• Nem Talált Eredményt

Available long-term tests

In document PART II (Pldal 137-153)

5. Testing strategies

5.2 Refinement of PNEC: strategy for further testing

5.2.2 Aquatic compartment

5.2.2.2 Available long-term tests

The long-term tests available when seeking to refine the effects assessment are limited, but it is nevertheless important that the correct test is chosen to maximise the usable information and avoid unnecessary repeat testing.

Long-term fish testing

Fish early-life stage (FELS) test (OECD 210)

This test is considered as the most sensitive of the fish tests, covering several life stages of the fish from the newly fertilised egg, through hatch to early stages of growth. This is felt to cover most, but not all, of the sensitive points in the life-cycle, and is the only suitable test currently available for examining the potential toxic effects of bioaccumulation, apart from the full life cycle test. It is, however, a long test, typically 60 days post-hatch for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), or approximately 30 days post-hatch for warm water fish, and is consequently the most expensive of those available. It should be requested where long-term fish toxicity data are required and the substance has the potential to bioaccumulate.

Egg and sac-fry stage test (draft guideline)2

This test measures the sensitive early life stages from the newly fertilised egg to the end of the sac-fry stage. It is considerably shorter, and hence cheaper, than the FELS test but is also considered to be less sensitive. The method is currently the subject of discussion at OECD, and is available as a draft method. It offers an alternative to the FELS test for substances with log Kow less than 4. The conditions under which the egg and sac-fry stage test can be used in place of the FELS test may be clarified following the further discussion at the OECD.

28-day growth test (draft guideline)2

This test measures the growth of juvenile fish over a fixed period, and is considered a sensitive indicator of fish toxicity. Although it is considered to be of insufficient duration to examine all the sensitive points in the fish life-cycle, it provides a shorter and cheaper option to the FELS test for substances of log Kow < 5. It is currently the subject of discussion at OECD and is available as a draft method.

Fish, prolonged toxicity test, 14-day study (OECD 204)

This test cannot be considered as a suitable long-term toxicity study since it does not examine a sensitive stage in the fish life-cycle. It is, in effect, a prolonged acute study with fish mortality as the major end-point examined. However, sub-lethal effects are monitored and the NOEC should be based on the absence of these effects. It should not be requested where a long-term fish study is required. It should only be requested where further information on possible short-term effects is considered necessary.

Long-term Daphnia testing

14-day Daphnia reproduction test (OECD 202, part II)

This test measures the juvenile production as well as parental immobility and mortality. It is frequently (and preferably) conducted over 21 days. Although it does not cover the full life cycle of Daphnia it covers the sensitive reproduction stage. It is therefore considered a sensitive long-term study. It has, however, generated a number of problems, including reproducibility, and is being revised in a new guideline.

21-day Daphnia reproduction test (revised OECD 202, part II, draft)

This test is a development of the above procedure with a number of important modifications to improve the reliability and reproducibility. It is likely to be adopted as a replacement guideline by OECD after the completion of a ring test.

Algal testing:

Algae toxicity test (EEC C3)

The algal growth inhibition test measures the inhibition of algal growth under standard conditions of light, temperature and nutrient concentrations. The test produces an EC50, which can be considered as equivalent to a short-term L(E)C50. The lowest of ErC50 and EbC50 (i.e. the EC50 measured according to the growth rate and biomass respectively, Nyholm, 1985, 1989) should be used. It is not only a multigeneration test but also measures the sublethal effect, reduction in population growth, and therefore can be considered as a true chronic test. The NOEC may therefore be used in the testing strategy.

5.2.2.3 Decision table for further testing

The decisions to be made on further testing are detailed in Table 18 and take the basic criteria above into account, although common sense must be applied to such generalised rules when considering individual situations. The decisions taken on further testing will be different depending on species sensitivity. In all cases, the algal study from the base set is first considered as a short-term study and the EC50 used for calculation of the PNECwater. However, the algal study is technically a multi-generation test and thus, if there are other long-term NOEC data, the algal NOEC can be considered as a long-term NOEC in the revised assessment. Generally, this algal NOEC would not be used unsupported by other long-term data.

