• Nem Talált Eredményt

LVL; 13 EUR 16 LVL; 29 EUR

LATVIA 2000

SO 2 NOx Dust

7.5 LVL; 13 EUR 16 LVL; 29 EUR

30 LVL; 54 EUR 35 LVL; 63 EUR 50 LVL; 89 EUR 70 LVL; 125 EUR 100 LVL; 179 EUR 1.4 LVL; 2.5 EUR

1.5 LVL/unit; 2.68 EUR/unit 3.0 LVL/unit; 5.36 EUR/unit 4.5 LVL/unit; 8.04 EUR/unit 6.0 LVL/unit; 10.71 EUR/unit 15% of product’s value 0.040 LVL/kg; 0.071 EUR/kg 0.090 LVL/kg; 0.161 EUR/kg 0.105 LVL/kg; 0.188 EUR/kg 0.06 LVL/kg; 0.107 EUR/kg 0.06 LVL/kg; 0.107 EUR/kg

0.012 LVL/kg; 0.021 EUR/kg

2 Payments related to the consumption of goods and products harmful to the environment are partly refundable to the enterprises recycling these goods, in compliance with the technological and environmental standards established by the Ministry of Environment and Regional Development.

Total Revenue Revenue collection

authority Use of Revenue Comments

468,435 LVL;

751,902 EUR (in 1999)

Road Safety Board

Road Safety Board

State Revenue Service

State Revenue Service

Road fund

Environmental Protection Fund

Environmental Protection Fund

Increase of rates is planned for the next year.

Since October 2000, a new approach in calculating packaging charges is in force (introduced through the amendments on the Natural Resources Tax Law). The new approach foresees one calculation method instead of the earlier four, and links charge rates to the weight of packaging materials.

The amendments provided for an increase of the charge rates, and introduced clearer definitions of packaging materials.

Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development, upon recommen-dation of the Packaging Management Council, may grant allowances to the companies that carry out voluntary pack-aging waste management programs. A new law on packaging is under preparation in Latvia, in line with the requirements of the EU Council Directive 94/62/EC on

packag-Disposable containers / packaging continued

Disposable plastic tableware

Tyres

CFCs and/or halons

Light bulbs

Oil filters

Lubricants

WASTE

Waste user charge

Waste disposal charge

Waste non-compliance fees

Levies related to nuclear waste management WATER

INSTRUMENTS FOR MANAGING WATER QUALITY Water consumption charge

LATVIA 2000

Instrument Objective of

tax/charge Tax base Tax rate

Incentive /ear-marked environ-mental charge Incentive / ear-marked environ-mental charge Incentive / ear-marked environ-mental charge

Incentive / ear-marked environ-mental charge Incentive / ear-marked environ-mental charge Incentive / ear-marked environ-mental charge

Cost recovery

Incentive / ear-marked environ-mental charge

Compliance / ear-marked environ-mental charge

Cost recovery

Cost recovery

Value of the product

All types of tyres

Ozone depleting sub-stances, dependent on their ozone depleting potential (ODP) Mercury luminescent bulbs

Oil filters

Mineral oils

Municipal waste

Non-toxic waste Toxic waste Highly toxic waste

Solid waste disposal

Radioactive waste

Households Industry

25%

0.06 LVL/kg; 0.107 EUR/kg

1 LVL/kg x ODP;

1.786 EUR/kg x ODP

0.1 LVL/item;

0.179 EUR/item

0.1LVL/piece; 0.179 EUR/piece

0.03 LVL/kg; 0.054 EUR/kg

2.2 – 5.4 LVL/ m3; 3.93 – 9.64 EUR/m3

0.25 LVL/m3; 0.446 EUR/m3 1.50 LVL/m3; 2.68 EUR/m3 50.0 LVL/m3; 89.29 EUR/m3

three times the disposal charge for disposal above the permitted level; 12 times the disposal charge for illegal disposal

Differentiated by the level of radioactivity

0.08 – 0.29 LVL/m3; 0.14 – 0.52 EUR/m3 0.08 – 1 LVL/m3; 0.14 – 1.79 EUR/m3

Total Revenue Revenue collection

authority Use of Revenue Comments

303,044 LVL;

486,427 EUR (in 1999)

2,005 LVL;

3,218 EUR (in 1999)

State Revenue Service State Revenue Service State Revenue Service

State Revenue Service

State Revenue Service

State Revenue Service

Municipal companies State Revenue Service

State Revenue Service

State Revenue Service

Water companies

Environmental Protection Fund Environmental Protection Fund Environmental Protection Fund

Environmental Protection Fund

Environmental Protection Fund

Environmental Protection Fund

Municipalities

40% National Environmental Protection Fund 60% Municipal environmental funds Environmental Protection Fund

Municipality

ing and packaging waste. The law is expected to come into force on 1 July 2002.

