717852,217622,098,70,00,0 - Education 027Public Program on “Children of Ukraine” 185986,6183359,898,6170566,1169537,399,415420,513822,5 89,6 Ministry of Agricultural Policy5753,65753,6100,05753,65753,6100,00,00,0 - Ministry of Agricultural Policy1722,41798,1104,41722,41798,1104,40,00,0 - Ministry of Education and Science 96180,096180,0100,096180,096180,0100,00,00,0 -

Ministry of Education and Science 72,072,0100,072,072,0100,00,00,0 - Ministry of Health Care 15949,715777,798,915949,715777,798,90,00,0 - Ministry of Health Care 31116,331115,2100,031116,331115,2100,00,00,0 - State Committee for Family and Youth4347,74167,295,84347,74167,295,80,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth11801,611157,694,511801,611157,694,50,00,0 - National Space Agency 400,0337,484,4400,0337,484,40,00,0 - Ukrainian Academy of Agricultural Sciences149,6149,6100,0149,6149,6100,00,00,0 - Ukrainian Academy of Agricultural Sciences 128,7149,6116,2128,7149,6116,20,00,0 - Academy of Medical Sciences967,2967,2100,0967,2967,2100,00,00,0 - Academy of Medical Sciences1217,71217,2100,01217,71217,2100,00,00,0 - Academy of Pedagogi- cal Sciences390,9390,9100,0390,9390,9100,00,00,0 - Academy of Pedagogi- cal Sciences368,7304,082,5368,7304,082,50,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations15420,513822,589,60,00,0-15420,513822,5 89,6 124Public Program on Talented Youth 7834,613746,6175,56113,612076,9197,51721,01669,7 97,0 Ministry of Education and Science 1204,81004,883,41204,81004,883,40,00,0 - State Committee for Family and Youth 2074,14444,6214,32074,14444,6214,30,00,0 -

Ministry of Family, Children and Youth2834,76627,5233,82834,76627,5233,80,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations1721,01669,797,00,00,0-1721,01669,7 97,0 132Public Program on Informatization of Secondary Educa- tional Institutions and Computerization of Rural Schools for 2001–2003

93621,293264,099,686500,086500,0100,07121,26764,0 95,0 Ministry of Education and Science 86500,086500,0100,086500,086500,0100,00,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations7121,26764,095,00,00,0-7121,26764,0 95,0 199Public Program on Development of Extracurricular Edu- cational Establish- ments for 2002–2008

8465,58310,598,20,00,0-8465,58310,5 98,2 Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations8465,58310,598,20,00,0-8465,58310,5 98,2 Culture 089Public Program on Preservation of Li- brary and Archive Funds for 2000–2005 1308,51284,098,11023,51023,5100,0285,0260,5 91,4 Ministry of Culture and Arts1023,51023,5100,01023,51023,5100,00,00,0 -

Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations285,0260,591,40,00,0-285,0260,5 91,4 141Public Program on Revitalization and Development of Ukrainian Cossacks for 2002–2005

10,010,0100,00,00,0-10,010,0 100,0 Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations10,010,0100,00,00,0-10,010,0 100,0 145Museum Assis- tance Program for 2001–2005 18120,913072,672,117591,512794,872,7529,4277,8 52,5 Ministry of Culture and Arts8773,48715,399,38773,48715,399,30,00,0 - Ministry of Culture and Arts7591,63312,443,67591,63312,443,60,00,0 - State Committee on Ar- chives718,4403,456,2718,4403,456,20,00,0 - State Committee on Ar- chives 508,1363,771,6508,1363,771,60,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations529,4277,852,50,00,0-529,4277,8 52,5 149Public Program on Film Industry De- velopment for 2003– 2007

32319,130002,192,832199,129882,192,8120,0120,0 100,0 Ministry of Culture and Arts19327,218601,296,219327,218601,296,20,00,0 - Ministry of Culture and Arts12871,911280,987,612871,911280,987,60,00,0 -

Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations120,0120,0100,00,00,0-120,0120,0 100,0 230Public Program on Library Funds for the period till 2005 18136,710766,359,411721,69977,785,16415,1788,6 12,3 Ministry of Culture and Arts6385,05872,692,06385,05872,692,00,00,0 - Ministry of Culture and Arts5336,64105,176,95336,64105,176,90,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations6415,1788,612,30,00,0-6415,1788,6 12,3 238Public Program on Certification of Cultural Heritage Units for 2003–2010

