• Nem Talált Eredményt

learners. Accordingly, the whole language learning process is better seen as a personalized experience, and learners can monitor their own progress and errors outside the school context, assess their own level of proficiency, and target the less developed features in their L2. At present, learners can make use of the unlimited access to pure L2 input from social media websites and even live communication with native speakers. Following an Informal Digital Learning of English (IDLE), EFL learners can benefit from the available dataset specified for such purposes and available online for EFL practice. In this relation, PA EFL learners are recommended to record themselves speaking in the L2 and then to listen and assess their own production of vowels and other segmental and suprasegmental features.

This thesis also produced some interesting findings that need further examination in the future. For example, a more detailed analysis of the pairwise boundaries between the 11 AE monophthongs in perception and production would allow me to determine the shape of the crossover between neighboring vowels. The results in Chapter 4 show the acceptability regions of all 11 AE monophthongs (the ellipses) that were obtained for L1 and L2 listeners. This has not been done before. In the literature, one normally finds stimulus continua between two (maximally three) sounds but never an exhaustively and systematically sampled vowel space.

It should be feasible to break this dissertation results down into a large number of pairwise contrasts between adjacent vowels and from that determine the exact shape of the crossover between neighboring vowels. By doing so, I will find not only that the boundaries in the L2 data are not at the same location in the vowel space as in the L1 data but also that the L2 crossover is shallower (more gradual, i.e., less sharply defined – meaning that the L2 listeners are less certain of their identification) than in the L1 data.

It is my hope that this dissertation (and future research) will contribute to alleviating the lamentable conditions for teaching English in the Palestinian school system and raising it up to a higher level.

REFERENCES

Ababneh, I. (2018). English pronunciation errors made by Saudi students. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14(2), 244–261. doi: 10.19044/esj.2018.v14n2p244

Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Chicago: Edinburg University Press

Abu-Salim, I. M. (1982). Syllable structure and syllabification in Palestinian Arabic. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 12(1), 103–122. Retrieved from https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rql/1986-v16-n1-rql2927/602581ar/

Abu-Salim, I. M. (1986). Vowel shortening in Palestinian Arabic. Lingua, 68(2-3), 223–240. doi:

10.1016/0024-3841(86)90005-7

Al-Abdely, A., & Thai Yap, N. (2016a). Learning English vowels by Iraqi EFL learners: Perceived difficulty versus actual performance. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(1), 1–18. doi: 10.17576/3l-2016-2201-01

Al-Abdely, A., & Thai Yap, N. (2016b). The interrelation between the perception and production of English monophthongs by speakers of Iraqi Arabic. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(S), 1-10. Retrieved from: http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/29338/

Al-Ani, S. H. (1970). Arabic phonology. Paris: de Gruyter.

Al-Badawi, K. (2013). An analysis of phonetic, morphological and syntactic errors in English: A case study of Saudi BA students at King Khalid University. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(6), 536–538. doi: 10.7763/ijssh.2012.V2.165

Al-Badawi, M., & Salim, J. (2014). The perception of English vowels by Arab EFL learners: A case study of university students at Zarqa University. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(20), 23–26. Retrieved from https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/view/15784

Almbark, R. (2011). Production and perception of SSBE vowels by Syrian Arabic speakers. In M.

Wrembel, M. Kul, & K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech: New sounds 2010 (Vol. 2, pp. 15–26): Peter Lang: International Verlag der Wissenschaften.

Almbark, R. (2012). The perception and production of SSBE vowels by Syrian Arabic learners: The foreign language model. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of York, UK.

Almbark, R. (2014). Perception and production of SSBE vowels by foreign language learners: Towards a Foreign Language Model. Concordia University Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 3–18.

Almbark, R., & Hellmuth, S. (2015). Acoustic analysis of the Syrian Arabic vowel system. In:

Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. University of Glasgow.

Ali, E. M. T. (2011). Speech intelligibility problems of Sudanese learners of English. (LOT dissertation series nr. 170). Utrecht: LOT.

