• Nem Talált Eredményt

Judit MolnárUniversity of Washington & University of Glasgow 2009

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "Judit MolnárUniversity of Washington & University of Glasgow 2009"

Copied!
45
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

Judit Molnár

University of Washington & University of Glasgow 2009

(2)

The research

American Immigrants –brief history with statistical data

Russian immigrants on the North American Pacific Rim

Preparing for the empirical survey

Reading

Pre-interviews

Questionnaire design and confidentiality statements, permissions, covering letters, publicity

Selecting survey areas, finding respondents

Questionnaire survey

Data analysis

 In-depth interviews, observation

 Analysis

 Results’ summaries

(3)

Integration and assimilation processes of immigrants (Woltman - Newbold, 2009; Hardwick, 1993)

Segmented assimilation

framework

Nature of immigration

Voluntary Forced

Resources and characteristics of

immigrants

savings, human capital,

culture, nationality,

ethnicity, religion, race, etc.

Host country reception

policy, immigration law,

level of discrimination,

racism culture, etc.

Time and spatial factors

Period of arrival (regional,

national resources: labor

markets, economic opportunities)

Place of resettlement (rural or urban

area)

(4)

picture: http://news.ronatvan.com/2008/02/11/whites-to-become-minority-in-us-by-2050/

Brief history of American immigration

with statistical

data

(5)

0 5000000 10000000 15000000 20000000 25000000 30000000 35000000 40000000

1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Number of foreign born people in the USA

(6)

Immigrants within the whole population of the USA as a percentage

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

1850 1900 1950 2000

percent

(7)

0 2000000 4000000 6000000 8000000 10000000 12000000

1850 1900 1950 2000

Europe Asia

Caribbean Mexico

former USSR

Birthplace of the foreign born population from 1850 to 2007 – I

source: US Census Bureau:http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0029/tab04.html

(8)

Birthplace of the foreign born population from 1850 to 2007 – II

source: US Census Bureau:http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0029/tab04.html

0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000 3000000

1850 1870 1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990 2010

Africa Oceania O. C. America

South America North America former USSR

(9)

Proportion of foreign born people within the

whole population by state, 1990

(10)

Proportion of foreign born people within the

whole population by state, 2000

(11)

Proportion of foreign born people within the

whole population by state, 2007

(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)

Immigration from the former Soviet

Union and Russia

(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)

Russian population in Washington

State

(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)

Preparing for the empirical survey

(27)

Reading

 American immigration

 Integration, segregation

 Russian speaking immigrants

(28)

Russian Refuge:

Religion, Migration, and Settlement on the North American Pacific Rim

Susan Wiley Hardwick

(29)

 Russians have not been typical of other Euroamerican immigrant groups in North America

 Russian residential enclaves have been relatively slow to disperse through time – slow assimilation

They had to bear the burden of negative perception

because of Communism

because of the perception that Russia is not truly European

They live and they tend to live in isolated enclaves

because of their religion(Orthodox, Old Believers, Doukhobors, Molokans, Baptists, Pentacostals)

because of their experience at home (persecution,

discrimination, etc.)

(30)

 Four waves of Russian migration after the first movement to Alaska in 1867:

1880-1917

Russians migrated to the Pacific Rim of North America for religious, political, and socioeconomic reasons. Almost 50.000 Russians settled in the region by the beginning of the Russian Revolution in 1917.

1917-1945

At the end of the Russian civil war in 1922, thousands who were fleeing the Soviet regime arrived in the US and Canada. A last percentage of them were from the aristocratic classes or were professionals, military officers, Orthodox clergy, and other opposed to the Soviet regime. Most newcomers had to accept employment at the lowest level when they first arrived. There were also many Jews among émigrés who had to left Russia to escape religious and political persecution.

1924: restrictive immigration laws were passed and became effective in 1929. The National Origins Act established the annual immigration quota at 150,000, with total number per country dependent on

percentages of population already living in the United States. These calculations were based on the 1920 census, and the large numbers of Russians had settled in the US after 1922, so the total number of people permitted entry from the Soviet Union was minimized.

(31)

1945-1987

A variety of Russian religious groups arrived on the North American Pacific Rime after World War II.

Many Russians lived in China. During the Chinese civil war from 1946 to 1949 tens of thousands of Russians who had been living in China were forced to leave the country. Close to 15,000 Russians were transported to Tubabao, in the Philippines, by the International

Refugee Association in May, 1949. Due to the restrictive US

immigration laws, Russians could not qualify as immigrants for admission into the US. Senator Knowland sponsored a bill in

Congress that expanded the US refugee quota to include Russians.

Because of these changes in American immigration restrictions, Russians came to this country in large numbers in 1950-51.

No large scale exodus occurred until the late 1980s from the former Soviet Union.

After 1987

1987 president Gorbachev met with President Reagan: residents of the USSR were free to leave. This announcement triggered the first large scale emigration from the Soviet Union since the early years of the socialist revolution.

(32)

Surveys

 Interviews

 Conversation with immigrants for the reason to design the questionnaire

 Questionnaire survey

 Among local American residents (who were born in the USA and whose parents were born there too).

