ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
jou rn al h om e p a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / j p b a
Review
Ion-exchange chromatography for the characterization of biopharmaceuticals
Szabolcs Fekete
a,∗, Alain Beck
b, Jean-Luc Veuthey
a, Davy Guillarme
aaSchoolofPharmaceuticalSciences,UniversityofGeneva,UniversityofLausanne,Boulevardd’Yvoy20,1211Geneva4,Switzerland
bCenterofImmunologyPierreFabre,5AvenueNapoléonIII,BP60497,74160Saint-Julien-en-Genevois,France1
a r t i c l e i n f o
Articlehistory:
Received3December2014
Receivedinrevisedform18February2015 Accepted19February2015
Availableonline26February2015
Keywords:
Ion-exchange Salt-gradient pH-gradient Monoclonalantibody Methoddevelopment
a b s t r a c t
Ion-exchangechromatography(IEX)isahistoricaltechniquewidelyusedforthedetailedcharacter- izationoftherapeuticproteinsandcanbeconsideredasareferenceandpowerfultechniqueforthe qualitativeandquantitativeevaluationofchargeheterogeneity.Thegoalofthisreviewistoprovidean overviewoftheoreticalandpracticalaspectsofmodernIEXappliedforthecharacterizationoftherapeutic proteinsincludingmonoclonalantibodies(Mabs)andantibodydrugconjugates(ADCs).Thesectionon methoddevelopmentdescribeshowtoselectasuitablestationaryphasechemistryanddimensions, themobilephaseconditions(pH,natureandconcentrationofsalt),aswellasthetemperatureand flowrate,consideringproteinsisoelectricpoint(pI).Inaddition,bothsalt-gradientandpH-gradient approacheswerecriticallyreviewedandbenefitsaswellaslimitationsofthesetwostrategieswerepro- vided.Finally,severalapplications,mostlyfrompharmaceuticalindustries,illustratethepotentialofIEX forthecharacterizationofchargevariantsofvarioustypesofbiopharmaceuticalproducts.
©2015ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
Contents
1. Introduction... 44
2. TheoreticalaspectsofIEX... 44
2.1. Salt-gradientbasedseparations... 44
2.2. pH-gradientbasedseparations... 45
3. MethoddevelopmentinIEXchromatography... 46
3.1. Theimpactofstationaryphase... 46
3.2. Theimpactofmobilephasecomposition... 46
3.3. TheimpactofsamplepI... 47
3.4. Theimpactoftemperature... 48
3.5. Optimizationprocedure... 48
4. ApplicationofIEXforproteinseparations... 49
4.1. Characterizationofchargevariantsoftherapeuticproteins... 49
4.2. SeparationofmAbvariants... 49
4.3. Analysisofantibody–drugconjugates... 51
5. PerspectivesinIEX ... 51
5.1. Decreasingtheparticlesize... 51
5.2. CapillaryIEX ... 52
5.3. Monolithiccolumns... 52
5.4. Twodimensionalseparations... 53
6. Conclusion... 53
References... 53
∗Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+41223796334;fax:+41223796808.
E-mailaddress:szabolcs.fekete@unige.ch(S.Fekete).
1 www.cipf.com.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2015.02.037 0731-7085/©2015ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Proteins and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are an emerg- ing class of therapeutic agents currently being developed by manypharmaceuticalcompanies[1].Duetotheincreasingnum- berofapprovedtherapeuticproteinsinthepharmaceuticalarea and the number of biosimilars (or follow-on-biologics) poten- tiallyenteringthemarket,theneedforanalyticaltechniquesfor theirdetailedcharacterizationhasincreased.Severalcharacteris- ticsofprotein-basedtherapycontributetoitssuccessbyimproving therisk–benefitratio.Thesecharacteristicsincludeimprovedtol- erance, good efficacy, highspecificity, and limited side effects.
However,theintrinsic micro-heterogeneity isof majorconcern withbiomoleculesandshouldbecriticallyevaluatedbecausedif- ferencesinimpuritiesand/ordegradationproductscouldleadto healthimplications[2].Furthermore,producingbiosimilarsismore challenging than manufacturing generic small molecule based pharmaceuticals[3].
In general, the identity, heterogeneity, impurity content, and activity of each new batch of therapeutic proteins has tobe thoroughly investigated before release. This examination is achieved using a wide range of analytical methods, includ- ing ion-exchange chromatography (IEX), reversed-phase liquid chromatography(RPLC),hydrophobicinteractionchromatography (HIC),sizeexclusionchromatography(SEC),sodiumdodecylsulfate polyacrylamidegelelectrophoresis(SDS-PAGE),capillaryisoelec- tricfocusing(cIEF),capillary zoneelectrophoresis(CZE),circular dichroism(CD),Fouriertransforminfraredspectroscopy(FT-IR), fluorescencespectrophotometry(FL),andmassspectrometry(MS).
Thegoalofthismulti-methodstrategyistodemonstratethesim- ilaritybetweenproductionbatchesbypreciselycharacterizingthe primary,secondary,andtertiarystructureoftheproteins[4,5].
IEXisahistoricalandnon-denaturingtechniquewidelyused forthecharacterizationofchargevariantsoftherapeuticproteins andisconsideredasareferencetechniqueforthequalitativeand quantitativeevaluationofchargeheterogeneityoftherapeuticpro- teins[1].ThehistoryandcontinuousevolutionofIEXwasreviewed byLucy[6].AmongthedifferentIEXmodes,cation-exchangechro- matography(CEX)isthemostwidelyusedforproteinpurification andcharacterization[7].CEXisconsideredasthegoldstandard forchargesensitiveanalysis,butmethodparameters,suchascol- umntype,mobilephasepH,andsaltconcentrationgradient,often needtobeoptimizedforeachindividualprotein[8].IEXseparates chargevariantsbydifferentialinteractionsonachargedsupport.
Thenumberofpossiblechargevariantsincreaseswiththemolec- ularweightoftheanalyzedsample.Inaddition,changesincharge maybeadditiveorsubtractive,dependingonanymodifications.
Thus,IEXprofilesbecomemorecomplex,andtheoverallresolution ofindividualvariantsmaybelost[1].Thispropertyisparticularly apparentforlargebiomolecules.Therefore,notonlytheintactbut alsothereducedordigestedforms(limitedproteolysisorpeptide mapping)oftherapeuticproteinsarecommonlycharacterizedby IEX.
Inthisreview,wefocusonthepossibilitiesofIEXchromatog- raphyforthecharacterizationoftherapeuticproteins.Moreover, theaimof this reviewis todetail thetheoretical and practical aspectsofmodernIEX.Last,methoddevelopmentapproachesand applicationsarealsoreviewedandexplained.