Chapter 4 (Use of (Q)SARs) gives full details on the use of the QSAR estimates for substances with a non-specific mode of action and on long-term fish and Daphnia toxicity within the testing strategy.

Table 18 Decision table for aquatic toxicity testing when results from a full base-set (FBS(a)) using an assessment factor on the lowest L(E)C50, show that PEC/PNEC>1

Variation in base-set data

Further testing Data available for assessment

Assessment factor(b) No significant

diffe-rence between the L(E)C50 values of fish, Daphnia or algae

A1 Long-term fish test + long-term Daphnia test + determination of NOEC algae

FBS + algae +

Daphnia + fish 10

Fish LC50 more than 10 times lower than L(E)C50 of Daphnia and algae

A2 Long-term fish test + determination of NOEC algae

If S/L(c) ratio for fish > 20:

long-term Daphnia test(d)

FBS + algae + fish

FBS + algae + fish + Daphnia

50

10 Daphnia L(E)C50

more than 10 times lower than L(E)C50

of fish and algae

A3 Long-term Daphnia test + deter-mination of NOEC algae If S/L(c) ratio for Daphnia >

20: long-term fish test(d)

FBS + algae + Daphnia

FBS + algae + fish + Daphnia

50

10 Algae L(E)C50 more

than 10 times lower than L(E)C50 of fish and Daphnia

A4 Test on other algae species + long-term fish/Daphnia test(e)

FBS + two algae(e)

+ fish/Daphnia 10(e)

Fish LC50 more than 10 times higher than L(E)C50 of Daphnia and algae

A5 Long-term Daphnia test + determi-nation of NOEC algae

If S/L(c) ratio for Daphnia >20;

long-term fish test(d)

FBS + algae + Daphnia

FBS + algae + fish + Daphnia

50

10 Daphnia L(E)C50

more than 10 times higher than L(E)C50

of fish and algae

A6 Long-term fish test + determinati-on of NOEC algae

If S/L(c) ratio for fish >20: long-term Daphnia test(d)

FBS + algae + fish

FBS + algae + fish + Daphnia

50

10 Algae L(E)C50 more

than 10 times higher than L(E)C50 of fish and Daphnia

A7 Long-term Daphnia test + long-term fish test + delong-termination of NOEC algae

FBS + algae + fish +

Daphnia 10

NOTES:

(a) FBS = full base set which includes L(E)C50 values for fish, Daphnia and algae.

(b) AF = the assessment factor must be applied to the lowest NOEC available at this stage, including the NOEC from the algae test.

(c) S/L refers to the short-term to long-term ratio, i.e. the ratio between the L(E)C50 from a short-term test and the NOEC from a long-term test.

(d) Generally testing of a third species will be unnecessary since the toxicity results from the first species should be protective. However, this cannot be a fixed rule given the toxicity variations within taxonomic groups as well as between them. Thus if a short-term L(E)C50: long-term NOEC ratio > 20 is found for the species tested, or from the algal study, then further testing of a third species might be necessary. The use of long-term fish or Daphnia QSARs could help in deciding which species need to be tested (see Chapter 4 "Use of QSARs"). It is considered that such a ratio may be indicative of an abnormal level of toxicity or a specific mode of action, and thus the acquisition of additional evidence is justified in order to improve the confidence in the calculated PNECwater. Other factors such as the shape of the toxicity time curve and the presence of sub-lethal effects in the short-term toxicity study for the second species may also be considered. An assessment factor of 10 may be applied to the lowest of the three NOECs. Before a toxicity study on a third species is requested, due consideration should be given to whether the resultant NOEC will lead to a further revision of the PNECwater.

(e) This table is based on the presumption that an algal NOEC is available at the base-set.

