• Nem Talált Eredményt

5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

5.2. Limitations and further research

Our study has several limitations that need to be taken into consideration when discussing our results.

The first set of limitations stems from the nature of the data. Our analysis in-cluded only those location factors that were inin-cluded in “The EU Regional Com-petitiveness Index 2016 Report” and had been reported by previous studies as significant location decision factors. This means that several other location fac-tors, such as labour costs or proximity to other units (Arauzo – Carod et al. 2010;

Pavlínek 2019), are not considered in our study that might still have an important impact on the location decisions of car manufacturing companies. Nevertheless, it was not the purpose of this paper to discover the whole set of location deci-sion factors; instead, we have focused solely on the relationship between regional competitiveness and location of car manufacturing companies and used the fac-tors included in the RCI report, which offers a consistent set of location facfac-tors with similar data types, structure and collection method for each EU region.

Table 9. Summary of the results

EU-28 non-CEE countries CEE countries

i.e. they are not needed, but only if…

counterbal-anced by other factors Main location factors +

Naturally, this does not mean that labour cost, for example, is not still one of the primary location decision factors, especially in the European car manufac-turing industry. Labour cost has been shown to be the most important location decision factor on the country level for automotive firms (Pavlínek 2019) and, therefore, is an important differentiator between the competitiveness of regions in different countries. Thus, whether an EU region is chosen or not by an auto-motive firm is not independent from country-level factors, such as labour costs.

However, our analysis excluded those competitiveness factors that are primarily determined on a country-level, and has focused instead on a sub-national level to identify those regional-level aspects that need to be developed by EU regions to improve their chances of hosting car manufacturing units.

In addition, we could not take into account different type of investments (e.g. greenfield vs brownfield) or the difference between various types of auto-motive subsidiaries (i.e. manufacturing vs R&D) due to the low number of stan-dalone R&D units in the EU, thus being unable to investigate whether units with different activities require different location advantages (Colovic – Mayrhofer 2011). Furthermore, data on the location of automotive units in the EU refers to the current situation, ignoring the temporal aspect of location decisions. How-ever, as argued by Slack et al. (2016), considering current locations is also a valid approach, as it implies the decision not to move operations from a given location.

Future research could investigate, using longitudinal datasets, the way location decisions are modified in time by companies along with the changing character-istics of different target locations or along the different types of activities carried out by automotive units.

Another set of limitations is concerned with the design of this study. As argued before, we have not focused on the dynamics of location decisions. Therefore, we have ignored such important decisions influencing the location of automotive units, as offshoring, backshoring, plant closure or upgrading/downgrading plant operations. How these decisions are influenced by the characteristics of (poten-tial) automotive locations remains an important question for further research.

Finally, our study measured location factors of automotive companies only indirectly, through the characteristics of the regions where these units are located.

How location decisions are actually taken and how different regional factors are considered is still underexplored (Pavlínek 2019). Therefore, in the future, pref-erably case study based research on company-level could further confirm and enrich our findings.

REFERENCES

Ambroziak, L. (2018): The CEECs in Global Value Chains: The Role of Germany. Acta Oeco-nomica, 68(1): 1–29.

Annoni, P. – Dijkstra, L. – Gargano, N. (2017): The EU Regional Competitiveness Index 2016.

European Commission Working Paper, No. 02/2017.

Arauzo-Carod, J. M. – Liviano-Solis, D. – Manjón-Antolín, M. (2010): Empirical Studies in In-dustrial Location: An Assessment of Their Methods and Results. Journal of Regional Science, 50(3): 685–711.

Bhat, C. R. – Paleti, R. – Singh, P. (2014): A Spatial Multivariate Count Model for Firm Location Decisions. Journal of Regional Science, 54(3): 462–502.

Biglaiser, G. – deRouen Jr, K. (2006): Economic Reforms and Infl ows of Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 41(1): 51–75.

Bilbao-Ubillos, J. (2010): Outlook on Europe: The Spatial Variable in the Recent Confi guration of the Value Chain in the European Automotive Industry. Tijdschrift voor Economischeen Sociale Geografi e, 101(3): 357–363.