2. TheoreticalaspectsofIEX 2.1. Salt-gradientbasedseparations
IEXseparatesproteinsbasedondifferencesinthesurfacecharge ofthemolecules,withseparationbeingdictatedbytheprotein
interactionswiththestationaryphase[9].Asaclassicalmodeof IEX,alinearsalt-gradientisregularlyappliedfortheelution.Several modelsforchromatographicretentionofion-exchangeadsorbents havebeenproposedinthepastyears[10].Theretentionmodels canbedividedintostoichiometricand non-stoichiometricmod- els.Stoichiometricmodelsdescribethemulti-facetedbindingof theproteinmoleculestothestationaryphaseasastoichiometric exchangeofmobilephaseproteinandboundcounter-ions[11].
Thisstoichiometricdisplacementmodel(SDM)predictsthatthe retentionofaproteinunderisocratic,linearconditionsisrelatedto counter-ionconcentration.Thismodelwasextendedtodescribe protein retentionunder linear gradient elutionconditions (LGE model)[12],aswellasundernon-linearproteinadsorptioncon- ditions(stericmassaction(SMA)model)[13,14]forisocraticand gradientelutionmode. Anotherextension ofthestoichiometric modelfortheion-exchangeadsorptionwhichaccountsforcharge regulationwasdevelopedrecently[15,16].
Even if stoichiometricmodels are capable of describing the behaviorofion-exchangechromatographicsystems,theyassume thattheindividualchargesontheproteinmoleculesinteractwith discrete charges onthe ion-exchangesurface. In reality, reten- tion throughion-exchange is more complexand primarily due totheinteractionoftheelectricalfieldsoftheproteinmolecules and the chromatographic surface [11]. Therefore, several non- stoichiometricmodelsfordescribingproteinretentionasafunction of the salt concentration in the mobile phase have also been proposed [17–20]. Quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR)modelshavebeenderivedforproteinretentionmodeling inIEXbymeansofdifferentnumericalapproachesthatattempt tocorrelateretentiontofunctionsofdescriptorsderivedfromthe three-dimensionalstructureoftheproteins[21–23].Morerecently, theoriesusedincolloidandsurfacechemistrytodescribeelectro- staticandotherinteractions havealsobeenappliedtodescribe retentionpropertiesofproteinsinIEX[24–28].
TheworkofSnyderandco-workersshowedthatIEXsystems follow non-linear solvent strength (LSS) type retention mecha- nism[29,30].Consequently,solute-specificcorrectionfactorsare requiredtouseLSSmodelforretentionpredictions,therebylim- itingtheapplicabilityoftheLSSmodel.Thenon-linearityofLSS modelwasassessed bycomparingtheelutiondatatothestoi- chiometricdisplacementmodel(SDM)commonlyusedinIEX.The retentionfactor(k)canbewritteninthefollowingwayaccording totheSDMmodel:
log k=logK−zlogC (1)
whereKisthedistributionconstant,zisassociatedwiththepro- teinnetchargeornumberofbindingsites(effectivecharge)andC isthesaltconcentration(thatdeterminestheionicstrength).This modelisprobablythemostacceptedoneandisusefulfromaprac- ticalpointofview.Thenon-linearityofEq.(1)ismostpronounced forsmallvaluesofz[30].Ifz>6(whichisveryoftenthecaseof therapeuticproteins),anLSStypemodelmayprovidereliabledata forretentionfactor(retentiontime)[31].Fig.1Ashowsexperimen- tallyobservedlogkversusCplotforz=1,whileFig.1Bshowssome calculatedlogk–Cplotsforvariouszvalues.
Proteinsareelutedinorderofincreasingbindingcharge(corre- latesmoreorlesswiththeisoelectricpoint(pI))andequilibrium constant.Theretentionoflargeproteinsinsalt-gradientmodeis stronglydependentonthesaltconcentration(gradientsteepness orgradienttime)–duetotherelativelyhighzvalue–andasmall changecouldleadtosignificantshiftinretention.Therefore,iso- craticconditionsareimpractical,andgradientelutionispreferred inreal-lifeproteinsseparations.Forlinearsalt-gradientinIEX,the
Fig.1. logk–Cplots:isocraticnon-LSSion-exchangeretentioncomparedwithLSSmodelwithz=1and1≤k≤10(A)andsometheoreticallogk–Cplotsassumingseveralz values(B).
Fig.1AwasadaptedfromRef[30],withpermission.
saltconcentrationvarieswithtimeduringthegradient,therefore Eq.(1)canberewrittenas:
log k=logK−zlog
C0+C tg
(2) whereC0isthesaltconcentrationatthebeginningofthegradient (initialmobilephasecomposition)andCisthechangeinthesalt concentrationduringthegradient.
InanalogywithRPLC,thefollowinggeneralequationcanbe writtenforsalt-gradientbasedIEXseparationsinthegradientelu- tionmode[31]:
k∗= tg
1.15[t0|z|log(Cf/C0)] (3)
wherek*isthemedianvalueofkduringgradientelutionwhenthe bandhasreachedthecolumnmid-point,t0isthecolumndeadtime andCfistheconcentrationofthecounter-ionattheendofthegradi- entprogram.PleasenotethatbothRPLCandIEXseparationsvary withgradientconditions inasimilarfashion.However,because of thedifferencesin thedependence of k onthemobile phase compositionCinIEX(log–logrelationship)versusRPLC(log–linear relationship),theLSSmodelistheoreticallynotapplicableforIEX.
Nevertheless,asshowninFig.1,thehigherthez,thelowerthe deviationfromnon-linearityis.Itwascurrentlyshown,thatLSS approachcanbeappliedforlargeproteins(mAbs)possessingan importantnumberofcharges[32].
2.2. pH-gradientbasedseparations
Ion-exchange chromatofocusing represents a useful alterna- tivetolinearsalt-gradientelutionIEX,inparticularforseparating proteinisoformswithminordifferences intheisoelectric point (pI).Chromatofocusingisperformedonanion-exchangecolumn employingapHgradientthatcanbegeneratedinternallywithin thecolumn[33,34]orbyexternalmixingofahigh-pHandalow-pH bufferusingagradientpumpsystem[35–37].Highlylinear,con- trollable,andwide-rangepHgradientscanbegenerated[37–40].
Thenumberofapplicationsreportedattheanalyticalscaleis large,butthenumberofpublicationsdealingwiththemathemat- icalmodelingoflinearpHgradientelutioninIEXisratherlimited [9].TodescribetheelutionbehaviorofproteinsinlinearpHgra- dientIEX,apHdependenceparameterhastobeincorporatedinto theion-exchangemodel.
InpH-gradientmode,theproteinsnetchargeismodifiedduring thepHgradient,due toprotonation–deprotonationofthefunc- tionalgroups.InCEX,theproteinisexpectedtoeluteat,orclose toitspI.Accordingtotheory,whenapplyingpH-gradientelution
modeandlowionicstrengthmobilephase,thechromatographic bandsshouldbefocusedinnarrowerpeaksenablinghigherreso- lutioncomparedtoapH-gradientperformedathighionicstrength.