404,7315,778,0308,1274,589,196,641,2 42,7 State Committee for Construction and Ar- chitecture122,5122,5100,0122,5122,5100,00,00,0 - State Committee for Construction and Ar- chitecture 185,6152,081,9185,6152,081,90,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations96,641,242,70,00,0-96,641,2 42,7 242Public Program on Assistance to Art- ists’ Associations for 2003–2005

7265,77220,399,47210,77210,7100,055,09,6 17,5 Ministry of Culture and Arts5541,05541,0100,05541,05541,0100,00,00,0 - Ministry of Culture and Arts1669,71669,7100,01669,71669,7100,00,00,0 -

Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations55,09,617,50,00,0-55,09,6 17,5 282Public Program on Cultural Develop- ment for the period till 2007

67411,447365,470,367233,447184,970,2178,0180,5 101,4 Ministry of Culture and Arts67233,447184,970,267233,447184,970,20,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations178,0180,5101,40,00,0-178,0180,5 101,4 287Public Program on Development and Use of the Ukrainian Language for 2004– 2010

15597,05384,734,515597,05384,734,50,00,0 - Ministry of Culture and Arts 15597,05384,734,515597,05384,734,50,00,0 - Tourism and Recreation 173Public Program on Tourism Develop- ment for 2002–2010 27326,524922,791,226407,924522,792,9918,6400,0 43,5 State Tourism Admini- stration 12729,512729,5100,012729,512729,5100,00,00,0 - State Tourism Admini- stration 13678,411793,286,213678,411793,286,20,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations918,6400,043,50,00,0-918,6400,0 43,5% Information Space Development 303Public Program “Journalist” 0,022300,0– 0,022300,0-0,00,0 -

State Committee for TV and Radio Broadcast- ing 0,022300,0–0,022300,0-0,00,0 - Vital Activity Safety 271Public Program on Implementation of Decisions of the World Summit on Sustain- able Development for 2003–2015

50,049,599,050,049,599,00,00,0 - Ministry of Environ- mental Protection 50,049,599,050,049,599,00,00,0 - Promoting Conditions for Enhanced Socio-Economic Growth Regulatory Policy and Entrepreneurship Development 212Public Program on Youth Entrepre- neurship Assistance for 2002–2005

3954,94015,9101,5910,0964,0105,93044,93051,9 100,2 State Committee for Family and Youth 520,0490,194,3520,0490,194,30,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth390,0473,9121,5390,0473,9121,50,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations3044,93051,9100,20,00,0-3044,93051,9 100,2 Real Sector Development Foreign Economic Policy 116EU Integration Program 27128,219660,372,527108,219656,172,520,04,2 21,0

Ministry of Economy and European Integration500,0117,423,5500,0117,423,50,00,0 - Ministry of Economy and European Integration 500,0233,446,7500,0233,446,70,00,0 - Ministry of Finance 20,00,00,020,00,00,00,00,0 - Ministry of Justice 1740,5957,655,01740,5957,655,00,00,0 - Ministry of Justice 2150,51233,657,42150,51233,657,40,00,0 - Foreign Ministry 3200,03200,0100,03200,03200,0100,00,00,0 - Foreign Ministry 2100,02000,095,22100,02000,095,20,00,0 - Ministry of Interior1000,01000,0100,01000,01000,0100,00,00,0 - Ministry of Interior960,0939,297,8960,0939,297,80,00,0 - Ministry of Labor and Social Policy43,243,2100,043,243,2100,00,00,0 - Ministry of Labor and Social Policy 122,9121,598,9122,9121,598,90,00,0 - State Nuclear Regula- tory Committee 8,911,2125,88,911,2125,80,00,0 - Ministry of Health Care 150,0150,0100,0150,0150,0100,00,00,0 - State Committee on Communication and Informatization 100,0100,0100,0100,0100,0100,00,00,0 - Ministry of Emergency Situations and Chorno- byl Affairs 275,0110,540,2275,0110,540,20,00,0 - Ministry of Transport and Communications 200,0200,0100,0200,0200,0100,00,00,0 - National Committee on Technical Regulation and Consumption Policy 4500,04500,0100,04500,04500,0100,00,00,0 -