Ali, E. M. T. (2013). Pronunciation problems: Acoustic analysis of the English vowels produced by Sudanese learners of English. International Journal of English and Literature, 4(10), 495–507.

Al-Mallah, Y. (1983). The emphatic sounds in Classical Arabic: A phonological description. Bethlehem University Journal, 2(1), 52–58. Retrieved from

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26444494?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

Al-Mazrouei, A., Negm, A., & Kulikov, V. (Submitted). The vowel system of Qatari Arabic: Are short vowels lax and non-peripheral? Journal of IPA.

Alqarni, H. (2018). The production of English vowels by native Arabic speakers. (MA thesis), Colorado State University, Colorado State University Libraries.

Alshalaan, K. (2020). A comparison between English and Arabic sound systems regarding places of articulation. Open Access Library Journal, 07(05), 1–7. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1105679

Al-Wer, E. (2002). Jordanian and Palestinian dialects in contact: vowel raising in Amman. In M. C.

Jones & E. Esch (Eds.), Language Change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors (pp. 63–80). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Wer, E. (2007). The formation of the dialect of Amman: From chaos to order. In C. Miller, E. Al-Wer, D. Caubet, & J. Watson (Eds.), Arabic in the city: Issues in dialect contact and language variation (pp. 55–76). London: Routledge.

Al-Zoubi, S. (2019). The speech sounds of Arabic language and their effect on learning English pronunciation: A contrastive analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9(1), 15–27. doi: 10.30845/ijhss.v9n1p2

Amara, M. H. (2003). Recent foreign language education policies in Palestine. Language Problems and Language Planning, 27(3), 217–232. doi: 10.1075/lplp.27.3.02ama

Amir, N., Amir, O., & Rosenhouse, J. (2014). Colloquial Arabic vowels in Israel: A comparative acoustic study of two dialects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(4), 1895–1907.

doi: 10.1121/1.4894725

Anderson, J. (1987). The markedness differential hypothesis and syllable structure difficulty. In G. Ioup

& S. Weinberger (Eds.), Interlanguage phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system (pp. 279–291). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.

Angoujard, J.-P. (1990). Metrical structure of Arabic. Dordrecht: Foris.

Astruc, L. (2013). Prosody. In M. J. Jones & R. Knight (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to phonetics (pp. 126–139). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Baart, J. L. (2010). A field manual of acoustic phonetics. Dallas, TX: SIL International.

Badawi, E.-S. M. (1996). Understanding Arabic: Essays in contemporary Arabic linguistics in honor of El-Said Badawi. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.

Balogné Bérces, K., & Szentgyörgyi, Sz. (2006). The Pronunciation of English. Budapest: HEFOP Bölcsész Konzorcium. Retrieved from: http://mek.oszk.hu/04900/04910/

Bergem, D. van (1993). Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class. Speech Communication, 12, 1–23.

Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words. (pp. 167–224). Cambridge, MA:

The MIT Press.

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of crosslanguage speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(2), 775–794. doi: 10.1121/1.1332378

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In O.-S. Bohn

& M. Munro (Eds.), The role of language experience in speech perception and production. A festschrift in honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bezooijen, R. van, & van Heuven, V. J. (2010). Avant-garde Dutch: An acoustic, perceptual and evaluational study. In: D. R. Preston & N. Niedzielsky (Eds.), A reader in Sociophonetics (pp. 357–

378). New York: De Gruyter.

Blanc, H. (1953). Studies in North Palestinian Arabic; Linguistic inquiries among the Druzes of western Galilee and Mt. Carmel. Jerusalem: Israel Oriental Society.

Blankenship, B. (1991). Vowel perception in a second language. (Unpublished master thesis), University of California, Los Angeles.

Boersma, P. (1998). Functional phonology. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Amsterdam. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

Boersma, P., & Heuven, V. J. van (2001). Speak and unSpeak with PRAAT. Glot International, 5, 341–

347.