ThewidthofaproteinpeakalongalinearpH-gradientexpressed inpHunitscanbewrittenasfollows[33,34,40]:
(pH)2≈D(dpH/dV)
ϕ(dZ/dpH) (4)
whereDisthediffusioncoefficientoftheanalyte,dpH/dVisthegra- dientslope,ϕistheDonnanpotentialanddZ/dpHisthechangein proteinnetchargealongthepHgradient.SincetheDonnanpoten- tialdependsontheionicstrength,apeakfocusingeffectisexpected atlowerionic strength.Inagreementwiththisexpectation, pH gradientsatlowionicstrengthshowedbetterresolutionformAb variantscomparedtopHgradientsperformedathighionicstrength [40].
TheappliedpHrangeclearlydeterminestheproteinsthatcan possiblybeeluted.Retentiontimesandpeakwidthsdependonthe gradientsteepness,asbotharefunctionofdZ/dpH.
Theeffectofgradientsteepness(gradienttime)ontheretention oflargeproteins(intactmAbsandtheirvariants)wasrecentlystud- iedandshowedanLSS-likelinearbehavior[41].Thedependence ofapparentretentionfactor(kapp)ongradientsteepness(time)in pH-gradientbasedIEXseparationisshowninFig.2.
InpH-gradientIEXmode,theuseofamixtureofaminebuffer- ingspeciesinthehigh-pHrangeandamixtureofweakacidsin thelow-pHrangeisquitecommon[38,39,42].Insuchasystem,
Fig.2.Thedependenceofapparentretentionfactor(kapp)ongradientsteepness (time)inpHgradientbasedIEXseparation.TheappliedpHrangewasfrompH=5.6 topH=10.2at0.6mL/minflow-rateona100mm×4.6mmCEXcolumn.
AdaptedfromRef[40],withpermission.
maintaininglinearityofthepHgradientslopemaybesomewhat difficult.It wasshownthatanappropriatemixtureofTrisbase, piperazineandimidazoleprovidesalinearpHgradientfrompH 6–9.5[8].Triethylamineanddiethylaminebasedbuffersystems alsoofferedlinearpHgradientinthepHrangeof7.5–10.0[40].
Formassspectrometric(MS)detection,5mMammoniumhydrox- idein20%methanolyieldedareasonablepHgradientinalimited pHrange(between9.5and10.5)[40].Zhangetal.[43]applieda salt-mediatedimprovedpHgradientthatwasusedinawidepH range(between5and10.5).Intheirstudy,a0.25mM/minsodium- chloridegradientwasperformedtogetherwiththepHgradient.
OneofthebenefitsofpH-gradientbasedIEXisthatthesaltcon- centrationcanbekeptlow,yieldinglessbufferinterferences(e.g.
on-lineoroff-linetwo-dimensionalLC).Inaddition,pH-gradient basedseparationusinga CEXcolumnwasfoundtobea multi- productchargesensitiveseparationmethodforlargetherapeutic proteins(mAbs)[43,44].
3. MethoddevelopmentinIEXchromatography
Positively charged molecules can be separated using CEX columns,typicallypackedwith3–10mparticlesandcontaining negativelychargedacidicfunctionalgroups.Thesecolumnsbind cationicspecies suchasprotonatedbasesthroughionicinterac- tion.Inanion-exchange(AEX)mode,thestationaryphasecarries positivelychargedbasicfunctionalgroupsthatarecapableofbind- inganions(e.g.ionizedcarboxylicacids).Themobilephaseusually containsabuffertomaintainstablepHandvaryingthesaltcon- centration(counter-ion)tocontroltheretentionofsampleions.
Thechargeofthecounter-ionhasthesamesignasthesampleions, thereforeitcanbeusedtocontroltheretentionofprotonatedbases inCEXorionizedacidsinAEX.
Thestrengthoftheinteractionisdeterminedbythenumber andlocationofthechargesontheanalyzedmoleculesandonthe functionalgroups.Byincreasingthesaltconcentration,thesamples withtheweakestionicinteractionsstarttoelutefromthecolumn first.Moleculeshavingastrongerionicinteractionrequireahigher saltconcentrationandelutelaterinthegradient.
InthepH-gradientmode,theionicstrengthofthemobilephase iskeptlowandconstant,whilethepHisvariedthankstoalinear gradient.
3.1. Theimpactofstationaryphase
Regardingthestationaryphase,therearetwomainaspects:(1) thestrengthofinteractionandassociatedretention(strongorweak ion-exchanger)andthe(2)achievablepeakwidths(efficiency).
Bothcation and anionexchangerscanbeclassifiedaseither weakorstrongexchangers.Weakcationexchangersarecomprised ofaweakacidthatgraduallylosesitschargeasthepHdecreases (e.g.carboxymethylgroups),whilestrongcationexchangersare comprisedofastrongacidthatisabletosustainitschargeovera widepHrange(e.g.sulfopropylgroups).Ontheotherhand,strong anion exchangers contain quaternary amine functional groups, whileweakanionexchangerpossessesdiethylaminoethane(DEAE) groups.Stronganionexchangersremainunderionizedforminthe pHrangebelow12,whilestrongcationexchangersareionizedat pH>2.
Asaruleofthumb,itispreferredtobeginthemethoddevelop- mentwithastrongexchangertoenableworkingoverabroadpH range.Strongexchangersarealsousefulifthemaximumresolution occursatanextremepH.(However,silicabasedion-exchangerscan beoperatedonlyinarestrictedpHrange.Incontrast,polymeric ion-exchangerscanbeusedinawidepHrange.)
Inthecaseofproteins,thecationexchangemodeiswellsuited, butastronganionexchangercanbeappliedtobindtheproteins iftheirpIisbelowpH7.Weakexchangerscanonlybeusefulina secondinstance,iftheselectivityofstrongionexchangersisunsat- isfactory.However,itisimportanttokeepinmindthattheion exchangecapacityofweakionexchangersvarieswithpH.
CommerciallyavailableIEXcolumnsarebasedonsilicaorpoly- merparticles.Bothporousandnon-porousparticlesareavailable butforlargemoleculeswhichpossesslowdiffusivity,non-porous materialsareclearlypreferredtoavoidtheunwantedbandbroad- eningeffectsofthetransparticlemasstransferresistance(C-term of the van Deemter equation). Highly cross-linked non-porous poly(styrene–divinylbenzene) (PS/DVB) particles are most fre- quently used in protein separations due to their pH stability (2≤pH≤12).Thosematerialscannowwithstandpressuredrop ofuptoa500–600barandcanberoutinelyusedbeyond400bar.
