• Nem Talált Eredményt

THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND DECISION MAKING ON THE MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION PROJECTS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND DECISION MAKING ON THE MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION PROJECTS"

Copied!
15
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

CROSSROADS OF ECONOMICS AND PSYCHOLOGY SZEGED, JUNE 2012

Stefan-Oliver ANGEL

West University of Timisoara, Romania stefan_oliver_angel@yahoo.com

(2)

• Part 1: How can managers initiate and keep on innovation ?

• Part 2: Modeling the process towards decision making, inside the manager’s mind

(3)

• INNOVATION:

a structured approach, around a process that has to answer in a creative(new) manner to a certain need, by creating value and by being accepted by the users (the customers)

GROFF, A., ”Manager l’innovation”, Ed. Afnor 2009, Paris

(4)

• INNOVATION MANAGEMENT

means to provide and to distribute the

resources needed in order to innovate. This implies the implementation, control and

dissemination of the results broughtened by the innovation process.

(5)

• INNOVATION = the answer to CHANGE, by exploring and exploiting innovation

opportunities

innovation opportunity = “the chance to obtain economic values through a formula that fits resources to market needs” [HOLMEN M., MAGNUSSON M., McKELVEY M., 2007]

(6)

• In the evaluation of innovation opportunities, managers should look for three elements that the concept of innovation opportunity should contain:

economic value (that supposes that the new solution is

marketable)

the capacity to mobilize the resources needed to exploit the chance of innovation

the benefits from innovation to be at least partly gained by the initiators of the project.

(7)

• Innovation opportunities do fit to THE BUSINESS MODEL?

Value proposition

Profit formula Key

resorces Key

processes

(8)

Management side

1. Are we making the right product?

2. Are we making the product right?

Customer side

1. Is this product useful for us?

2. Do we use it in the right way?

(9)

Involvement of potential users in the decision process

Brainstorming (clients, employees)

Quick design

(first) User experience

Quick implementation

Cost/Benefit test

Writing down:

- decision criteria(d.c.) for innovation

- d.c. critical values and measurement tools

(10)

• Hewlett Packard weighting decision criteria model

1st. Criteria: Business Value (46%)

2nd.Criteria: Customer Satisfaction (26%) 3rd.Criteria: Process Effectiveness (19%) 4th.Criteria: Employee Satisfaction (7%)

[ENGLUND, GRAHAM 1999]

(11)

Business Value (46%)

Achieves critical results for a specific opportunity

Minimizes risk of implementation

Improves integration and relationship with partners

Provides a positive ROI in <2 years

Customer Satisfaction (26%) Improves service levels

More accurate and consistent consumer information

Process Effectiveness (19%)

Increases employees self suffciency

Enables employees to do things right the first time

Reduces manual work and non value- added activities

Employee Satisfaction (7%)

Improves employees knowledge Helps balance workload

Increases employees effienciency or effectiveness

(12)

Conclusions(1)

Innovation decisions are a kind of change decisions

that is giving them a strategic dimension

Innovation decisions need to be built on a base of agreement among the participants about the innovation process concerning new values

(13)

• The ABCDE Model [Albert ELLIS]

The aim of this model is to offer a better understanding of the forces that influence managerial decisions

(14)

A – activating event Internal beliefs -B, such as: fear,

doubt,

avoidance of conflict

C- consequences

D -

disputing (beliefs &

emotions)

Actions

(15)

Conclusions (2)

• Change – is a driver for innovation

• The ABCDE model is a quiet simple framework to re-think and analyze our convictions and

behaviors by changing them with moving incentives.

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

It extends a suitable set of balanced exceptional systems into a set of edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles covering most edges of an almost complete and almost balanced bipartite

9 The Summary Innovation Index of the European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS 2008), the Service Sector Innovation Index of the European Trend Chart on Innovation (Kanerva et al. 2006),

Európai Bizottság (2002): Innovation tomorrow, Innovation policy and the regulatory framework: Making innovation an integral part of the broader structural agenda.. Innovation papers

• The Borda count: Give each of the m candidates a score of 1 to m based on the candidate’s ranking in a voter’s preference ordering; that is, the candidate ranked first receives

The objective of a regional innovation strategy is to encourage and facilitate new ideas and innovation through the creation, diffusion and exploitation (or commercialisation) of

The purpose of idealization is to embed M into a commutative ring A so that the structure of M as R-module is essentially the same as an A-module, that is, as on ideal of A

Its purpose is to obtain long-term competitive advantage to achieve the Cost management is a series of scientific management activities such as forecasting, decision

For instance, three quarters of the UK’s total water footprint (a multi- dimensional indicator, measuring both water consumption (the consumptive WF) and water pollution