Bilbao-Ubillos, J. – Camino-Beldarrain, V. (2008): Proximity Matters? European Union Enlarge-ment and Relocation of Activities: The Case of the Spanish Automotive Industry. Economic Development Quarterly, 22(2): 149–166.

BMW (2018, July 31): BMW Group to Expand Production Network in Europe. https://www.bmw-group-werke.com/debrecen/en/aktuelles/new-plant.html, last accessed on: 21.02.2019.

Cheng, L. K. – Kwan, Y. K. (2000): What are the Determinants of the Location of Foreign Direct Investment? The Chinese Experience. Journal of International Economics, 51(2): 379–400.

Chung, W. – Alcácer, J. (2002): Knowledge Seeking and Location Choice of Foreign Direct Invest-ment in the United States. ManageInvest-ment Science, 48(12): 1534–1554.

Cieslik, A. (2005): Location of Foreign Firms and National Border Effects: The Case of Poland.

Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografi e, 96(3): 287–297.

Colovic, A. – Mayrhofer, U. (2011): Optimizing the Location of R&D and Production Activities:

Trends in the Automotive Industry. European Planning Studies, 19(8): 1481–1498.

Daude, C. – Stein, E. (2007): The Quality of Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment. Economics

& Politics, 19(3): 317–344.

Demeter, K. – Szász, L. (2016): The Diversity of European Manufacturing Plant Roles in Interna-tional Manufacturing Networks. Journal of East European Management Studies, 21(2): 184–

208.

Dijkstra, L. – Annoni, P. – Kozovska, K. (2011): A New Regional Competitiveness Index: Theory, Methods and Findings. European Union Regional Policy Working Paper, No. 02/2011.

Disdier, A. C. – Mayer, T. (2004): How Different is Eastern Europe? Structure and Determinants of Location Choices by French Firms in Eastern and Western Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(2): 280–296.

Dunning, J. H. (1988): Explaining International Production. London: Unwin Hyman.

Dunning, J. H. (2001): The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2): 173–190.

Faeth, I. (2009): Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment – A Tale of Nine Theoretical Models.

Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(1): 165–196.

Goerzen, A. – Asmussen, C. G. – Nielsen, B. B. (2013): Global Cities and Multinational Enterprise Location Strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 427–450.

Guzman, L. (2015): Localization Factors from Japanese Firms in Automotive-Related Industries in Mexico. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30: 265–270.

He, C. (2003): Location of Foreign Manufacturers in China: Agglomeration Economies and Coun-try of Origin Effects. Papers in Regional Science, 82(3): 351–372.

Jacobs, A. J. (2017): Automotive FDI in Emerging Europe: Shifting Locales in the Motor Vehicle Industry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jain, N. K. – Kothari, T. – Kumar, V. (2016): Location Choice Research: Proposing New Agenda.

Management International Review, 56(3): 303–324.

JLR (2018a, October 25): Jaguar Land Rover Opens Manufacturing Plant in Slovakia. https://

media .jaguarlandrover.com/news/2018/10/jaguar-land-rover-opens-manufacturing-plant-slova-kia, last accessed on: 21.02.2019.

JLR (2018b, November 2): Jaguar Land Rover Confi rms Technical Engineering Offi ce in Hun-gary. https://media.jaguarlandrover.com/news/2018/11/jaguar-land-rover-confi rms-technical-engineering -offi ce-hungary, last accessed on: 21.02.2019.

Jofre-Monseny, J. – Marín-López, R. – Viladecans-Marsal, E. (2014): The Determinants of Lo-calization and Urbanization Economies: Evidence from the Location of new Firms in Spain.

Journal of Regional Science, 54(2): 313–337.

Jürgens, U. – Krzywdzinski, M. (2009): Changing East–West Division of Labour in the European Automotive Industry. European Urban and Regional Studies, 16(1): 27–42.

Kim, J. U. – Aguilear, R. V. (2016): Foreign Location Choice Review and Extensions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2): 133–159.

Klier, T. – McMillen, D. (2015): Plant Location Patterns in the European Automobile Supplier Industry. Growth and Change, 46(4): 558–573.

Klier, T. – McMillen, D. P. (2008): Evolving Agglomeration in the US Auto Supplier Industry.

Journal of Regional Science, 48(1): 245–267.