Columnspackedwith10,5or3mnon-porousparticlesareoften used,butsub-2mmaterialsarealsoavailablesincerecently.On thosecolumnshighpeakcapacitycanbeattainedevenwithlarge biomolecules.Howeversomelimitationscanbeexpectedinterms ofloadingcapacityandretentionwhenapplyingthesenon-porous materials.Table1summarizesthemostpopularstate-of-the-art IEXcolumnsappliedfortheseparationofproteinchargevariants.
3.2. Theimpactofmobilephasecomposition
Inthesalt-gradientmode,themobilephasebufferpHmustbe betweenthepIofthechargedmolecule(e.g.therapeuticprotein) andthepKaofthechargedfunctionalgroupatthesurfaceofthe stationaryphase.InCEX,usingastrongcationexchangerwitha pKaof1.2,amoleculewithapI∼8(e.g.mAbs)maybeelutedwith amobilephasepHbufferof∼6.InAEX,amoleculewithapI∼6 mayberunwithamobilephasebufferatpH8whenthepKaofthe solidsupportisbeyond10.
IntheCEXmode,increasingthemobilephase bufferpHwill cause the molecule to become less protonated (less positively charged). Therefore,the proteinforms weaker ionicinteraction withthenegativelychargedstationaryphasegroups,whichresults inaretentiondecrease.Onthecontrary,decreasingthepHmani- festsinhigherretention.InAEXmode,–oppositely–decreasingthe mobilephasepHcausesthemoleculetobecomemoreprotonated (morepositivelyandlessnegativelycharged),thereforeadecrease inretentionisexpected.
ThemostoftenappliedpHrangeforproteinsIEXseparations isbetween5.5 and 7.0,however insomecaseslow pHaround 3.5isrequiredtoreachappropriateselectivityandretention.The most frequentlyused buffers for protein separations are 2-(N- morpholino)ethanesulfonicacid(MES),phosphateandcitrate.MES isusefulbetweenpH5.5and6.8(pKa∼6.15),phosphateisapplied forpHbetween6.7and7.6(pKa∼7.2),whilecitrateprovideshigh buffercapacityforpHbetween2.6and3.7(pKa∼3.1).Otheraddi- tivessuchasmalonicacid,aceticacidorformicacidhavealsobeen reportedforalimitednumberofapplications.Thebufferconcen- trationistypicallycomprisedbetween10and50mMandallowsa sufficientbuffercapacity.
AfterselectingthemobilephasepHandbuffer,thesalt-gradient hastobeoptimized.Typicallysodium-orpotassium-chlorideare usedforproteinscharacterization,usingasaltgradientfrom0to 0.2–0.5M.Theproteinsamplesareinjectedontothecolumnunder conditionswhereitissufficientlyretained.Then,agradientoflin- earlyincreasingsaltconcentrationisappliedtoelutethesample componentsfromthecolumn.Itisfinallyimportanttonoticethat thegradientsteepnesshasastrongimpactonretentionandselec- tivityandshouldthereforebesystematicallyoptimized.
InthepH-gradientmode,themaindifficultyistoperformlinear androbustpHgradients.Theuseofamixtureofaminebuffering
Table1
Propertiesofthemostpopularstate-of-the-artIEXcolumnsavailableforproteinseparations.
Columnname Chemistry Particle
size/macropore size
Max temperature (◦C)
pHrange Maxpressure (bar)
Monoliths Proswift (Thermo)
SAX-1S Stronganionexchange
(quaternaryamine) Information notavailable
70 2–12
WAX-1S Weakanionexchange 70 (tertiaryamine)
60 WCX-1S Weakcationexchange
(carboxylicacid)
60 SCX-1S Strongcationexchange
(polymethacrylate)
60
Packed
TSKgel(Tosoh)
SCX Strongcationexchange (sulfonicacid)
5 45 2–14
SuperQ-5PW Strongcationexchange 50 (trimethylamino)
10 2–12
SP-STAT Strongcationexchange (sulfopropyl)
7,10 3–10
Q-STAT Stronganionexchange (quaternary ammonium)
7,10 3–10
BioMab(Agilent) Weakcationexchange (carboxylate)
1.7 3 5 10
80 2–12 270
410 550 680 Antibodix(Supelco,Sepax) Weakcationexchange
(carboxylate)
1.7 3 5 10
80 2–12 270
410 550 680 Protein-PakHi
ResIEX (Waters)
SP Strongcationexchange (sulfopropyl)
7
60
3–10 100
CM Weakcationexchange
(carboxymethyl)
7 100
Q Stronganionexchange
(quaternary ammonium)
5 150
MAbPacSCX-10(Thermo) Strongcationexchange (sulfonicacid)
3 5 10
60 2–12 480
480 200 Bio-Pro(YMC) QA
QA-F
Stronganionexchange (quaternary ammonium)
5 60 2–12 30
120 SP
SP-F
Strongcationexchange (sulfopropyl)
30 120 Poly(PolyLC) CATA Weakcationexchange
(polyasparticacid) 5 Ambient Information
notavailable
Information notavailable WAXLP Weakanionexchange
(polyethyleneimine)
speciesinthehigh-pHrangeandamixtureofweakacidsinthe low-pHrangeisquitecommon[38,39,42].Aspreviouslydiscussed, themostoftenusedbuffercomponentsareTrisbase,piperazine, imidazole,triethylamine, diethylamineand ammoniumhydrox- ide[8,40,43].Finally,a0.25mM/minsodium-chloridegradientwas successfullyperformedconcomitantlywithapH-gradientforthe characterizationofmAbspossessingisoelectricpoints(pI)between 6.2and9.4,tohighlighttheinterestofpHgradientseparationover saltgradients[43].
3.3. TheimpactofsamplepI
Thechargeofproteinsdependsonthenumberandtypeofion- izableaminoacidgroups.Lysine,arginineandhistidineresidues haveapositivelychargedsidechaingroupwhenionized,whereas glutamicacidand asparticacidresiduesare negativelycharged whenionized.EachionizablesidechaingroupshasitsownpKa. Therefore,theoverallnumberofchargesonaparticularproteinat agivenpHdependsonthenumberandtypeofionizableamino acidgroups.ProteinstendtohavedifferentchargesatagivenpH and socan befractionatedonthebasisof theirnetand acces- siblecharges.EachproteinhasapIvalue,which correspondsto
thepHvaluewhereithasnonetcharge.Then,whenpHisequal topI,theproteinwillnotbindtotheion-exchangeresin.Below this pH value,the protein hasa net positive charge and binds toacationexchanger,whileabovethispH,ithasanetnegative chargeandbindstoananionexchanger.Inpractice,proteinsare stable and functionallyactive withina fairlynarrow pHrange, sothechoiceofion exchanger isoftendictatedby thepHsta- bilityofthedesiredprotein.IftheproteinisstableatpHvalues belowitspI,acationexchangershouldbeusedifitisstableat pHvaluesaboveitspI,thenananionexchangerphasehastobe chosen.