Since 1 July 2000.

Charge rate has increased in July 2000 (according to the amendments to the Natural Resources Tax Law).

Since 1 July 2000.

Charge rate has increased in July 2000 (according to the amendments on the Natural Resources Tax Law).

Paid by the waste disposal companies, for the deposition of solid wastes.

State Environmental Inspectorate and regional environmental boards establish non-compliance cases, and State Revenue Service collects the fees.

Sewage charge

Water effluent charge

Water pollution non-compliance fees

INSTRUMENTS FOR MANAGING WATER QUANTITY Water extraction charge

NATURAL RESOURCE AND MINING Mining / natural resource

extraction charge

INSTRUMENTS FOR BIODIVERSITY AND NATURE PROTECTION Hunting charge

Fishing charge

Natural park entrance fees

Nature protection non-compliance fees

LATVIA 2000

Instrument Objective of

tax/charge Tax base Tax rate

Cost recovery

Incentive / ear-marked environ-mental charge

Compliance / ear-marked environ-mental charge

Earmarked environ-mental charge

Earmarked environ-mental charge

Households Industry

Non-toxic substances Suspended solids Moderately dangerous substances

Dangerous substances Highly dangerous substances Excess/illegal dis-charges of water pollutants

Surface water Ground water:

- drinking water - technological water Mineral water:

- medicinal water - drinking mineral water

Thermal water

SoilConstruction sand Glass and molding sand Sand, gravel

Clay for cement and brick Clay for ceramic and ceramsite dolomite Decorative dolomite

Based on permits

0.11 – 0.29 LVL/m3; 0.2 - 0.52 EUR/ m3

0.24 – 1.14 LVL/m3; 0.43 – 2.04 EUR/ m3 3.0 LVL/t; 5.36 EUR/t 10.0 LVL/t; 17.86 EUR/t 30.0 LVL/t; 53.57 EUR/t 8,000 LVL/t; 14,286 EUR/t 50,000 LVL/t; 89,286 EUR/t

three times the effluent charge for exceeding the permitted limits; 12 times the effluent charge for illegal discharge or non-reporting

0.002 LVL/m3; 0.004 EUR/m3 0.01 LVL/m3; 0.018 EUR/m3 0.005 LVL/m3; 0.009 EUR/m3 0.1 LVL/m3; 0.179 EUR/m3 0.2 LVL/m3; 0.357 EUR/m3 0.05 LVL/ m3; 0.089 EUR/ m3

0.2 LVL/m3; 0.357 EUR/m3 0.05 LVL/m3; 0.089 EUR/m3 0.2 LVL/m3; 0.357 EUR/m3 0.1 LVL/m3; 0.179 EUR/m3 0.1 LVL/m3; 0.179 EUR/m3 0.13LVL/m3; 0.232 EUR/m3 0.06 LVL/m3; 0.107 EUR/m3

Total Revenue Revenue collection

authority Use of Revenue Comments

Water companies

State Revenue Service

State Revenue Service

State Revenue Service

State Revenue Service

Municipality

40% National Environment Protection Fund 60% Municipal environmental funds

Environmental Protection Fund

40% National Environmental Protection Fund 60% Municipal environmental funds

40% National Environmental Protection Fund 60% Municipal environmental funds

State Fish Fund

Charge rates are linked to water pollution hazard categories, ambient standards and effluent standards for 36 pollutants. Listed pollutants are classified into five categories (phosphorus, nitrogen and BOD fall into category of moderately dangerous sub-stances).

State Environmental Inspectorate and regional environmental boards enforce the non-compliance fees.

Water extraction charge rates increased in July 2000 (based on the amendments to the Natural Resources Tax Law; the amendments were passed in April 2000).

Tree cutting charges

DIRECT TAX PROVISIONS Investments, grants, etc.

Accelerated depreciation Income Tax/VAT allowances for environment

Duty/tax allowance on import of environment-friendly goods

LATVIA 2000

Instrument Objective of

tax/charge Tax base Tax rate

Revenue raising / resource manage-ment

Tree cutting, dependent on the species, quality, average tree trunk diameter, height, and type of cutting

Varies

Total Revenue Revenue collection

authority Use of Revenue Comments

State Forestry

Service 30% Local budget

70% Forestry Development Fund

Total Revenue Revenue

collec-tion authority Use of Revenue Comments