National Committee on Technical Regulation and Consumption Policy 8500,04304,750,68500,04304,750,60,00,0 - State Committee for La- bor Protection Control 124,5124,5100,0124,5124,5100,00,00,0 - State Committee for La- bor Protection Control 56,546,582,356,546,582,30,00,0 - State Tourism Admini- stration 100,0100,0100,0100,0100,0100,00,00,0 - State Tourism Admini- stration 70,053,576,470,053,576,40,00,0 - State Taxation Admini- stration 568,474,513,1568,474,513,10,00,0 - State Committee on Se- curities and Stock Market10,010,0100,010,010,0100,00,00,0 - State Committee on Se- curities and Stock Market 13,09,875,413,09,875,40,00,0 - State Commission for Regulation of Financial Services Markets 15,015,0100,015,015,0100,00,00,0 - Main Intelligence De- partment of the Minis- try of Defense 79,80,00,079,80,00,00,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations20,04,221,00,00,0-20,04,2 21,0 Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms, Strengthening of Law and Order 130Public Program on Combating Illegal Mi- gration for 2001–2004 6000,05544,992,46000,05544,992,40,00,0 - Ministry of Interior3000,03000,0100,03000,03000,0100,00,00,0 -

Ministry of Interior3000,02544,984,83000,02544,984,80,00,0 - 147Public Program onSettlement and Ac- commodation of Cri- mean Tatars and Other Repatriates for 2001–2005

115012,0112016,197,483000,081154,797,832012,030861,4 96,4 State Committee for Nationalities and Mi- gration 60012,057106,495,243000,043000,0100,017012,014106,4 82,9 State Committee for Nationalities and Mi- gration 55000,054909,799,840000,038154,795,415000,016755,0 111,7 219Public Program on Combating Traf- ficking in Human Be- ings for 2002–2005

5471,95548,4101,4416,3499,4120,05055,65049,0 99,9 State Committee for family and Youth 216,3153,671,0216,3153,671,00,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth200,0345,8172,9200,0345,8172,90,00,0 - Regional, Kyiv and Se- vastopol City State Ad- ministrations5055,65049,099,90,00,0-5055,65049,0 99,9 277Program on Public Policy in Combating Illegal Circulation of Narcotics, Psychotropic Substances and Precur- sors for 2003-2010

167,569,841,7167,569,841,70,00,0 - Ministry of Family, Children and Youth 167,569,841,7167,569,841,70,00,0 - Total 2341476,92149615,691,81794146,71743277,997,2547330,2406337,7 74,2

Str uc ture of Ex pens es for Public Pur pos e Programs in the Socio-Hu man itari a Area (2003)

REAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT; UAH 10,300,000; 0.9%

VITAL ACTIVITY SAFETY; UAH 0,000,000; 0.0% PROMOTING CONDITIONS FOR ENHANCED SOCIO- ECONOMIC GROWTH; UAH 3,500,000; 0.3%

SOCIAL POLICY; UAH 256,500,000; 22.3%

HUMANITARIAN AREA; UAH 815,400,000; 70.8%

Dagram 1

Stru ctu re o f E xp en ses fo r P ub lic Pu rp os e Pro grams i n th e So ci o- Hu man itari a Area (2004)

VITAL ACTIVITY SAFETY; UAH 0,000,000; 0.0% PROMOTING CONDITIONS FOR ENHANCED SOCIO- ECONOMIC GROWTH; UAH 500,000; 0.0%

SOCIAL POLICY; UAH 194,300,000; 19.5%

HUMANITARIAN AREA; UAH 736,500,000; 73.8%

Diagram 2

Su b- Bran ch Stru ctu re o f E xp en ses fo r P ub lic Pu rp os e Pro grams i n th e S oci o- Hu man itari an Area (2004)

Others: UAH 13,700,000; 1.9%

Protection of Health, Maternity and Childhood: UAH 576,500,000; 80.5% Education: UAH 52,400,000; 7.3%

Diagram 3

Sh ares o f th e Nati on al Bu dg et an d O th er So ur ces i n F un di ng o f Pu bl ic So co -H um an itari an P ro grams (2003-2004)

Diagram 4

Sources of Expenditures for Public Socio-Humanitarian Programs UAH 955,100,000 UAH 788,200,000

UAH 362,900,000UAH 43,500,000 20032004

Other sources National budget years

Diagram 5

Execution of Expenditures for Public Socio-Humanitarian Programs 91,8% 74,2%

97,2%99,9% 73,6%

89,8% 80,4%

95,0% 94,3% 0,0%

10,0%

20,0%

30,0%

40,0%

50,0%

60,0%

70,0%

80,0%

90,0%

100,0% TotalNational budgetOther sources 2003-200420032004

Diagram 6

Execution of Expenditures for Public Socio-Humanitarian Programs by Directions (2003)

70,3%

100,2%

54,8%

97,7%

100,0%

91,7%

0,0%

0,0%

0,0%

99,4%

94,3%

100,2%

89,6%

89,7%

21,0%

95,6%

99,9%

86,8%

0,00%

20,00%

40,00%

60,00%

80,00%

100,00%

120,00% TotalNational budgetOther sources Social Policy Humanitarian Area Vital Activity Safety Providing Conditions for Enhanced Socio-Economic Growth

Diagram 7

Execution of Expenditures for Public Socio-Humanitarian Programs by Directions (2004)

89,1%

93,7%

62,8%

96,1%

96,1%

97,0%

99,0%

99,0%

0,0%

121,5%

121,5%

0,0%

99,1%

94,8%

111,7%

95,6%

99,9%

86,8%

0,00%

20,00%

40,00%

60,00%

80,00%

100,00%

120,00%

140,00% TotalNational budgetOther sources Social Policy Humanitarian Area Vital Activity Safety Providing Conditions for Enhanced Socio-Economic Growth

Diagram 8

Others; UAH 105,100,000; 4.9% State Committee for Nationalities and Migration; UAH 112,000,000; 5.2% Ministry of Cultre and Arts; UAH 112,700,000; 5,2%Ministry of Education and Science; UAH 183,800,000; 8.6%

Regional, Kyiv and Sevastopol City State Administations; UAH 348,700,000; 16.2%

Ministry of Health Care; UAH 418,000,000; 19.5% Ministry of Agricultural Policy; UAH 98,900,000; 4.6%

Ministry of Family, Children and Youth; UAH 770,4 00,000; 35.8%

Shares of Administrators of Budget Funds in Public Program Funding (20 03-2004)

Diagram 9

Str uctur e a nd Funding of Public Pur pos e Pr ogr am s in the Soc io-H uma nitar ia n A re a (2003-2004)

245 Immunoprophylaxis of the population in 2002-2006; UAH 207,300,000; 9.7%

027 "Children of Ukraine" National Program; UAH 183,400,000; 8.5%

227 Youth Housing; UAH 229,000,000; 10.6% 147 Settlement and Accommodation of Crimean Tatars and Other Repatriates for the period till 2005; UAH 112,000,000; 5.2%

Others; UAH 606,400,000; 28.2%

Diagram 10

Planned D ist ribut ion of Budge t Funds f or Yout h H ous ing Progra m (2003-2004)

27,827,7 10,2 8,011,514,016,7 9,0

13,7

26,7 7,6

21,6 15,3 12,113,9 7,4

22,7 9,212,9 11,4 6,67,5

41,1 4,7 2,7

23,2 4,23,76,57,35,212,8 4,27,86,88,612,2 4,3

15,1 7,85,19,57,96,54,55,8

15,715,7 7,68,910,4

64,4 43,343,4 21,124,5

28,9 16,0 12,5

18,021,926,2 14,0

21,5

41,8 33,7 23,9 11,9

18,921,7 11,6

35,5 14,5

20,3 17,9 10,311,7 7,4 0,0

65,0

Au tono ous Re m publ of ic Cr

ea im nny Vi

ya ts Vol yn

Dni op pr ro et

vsk Don

sk et Zhytomyr Tra

car ns th pa ia

pori Za zhz a hy

Iva no-Fra nkiv

sk Kyi

v rov Ki

rad oh han Lu

sk Lvi

v Myko

iv la Ode

sa Pol

tav a Rivn e

Sm

y Ter

nopi

l Kha

iv so rk er Kh

n Khm nyt el y sk

Che rka

ssy Che

vts rni

i Che

hiv rni Kyi

ci v ty

va Se stopo l city

UAH, mln

Diagram 11 20042003