• Nem Talált Eredményt

Horváth &amp

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "Horváth &amp"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

Abonyi, A., Z. Horváth & R. Ptacnik, 2018. Functional richness outperforms taxonomic richness in predicting ecosystem functioning in natural phytoplankton communities. Freshwater Biology 63(2):178–186

doi:10.1111/fwb.13051.

1 Supplement 3 for:

Abonyi, A., Z. Horváth & R. Ptacnik, 2018. Functional richness outperforms taxonomic richness in predicting ecosystem functioning in natural phytoplankton communities. Freshwater Biology 63(2):178–186 doi:10.1111/fwb.13051.

Supplement 3A Coefficient of determination (R2) in linear (LM) and Generalized Additive Models (GAM) predicting (A) the number of unique combinations of functional trait categories (FTR); and (B) response group richness sensu Reynolds (RGR) from genus richness (GR). The p value of each model is given in brackets.

NO: Norwegian lakes, SE: Swedish lakes, FI: Finish lakes, All: the entire dataset including the three Fennoscandian countries

Region n R2 (LM) R2 (GAM)

(A) FTR=a+b*GR FTR=s(GR)

NO 537 0.869 (<0.001) 0.874 (<0.001) SE 158 0.834 (<0.001) 0.838 (<0.001) FI 321 0.876 (<0.001) 0.884 (<0.001) All 1016 0.938 (<0.001) 0.941 (<0.001)

(B) RGR=a+b*GR RGR=s(GR)

NO 537 0.728 (<0.001) 0.732 (<0.001) SE 158 0.652 (<0.001) 0.655 (<0.001) FI 321 0.613 (<0.001) 0.627 (<0.001) All 1016 0.810 (<0.001) 0.831 (<0.001)

(2)

Abonyi, A., Z. Horváth & R. Ptacnik, 2018. Functional richness outperforms taxonomic richness in predicting ecosystem functioning in natural phytoplankton communities. Freshwater Biology 63(2):178–186

doi:10.1111/fwb.13051.

2 Supplement 3B Generalized Additive Models (GAM) predicting (A) the number of unique combinations of functional trait categories: FTR (R2=0.941, p<0.001) and (B) the functional response group richness sensu Reynolds: RGR (R2=0.831, p<0.001) from genus richness (G). Data involves Fennoscandian summer phytoplankton compositions (n=1016)

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

Hypotheses for this study were as follows: (i) species richness would be higher in native forests compared to exotic forests, and tree species would have an effect on species

Species, functional and phylogenetic α-diversity For comparison of active and subfossil communi- ties, we calculated the mean abundances of contemporary cladoceran species of

for species richness in case of small contrast, complex landscape and intensive

Moreover, phytoplankton response group richness sensu Reynolds summarizes information on ecosystem functioning contained in the taxonomic data in a way that represents

higher insect-pollinated forb species richness and flower cover in the field boundaries, 28.. presumably due to the lack of

revealed that plant species richness was affected by climbing intensity and cliff aspect.. Plant

found a higher species richness in case of mowing once per year, than in case of mowing

The interaction between grassland type and grazing in- tensity was also significant: functional richness displayed a marked decrease with increasing grazing intensity in dry