 Among immigrants from the former USSR

(33)

Statements, permissions, covering letters, publicity

(34)

Selecting survey areas

 Using the map, where they are in Washington state

 They have tight relationship with religious: visit churches

 Many of them are refugees: visit different organisations which support refugees

 World relief

 Lutheran Community Services

 Russian Oregon Social Services

 Schools – ESL teachers

 Russian Cultural groups

(35)

Preliminary results of the

questionnaire survey

(36)

Our respondents

The average years they have spent in the USA : 9 years

More than 76% of them came directly to this area

More than 84% of them had friends or relatives in this area before they came

More than 71% of them had recieved help to settle down (financial support 75%, and information 50%)

Everyone has friends now in the area where they live

Around 73% of them live in the area where other Russians live

7 months after they entered the US they found a job

Respondents Men Women

Age /mean 47.3 43.7

Age when they

entered / mean 38.6 35.0

(37)

Their English skills and educations, %

Selective migration – high education standard

More women studied in the USA

Among female respondents they use English at home in their communication with their husbands and children

English skills and educations men women Spouses / F Spouses / M

No English when they entered 75.0 84.6 55.6 92.9

Good English now 50.0 57.7 44.4 46.2

They had a university degree when

they entered the US 58.3 48.0 66.7 50

They did study in the USA 66.7 76.9

They studied at the university / college 25 30 11.1 25.0 They studied in the language school 41.7 34.6 33.3 25.0 They speak with their spouses Russian 83.3 68.0

They speak with their spouses R & E 8.3 24.0 They speak with their kids Russian 58.3 64.3 They speak with their kids R & E 8.3 21.4

(38)

How they feel about Russia, %

men women

Why did they leave Russia?

Unfavourable economic circumstances 33.3 11.5

Religious discrimination 0 34.7

Ethnic discrimination 25.0 30.8

Better economic stiation in the USA 41.7 15.4 Better future for their children 33.3 34.6

Family unification 16.7 19.2

Would they like to return to

Russia?

No 50.0 65.4

Yes 8.3 3.8

Maybe 41.7 26.9

What they like the best in

Russia?

Relationship, friendship 50.0 19.2

Social life 33.3 19.2

Education / Language 16.7 7.7

Landscape, environment, climate 8.3 19.2

Food 16.7 3.8

(39)

How satisfied they were living in the USA when they first arrived and how they like it now? (scale -10 - +10)

Improvement since they entered

Gender difference: male respondents like living in the USA better

(40)

Opinion about the USA, %

men women

Why it is beneficial living in the USA

Good career and living standard 41.7 46.2

Learn English 16.7 15.4

Religious freedom 8.3 11.5

Independence 16.7 7.7

Education system 16.7 7.7

The greatest

challenges living in the USA

Language 58.3 69.2

Different custom 8.3 15.4

Hard to get the best position 8.3 15.4 General opinion

about the USA The best 83.3 73.1

What they like the best in the USA

Lots of opportunity (economic, edu.) 33.3 19.2

Mentality of people 33.3 23.1

Freedom 25 23.1

High living standard 8.3 23.1

Tranquility 16.7 11.5

(41)

Citizenship, identity

men women

Their citizenship

Russian 50.0 34.6

American 33.3 38.5

Russian and American 8.3 11.5

Their national

identity

Russian 58.3 65.4

Russian American 0 3.8

No 8.3 7.7

Russian with Jewish roots 16.7 3.8

Their friends’

nationalities

Only Russians

8.3 15.4

Russians, Americans, other European mixed 8.3 30.8 Russians, Americans, other Europeans and

other nationalities mixed 41.7 19.2

Their closest friends’

nationalities

Russians and/or Russian Americans 75.0 60.9 their spouses’ : Russians and/or Russian

Americans 58.4 (F) 64.3 (M)

(42)

Their experiences of being discriminated (scale 0 – 10)

How proud they are for their Russian nationality

(scale -10 - +10)

Low level of discrimination,

Main disadvantage because of the lack of English especially among female respondents

They are not very proud of their Russian nationality

There is no big difference between female and male respondents’ attitude

(43)

Their opinion about the immigration policy (scale -10 - +10)

Male respondents’ attitude is more distributive and more categorical

Equal opportunity for immigrants from different parts of the world and for employees

(44)

Continue our project work

 Gathering more data

 Carrying out in-depth interviews

 Observation

 Final analysis of the US part of the research

 Comperative research in the UK, Scotland

(45)

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

A detailed description of the structure elucidation of these compounds is presented in Section 3.3, percent yields of all isolated products from large-scale irradiations under N 2

In this study, we investigated the effects of latitude, altitude (large-scale environmental factors), and forest conditions (small-scale environmental factors) on the nest size

This divergence of opinions is in large part due to the fact that until recently, most analyses of FCIs in imperatives remained agnostic as to the formal details of the semantics

Major research areas of the Faculty include museums as new places for adult learning, development of the profession of adult educators, second chance schooling, guidance

The decision on which direction to take lies entirely on the researcher, though it may be strongly influenced by the other components of the research project, such as the

In this article, I discuss the need for curriculum changes in Finnish art education and how the new national cur- riculum for visual art education has tried to respond to

and Volodin, A., A note on the growth rate in the Fazekas- Klesov general law of large numbers and some applications to the weak law of large numbers for tail series, Submitted

Why did salesmen figures flood American literature in the first half of the 20th century, did this character have any prototypes; what social, political and cultural