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2021). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. www.praat.org.

Bohn, O.-S. (1995). Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 279–304). Baltimore, MD: York Press.

Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11(3), 303–328.

doi: 10.1017/s0142716400008912

Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (1992). The production of new and similar vowels by adult German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(2), 131–158.

doi: 10.1017/s0272263100010792

Bohn, O.-S., & Munro, M. J. (Eds.). (2007). Language experience in second language speech learning:

A festschrift in honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Broselow, E. (1984). An investigation of transfer in second language phonology. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 22(4), 253–269.

doi: 10.1515/iral.1984.22.4.253

Brown, A. (2015). Syllable Structure. In M. Reed & J. M. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 85–105). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Brown, A., & Oyer, S. (2013). Vowel project: Analysis of a native-Arabic speaker. Linguistic Portfolios, 2, 31–46. Retrieved from https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/stcloud_ling/vol2/iss1/4/

Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:

Prentice Hall.

Buckingham, L. (2014). Attitudes to English teachers’ accents in the Gulf. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 50–73. doi: 10.1111/ijal.12058

Canepari, L. (2007). A handbook of pronunciation: English, Italian, French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian, Arabic, Hindi, Chinese, Japanese, Esperanto. Munich: LINCOM Europa.

Carley, P., & Mees, I. M. (2019). American English Phonetics and Pronunciation Practice (1st ed.).

London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429492228

Catford, J. (2002). A practical introduction to phonetics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D.M., Goodwin, J.M. & Griner, B. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide. 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cenoz, J., & Lecumberri, M. L. G. (1999). The acquisition of English pronunciation: learners’ views.

International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 3-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.1999.tb00157.x Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

Cohn, A. C. (2017). Phonology. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp.

185–210). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Colantoni, L., Steele, J., Escudero, P., & Neyra, P. R. E. (2015). Second language speech: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Collins, B., Mees, I. M., & Carley, P. (2019). Practical English phonetics and phonology. London, New York: Routledge.

Collins, K. A., & Clément, R. (2012). Language and prejudice: Direct and moderated effects. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(4), 376–396. doi: 10.1177/0261927x12446611

Corder, S. P. (1971). Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 9(2), 147–160. doi: 10.1515/iral.1971.9.2.147

Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cotter, W. M. (2020). The Arabic dialect of Gaza City. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 1–13. doi: 10.1017/s0025100320000134

Cowell, M. (1964). A reference grammar of Syrian Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cutler, A. (2015). Lexical stress in English pronunciation. In M. Reed & J. M. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 106–124). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Dauer, R. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing re-analysed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51–62.

Davis, S. (1995). Emphasis spread in Arabic and grounded phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 26(3), 465–

498. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178907

del Rosario Garita, M., González Lutz, M. I. & Solís Pérez, N. (2019). English vowel sounds:

Pronunciation issues and student and faculty perceptions. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 19(3): 33-67. doi: 10.15517/aie.v19i3.38629

Denham, K., & Lobeck, A. (2013). Linguistics for everyone: An introduction (2nd ed.). Boston, MA:

Wadsworth-Cengage Learning.

Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27(2), 315–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x

Eckman, F. (1987). The reduction of word-final consonant clusters in interlanguage. In A. James & J.

Leather (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 143–162). Providence, RI: Foris.

Eckman, F. R. (1991). The structural conformity hypothesis and the acquisition of consonant clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(1), 23–41. doi:

10.1017/S0272263100009700

Eckman, F. R. (1996). A functional-typological approach to second language acquisition theory. In W.