If this is not the case an assessment factor of 50 should be used .

5.2.3 Soil compartment

At the moment there is a lack of standardised ecotoxicity tests for terrestrial organisms. The OECD tests on plants and earthworms are the only ones which are directly related to the soil compartment. These tests are of relatively short duration and should be regarded as short-term tests.

Several research programmes have been started in the last years, aimed at the development of soil tests: the Netherlands Integrated Soil Research Programme (NISRP; Eijsackers, 1989) and the Swedish Mark Test System (MATS; Rundgren et al., 1989). Recently, in Denmark a research programme has been started in which attention is paid to terrestrial toxicity research.

Finally, within the framework of the EU Environment Programme the international research project Sublethal Effects of Chemicals on Fauna Soil Ecosystem (SECOFASE) receives funding for the development, improvement and standardisation of ecotoxicity tests with a number of terrestrial organisms (Løkke and Van Gestel, 1993). However, it is unclear at the moment how many and which ecotoxicity tests should be implemented in testing strategies for a realistic effect assessment for the soil compartment. This means that a set of tests according to the base-set for the water compartment (algae, Daphnia and fish) does not exist for the soil compartment. A test set for soil organisms could be devised to contain data on:

primary producers (plants);

consumers (herbivores, fungivores and saprovorous organisms);

decomposers (litter consumers and micro-organisms).

Within the OECD Test Guidelines Programme a suitable test set for soil organisms is being developed. Within this framework Léon and Van Gestel (1994) made an inventory of existing and international test guidelines and newly developed tests. Also they made an inventory of criteria for the selection of toxicity tests, and developed a more or less standardised method for selecting tests based on a scoring system for these criteria.

In the "OECD Terrestrial Effects Working Group Meeting" in June 1995 types of terrestrial testing required for various chemicals were discussed. For "general" chemicals the following tests were recommended at an "initial stage" (OECD, 1995):

plant test involving exposure via soil;

test with an annelid (earthworm acute or possibly reproduction test);

and/or

test with a soil-dwelling arthropod.

Several tests with soil organisms are summarised in Appendix VI.

With respect to the testing strategy two cases can be distinguished if it is decided to revise the PNECsoil:

(1) If the equilibrium partitioning method is applied due to the absence of toxicity data for soil organisms and PECsoil/PNECsoil is >1, short term tests on primary producers, consumers and decomposers should be performed. Test guidelines are available for primary producers (OECD 208) and for consumers (OECD 207). Tests for decomposers have been developed for plant protecting agents and are available in several EU Member States as tests standardised on a national level (e.g. NEN (1988) in the Netherlands, BBA (1990b) in Germany). Currently, more methods are being developed (see Appendix VI).

(2) If the PNECsoil is based on toxicity data for soil organisms using assessment factors and PECsoil/PNECsoil >1, further testing may be necessary.

Depending on the effect a substance has on vascular plants, earthworms or micro-organisms, the information about the ecotoxicological effect on the most sensitive group of organisms (primary producers, consumers or decomposers) has to be improved by conducting appropriate tests for the respective endpoints. The choice of test species will be made on a case-by-case basis taking into account the availability of a suitable test method, the indicative nature of the assessment factors and the uncertainty in the proposed approach.

References

Ahlers, J., Koch, W., Lange, A., Marschner, A., Welter, G., (1992). Bewertung der Umweltgefährlichkeit von Alten Stoffen nach dem Chemikaliengesetz (ChemG), Chemikaliengesetz-Heft 10, Texte 19/92, Umwelt-bundesamt, Berlin.

ASTM - American society for Testing and Materials (1990a). Standard guide for conducting 10-day static sediment toxicity tests with marine and estuarine amphipods. -ASTM Standard E 1367-90. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA: 1-24.

ASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials (1990b). Guide for designing biological tests with sediments.- (Subcommittee Ballot Draft #1 dated 10/19/90) (Jim Dwyer, 314/875-5399.) American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.

ASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials (1990c). Guide for Determination of the Bioaccumulation of Sediment-Associated Contaminants by Fish (Concurrent Subcommittee and Main Committee Ballot, Draft #2 dated 04/17/90) (Mike Mac; 314/994-3331.) American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.

ASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials (1990d). Guide for Determination of the Bioaccumulation of Sediment-Associated Contaminants by Benthic Invertebrates (Subcommittee Ballot, Draft

#3 dated September 1990) (Henry Lee; 503/867-4042.) American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.

ASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials (1990e). Sediment Testing Methods.- (Draft #1 dated 11/06/90.) American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.

ASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials (1991). Standard Guide for Conducting Sediment Toxicity Tests with Freshwater Invertebrates.- ASTM Standard E 1383-90. (Marcia Nelson; 314/875-5399.) American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA: 1-20.

BBA (Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land-und Forstwirtschaft) (1986). Test guideline IV; 4-1; Fate of plant protection agents in soil-degradation, conversion and metabolism for simulation of the compartment soil.

BBA (Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft (1990a). Test guideline IV, 5-1;

Degradability and fate of plant protection agents in the water/sediment system for simulation of smaller surface waters.

BBA (Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft) (1990b). Richtlinien für die amtliche Prüfung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln (Nr. VI, 1-1 (2. Auflage)), Auswirkungen auf die Bodenmikroflora. Erlassen im März 1990.

Belfroid, A., W. Seinen , K. van Gestel, J. Hermens and K. van Leeuwen (1995). Modelling the accumulation of hydrophobic organic chemicals in earthworms. - Application of the equilibrium partitioning theory. Environ. Sci.

Pollut. Res. 2, 5-15.

Bringmann, G. and R. Kühn (1960). Vergleichende toxikologische Befunde an Wasser-Bakterien. Gesundheits-Ingenieur 11, 337-340.

Bringmann, G. and R. Kühn (1980). Comparison of the toxicity tresholds of water pollutants to bacteria, algae and protozoa in the cell multiplication inhibition test. Wat. Res. 14, 231-241.

BUA (1992). OH radicals in the troposphere. BUA Report 100; GDCh-Advisory Committee on Existing Chemicals of Environmental Relevance, April 1992.

Burton, G. A., Jr. (1991). Assessing the toxicity of fresh water sediments. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 10, (2), 1585-1627.

Burton, G. A., Jr. (1992). Biological Test Method: Acute Test for Sediment Toxicity using Marine or Estuarine Amphipods. Report, EPS 1/RM/26, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Kl A OH3, Canada.

Connell, D.W. and R.D. Markwell (1990). Bioaccumulation in the soil to earthworm system. Chemosphere 20, 91-100.

De Greef, J., and De Nijs, A.C.M. (1990). Risk assessment of new chemical substances. Dilution of effluents in the Netherlands. RIVM report no. 670208001.

De Leeuw, F.A.A.M. (1993). Assessment of the atmospheric hazards and risks of new chemicals: procedures to estimate "hazard potentials". Chemosphere 27, (8), 1313-1328.

Di Toro, D.M., Zarba, C.S., Hansen, D.J., Berry, W.J., Schwarz, R.C., Cowan, C.E. Pavlou, S.P. Allen, H.E., Thomas, N.A., Paquin P.R. (1991). Technical basis of establishing sediment quality criteria for nonionic organic chemicals using equilibrium partitioning. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 10, 1541-1583.

ECETOC (1994a). Technical Report No. 56: Aquatic Toxicity Data Evaluation.

ECETOC (1994b) Technical Report No. 61: Environmental Exposure Assessment.

ECETOC (in press). Technical Report No. 68: The Role of Bioaccumulation in Environmental Risk Assessment:

The Aquatic Environment and the Related Food Web.

Emans, H.J.B., Van De Plassche, EJ., Canton, J.H., Okkerman, P.C., Sparenburg P.M. (1993). Validation of some extrapolation methods used for effect assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12, 2139-2154.

EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1980). Offic of Toxic Substances. Chemical Use Standard Encoding System (ChemUSES), Volume 2: Function List and Function List Index (Draft) EPA 560/13-80-034b, August 1980, Washington, DC 20460.

Eijsackers, H.J.P. (1989). The Netherlands Integrated Soil Research Programme: plan and realization of the research programme. Programme Office for Integrated Soil Research, Wageningen.

Frank, R., and Klöppfer, W. (1989). A convenient model and program for the assessment of abiotic degradation of chemicals in natural waters. Ecotox. Environ. Safety, 17, 323-332.

Heijna-Merkus, E., and Hof M. (1993). Harmonisation of model parameters. RIVM report no. 679102022.

Hill, I.R., Heimbach, F., Leeuwangh, P. and Mathiessen, P. (eds.) (1994). Freshwater field tests for hazard assessment of chemicals. Lewis Publishers, London.

Hine, J., and Mookerjee, P. K. (1975). The intrinsic hydrophilic character of organic compounds. Correlations in terms of structural contributions. J. Org. Chem., Vol. 40, (3), 292-298.

Hoekstra, J.A., Van Ewijk, P.H. (1993). Alternatives for the no-observed-effect level. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

12, 187-194.

ISO (International Organisation for Standardisation) (1994). Water quality - Evaluation of the "ultimate"

anaerobic biodegradability of organic compounds in digested sludge - Method by measurement of the biogas production. Draft International Standard No 11734.

ISO (International Organisation for Standardisation) No. 9509. Water quality - Method for assessing the inhibition of nitrification of activated sludge microorganisms by chemicals and waste waters.

Jongbloed, R.H., J. Pijnenburg, B.J.W.G. Mensink, TI.P. Traas and R. Luttik (1994). A model for environmental risk assessment and standard setting based on biomagnification. Top predators in terrestrial ecosystems. RIVM report no. 71901012.

Junge, C.E. (1977). In: Fate of pollutants in the air and water environment. I.H. Suffet (ed), Wiley interscience, New York, 7-25.

Knacker, T. and Morgan, E. (1994). UBA-workshop on terrestrial model ecosystems. UBA-FB 94-117.

Léon, C.D. and Van Gestel, C.A.M. (1994). Selection of a set of standardized laboratory toxicity tests for the hazard assessment of chemical substances in terrestrial ecosystems. Report no. D94004, Department of

Ecology and Ecotoxicology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Løkke, H. and Van Gestel, C.A.M. (1993). Manual for SECOFASE, Development, Improvement and Standardization of Test Systems for Assessing Sublethal Effects of Chemicals on Fauna in the Soil Ecosystem.

Report from a workshop held in Silkeborg, Denmark, January 18-19, 1993, National Environmental Research Institute. 41 pp.

Ma, W.-C. (1994). Methodological principles of using small mammals for ecological hazard assessment of a chemical soil pollution, with examples on cadmium and lead. In: Donker, M.H.; Eijsackers, H.; Heimbach, F.

(eds) Ecotoxicology of soil organisms. SETAC Special Publication Series, Lewis Publishers.

Mackay, D. (1991). Multimedia Environmental Models. Lewis, Chelsea, MI.

Mackay, D., Paterson, S., Shiu, W.Y. (1992). Generic models for evaluating the regional fate of chemicals;

Chemosphere 24, (6), 695-717.

Meylan, W.M., and Howard P.H. (1991). Bond contribution method for estimating Henry's law constants.

Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 10, 1283 - 1293.

Mikkelsen, J. (1995, in press). Fate Model for Organic Chemicals in an Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Plant - Modification of SimpleTreat. National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark. Prepared for the Danish EPA.

NEN (Nederlandse Norm) (1988). Soil - Determination of the Influence of Chemicals on Soil Nitrification, No.