ThepIoftheproteinalsodeterminesthemobilephasepH.ThepI oftherapeuticproteinsdistributebetween3.6and11.0,andamong them,mAbspossesspIvaluesbetween6and10.Forsalt-gradient basedCEXmode,themobilephasepHshouldpreferablybeatleast 1–2unitsbelowthepIofthesample,tomaintainappropriatereten- tion.InAEXmode–oppositely–thepHhastobesetatleast1–2 unitsabovethepIoftheprotein.
InthepHgradientmode–performedonCEXcolumns–the startingpHshouldbebelow thepIof theless retainedprotein, whilethefinalpHhastobesomewhathigherthanthepIofthe mostretainedprotein.
3.4. Theimpactoftemperature
Theeffectoftemperatureonretentionfactor(k)isgenerally expressedinliquidchromatographywiththeGibbsfreeenergyor van’tHoffequation:
log k=−H RT +S
R +logˇ (5)
where H representstheenthalpy changeassociated withthe transfer of the solute between phases, S the corresponding entropychange,Rthemolargasconstant,Ttheabsolutetemper- atureandˇthephaseratioofthecolumn.Whenlog(k)isplotted against1/T,theenthalpyisgivenbytheslopeofthecurve.Withreg- ularcompounds,theseplotsgenerallyfollowalinearrelationship.
However,non-lineardependenceoflog(k)versus1/Toverawide rangeoftemperaturewasnoticedbydifferentauthorsusingsilica- basedaswellasnonsilica-basedstationaryphases[45].Theeffect oftemperatureontheretentionofpartiallyionizedcompounds whichmayexistintwoforms(i.e.molecularandionizedforms)can alsobedescribedwithEq.(5).However,bothenthalpyandentropy areexpectedtobedifferentforthetwoformsandasaresult,both HandScanvarywithtemperaturewhenbothformsarepresent toa significantextent[45].Withlargebiomolecules, theeffect oftemperatureonretentionbecomesmorecomplex.Depending onthestabilityofthesecondarystructure,themoleculesunfold tovariousextents andhenceinteractwiththestationaryphase withvariousstrengths[46]. Duetothedifferentconformation- dependentresponses of proteinsat elevated temperatures, the changeinretentioncanbedifficulttoassess[47,48].InRPLCsepa- rationofproteins,temperatureisausefulparameterforadjusting selectivity.InIEXseparationsofproteins,theimpactoftempera- turewasfoundtobeespeciallyimportantforpeakcapacity(and thereforeforresolution),buthasa limitedimpactonselectivity [32,41].Itseemedthatinbothsalt-andpH-gradientbasedsepa- rations,thetemperaturedoesnotmodifyseverelyselectivity,but impacttheachievablepeakcapacity.Therefore,insomecases,tem- peratureoptimizationcouldalsobeofimportanceduringtheIEX methoddevelopmentprocedure.
3.5. Optimizationprocedure
In contrastwithRPLC, the methoddevelopment inIEX was mostly basedon trialand erroror “one factor at time”(OFAT) approaches.However,therearesomeguidelinesavailablefromcol- umnproviders,whichexplainthebasicrulesformethodscreening (e.g.columnselection,bufferselection...).
Baietal.showedthedependenceofretentionandselectivityof IgGantibodiesonmobilephasepH,stationaryphasetypeandsalt- gradientsteepnessinCEXmode[49].Theystudiedtheeffectof thethreevariablesindependently,andfoundthatmobilephasepH wasthemostimportantparameterinCEXseparationsofproteins.
Ithadthebiggestimpactontheseparationandthereforeshould bedeterminedfirst[49].Itwasalsofoundthat(i)peakwidthof IgG-smostlydependsonthetypeofthestationaryphaseand(ii) resolutioncanbetunedbychangingthegradientsteepness.Fig.3 showstheimpactofsalt-gradientsteepnessontheseparationof IgGproteins.
Themobilephaselinearvelocityalsohasastronginfluenceon theseparationqualityoflargeproteins[50,51].Indeed,thelon- gitudinaldiffusionisnegligiblewithlargemolecules,whileband broadeningismostlydeterminedbythemasstransferresistance.
Therefore,lowflowrateisalwayspreferredforhighresolutionsep- arations,butacompromisehastobefoundbetweenresolutionand analysistime.
Fig.3. Theeffectofsalt-gradientslopeontheretention,selectivityandpeakwidth inCEXseparation.Sample:IgG1,mobilephase:40mMphosphatepH6.5,applying a0–0.4MNaClgradient.
AdaptedfromRef[49],withpermission.
Theinfluenceofsalttypecanalsobeimportant.Itseffecton theretentionofbovineserumalbuminwasreportedbyAl-Jibbouri [52].
Computerassistedmethoddevelopmentandoptimizationin RPLCproteinseparationsisquitecommon[53,54]andwasalso recently appliedin ion-exchange mode. Because of the system non-linearity,findingtheoptimumforprocessoptimizationischal- lenging[55].Thiemoetal.developedasoftwarecalledChromX fortheestimationofparameters,chromatogramsimulation,and processoptimization[55].ChromXprovidesnumericaltoolsfor solving varioustypes of chromatography models,includingthe modelcombinationofTransportDispersiveModel(TDM)andSMA.
SimilarlytoRPLCmethoddevelopment,anon-LSSand LSStype computerassistedmethoddevelopmentprocedurewasrecently reportedforbothsalt-andpH-gradientmodesinagreementwith QualitybyDesign(QbD)concept[32,41].
Forthesalt-gradientbasedproteinseparation,itseemedthat temperaturewasnotarelevantparameterfortuningselectivityand shouldbekeptat30◦C,toachievehighresolvingpower(elevated peakcapacity) [32].Becausetherelationship betweenapparent retentionfactorsandgradienttime(slope)canbedescribedwitha linearfunction,onlytwoinitialgradientrunsofdifferentslopes are required for optimizing the salt gradient program. For pH dependence,asecondorderpolynomialmodel(i.e.basedonthree initialruns)ispreferredtodescribekversuspHdependence.When combiningtheexperimentsina designofexperiments(DoE),it appearedthatmethodoptimizationcanbeperformedrapidly,in anautomatedwaythankstoaHPLCmodelingsoftware,usingtwo gradienttimesandthreemobilephasepH(e.g.10and30mingra- dientona100mmlongstandardborecolumnatpH=5.6,6.0and 6.4).Suchaprocedurecanbeappliedroutinelyandthetimespent formethoddevelopmentwouldbeonlyaround9h.Therelative errorinretentiontimepredictionwaslowerthan1%,makingthis approach highlyaccurate[32]. Fig.4Ashows a generic DoEfor
Fig.4. Designofexperiments(A)andresolutionmap(B)fortheoptimizationofsalt-gradientbasedCEXseparationofmAbs(tg–pHmodel).Column:YMCBioProSP-F (100mm×4.6mm).Mobilephase“A”10mMMES,“B”10mMMES+1MNaCl.Flowrate:0.6mL/min,gradient:0–20%B,temperature:30◦C.Gradienttimes:tg1=10min, tg2=30min,pH1=5.6,pH2=6.0,pH3=6.4.Ontheresolutionmap,red-orangecolorsshowthehighestresolutionwhilethedark-blueareasindicatetheco-elutionofpeaks.
