• Nem Talált Eredményt

COMPUTATIONAL THINKING IN PROBLEM-SOLVING: A THEORETICAL OVERVIEW

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "COMPUTATIONAL THINKING IN PROBLEM-SOLVING: A THEORETICAL OVERVIEW"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

XVI. Pedagógiai Értékelési Konferencia 16th Conference on Educational Assessment

2018. április 26–28. 26–28 April 2018

30

COMPUTATIONAL THINKING IN PROBLEM-SOLVING: A THEORETICAL OVERVIEW

Fehér Péter, Aknai Dóra Orsolya IKT MasterMinds Kutatócsoport

Keywords: computational thinking; coding; problem solving

Computational thinking (CT) is a quite new and complex phenomenon, closely related with problem solving (Voskoglou & Buckley, 2012). Although the term was first used by Seymour Papert (known as a creator of the Logo programming language), it has been highlighted and popularized by Wing (2006). Her first definition described it as ‘taking an approach to solving problems, designing systems and understanding human behavior that draws on concepts fundamental to computing’ (Wing, 2008). In the last 10 years, a growing number of studies and debates have appeared among researchers. Despite the differences of views or inconsistent results (for example, Doleck et al., 2017; Román- González et al., 2018), there is a common opinion that computational thinking is one of the most important skills for 21st century students (Grover & Pea, 2013; Swaid, 2015). In our review we have investigated studies reporting empirical research from primary schools (Brackmann et al., 2017; Durak & Saritepeci, 2018) to university students (Ambrosio et al., 2014). There are many components listed in several studies in the educational literature, for example algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, data analysis, debugging, decomposition, heuristic reasoning, and recursive thinking (Barr & Stephenson, 2011; Brennan & Resnick, 2012; Korkmaz et al., 2017;

Yadav, Hong & Stephenson, 2016; Wing, 2006, 2008, 2011, 2014). We find the definition Korkmaz et al. (2017) summarizes the most relevant skill components: algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving. A number of research questions have arisen from the literature review. To name but some of them:

How to implement the teaching of CT in the curriculum of schools? How to integrate CT into different learning environments? How to assess the effectiveness of CT? Do STEM tools and robotics support the development of CT? How could teachers be prepared for this new approach? How to support teachers to teach CT instead of traditional ICT? This overview can provide a starting point of further discussion, empirical research and perhaps some ideas for the development of assessment tools and methods (Román- González, 2015). The implementation of teaching computational thinking in Hungarian schools is also a very important and urgent question.

T-9

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

assessments of collaborative problem solving consist of determining the structure of the problem that collaborators should work on (e.g., if the problem is topic related, or

The purpose of the study is to examine the nature of interactive problem solving by (a) defining a two-dimensional measurement model of problem solving comprising

Similar problem groups were revealed among primary and secondary school (7-18-year-old) students (Kasik & Gál, 2015; Kasik, 2015): the most frequent problems claimed

Several researchers investigated the disparity between opinions of rural and urban students and teachers towards ICT, computational thinking, and other technology

This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 IGO license (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO)

The skills considered most essential in our modern societies are often called 21st- century skills. Problem solving is clearly one of them. Students will be expected to work in

The skills considered most essential in our modern societies are often called 21st- century skills. Problem solving is clearly one of them. Students will be expected to work in

This may point towards the explanation for research question 4 and the results in this study and in the literature, specifically that DPS measures skills not measured by DSPS