C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 195–211). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Eckman, F. R. (2008). Typological markedness and second language phonology. In J. G. H. Edwards &

M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 95–115). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Eckman, F. R., & Iverson, G. K. (1993). Sonority and markedness among onset clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Second Language Research, 9(3), 234–252.

doi: 10.1177/026765839300900302

Eliot, L. (2013). Single-Sex Education and the Brain. Sex Roles, 69(7), 363-381. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0037-y

Elmahdi, O. E. H., & Khan, W. A. (2015). The Pronunciation Problems Faced by Saudi EFL Learners at Secondary Schools. Education and Linguistics Research 1(2), 85–99. doi:10.5296/elr.v1i2.7783 Embarki, M. (2013). Phonetics. In J. Owens (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Arabic linguistics (pp. 23–

44). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199764136.013.0002

Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization (LOT Dissertation Series nr 113). Utrecht: LOT. Retrieved from https://www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/113_fulltext.pdf

Escudero, P. (2009). Linguistic perception of “similar” L2 sounds. In P. Boersma & S. S. Hamann (Eds.), Phonology in perception (pp. 151–190). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Escudero, P., & Vasiliev, P. (2011). Cross-language acoustic similarity predicts perceptual assimilation of Canadian English and Canadian French vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(5), EL277–EL283. doi: 10.1121/1.3632043

Escudero, P., & Williams, D. (2011). Perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Peruvian Spanish listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(1), EL1–EL7.

doi: 10.1121/1.3525042

Evans, B. G., & Alshangiti, W. (2018). The perception and production of British English vowels and consonants by Arabic learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 15–31.

doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.01.002

Fant, G. (1970). Acoustic theory of speech production: With calculations based on x-ray studies of Russian articulations. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

Faris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2016). An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139(1), EL1–EL5. doi: 10.1121/1.4939608

Farrah, M., & Halahlah, N. (2020). Pronunciation problems among Palestinian English major students in Hebron University. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 20(1), 203–226. doi:

10.33806/ijaes2000.20.1.11

Farran, B., & Hortobágyi, I. (2020). The linguistic landscape of Ramallah, Palestine: A case study of analysing the dominance of English vs. Arabic as L1 in the Main Street of the city. SYNERGY - ASE, 16(2), 242–258. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=886291

Farran, B., Hortobágyi, I., & Gyöngyi, F. (2020). Testing English as a foreign language in Palestine: A case study of INJAZ (GCSE) 2018 English exam. Hungarian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 1–28. doi: 10.18460/ANY.2020.1.001

Fathi, H., & Qassim, Z. (2020). An acoustic study of the production of Iraqi Arabic vowels. Journal of Al-Frahedis Arts, 12(40), 692–704. doi: 10.25130/arts.v12i40.724

Ferguson, C. (1956). The emphatic L in Arabic. Language, 32, 446–452. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/410565

Ferrand, C. T. (2018). Speech science: An integrated approach to theory and clinical practice (4th ed.).

Boston, MA: Pearson.

Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–

423. doi: 10.2307/3588487

Fischer, W. (1997). Classical Arabic. In R. Hetzron (Ed.), The Semitic languages (pp. 187–219).

London, New York: Routledge.

Flege, J. E. (1981). The phonological basis of foreign accent. TESOL Quarterly, 15(4), 443–455. doi:

10.2307/3586485

Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 47–65. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30537-6

Flege, J. E. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice‐onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(1), 395–411.

doi: 10.1121/1.400473

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233-277).

Timonium, MD: York Press.

Flege, J. E. (2002). Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In P.

Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 217–243). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.

Flege, J. E. (2003). Methods for assessing the perception of vowels in a second language. Padua:

UniPress.

Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83): Cambridge University Press.

Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470.

doi: 10.1006/jpho.1997.0052

Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 67-83. doi:10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30538-8

Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987.

Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134.

doi: 10.1121/1.428116

Flemming, E. (2001). Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology.

Phonology, 18(1), 7–44. doi: 10.1017/s0952675701004006

Fourakis, M. (1991). Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 1816–1827.

Fowler, C. A. (1981). A relationship between coarticulation and compensatory shortening. Phonetica, 38, 35–40.

Fries, C. (1945). Teaching and learning English as a Foreign language. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2019). An introduction to language (11th ed.). Boston, MA:

Cengage Learning.