5 APPENDICES
Information Sheet
1. The name of your organization:
2. Name and contact details of the coordinator:
3. Please give a brief description of the activities carried out by the organization:
3.1. How long have the organization been operating?
3.2. How many employees have the organization?
3.2.1. How many paid employees have the organization?
3.2.2. How many of the employees are volunteers?
3.2.3. What is the method of payment for the employees (e.g. per hours, occasionally, as regular employment)?
3.3. What kind of interventions does the organization provide? What is the proportion of harm reduction amongst the interventions? Please, give a detailed description!
3.4. What is the geographical area of the interventions? Where have the interventions been implemented during the last year?
3.5. What are the settings of the intervention(s)?
3.6. What is the frequency of the intervention(s)?
4. Additional material for the harm-reduction intervention(s).
4.1. Have you ever been considering, that additional information or tools would be needed for the planning/implementation of your interventions? If yes, what type?
4.2. Are you planning to extend or improve your services in the near future, for which you would use the HNT handbook? If yes, what type?
5. Is the organization at this moment responsible for an intervention program that contributes to the creation of a healthier/safer nightlife?
If yes, please answer the following questions:
5.1. Name of the intervention:
5.2. Please give a brief description of the intervention and its overall objectives.
5.3. Dates of operation:
– When did you launch the service (date)?
– On what frequency is it operating?
5.4. Where has the intervention been implemented (region, city, country)?
5.5. In what settings has the intervention been implemented?
5.6. What is the target population of the intervention?
Give a short description of the target population, including age group and sex, and the strategic target group (those social agents acting as intermediaries between the intervention and the target population; e.g. social workers, educators, nightlife professionals, ...).
– Target population:
– Strategic target population:
5.7. What theoretical concept gives the basis of your activity?
5.8. Is the effectiveness of your intervention supported by evidence/research data?
If yes, what are these?
5.9. How have you been monitoring the intervention? Has the effectiveness of the intervention been shown?
Questionnaire
First (Overall) Impressions on the Handbook
1. Please, give us your overall opinion on the handbook in a few lines. What are your first impressions?
2. What did you find the most helpful in the handbook?
3. What is that you find superfluous in the handbook?
4. What is that you would emphasize more in the handbook?
5. What is that you think to be missing from the handbook?
6. What kind of information would you find useful to further include in the handbook?
Please specify as much as possible.
7. Does the handbook present such new information, that you have not met in other scientific sources/literature? If yes, what?
8. How clearly does the handbook state the objectives targeted?
9. How clearly does the handbook state the steps of implementation?
10. Please rate the following statements from 1 to 5 regarding the handbook. Where:
1= not at all 2= slightly 3= moderately 4= to a great extent 5= to a very great extent
Put a sign to the sixth row only if you cannot decide or you feel like there is no appropriate information available.
In my opinion the handbook... 1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
…is easy to read.
…has a clear structure.
…is easy to handle.
…is easy to follow.
…is based on a logical structure.
…is interesting.
…has an appealing appearance.
…has a logical/practical sequence.
…has an appropriate language/style.
…is informative.
…contains much practical information.
…presents the steps of project planning in details to an appropriate extent.
…presents the steps of implementation in details to an appropriate extent.
…provides useful tips for practice.
…presents the steps of planning in a concise way.
…provides an adequate help in choosing the appropriate intervention.
…presents the steps of implementation in a concise way.
…could be useful in the planning of a future intervention project.
…could be useful for the implementation of a future intervention.
…presents the objectives clearly and unambiguously.
…presents the steps of implementation in a clear and easy to follow way.
…presents the objectives of each work phase clearly.
…presents each work phase in an easy to follow way.
Practical information presented in the fourth chapter is clear and unambiguous.
Do you find the prevention policy presented in the handbook consistent with those of your own country?
Do you find the steps advised by the handbook feasible in the Hungarian/Italian environment?
The handbook contains much conducive information independent of cultural context.
Validity of handbook is independent of cultural context.