(Forinterpretationofthereferencestocolorinthisfigurelegend,thereaderisreferredtothewebversionofthisarticle.) AdaptedfromRef[31],withpermission.
themethoddevelopmentofsalt-gradientbasedCEXseparationof mAbs(possessingawiderangeofpIbetween6.7and9.1),while Fig.4Brepresentstheobtainedresolutionmapshowingthecriti- calresolutionofthepeakstobeseparatedasafunctionofmethod parameters.
InthepH-gradientmode,itwasfoundthattheretentionoflarge proteinscanbeaccuratelymodeledasafunctionofgradientsteep- nessand mobilephasetemperature[41].Becausetheretention modelswerealwayslinear,onlyfourinitialexperiments(2gradi- entstimesat2temperatures)wererequiredtomodelthebehavior inCEXpH-gradient.Then,only∼6hwererequiredtofindoutthe optimalconditionsona100×4.6mmcolumn[41].
4. ApplicationofIEXforproteinseparations
Today,IEXismainlyappliedtoseparateproteinchargevariants andisoforms.IEXmaybeusefulatdifferentlevelsofproteinanaly- sis,including(i)theanalysisofintactproteins(topdownapproach), (ii)theanalysisofpartlydigestedlargeproteinfragments(mid- dledownapproach)and(iii)thecharacterizationoftrypticdigests (peptidemappingorbottomupapproach).
Inthecaseoftherapeuticproteinscharacterization,IEXismostly usedtoseparateC-terminallysinevariants/truncation,N-terminal glutamine-pyroglutamatevariants,deamidatedforms(asparagine formsasuccinimideintermediatethatresultsintwoproductsofits hydrolysis,eitheraspartateorisoaspartate),glycoformsespecially sialicacidvariants(usuallyattachedatterminalpositionsofgly- canmolecules).Inaddition,IEXalsoseparatestheproductsofthe PEGylationreactionaccordingtotheextentofconjugation,andpro- videstheseparationfortheisomericformsofPEGylatedproteins (whichdifferfromoneanotherbythelocationoftheconjugation sitewithinthepolypeptidechain)[55,56].
4.1. Characterizationofchargevariantsoftherapeuticproteins Peptide mapping is commonly used todemonstrate protein identity.Inthelastphasesofpharmaceuticaldevelopmentandin qualityassurance/control(QA/QC),peptidemappingoftheprotein drugsservesasaprimaryproteinQCmethod.Althoughreversed- phase separation is the typical choice for separating peptides, high-resolution ion-exchangechromatography is an alternative methodthatprovidesadditionalinformationandadifferentselec- tivity [57]. Asexample,a strong CEXcolumn wasused forthe peptidemappingofcytochromeCtrypticdigest[58]andImamura etal.appliedCEXforthepeptidemappingofhemoglobintoiden- tifyitschargevariants[59].IEXwaswidelyusedinthepastfor
peptidemapping,buttodayitislesspopularandismostlyreplaced byRPLC,duetotheinherentincompatibilityofIEXwithMSdetec- tion.
IEXisdefinitelyoneofthemostpowerfultechniquestosepa- ratedeamidatedformsofnativeproteins.Deamidationisasource ofnonenzymaticproteindegradation,andshouldbestrictlymon- itored during the course of formulation development [60]. As example,CEXwassuccessfullyappliedtoseparatethedeamidated analogsofrecombinantgranulocytecolony-stimulatingfactor(G- CSF, filgrastim),asillustratedin Fig.5.Weitzhandler et al.[61]
presentedthebaselineseparationofcytochromeCvariants(bovine, horse,rabbit)and twodeamidation productsofribonucleaseA, suchastheAsp67andisoAsp67forms.Gotteetal.[62]appliedCEX fortheseparationofribonucleaseBdeamidatedforms.Abzalimov etal.[55]appliedthecombinationofIEXandtop-downtandemMS forthestructuralcharacterizationofprotein–polymerconjugates andtoassessheterogeneityofasmallPEGylatedproteinandmap- pingconjugationsites.Finally,Ganzleretal.showedtheseparation ofoxidizedanddeamidatedPEGylated-G-CSFusingCEX[63].
4.2. SeparationofmAbvariants
MAbsareaspecificclassoftherapeuticproteinsandgainedsig- nificantinterestoverthepastfewyears.Then,adedicatedsection wasdevotedtotheirIEXbasedseparationandcharacterization.
Fig.5. Ion-exchangeHPLCofrhG-CSFandthedeamidatedanalogs.(A)Gln11,20,67
→Gluanalog,Gln67→Gluanalog,f-metrhG-CSF,Gln11,20→Gluanalog,andmet rhG-CSF(fromleft);(B)Gln12,21→Gluanalog;(C)Gln67→Gluanalog;(D)Gln11,20,67
→Gluanalog.
AdaptedfromRef[60],withpermission.
ThemAbsareglycoproteinsthatbelongtotheimmunoglobulin (Ig)superfamily,whichcanbedividedintofiveisotypes:IgA,IgD, IgE,IgG,andIgM.BecauseonlyIgGsareproducedfortherapeutic purposesthroughgeneticengineering,thetermsrecombinantmAb andIgGareoftenusedinterchangeably.IgGsarelargetetrameric glycoproteinsmeasuringapproximately 150kDa that are struc- turallycomposedoffourpolypeptidechains:twoidenticalheavy chains(HC,∼50kDa)andtwoidenticallightchains(LC,∼25kDa) connectedthroughseveralinter-andintra-chaindisulfidebonds attheirhingeregion[64].Eachchainiscomposedofstructural domainsaccordingtotheirsizeandfunction,givingtheconstant, variable,andhypervariableregions.DifferencesbetweentheHC constantdomainsareresponsiblefortheIgGsub-classes(i.e.,IgG1, IgG2,IgG3,andIgG4).
Functionally,mAbs consist of two regions, thecrystallizable fraction (Fc) and the antigen-binding fraction (Fab) [65]. Fc (∼50kDa)iscomposedoftwo truncatedHCs andisresponsible fortheeffectorfunctions,suchascomplementfixationandrecep- torbinding.TheFcsequencealsohasaconservedN-glycosylation site,whichisgenerallyoccupiedbyabiantennaryoligosaccharide accountingforsignificanteffectsontheactivityandefficacyofthe IgGs[66].TheFabdomain(∼50kDa)iscomposedoftheLCandthe remainingportionoftheHC.Thisdomainisprimarilyinvolvedin antigenbinding[65].