5795, Nederlands Normalisatie-Instituut, Delft

Notenboom, J. and Boessenkool, J.J. (1992). Acute toxicity testing with the groundwater copecod Parastenocarsis germanica (Crustecea). In: Stanford, J.A. and Simons, J.J. (eds.). Proceedings of the first international conference on groundwater ecology. American Water Resources Association, Bethesda, pp. 301-309.

Nyholm, N. (1985). Response Variable in Algal Growth Inhibition Tests - Biomass or Growth Rate? Water Res. 19, (3), 273-279.

Nyholm, N. amd Källquist, T. (1989). Methods for Growth Inhinition Tests with Freshwater Algae, Environ.

Toxicol. Chem. 8, 689-703.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1981a). Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 305 E, Bioaccumulation: Flow-through Fish Test, Paris.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1981b). Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 303 A, Simulation Test - Aerobic Sewage Treatment : Coupled Units Test, Paris.

OECD (1981c). Guidelines for testing of chemicals. Paris, OECD, ISBN 92-64-12221-4 (including 1984 and 1987 updates).

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1984). Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 201, Alga, Growth Inhibition Test, Paris.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1984). Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 202, Daphnia sp., Acute Immobilisation Test and Reproduction Test, Paris.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1984). Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 204, Fish, Prolonged Toxicity : 14-day Study, Paris.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1984). Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 207, Earthworm Acute Toxicity Test, Paris.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1984). Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 208, Terrestrial Plants, Growth Test, Paris.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1984). Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 209, Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test, Paris.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1984). Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 210, Fish, Early-life Stage Toxicity Test, Paris.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1989). Report of the OECD Workshop on Ecological Effects Assessment, OECD Environment Monographs No. 26.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1992a). Screening Assessment Model System (SAMS),Version 1.1, Paris.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1992b). Report of the Workshop on Effects Assessment of Chemicals in Sediment. OECD Environment Monographs No. 60.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1992c). The Rate of Photochemical Transformation of Gaseous Organic Compounds in Air Under Tropospheric Conditions, OECD Environment Monographs No. 61.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1992d). Report of the OECD Workshop on the extrapolation of laboratory aquatic toxicity data on the real environment, OECD Environment Monographs No 59.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1993a). Application of Structure-Activity Relationships to the Estimation of Properties Important in Exposure Assessment, OECD Environment Monographs No. 67.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1993b). OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, Paris, OECD, ISBN 92-64-14018-2.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1994). Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 305 E, Bioaccumulation: Flow-through Fish Test, draft revision, Paris.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1995). Terrestrial Effects Working Group Meeting, Paris 18-19 June 1995. Draft summary of discussions.

Pack, S. (1993). A review of statistical data analysis and experimental design in OECD aquatic toxicology test guidelines. Shell Research, Sittingbourne, UK, prepared for OECD.

Pedersen, F., Samsøe-Petersen, L. (1994). Discussion Paper Regarding Guidance for Terrestrial Effects Assessment, 1st Draft, Water Quality Institute, Horsholm, Denmark.

Reynolds, L., Blok, J., de Morsier, A., Gerike, P., Wellens, H. and Bonontinck, W.J. (1987). Evaluation of the toxicity of substances to be assessed for biodegradability. Chemosphere 16, 2259-2277

Römbke, J., Bauer, C., Brodesser, J., Brodsky, J., Danneberg, G., Dietze, C., Härle, M., Heimann, D., Klunker, H., Kohl, E.-G., Renner, I., Ruzicka, J., Schallnass, H.-J., Schäfer, H., Vickus, P. (1993). Grundlagen für die Beurteilung des ökologischen Gefährdungspotentials von Altstoffen im Medium Boden,

Entwicklung einer Teststrategie, Bericht im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, F + E - Vorhaben Nr. 106 04 103, Batelle Eurpoe, Frankfurt am Main.