Objectives presented in the handbook apply in your own
country
How likely is it you would use the handbook while planning a project?
Information presented in the handbook is conducive for planning a project.
Literature database contains useful materials.
It is probable that I will use the handbook for planning an intervention.
If not, why? Please describe briefly below.
Questionnaire
on Problem Assessment/ Problem Analysis
Please, answer the following questions regarding the handbook and the process of problem analysis, where 1= not at all, 2= slightly, 3= moderately, 4= yes, to a great extent, 5=yes, to a very great extent.
Put a sign to the sixth row only if you can not decide between the answers or you feel like there is no appropriate information available.
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
1. Is it clearly presented in the Handbook, why the execution of the problem analysis is important?
2. Do the questions mentioned in the Handbook cover the areas necessary?
3. Do the questions regarding the assessment of problems give useful hints for the analysis?
4. Do the questions regarding the nature of problems give useful hints for the analysis?
5. Does the Handbook provide helpful tips and advice for creating cooperation with the parties involved in the problem analysis?
6. Does Chapter 4.2. provide help for mapping problems in the given region?
7. Does this chapter help the process of problem analysis?
8. Does information presented in chapter 2 and 3 seem to be helpful concerning problem assessment?
9. Did you rely on the handbook in the course of problem assessment?
10. Did the handbook convince you of the need for problem assessment?
Interview questions:
1. Please describe briefly; what activities have you done during the process of problem assessment. What actions have been executed?
2. What kind of sources have been used during this work phase? With whom did you contact?
3. How have you summarized the obtained information? Who did participate in summarizing the data?
4. In your opinion, is there anything missing from chapter 4.2 of the handbook. If yes, what?
5. Is there anything superfluous or redundant in the chapter of problem analysis? If yes, what?
6. What information provided by the handbook have you used during the problem analysis? Howthe handbook has contributed to your activities of problem assessment?
7. Have any unexpected obstacles turned up during the problem analysis? Did the handbook provide any help in solving these problems?
8. In the final version of the Handbook we would like to add examples from different countries, both succesfull and less succesfull. From your experience, could you describe an instructive example in the field of problemassessment or give an advise that might be helpful for others?
Note:
If any rating happens to be below 3, ask about the reason.
Networking Questionnaire
Please answer the following questions regarding the networking process by signing a square from 1 to 5, where
1= Not at all, 2= slightly, 3= moderately, 4= to a great extent, 5= to a very great extent.
Put a sign to the sixth row only if you can not bring a decision or you feel like there is no appropriate information available.
1 2 3 4 5 N.A.
1. Did the Handbook make the process of networking easier?
2. Did the topics mentioned in the Handbook cover all areas needed concerning network building?
3. Did the Handbook provide useful ideas and tips for the planning of networking?
4. Does the Handbook present clearly the importance of network building?
5 Does the Handbook give useful hints and tips for getting into touch with the persons involved in the planning and implementation of the intervention?
6. Does Chapter 4.3. provide an efficient help for the networking process in the given area?
7. Does this chapter support the
process of project planning?
8. Has the Handbook contributed to systematic network building?
9. Have you applied activities in the course of network building that you would not have used without knowing the Handbook?
10. Are all advices mentioned in chapter 4.3. clear and unambiguous?
Interview questions:
1. Please describe briefly; what activities have you done during the process of network building. What actions have been executed? With whom did you get into contact?
2. Did knowing the Handbook mean any help in network building? How?
3. Which parts of the Handbook proved to be useful?
4. What is missing from the Handbook regarding network building that would be useful if included?
5. Have any unexpected obstacles turned up when applying the tips and advices of the Handbook?
6. Have any unexpected success turned up when applying the tips and advices of the Handbook?
7. In the final version of the Handbook we would like to add examples from different countries, both succesfull and less succesfull. From your experience, could you describe an instructive example in the field of networking or give a usefull advise that might be helpful for others?
NOTE:
Where rating on the scale falls between 1 and 3, ask for a specific reason!