There are several common modifications leading to anti- body charge variants (or isoforms) on thepeptide chains(e.g., deamidation, C-terminal lysine truncation, N-terminal pyroglu- tamation, methionine oxidation, or glycosylation variants) and sizevariantsonthepeptide chains(e.g.,aggregationorincom- pleteformation of disulfidebridges). Thecombination of these micro-heterogeneity sources in the peptidechains significantly increasestheoverallmicro-heterogeneityofanentireIgG.There- fore,thecompletecharacterization ofanintactmAb isdifficult to achieve. In this context, various enzymes, such as pepsin, papain, Lys-C or IdeS are often used toobtain mAb fragments andfacilitatetheinvestigationofitsmicro-heterogeneity.Papain isprimarilyusedtocleaveIgGsintothree fragmentsattheHC hingeregiontocreateoneFcandtwoidenticalFabfragmentsof
∼50kDaeach,whilepepsinandIdeSgeneratesF(ab)2fragments of∼100kDa.Thesetypesofdigestionarecalledlimitedproteolysis (LP).
Moorhouseetal.[56]wasamongthefirstonestodescribethe potentialofIEX formAbcharacterization. Papain-digestedmAb samplesweresuccessfullyseparatedandthecorrespondingfrag- ments were identified thanks to MS detection. The C-terminal lysine variability of the Fc and the N-terminal glutamine- pyroglutamatevariabilityoftheFabwereobserved.Arecentstudy demonstratedthesuitabilityofIEXforstudyingcomplexdegrada- tionprocessesinvolvingvariousIgG1molecules[67].Assignment ofcovalentdegradationstospecificregionsofthemAbswasfacil- itatedusingLys-CandpapaintogenerateFabandFcfragments.
Thismethodwasparticularlyusefulforcharacterizingproteinvari- ants formedin the presenceof salts under accelerated storage conditions.Theusefulnessofthisassaywasfurtherillustratedby characterizationof light-induced degradationsof mAbformula- tions.AnotherstudypresentedtheimportanceofIEXintheanalysis ofoxidizedmAbsamples[68].BothCEXandAEXapproacheswere usedandfoundsuitablefortheseparationofthemorebasicoxi- dizedvariantsoftheintactmAbs.Fig.6displaysmultipleacidicand basicisoformsobtainedinAEXmode,typicalofrecombinantmAb drugproducts.Vlasaketal.[69]combinedCEX,papaindigestion andapanelofMStechniquestoidentifyasparaginedeamidationin thelightchainregionofahumanizedIgG1mAb.Anotherstudyalso presentedandprovedtheimportanceofCEX(salt-gradientbased) inmAbcharacterizationandshowedtheseparationofdifferent isoforms[70].
Fig.6.CEXofXOMA3ABantibodies.ThethreeXOMA3ABreferenceantibodies(Ab- A,Ab-B,andAb-C)displaymultipleacidicandbasicisoformstypicalofrecombinant monoclonalantibodydrugproducts.Theforcedoxidizedsamplesofeachofthese antibodiesexhibitbroadpeakprofilesindicatingunderlyingstructuralheterogene- ity.
AdaptedfromRef[68],withpermission.
A pH-gradient based separation using CEX chromatography was evaluated in a recent study [8]. The method was shown toberobust formAbs and suitable for itsintended purposeof chargeheterogeneityanalysis.Simplemixturesofdefinedbuffer componentswereusedtogenerate thepHgradientsthatsepa- ratedcloselyrelatedantibodyspecies.Validationcharacteristics, suchas precision,linearity and robustnesswere demonstrated.
Thestability-indicatingcapabilityofthemethodwasdetermined using thermally stressed antibody samples [8]. Another recent studyshowedtheapplicabilityofashallowpHgradientthrough CEX monolithic column and demonstrated relatively high res- olution separation of mAb charge variants in three different biopharmaceuticals[40].Zhangetal.[43]presentedamultiprod- uctchargesensitiveseparation methodfor 16mAbs possessing pI-s between 6.2 and 9.4. This salt-mediated pH-gradient IEX method was demonstrated to be robust under various chro- matographicconditionsandcapableofassessingmanufacturing consistency and monitoring degradation of mAbs. As an illus- tration, Fig. 7 shows the charge heterogeneity profile of 16 mAbs.
High-performance cation-exchange chromatofocusing meth- odsweredevelopedforthevariantsofneutraltoacidicantibodies, and base-line separation of a variety of antibody variants wasachieved [71]. Thehighresolution achieved indicated that the methods developed were useful alternatives to isoelectric focusingforcharacterizingthechargeheterogeneityofmAbsvari- ants.
ThefastandefficientseparationofcetuximabFabandFcvari- ants were recently reported in both salt and pH-gradient CEX mode[32,41].Fourteen charge variantswere separatedin only 17min.
AsystematicstudycomparedthepossibilitiesofIEXmodesand showedthattheseapproachesarecost-andtimesavingalterna- tivetoclassicalproteinanalysismethods(e.g.gelelectrophoresis).
Theauthorspredictedthatinthenextstep,furtherbiologicals,e.g.
antibodies,willbeanalyzedandquantifiedmostlywithIEXand RPLCinthenativeaswellasinitsdenaturedform,respectively [72].AnotherstudyalsofoundbenefitsofIEXcomparedtoelec- trophoreticmethodssuchasthepossibilityofbeingautomatedand betterquantitativeresults[73].
BesidestheseparationofmAbs’chargevariants,pH-gradient basedIEXchromatographycanalsobeappliedtoevaluatethepIof intactmAbs[74].
BesidesrecombinantmAbs,IEXseemstobeapromisingtech- niqueforthecharacterizationofotherantibody-relatedproducts suchasbispecificantibodies,recombinantpolyclonalantibodies (pAbs)andFc-fusionproteins[75–80].
Fig.7.Thechargeheterogeneityprofilesof16mAbswithpIrangingfrom6.2to9.4obtainedwiththesalt-mediatedpH-gradientbasedIEXmethod.
AdaptedfromRef[43],withpermission.
4.3. Analysisofantibody–drugconjugates
Antibody–drug conjugates(ADCs) or immunoconjugates, are becoming another increasingly important class of therapeutic agents undergoing clinicalinvestigations for treatmentof vari- ouscancer[81].ADCsareproducedthroughthechemicallinkage ofapotentsmallmoleculecytotoxin(drug)toa mAbandhave morecomplexandheterogeneousstructuresthanthecorrespond- ingantibodies[82].ADCsareconstructedfromthreecomponents:
amAbthatisspecifictoatumorantigen,ahighlypotentcyto- toxicagentandalinkerspeciesthatenablescovalentattachment ofthecytotoxintothemAbthrougheithertheproteinorthegly- can.Theprimarysitesusedforprotein-directedconjugationare theaminogroupsoflysineresiduesorthesulfhydrylgroupsofthe inter-chaincysteineresidues[82].Dependingonthecharacteristics ofthedrug,thelinkerandtheconjugationsite(i.e.,lysine,inter- chainsulfhydryl,carbohydrate),themethodscommonlyusedto characterizetheparentmAbmaynotbeapplicabletotheADCor maygivesignificantlydifferentinformation.