Romijn, C.A.F.M.. Luttik, R., Van De Meent, D., Slooff, W., Canton, J.H. (1993). Presentation of a General Algorithm to Include Effect Assessment on Secondary Poisoning in the Derivation of Environmental Quality

Criteria. Part 1: Aquatic food chains. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 26, 61-85.

Romijn, C.F.A.M., Luttik, R., Canton, J.H. (1994). Presentation of a general algorithm to include effect assessment on secondary poisoning in the derivation of environmental quality criteria. Part 2. Terrestrial food chains. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 27, 107-127.

Rundgren, S., Andersson, R., Bringmark, L., Byman, J., Gustafsson, K., Johansson, I., and Tortensson, L. (1989).

Soil biological variables in environmental hazard assessment: Organisation and research programme. National Swedish Environmental Protection Board, Solna, Sweden. NSEPD report no. 3603.

Samsøe-Petersen, L. (1987). Laboratory Method for Testing Side-Effects of Pesticides on the Rove Beetle Aleochara bilineata - adults (Col., Staphylinidae). Entomophaga 32, 73-81.

SETAC (1991). Guidance Document on Testing procedures for Pesticides in Freshwater Mesocosms.

SETAC (1992). Workshop Report on Aquatic Microcosms for Ecological Assessment of Pesticides, Wintergreen, Virginia, 6 - 12 October 1991.

Stavola, A. (1990). Detailed Review Paper on Terrestrial Ecotoxicology Test Guidelines, OECD Updating Programme, periodical review.

Struijs, J., Stoltenkamp, J., Van De Meent, D. (1991). A Spreadsheet-based Model to Predict the Fate of Xenobiotics in a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant. Wat. Res. 25, (7), 91-900.

Schwartzenbach, R.P., P.M. Gswend and D.M. Imboden (1993). Environmental Organic Chemistry. John Wiley

& Sons.

Toet, C. and F.A.A.M. de Leeuw (1992). Risk Assessment System for New Chemical Substances: Implementation of atmospheric transport of organic compounds. Bilthoven, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), Report No. 679102 008.

Umweltbundesamt (1993). Entwurf zur Bewertung von Bodenbelastungen, Fachgebiet I 3.7.

Van Beelen, P., Fleuren-Kemilä, A.K., Huys, M.P.A., Van Mil, A.C.M. and Van Vlaardingen, P.L.A. (1990).

Toxic effects of polutants on the mineralization of substrates at low experimental concentrations in soil, subsoils and sediments. In: Arendt, F., Hinseveld, M. and Van den Brink, W.J. (eds.). Contaminated Soil. Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands, pp. 431-438.

Van De Meent, D. (1993). Simplebox: a generic multimedia fate evaluation model. RIVM report no. 672720 001.

Van Gestel, C.A.M. (1992). The influence of soil characteristics on the toxicity of chemicals for earthworms: a review. In: Becker, H. et al. (eds.). Ecotoxicoloay of earthworms. pp. 44-54, Intercept Andover.

Van Gestel, C.A.M., and W. Ma (1993). Development of QSARs in soil ecotoxicology: earthworm toxicity and soil sorption of chlorophenols, chlorobenzenes and chloroanilines. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 69, 265-276.

Van Jaarsveld, J.A. (1990). An operational atmospheric transport model for Priority Substances; specifications and instructions for use. RIVM report no. 222501002.

Veith, G.D., D.L. Defoe and B.V. Bergstedt (1979). Measuring and estimating the bioconcentration factor of chemicals in fish. J. Fish Board Can. 36, 1040-1048.

Water Quality Institute, Denmark and RIVM, The Netherlands (final draft 1995). Detailed Review Paper. Aquatic testing methods for pesticides and industrial chemicals. Prepared for National Coordinators of the OECD Test Guidelines Programme, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD.

Zepp, G.R., and Cline, D.M. (1977). Rates of direct photolysis in aquatic environment. Environ. Sci. Techn. 11, (4), 359-366.

In document PART II (Pldal 137-153)