• Nem Talált Eredményt

Difficulties during the integration process

In document CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS (Pldal 121-127)

María Palacios Guillem; Elena Perez Bernabeu; Víctor Gisbert Soler and Marta Blasco Torregrosa

4 DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

4.3 Difficulties during the integration process

As in any process, in the implementation of management methodologies there are difficulties that make it a little more complicated to implement the systematic ones that have been chosen. A summary of these

122

difficulties could be: “Lack of integration guidelines (books, articles, documents, etc.)”; “Lack of human resources”; “Lack of department collaboration”; “Lack of specialised auditors”; “Excessive time to conduct the integration”; “Lack of employees motivation”, among others.

In this section we will observe that difficulties have been found the companies surveyed.

Figure 4 – Difficulties Source: Own preparation

In this question a Likert scale was used which are "Little Important"; "Important" and "Very important", to which the numbers 1; 2 and 3, were assigned, respectively.

The difficulty that most companies have responded as "Very important" is the "lack of human resources", 25%. Followed by "Lack of collaboration of departments”, 19.12%. While the difficulty that most companies have marked as "Little important" is "inefficient implementation of the first system", 69.12%

(Figure 5).

And is that, apart from not having the necessary resources to perform the integration, one of the problems with which companies find themselves is the lack of collaboration on the part of the different departments, among other things, for the lack of knowledge and culture with respect to management systems. One of the measures that can be applied to avoid this is to train the departments that are part of the integration of the systems before the implementation.

4.4 Benefits

What makes companies interested in implementing management systems are the benefits they present.

These can be summarized in: “Task simplification (documentation, control, requirements)”; “Increase of

123

organizational efficiency (cost reduction, etc.)”; “Better use of the internal and external audit results”; “Firm image improvements” and “Competitive advantage in the market”, among others.

In this section we will see the benefits that companies have obtained with the implementation of management systems.

Figure 5 – Benefits. Source: Own preparation

Like the previous question, this question also used a Likert scale which is “Little Important"; "Important"

and "Very important", to which the numbers 1; 2 and 3, were assigned, respectively.

The benefits that have been valued by the companies that have responded have been "Improvement of the external image of the company", 67.65%. The other best evaluated is "Improvement in the quality of the products and / or services", 47.06%, as one of the causes by which management systems are known and by which companies decide to implement them, is the ability of management systems to improve the competitiveness of companies by means of improving the quality of their products or services and, therefore, the image transmitted by the company.

The most voted as "Little important" and therefore, the least valued by the companies are "Better options to include new systems", 33.82%, and “Employee motivation improvements”, also with 33.82% (Figure 6).

124

5 CONCLUSIONS

For all of the above reasons, it could be concluded that although the management systems arose at the end of the 90s, it is not until the years 2000 and 2005 that there is a great number of companies that implement the above mentioned methodologies, such as ISO 9001 and ISO 14001, with a duration of implementation, in general, of no more than 2 years.

Regarding how companies have implemented their systems, most have made a map of processes, in which they have integrated elements such as "quality objectives and planning to achieve them"; "System Review"

and "System Improvement".

In relation to the difficulties that companies have found in their systematic implementation one could conclude that "Lack of human resources" and "Lack of collaboration of the departments” are those that most affected them.

On the other hand the benefits that the companies have obtained with the integration are "Firm image improvements" and "Improvement in the quality of the products or services".

Observing the above conclusions, it is possible to be affirmed that with this study the conclusions are verified to which they arrived Samuel Vinícius and Carla Schwengber (Samuel Vinícius & Carla Schwengber Ten, 2015); Roselyn Martínez; Beatriz Agüero; Alejandro Penabad and Ricardo Montero (Martínez et al., 2011) and Mercè Bernardo Vilamitjana (Bernardo Vilamitjana, 2010).

References

Bamber, C. J., Sharp, J. M., & Hides, M. T. (2000). Developing management systems towards integrated manufacturing : a case study perspective, 454–461.

Beckmerhagen, I. a., Berg, H. P., Karapetrovic, S. V., & Willborn, W. O. (2003). Integration of management systems: focus on safety in the nuclear industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710310456626

Beechner, A. B., & James, E. (1997). Integrating ISO 9001 and ISO 14001. Quality Progress, 33–36.

Bernardo, M., Casadesus, M., Karapetrovic, S., & Heras, I. (2009). How integrated are environmental, quality and other standardized management systems? An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(8), 742–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.003

Bernardo Vilamitjana, M. (2010). Integració de sistemes estandarditzats de gestió: Anàlisi empírica.

Retrieved from https://www.educacion.gob.es/teseo/mostrarSeleccion.do

Bornay Barrachina, M. del M., García Rodríguez, M., & Ferguson Amores, M. C. (2002). Modelos de implantación de los sistemas integrados de gestión de la calidad, el medio ambiente y la seguridad.

Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección Y Economía de La Empresa, 8(1), 97–118.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.003

Charlet, L. (2011). The ISO Survey of Management System Standard Certifications – 2011 Executive summary, 2008, 3. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_survey2011_executive-summary.pdf DIRCE. (2015). Retrato de la PYME, 1–8.

Douglas, A., & Glen, D. (2000). Integrated management systems in small and medium enterprises. Total Quality Management, 11(4), 686–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544120050008075

Fraguela Formoso, J. A., Carral Couce, L., Iglesias Rodríguez, G., Castro Ponte, A., & Rodríguez Guerreiro, M. J. (2011). Integration of management systems. Need for a new entrepreneurial culture . DYNA (Colombia), 78(167), 44–49. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-83155172914&partnerID=40&md5=b6f6f3055827e3933b0fb7be18df68f1

125

Heras Saizarbitoria, I., Bernardo, M., & Casadesús, M. (2007). La Integración De Sistemas De Gestión Basados En Estándares Internacionales. Revista de Dirección Y Administracion de Empresas - España, 14, 155–174.

Karapetrovic, S. (2002). Strategies for the integration of management systems and standards. The TQM Magazine, 14(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780210414254

Karapetrovic, S. (2003). Musings on integrated management systems. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040310466681

Karapetrovic, S., & Jonker, J. (2003). Integration of standardized management systems: Searching for a recipe and ingredients. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(4), 451–459.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1478336032000047264

Karapetrovic, S., & Willborn, W. (1998a). Integration of quality and environmental management systems.

The TQM Magazine The TQM Magazine Iss The TQM Magazine, 10(2), 204–213.

https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789810214800

Karapetrovic, S., & Willborn, W. (1998b). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management Integrated audit of management systems. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management Managerial Auditing Journal Iss The TQM Magazine Iss, 15(3), 694–711.

https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656719810218220

Labodová, A. (2004). Implementing integrated management systems using a risk analysis based approach.

Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.08.008 Martínez, R., Agüero, B., Penabad, A., Montero, R., Finlay, I., Investigación, C. De, … Lisa, L. (2011).

Sistema Integrado de Gestión de Calidad , Seguridad y Ambiental en un centro biotecnológico Materiales y Métodos. VacciMonitor, 20(2), 24–31. Retrieved from http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/vac/v20n2/vac05211.pdf

McDonald, M., Mors, T. A., & Phillips, A. (2003). Management System Integration: Can It Be Done?

Quality Progress, 36(10), 67–74. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0142052968&partnerID=tZOtx3y1

Peña-Escobio, D., Moreno-Pino, M., & Rigol-Cardona, B. (2011). Ciencias Holguín , Revista trimestral, Año XVII, Julio-septiembre, 2011.

Samuel Vinícius, B., & Carla Schwengber Ten, C. (2015). Diagnóstico da integração dos sistemas de gestão ISO 9001, ISO 14001 e OHSAS 18001. Production, 626–640. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.004811

Villar, A. (2012). AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF INTEGRATED Doctoral Thesis An Empirical Analysis of Integrated Management Systems Alexandra Simon i Villar. Univerisitat de Girona.

Retrieved from http%3E//.handle.net/0803184065

Wilkinson, B. G. . D. (1998). System Integration: the Views and Activities of Certification Bodies. The TQM Magazine, 10(4), 288–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789810222658

Wilkinson, G., & Dale, B. G. (2000). Management system standards: The key integration issues.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 214(9), 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954405001517838

Winder, C. (2000). Integrating OHS, Environmental, and Quality Management Standards. Quality Assurance, 8(2), 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/105294100317173880

Zeng, S. X., Shi, J. J., & Lou, G. X. (2007). A synergetic model for implementing an integrated management system: an empirical study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(18), 1760–1767.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.007

126

Contact information

María Palacios Guillem, Ph.D Student

Universidad Politécnica de Valencia , Ph.D School Camí de Vera, s7n, 46022

Valencia- España +34 665849289

mapagui1@epsa.upv.es

Elena Perez Bernabeu , Ph.D

Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Dpto. de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad Camí de Vera, s7n, 46022

Valencia- España elenapb@eio.upv.es

Víctor Gisbert Soler, Ph.d

Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Dpto. de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad Camí de Vera, s7n, 46022

Valencia- España vgisber@eio.upv.es

Marta Blasco Torregrosa, Ph.D Student

Universidad Politécnica de Valencia , Ph.D School Camí de Vera, s7n, 46022

Valencia- España marblato@epsa.upv.es

DOI ID: https://www.doi.org/10.7441/dokbat.2017.12

127

COST STRUCTURE IN SLOVAK STARTUPS BASED ON

In document CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS (Pldal 121-127)