Attachmentof anunchargedlinker anddrug throughlysine residuesdecreasesthenetpositivechargebyoneforeachbound drug-linker.Inthiscase,separationbasedoncharge,suchasusing IEXoriso-electricfocusing(IEF),resultsinprofilesthatcharacterize thedrugload,ratherthanprovinginformationabouttheunderly- ingmAb[83].Despitetheutilityofthesemethods,thereareonlya fewpublishedreportsofcharge-basedassaysappliedtoADCs.
Forgemtuzumabozogamicin,theIEXprofileshowedthatmost ofthecalicheamicinwasonapproximatelyhalfof theantibody while45–65%oftheproductwasalowconjugatedfraction,essen- tiallyunconjugatedantibody[83,84].
Thiomabsareantibodieswithanengineeredunpairedcysteine residueoneachheavychainthatcanbeusedasintermediatesto generateADCs[85].Multiplechargevariantpeakswereobserved duringCEXanalysisofseveraldifferentthiomabs.Thischargehet- erogeneitywasduetocysteinylationand/orglutathionylationat
theengineered and unpairedcysteinesthrough disulfidebonds formedduringthecellcultureprocess[85].
Ina recentstudy,theeffectsof chemicalconjugationonthe electrostatic properties of Fc-conjugates were estimated [86].
Tominimizetheeffectsofpost-translational modifications(e.g., deamidation),asingleFcchargevariantwasisolatedpriortocon- jugationofafluorescentprobe,tothesidechainsoflysineresidues.
TheresultingFc-conjugateswereassessedbyavarietyofanalyti- caltechniques,includingIEX,todeterminetheirchargeproperties [86].
5. PerspectivesinIEX 5.1. Decreasingtheparticlesize
TheUltra-HighPressureLiquidChromatography(UHPLC)tech- nologywasoriginallydevelopedforRPLCapplications,butitisnow alsoavailableforSEC[87]andIEXoperationsduetotheavailability of1.7and3mnon-porousparticles(PS/DVB)[88,89].
Applying1.7and3mparticlesmayopenanewlevelofper- formanceinIEX,butithastobekeptinmindthatonveryfine particles,theseparationqualityisimprovedatthecostofpressure (andtemperaturegradientsattributedtofrictionalheatingeffects).
Therefore,thereisariskofcreatingon-columndegradationwhen analyzingtemperatureorpressuresensitiveproteinsunderhigh pressure(i.e.,>300bar)conditions,asreportedforRPLCandSEC [90,91].Theotherdisadvantageofsub-2mIEXseparationsisthat currentlythereareonlyaverylimitednumberofcommercially availablestationaryphases.
Columnspackedwiththeseveryfineparticlesarestableupto 600barthatcouldbebeneficialforbothfastandhighresolution separations.Onshortcolumns,highthroughputseparationscan beachievedbyapplyinghighflowrates.Ontheotherhand,the separationpowercanbeimprovedbyincreasingthecolumnlength (e.g.couplingcolumnsinseries).Withrelativelylongcolumns(e.g.
Fig.8. Separationofastandardproteinmixtureona0.32mmID×25cmstrong anionexchangercapillarycolumnusingpH-gradientmode.Theelutionorderofthe proteins:cytochromeC(1),myoglobinbasicband(2),myoglobinacidicband(3), conalbumin(4),and-lactoglobulinB(5)andA(6).
AdaptedfromRef[43],withpermission.
20–40cm)employedatlowflowrates,thepeakcapacitycanbe improvedatthecostofanalysistime.
5.2. CapillaryIEX
Toimprovethesensitivityofproteinvariantsdeterminationor handleverysmallamountsofsamples,theuseofcapillarycolumns inIEXappearstobeapromisingapproach.However,severalkey modificationstoacommerciallyavailableliquidchromatography systemarerequiredtoreducethesystemvolumeandassociated extra-columnbandbroadening,whichcouldbecriticalforcapil- laryIEXoperation.Untilnow,thenumberofapplicationsinthis fieldisratherlimited,buta0.32mmI.D.IEXcapillarycolumnwas successfullyappliedinpH-gradientmodeasthefirstdimensionin a2Dseparationofstandardproteinmixtures[92].Fig.8showsthe
chromatogramobservedwitha0.32mmID×25cmstronganion exchangercapillarycolumnusingpH-gradientmode.
5.3. Monolithiccolumns
Monolithic stationary phases are promising materials to improvechromatographicperformance[93,94].
A monolithic column can be defined as a continuous solid matrix, porous in nature and containing interconnected flow paths. Various types of inorganic (e.g. silica, zirconia, car- bon,titania)andorganic(e.g.polymethacrylate,polyacrylamide, poly(styrene-divinylbenzene...)monoliths can beprepared but onlypolymethacrylate,poly(styrene–divinylbenzene),andsilica- based monoliths are commercially available (mostly for RPLC separations).
Thelargeflow-throughchannelsandessentiallynonporoussur- facessupport fast masstransfer, especially for largemolecules (possessingslowdiffusion),resultinginhighresolutionorfastsep- arations.Thesechannelsalsoprovidehighpermeability,allowing theuseofhighlinearvelocities.
Monolithsaregenerallyclassifiedasorganicandsilica-based monoliths. The organic monoliths are usually applied for the separationsofbiomolecules,includingoligonucleotides,peptides, and intact proteinssuch as protein isoforms [95,96]. They are better accepted for protein separations than inorganic mono- liths because of their biocompatibility. However, low surface areaandbinding capacity,swelling and shrinkagein somesol- vents, as well as deficiency in mechanical stability are their major drawbacks. Contrarily, silica-based monoliths are well adapted to the analysis of small molecules. They consist of a singlerodof silicawithtwo typesofpores:macropores,which enablelowflowresistance,andmesopores,whichensureenough surface area to reach high separation efficiency and loadabil- ity.
Currently,only5cmlongorganicmonolithscontainingstrong andweakexchangersareavailableineither4.6or1.0mmIDformat [97].
Fig.9. The2DproteinexpressionmapofE.colibacteriallysate.ThexaxisisinpIunitfrompH4.0to7.0(measuredbypH-gradientIEX)andtheyaxisdisplaysincreasing hydrophobicity(%B)(measuredbyRPLC).
AdaptedfromRef[98],withpermission.