Kogut, B. – Chang, S. J. (1991): Technological Capabilities and Japanese Foreign Direct Invest-ment in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3): 401–413.

Kramer, J. P. – Diez, J. R. (2012): Catching the Local Buzz by Embedding? Empirical Insights on the Regional Embeddedness of Multinational Enterprises in Germany and the UK. Regional Studies, 46(10): 1303–1317.

Larsson, A. (2002): The Development and Regional Signifi cance of the Automotive Industry:

Supplier Parks in Western Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(4): 767–784.

Magna (2018, October 11): Magna Wins Additional Seating Business, Celebrates Opening of New Facility. https://www.magna.com/company/newsroom/releases/release/2018/10/11/news-release---magna-wins-additional-seating-business-celebrates-opening-of-new-facility, last ac-cessed on: 21.02.2019.

McCann, P. – Mudambi, R. (2004): The Location Behavior of the Multinational Enterprise: Some Analytical Issues. Growth and Change, 35(4): 491–524.

Montemayor, H. M. V. – Pirvulescu, R. (2015): FDI Success Factors: Evidence from a European Manufacturer in the Chinese Automobile Industry. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 16(2): 61–70.

Nielsen, B. B. – Asmussen, C. G. – Weatherall, C. D. (2017): The Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investments: Empirical Evidence and Methodological Challenges. Journal of World Business, 52(1): 62–82.

OICA: International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers – Organisation Internation-ale des Constructeurs d’Automobiles (2016): 2016 Production statistics. http://www.oica.net/

category /production-statistics/2016-statistics/, last accessed on: 28.02.2019.

Pavlínek, P. (2002): Restructuring the Central and Eastern European Automobile Industry: Lega-cies, Trends, and Effects of Foreign Direct Investment. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 43(1): 41–77.

Pavlínek, P. (2015): The Impact of the 2008–2009 Crisis on the Automotive Industry: Global Trends and Firm-Level Effects in Central Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 22(1):

20–40.

Pavlínek, P. (2019): Restructuring and Internationalization of the European Automotive Industry.

Journal of Economic Geography, 1–33.

Pfaffmann, E. – Stephan, M. (2001): How Germany Wins out in the Battle for Foreign Direct Investment: Strategies of Multinational Suppliers in the Car Industry. Long Range Planning, 34(3): 335–355.

Ramírez-Alesón, M. – Fleta-Asín, J. (2016): Is the Importance of Location Factors Different De-pending on the Degree of Development of the Country? Journal of International Management, 22(1): 29–43.

Ranjan, V. – Agrawal, G. (2011): FDI Infl ow Determinants in BRIC Countries: A Panel Data Analy-sis. International Business Research, 4(4): 255.

Rugman, A. M. – Collinson, S. (2004): The Regional Nature of the World’s Automotive Sector.

European Management Journal, 22(5): 471–482.

Sass, M. – Szalavetz, A. (2009): Crisis and Upgrading: The Case of the Hungarian Automotive and Electronics Sectors. Europe–Asia Studies, 65(3): 489–507.

Schwab, K. (ed.) (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Fo-rum.

Šipikal, M. – Buček, M. (2013): The Role of FDIs in Regional Innovation: Evidence from the Auto-motive Industry in Western Slovakia. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 5(4): 475–490.

Slack, S. B. – Jones, A. – Johnston, R. (2016): Operations Management. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited.

Smith, D. – Florida, R. (1994): Agglomeration and Industrial Location: An Econometric Analysis of Japanese-Affi liated Manufacturing Establishments in Automotive-Related Industries. Jour-nal of Urban Economics, 36(1): 23–41.

Sturgeon, T. – Van Biesebroeck, J. – Gereffi , G. (2008): Value Chains, Networks and Clusters: Re-framing the Global Automotive Industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3): pp. 297–321.

Túry, G. (2014): Automotive Industry in the EU10 Economies: Developments in the Past Decade.

In: Éltető, A. (ed.): Mind the Gap – Integration Experiences of the Ten Central and Eastern European Countries. Budapest: Center for Economic and Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of World Economics, pp. 41–60.

Van Tuijl, E. (2014): Car Makers and Upgrading: Renault in Romania. Journal of Business Strategy , 35(2): 13–18.

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK